 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, 2002, 22:RC203:1-6
RAPID COMMUNICATION
Spatiotemporal Pattern of Motoneuron Activation in the Rostral
Lumbar and the Sacral Segments during Locomotor-Like Activity in the
Neonatal Mouse Spinal Cord
Agnès
Bonnot,
Patrick J.
Whelan,
George Z.
Mentis, and
Michael J.
O'Donovan
Laboratory of Neural Control, Section on Developmental
Neurobiology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
 |
ABSTRACT |
We used calcium imaging to visualize the spatiotemporal pattern of
motoneuron activity during dorsal root-evoked locomotor-like bursting
in the lumbosacral spinal cord of the neonatal mouse. Dorsal root
stimuli elicited a tonic discharge in motoneurons on which alternating
left-right rhythmic discharges were superimposed. Both the tonic and
the rhythmic components could be recorded optically from populations of
motoneurons labeled with calcium-green dextran. Optical and electrical
recordings revealed that rhythmic signals from different parts of the
lumbar (L1, L2) and sacral (S1-S3) segments rose, peaked, and decayed
in a rostrocaudal sequence. This pattern gave rise to a rostrocaudal
"wave" in the activation of motoneurons during each cycle of
locomotor-like activity. A similar rostrocaudal delay was observed
during episodes of alternation that occurred in the absence of
stimulation, suggesting that this delay was not caused by
the train of dorsal root stimuli. It is hypothesized that this behavior
may simplify the appropriate sequencing of motoneurons during locomotion.
Key words:
calcium imaging; motoneuron; locomotion; spinal cord; rhythmogenesis; mouse
 |
INTRODUCTION |
During
locomotion, the motoneuron pools innervating the limbs, the axial
musculature, and the tail are activated in a complex spatiotemporal
pattern. Little is known about the mechanisms that ensure the proper
coordination between motoneurons during this behavior. In several
species, including the cat, rat, turtle, and chick embryo, it appears
that the most rostral segments of the lumbar cord are the most
excitable (for review, see Kiehn and Kjaerulff, 1998 ), and there
is some evidence that they may drive the more caudal segments (Cazalets
and Bertrand, 2000 ). However, other studies have established that
rhythmogenicity is distributed along the lumbosacral cord and can
be expressed in both the isolated lumbar and sacral cords (Whelan et
al., 2000 ; Delvolvé et al., 2001 ).
During forward swimming, the motoneurons of fish, frogs, tadpoles, and
urodeles are activated in a rostrocaudal sequence (Kahn et al., 1982 ;
Wallen and Williams, 1984 ; Delvolvé et al., 1997 ), although such
sequences can be reversed under some conditions (Delvolvé et al.,
1999 ). In principle, a rostrocaudal pattern of activation would greatly
simplify the problem of recruiting hindlimb motoneurons in the
appropriate sequence during locomotion by exploiting their rostrocaudal
position along the axis of the lumbar cord. However, it is not known
whether this pattern, or a variant of it, operates to coordinate the
lumbar and sacral motoneurons during locomotion in mammals. Obviously,
the activation of motoneurons during locomotion will be more complex
than during swimming, because the limb-moving segments are composed of
flexor and extensor motoneurons that are activated out of phase.
Recently, Yakovenko et al. (2002) performed a modeling study in which
they combined published EMG data from cat hindlimb motoneurons during treadmill locomotion with anatomical data about the position of motoneurons along the spinal cord (Vanderhorst and Holstege, 1997 ) to
generate a model of the spatiotemporal pattern of motoneuron activity
in the cat spinal cord during walking. This study suggested that
motoneuron activity was oscillating rostrocaudally during the flexor
and extensor phases of the locomotor cycle.
In the present work, we have used calcium imaging to visualize the
spatiotemporal spread of activity in the rostral lumbar and sacral
segments during rhythmic activity induced by dorsal root stimulation in
the neonatal mouse spinal cord. This activity is locomotor-like in both
the rat (Marchetti et al., 2001 ) and the mouse (Bonnot et al., 2002 ),
because the lumbar ventral root discharge alternates between the left
and right sides and between flexor and extensor pools. We focused on
the activity of the rostral lumbar and the sacral segments because
their constituent motoneurons fire in phase (Whelan et al., 2000 ). Some
of this work has been published previously in abstract form (Bonnot et
al., 1998 , 1999 , 2001 ).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Experiments were performed on 19 Swiss Webster mice
(Taconic Laboratory, Germantown, NY) that were 1-4 d of age
[postnatal day 0 (P0)-P3]. After induction of anesthesia with
methoxyflurane, the animals were decapitated and eviscerated. The
remaining tissue was placed in a dissecting chamber containing
artificial CSF (ACSF) (concentration in mM): 128 NaCl, 4 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, 0.5 NaH2PO4, 21 NaHCO3, and 30 D-glucose, bubbled
with 95% O2 and 5% CO2. A
ventral laminectomy exposed the cord, which was then transected at
T5-T7 and removed from the vertebral column together with the cauda
equina. Full details have been described previously (Whelan et al.,
2000 ).
Dye loading. In 14 experiments, motoneurons spanning two to
three segments (T13-L2 or S1-S3) were retrogradely loaded with calcium-green 1 (dextran-conjugated, molecular weight of 10,000; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) using established techniques (O'Donovan et al., 1993 ). For this purpose, several adjacent ventral roots were drawn into a suction electrode containing ~6 µl solution of
the dye (10 mM) dissolved in distilled
H2O with 0.2% Triton X-100. The cord was
left at 17°C for 8-10 hr to allow labeling of cell bodies.
Optical imaging. The cord was placed in a chamber on an
inverted epifluorescence microscope (Eclipse TE300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and continuously perfused with ACSF. It was illuminated with a
75 W xenon light source (excitation filter, 470-490 nm; emission
filter, 520-560 nm), and labeled motoneurons were visualized through
the ventral white matter. Activity-dependent changes in fluorescence
were detected using an intensified CCD camera (Stanford Photonics, Salt
Lake City, UT) and stored on videotape (SVO 9500MD; Sony, Tokyo,
Japan). Changes in fluorescence were monitored on-line using a PC-based
frame grabber (Matrox Image LC; Matrox Graphics, Dorval, Quebec,
Canada) and image-processing software (Metamorph; Universal Imaging,
West Chester, PA).
Electrical recordings and activation of the locomotor
networks. Motoneuron electrical activity was recorded together
with optical recordings (eight experiments) or alone (five experiments) with suction electrodes into which individual ventral roots were drawn.
The electrical signals were filtered (DC, 3 kHz), digitized (NeuroData,
New York, NY), and recorded on videotape. Locomotor-like activity was evoked by electrical stimulation of the cauda equina or
individual coccygeal dorsal roots (trains, 4-8 Hz; stimulus duration,
500 µsec; stimulus intensity, 20-200 µA; train duration, 10 sec)
or with a brief suction pulse (1-2 sec) applied to the dorsal root.
Spinal motoneurons were activated antidromically by stimulation of the
ventral roots used to load motoneurons (stimulus duration, 500 µsec;
trains, 5-50 Hz; train duration, 10 sec).
Data analyses. Stacks of images were collected off-line
during periods of evoked activity, spontaneous activity, or antidromic stimulation (30 frames/sec). Synchronization of the electrical and
optical signals was achieved during 8 of 11 experiments by gating the camera off and recording the gating pulse together with the
electrical recordings. Electrical activity was filtered (100-500 Hz),
digitized (1 kHz), and integrated at 30 Hz for comparison with time
series of the fluorescence measurements.
Both optical and electrical data were analyzed using cross-correlograms
to examine the left-right phasing and the rostrocaudal spread of
activity during rhythmic episodes (Fig.
1). The data were smoothed with a five
point moving average, demeaned and detrended before computing
cross-correlograms between the various regions or roots using
commercially available software (Statistica, Tulsa, OK).
Analyses were performed on records that exhibited regular rhythmic
discharges (observation of the correlograms over two to three cycles;
100 lags; lag duration of 33 msec) alternating between the left and
right sides of the cord (phase value of 0.5 ± 0.01, measured
optically or electrically at the same rostrocaudal level).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Measurement of the rostrocaudal spread of
electrical and optical activity. Top panel,
Cross-correlogram generated from a spontaneous episode (seven cycles)
of ventral root discharge recorded from the ipsilateral L1 and L2
ventral roots. The distance between 0 and the peak of the
cross-correlogram (L2/L1) corresponds to the delay
(d) between L1 and L2. Bottom
panel, Correlograms generated from the optical activity
illustrated in Figure 3A. The black
trace (circles) shows the autocorrelogram
of the optical signal recorded from the most caudal region of the L2
segment (Fig. 3B, blue arrow). The
gray trace (triangles) is the
cross-correlogram between the optical activity of the region that was
auto-correlated and the most rostral region of the L1 segment (Fig.
3B, red arrow). The distance between the
two peaks corresponds to the delay between those two regions. In both
graphs, the horizontal dotted lines indicate ± 2 SE.
|
|
Regions of interest were drawn over motoneuronal populations (four to
five regions per segment, ~140 µm apart). We generated cross-correlograms between the optical signal of the most caudal region
of interest (reference signal) and the optical signals at successively
more rostral positions along the cord. When performed this way, a
positive delay in the peak of the cross-correlogram indicates that the
caudal signal was delayed with respect to the rostral signal. Distances
between regions of interest (range of 100-1300 µm) were measured
from the center of the most caudal region to the center of every other
region (see Fig. 3B). The delays between the regions were
obtained from the X coordinates of the central peaks of the
resulting cross-correlograms (peaks estimated using a polynomial fit).
To determine whether the delay increased significantly with the
distance from the most caudal region, a linear regression analysis was
performed between delays and distances (correlation coefficient), and a
t test was used to establish the probability that the
variables were not significantly correlated. The same approach was used
to examine the correlation between the propagation velocity and the
cycle period.
Confocal microscopy. Spinal cords in which lumbar (two of
four cords) or sacral (two of four cords) motoneurons had been labeled previously were fixed in 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). EDC was prepared fresh at a concentration of 40 mg/ml in PBS (Tymianski et al., 1997 ).
The spinal cords were refrigerated and sectioned the following day. The
fixed cords were washed in PBS for 5-10 min and subsequently embedded
in 5% agar in PBS. The cords were cut horizontally (70 µm) or
transversely (50 µm) using a Vibratome. Sections were collected on
slides, mounted with an antifading solution (7:3 PBS/glycerol), and
coverslipped. Sections were viewed on a Zeiss (Thornwood, NY) LSM410
confocal microscope (excitation, 488 nm; emission, 515-540 nm)
immediately after sectioning. Images presented in this study are
two-dimensional projections from a z-series collected at 1-5 µm
intervals for 40-80 µm.
 |
RESULTS |
Retrograde loading of motoneurons and optical signals during
antidromic stimulation
Figure 2A-C shows
confocal images of lumbar and sacral motoneurons labeled with
calcium-green dextran applied to the cut ventral roots. The labeling
pattern and distribution of motoneurons in the lumbar cord are shown in
horizontal (L2-L3; Fig. 2A) and transverse (L2; Fig.
2B) sections. In both the anterior lumbar (L1/L2) and the S1 sacral segment, the motoneurons extended as a flattened pool
with a dorsoventral thickness of ~100-150 µm.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
A-C, Confocal
photomicrographs of retrogradely labeled motoneurons. A,
Horizontal section (L2-L3). The dashed line
indicates the limit between L2 and L3. B, Transverse
section (L2) showing motoneurons and presumed preganglionic neurons
(arrowheads). C, High-power view
showing labeled sacral (S1) motoneurons in a transverse section.
D, Fluorescence microgram of the S2 and S3 segments
viewed through the ventral white matter. E,
Difference image obtained by subtracting the control fluorescence from
an average generated during stimulation of the S2 ventral root
(arrow) at 20 Hz. F, Fluorescence
transients generated from motoneurons (same experiment as in
D and E) in response to antidromic
stimulation (single shock at 50 µA and 10 sec trains at different
frequencies). The dotted (A,
B) or solid (D,
E) lines outline the spinal cord.
|
|
We first established that discharge could be detected optically from
the labeled motoneurons. This was accomplished in 10 experiments by
antidromic stimulation of the ventral root of a labeled segment and
recording of the evoked optical signals (Fig. 2D-F). When the ventral root was stimulated,
the activity of the entire segment of labeled motoneurons could be
visualized (Fig. 2E). We examined the frequency
dependence of the antidromic signal between 1 and 20 Hz in four
experiments and up to 50 Hz in two of these experiments (Fig.
2F). After a single shock, the peak fractional change
in fluorescence averaged 8.7 ± 4.2% (mean ± SD, range of
4.3-14.4%). At a stimulus frequency of 20 Hz, the corresponding
values were 30.9 ± 5.4% (range of 26.8-36.1%). These results
indicate that calcium dyes can be used to resolve motoneuron discharge
in the neonatal mouse spinal cord at the resolution of single action
potentials (Fig. 2F, Single shock). The
cellular variation in the intensity of the optical signal (Fig.
2E) arises in part because of differences in the
amount of dye loaded into individual motoneurons. When this is
corrected, by normalizing the fluorescence change, this variation is
much less. It is also possible that calcium influx generated by action
potentials varies between different types of motoneurons.
Motoneuron electrical and optical signals during locomotor-like
activity induced by dorsal root stimulation
A train of dorsal root stimuli induced rhythmic discharges that
alternated between the left and right sides of the cord and persisted
for the duration of the stimulus (Fig.
3A) (Whelan et al., 2000 ).
During the induced bursting, large optical signals (peak fractional
change in fluorescence F/F measured from baseline, 41.0 ± 8.9%; 38 episodes, 11 animals) were recorded from the
labeled motoneurons (Fig. 3A). The optical signals comprised
a tonic component ( F/F, 21.2 ± 5.5%) and a
rhythmic component ( F/F measured from the tonic
component, 19.8 ± 7.3%). As illustrated in Figure 3, each cycle
of rhythmic optical activity coincided with the ipsilateral ventral
root discharge and alternated with the optical and electrical activity
recorded contralaterally. Because action potentials appear to be the
primary determinant of the motoneuronal calcium signals (O'Donovan et
al., 1993 ; Lev-Tov and O'Donovan, 1995 ), we presume that the
tonic optical signal arises from the temporal summation of the calcium
transients accompanying individual bursts of motoneuron discharge.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
A, Rostrocaudal propagation of
motoneuron optical signals recorded during locomotor-like activity
induced by stimulation of a dorsal root (30 µA, 4 Hz). The time
course of the optical signals measured from the labeled motoneurons on
both sides of the L1 segment (shown in B) was compared
with that of the electrical activity recorded from the right L1 and
left T13 ventral roots. Note that the electrical and optical
activity alternates between the left and right sides
(highlighted). B, Videomicrograph of the labeled
motoneurons (L1-L3) viewed through the ventral white matter. The
colored arrows indicate the center of the regions of
interest. The midline (dashed line) and the limits
between L1, L2, and L3 segments (dotted lines) are
indicated. C, Average of five successive fluorescence
transients (indicated by the dotted box in
A) obtained from the regions marked in B
(same color code) compared with the averaged discharge recorded from
the right L1 and the left T13 ventral roots (cycles indicated by the
boxed area in A). D, Rostrocaudal
spread of activity during a single cycle of rhythmic activity
(indicated by gray bar in A). The first
panel is the same as B, and subsequent
panels are difference images normalized to the quiescent
baseline. The trough in the normalized activity of each side was
subtracted from the resulting images to demonstrate the propagation of
activity during the rhythmic component of the signal. Every other video
frame is illustrated. In this example, the rostrocaudal wave starts on
the right side (R) marked by the
asterisk and progresses rostrocaudally. The first row
shows the propagation on the right side and the second row shows the
propagation on the left side (see accompanying video).
E, Average of eight successive bursts of electrical
activity in L1 and L2 ventral roots obtained during a train of dorsal
root stimuli (25 µA, 4 Hz).
|
|
To assess the spread of activity along the cord, we monitored the
optical signals at multiple locations along the rostrocaudal axis, as
illustrated in Figure 3B. Typically, we monitored four to
five adjacent regions within each segment (the arrows in
Fig. 3B show the center of every other region). We performed
this analysis across single and multiple segments in the thoraco-lumbar
(five experiments) and sacral (seven experiments) cord in 61 sequences of rhythmic activity obtained from 38 episodes of alternating left-right activity (11 animals). At the beginning of the episode, when the dorsal root stimuli induced the first rise in fluorescence, we
found that activity often evolved in a caudorostral direction (data not
shown). However, the pattern changed once rhythmic alternating bursting
became well established. Under these conditions, the optical activity
rose throughout the first part of each cycle to peak at approximately
mid-cycle and then decayed during the remainder of the cycle (Fig.
3C). During each burst there was a progressive delay in the
timing of the optical transients obtained from successively more caudal
parts of the segments. This resulted in a rostrocaudal propagation of
activity at a velocity of 15.0 ± 8.1 µm/msec.
The propagating component of the optical activity could be seen most
strikingly in a video that displays only the rhythmic component of the
optical signal (see video). Frames of such a video are illustrated in
Fig. 3D, which shows the optical signals during a single
cycle of rhythmic activity. In this example, the activity on the right
side of the cord started at the asterisk and propagated over
two segments within 150-180 msec. This was followed by a similar wave
in the activity on the left side (Fig. 3D, bottom
panels). We observed a rostrocaudal propagation of optical
activity in 24 of 24 rhythmic sequences recorded from the
thoraco-lumbar cord (16 alternating episodes, five experiments) and in
33 of 37 rhythmic sequences obtained from sacral segments (22 alternating episodes, seven experiments). The delay between the optical
activity of different regions increased significantly with distance
(r = 0.68; p < 0.005). Only 83 of 372 (~22%) values of the delay computed between different regions
revealed an absence of propagating activity or a short caudorostral
sequence of activation.
We also found a significant negative correlation (r = 0.21; p < 0.005) between the velocity of rostrocaudal
propagation and the cycle period. The cycle period was ~15% shorter
in the lumbar segments (1.2 ± 0.3 sec) compared to the sacral
segments (1.3 ± 0.5 sec), and propagation was correspondingly
faster in the lumbar (17.5 ± 9.1 µm/msec) compared to the
sacral (12.5 ± 6.1 µm/msec) segments. Combining the average
propagation velocity with the average length of a segment (~700
µm), the average delay along a single segment was ~50 msec.
We found an average delay of 28 ± 10 msec (30 episodes, five
animals) between the electrical activity of adjacent ventral roots
(L1/L2, L2/L3, S1/S2, and S2/S3) during episodes of locomotor-like activity (Fig. 3E). As illustrated in Figures
3C,E and 4C,E, the rising phase of both the optical and the integrated electrical activity
was successively delayed along the cord, consistent with the idea that
the onset of each cycle of activity was also delayed rostrocaudally.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Electrical and optical recordings during
spontaneous episodes of left-right alternation. A,
Optical recording from labeled sacral motoneurons (averaged from the
dotted regions in B) during a brief
episode of spontaneous alternation. Note the synchronous
activation of the left and right sides (arrow) before
alternation develops. B, Videomicrograph of the labeled
motoneurons (S2) viewed through the ventral white matter. The
colored arrows indicate the center of the regions of
interest. C, Normalized fluorescence transients measured
from the regions of interest shown in B (same color
code) during the cycle on the left side of the cord (indicated by the
dotted box in A). D,
Integrated electrical activity of L1 and L2 ipsilateral ventral roots
during a spontaneous episode of left-right alternation (same
experiment as in Fig. 3E). E, Average of
seven successive bursts (indicated by the dotted box in
D).
|
|
Spatiotemporal pattern of spontaneous activity
It is possible that the rostrocaudal pattern of activation we
observed was caused by the train of dorsal root stimuli rather than the
evoked bursting. To test this possibility, we examined bursting (in the
absence of stimulation) in several episodes that either occurred
spontaneously (one optical and three electrical experiments) (Fig. 4)
or were initiated by a brief mechanical stimulus (1-2 sec
suction pulse) applied to the dorsal root (one optical and two
electrical experiments).
At the onset of a spontaneous episode recorded optically, the
fluorescence change propagated caudorostrally (as it does at the onset
of evoked alternation). However, once the alternation was established,
a rostrocaudal propagation was detected with an average delay of 58 msec along the segment (four bursts from three episodes of one or two
alternating cycles). In the electrical experiments (Fig.
4D-E), we recorded a delay of ~33 msec (range of
15-65 msec, 14 episodes of 2-10 cycles) between the spontaneous discharges of ipsilateral adjacent ventral roots (L1/L2, L2/L3, S1/S2,
and S2/S3).
In the three experiments in which alternating activity was triggered by
a brief mechanical stimulus (eight episodes of 5-13 cycles), we found
delays similar to those measured during a train of dorsal root stimuli.
In one optical experiment, the rostrocaudal propagation velocity across
L1/L2 was 16.9 ± 3.5 µm/msec during a train of dorsal root
stimuli (four episodes) and was 13.3 ± 4.7 µm/msec (three
episodes) after the mechanical stimulus. Similarly, in two experiments
using ventral root recordings only, we found a delay of 25.0 ± 9.4 msec (six episodes) between the activity of adjacent sacral roots
(S1/S2 or S2/S3) during the stimulus train and a delay of 27.8 ± 7.3 msec in five episodes initiated by the brief mechanical stimulus.
Collectively, these findings are consistent with the idea that
rostrocaudal propagation is a characteristic of the bursting rather
than the stimulus train.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have identified a rostrocaudal "wave" in the activation of
motoneurons of the first two lumbar and the first three sacral segments. Because the optical signals are likely to reflect spiking rather than subthreshold synaptic activity (O'Donovan et al., 1993 ; Lev-Tov and O'Donovan, 1995 ), our findings suggest that the propagating optical activity is generated by a corresponding propagation in the discharge of motoneuron populations. The optical findings were supported by the observation of a rostrocaudal delay in
the discharge of adjacent ventral roots. However, because the electrical recordings sum the activity of motoneurons within the segment, it would not have been possible to establish the existence of
a systematic rostrocaudal propagation within a segment based solely on
such recordings.
We focused on the thoraco-lumbar segments (T13, L1/L2) and on the
sacral segments for several reasons. First, previous work has shown
that the ventral root discharges of these segments are coactive with
flexor motoneurons during each cycle (Whelan et al., 2000 ). In
contrast, the bursting of the L3-L5 ventral roots is more complex,
comprising double bursts that probably correspond to activity of the
flexor and extensor motoneurons known to be present in these segments
(McHanwell and Biscoe, 1981 ). In addition, all ipsilateral motoneurons
(flexors, extensors, and abductors) in the sacral segments have been
shown to be coactive during dorsal root-evoked bursting in the neonatal
rat (Delvolvé et al., 2001 ). We hypothesized that a propagating
component of the optical signal would be easier to resolve within a
single functional class of motoneurons. In future experiments, it will
be useful to establish whether a propagating component of the optical
activity can be detected within the flexor and extensor pools of the
L3-L6 segments.
An important question that arises from these results is whether the
rostrocaudal propagation of activity is attributable to the dorsal root
train used to evoke the bursting. This might occur for example if a
stimulus train applied to the cauda equina established a rostrocaudal
gradient of excitability along the cord. Although we cannot exclude
this possibility, we consider it unlikely for the following reasons.
First, the stimuli during the dorsal root train (4-8 Hz) were never
coupled with the rhythmic activity (~1.3 Hz) and individually did not
result in a rostrocaudal propagation. Second, and most compellingly, we
found a rostrocaudal propagation of activity similar to that recorded
during the dorsal root train, during spontaneous episodes, and during
episodes triggered by a brief mechanical stimulus applied to the
dorsal roots.
It is not clear whether the rostrocaudal pattern of activation we have
found bears any relation to the patterns of motoneuron activity
observed by Yakovenko et al. (2002) in their modeling studies of the
cat step cycle. They found a rostrocaudal-caudorostral oscillation of
activity during each step cycle that could be accounted for in part by
the rostrocaudal separation of flexor and extensor motoneurons along
the cord (flexor rostral extensor caudal; Vanderhorst and Holstege,
1997 ). It is also possible that the pattern we have observed is
entirely developmental, perhaps depending on the electrical coupling
between neonatal motoneurons (Tresch and Kiehn, 2000 ). In future
experiments, it will be very interesting to establish whether other
modes of activation (e.g., caudorostral) can occur, as has been
reported under certain conditions in other species (Delvolvé et
al., 1999 ), and to determine the spatiotemporal pattern of activity
during the much slower rhythms induced by drugs.
These findings raise the possibility that the lumbosacral motoneurons
of mammals may be activated in part by mechanisms similar to those
documented for the rostrocaudally organized swimming movements of
simpler vertebrates. Such a pattern would greatly simplify the problem
of ensuring proper coordination between the different pools of
motoneurons by exploiting their position along the rostrocaudal axis of
the cord.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received July 27, 2001; revised Sept. 20, 2001; accepted Nov. 6, 2001.
We thank Arthur Prochazka and Peter Wenner for comments on this paper
and Bill Marks for statistical advice.
Correspondence should be addressed to Agnes Bonnot, Laboratory of
Neural Control, Section on Developmental Neurobiology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: bonnota{at}ninds.nih.gov.
Dr. Whelan's present address: Department of Physiology and Biophysics,
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1.
This article is published in
The Journal of Neuroscience, Rapid Communications Section,
which publishes brief, peer-reviewed papers online, not in print. Rapid
Communications are posted online approximately one month earlier than
they would appear if printed. They are listed in the Table of Contents
of the next open issue of JNeurosci. Cite this article as:
JNeurosci, 2002, 22:RC203 (1-6). The
publication date is the date of posting online at
www.jneurosci.org.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Bonnot A,
Tabak J,
Cohen U,
Wenner P,
O'Donovan M
(1998)
Calcium imaging of rhythmic network activity in the mouse spinal cord.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
24:1668.
-
Bonnot A,
Whelan P,
O'Donovan M
(1999)
Calcium imaging of spinal network behavior during locomotor-like activity in the neonatal mouse.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
25:1904.
-
Bonnot AC,
Whelan PJ,
Mentis GZ,
O'Donovan MJ
(2001)
Spatiotemporal pattern of motoneuron activation in the lumbosacral spinal cord of the neonatal mouse in vitro.
Soc Neurosci Abstr
27:297.6.
-
Bonnot A, Whelan PJ, Mentis GZ, O'Donovan
MJ (2002) Locomotor-like activity generated by the neonatal
mouse spinal cord. Brain Res Rev, in press.
-
Cazalets JR,
Bertrand S
(2000)
Coupling between lumbar and sacral motor networks in the neonatal rat spinal cord.
Eur J Neurosci
12:2993-3002[Medline].
-
Delvolvé I,
Bem T,
Cabelguen JM
(1997)
Epaxial and limb muscle activity during swimming and terrestrial stepping in the adult newt, Pleurodeles waltl.
J Neurophysiol
78:638-650[Abstract/Full Text].
-
Delvolvé I,
Branchereau P,
Dubuc R,
Cabelguen JM
(1999)
Fictive rhythmic motor patterns induced by NMDA in an in vitro brain stem-spinal cord preparation from an adult urodele.
J Neurophysiol
82:1074-1077[Abstract/Full Text].
-
Delvolvé I,
Gabbay H,
Lev-Tov A
(2001)
The motor output and behavior produced by rhythmogenic sacrocaudal networks in spinal cords of neonatal rats.
J Neurophysiol
85:2100-2110[Abstract/Full Text].
-
Kahn JA,
Roberts A,
Kashin SM
(1982)
The neuromuscular basis of swimming movements in embryos of the amphibian Xenopus laevis.
J Exp Biol
99:175-184[Abstract].
-
Kiehn O,
Kjaerulff O
(1998)
Distribution of central pattern generators for rhythmic motor output in the spinal cord of limbed vertebrates.
In: Neuronal mechanisms for generating locomotor activity (Kiehn O,
Harris Warrick RM,
Jordan LM,
Hultborn H,
Kudo N,
eds), pp 110-129. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
-
Lev-Tov A,
O'Donovan MJ
(1995)
Calcium imaging of motoneuron activity in the en-bloc spinal cord preparation of the neonatal rat.
J Neurophysiol
74:1324-1334[Medline].
-
Marchetti C,
Beato M,
Nistri A
(2001)
Alternating rhythmic activity induced by dorsal root stimulation in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro.
J Physiol (Lond)
530:105-112[Abstract/Full Text].
-
McHanwell S,
Biscoe TJ
(1981)
The localization of motoneurons supplying the hindlimb muscles of the mouse.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
293:477-508[Medline].
-
O'Donovan MJ,
Ho S,
Sholomenko G,
Yee W
(1993)
Real-time imaging of neurons retrogradely and anterogradely labelled with calcium-sensitive dyes.
J Neurosci Methods
46:91-106[Medline].
-
Tresch MC,
Kiehn O
(2000)
Motor coordination without action potentials in the mammalian spinal cord.
Nat Neurosci
3:593-599[Medline].
-
Tymianski M,
Bernstein GM,
Abdel-Hamid KM,
Sattler R,
Velumian A,
Carlen PL,
Razavi H,
Jones OT
(1997)
A novel use for a carbodiimide compound for the fixation of fluorescent and non-fluorescent calcium indicators in situ following physiological experiments.
Cell Calcium
21:175-183[Medline].
-
Vanderhorst VG,
Holstege G
(1997)
Organization of lumbosacral motoneuronal cell groups innervating hindlimb, pelvic floor, and axial muscles in the cat.
J Comp Neurol
382:46-76[Medline].
-
Wallen P,
Williams TL
(1984)
Fictive locomotion in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro compared with swimming in the intact and spinal animal.
J Physiol (Lond)
347:225-239[Abstract].
-
Whelan PJ,
Bonnot A,
O'Donovan MJ
(2000)
Properties of rhythmic activity generated by the isolated spinal cord of the neonatal mouse.
J Neurophysiol
84:2821-2833[Abstract/Full Text].
-
Yakovenko S, Mushahwar VK, VanderHorst VG, Holstege G, Prochazka
A (2002) Spatiotemporal activation of lumbosacral motoneurons
in the locomotor step cycle. J Neurophysiol, in press.
Copyright © Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474//$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Kwan, S. B. Dietz, W. W. Webb, and R. M. Harris-Warrick
Activity of Hb9 Interneurons during Fictive Locomotion in Mouse Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci.,
September 16, 2009;
29(37):
11601 - 11613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Cowley, E. Zaporozhets, R. A. Joundi, and B. J. Schmidt
Contribution of Commissural Projections to Bulbospinal Activation of Locomotion in the In Vitro Neonatal Rat Spinal Cord
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2009;
101(3):
1171 - 1178.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. T. Gordon and P. J. Whelan
Deciphering the organization and modulation of spinal locomotor central pattern generators
J. Exp. Biol.,
June 1, 2006;
209(11):
2007 - 2014.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. P. Ivanenko, R. E. Poppele, and F. Lacquaniti
Spinal Cord Maps of Spatiotemporal Alpha-Motoneuron Activation in Humans Walking at Different Speeds
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2006;
95(2):
602 - 618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Christie and P. J. Whelan
Monoaminergic Establishment of Rostrocaudal Gradients of Rhythmicity in the Neonatal Mouse Spinal Cord
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2005;
94(2):
1554 - 1564.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. J. Moody and M. M. Bosma
Ion Channel Development, Spontaneous Activity, and Activity-Dependent Development in Nerve and Muscle Cells
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2005;
85(3):
883 - 941.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Z. Mentis, F. J. Alvarez, A. Bonnot, D. S. Richards, D. Gonzalez-Forero, R. Zerda, and M. J. O'Donovan
Noncholinergic excitatory actions of motoneurons in the neonatal mammalian spinal cord
PNAS,
May 17, 2005;
102(20):
7344 - 7349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Marin-Burgin, F. J. Eisenhart, S. M. Baca, W. B. Kristan Jr, and K. A. French
Sequential Development of Electrical and Chemical Synaptic Connections Generates a Specific Behavioral Circuit in the Leech
J. Neurosci.,
March 9, 2005;
25(10):
2478 - 2489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bonnot, G. Z. Mentis, J. Skoch, and M. J. O'Donovan
Electroporation Loading of Calcium-Sensitive Dyes Into the CNS
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2005;
93(3):
1793 - 1808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Nakayama, H. Nishimaru, and N. Kudo
Rhythmic Motor Activity in Thin Transverse Slice Preparations of the Fetal Rat Spinal Cord
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2004;
92(1):
648 - 652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Yvert, P. Branchereau, and P. Meyrand
Multiple Spontaneous Rhythmic Activity Patterns Generated by the Embryonic Mouse Spinal Cord Occur Within a Specific Developmental Time Window
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2004;
91(5):
2101 - 2109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J Whelan
Developmental aspects of spinal locomotor function: insights from using the in vitro mouse spinal cord preparation
J. Physiol.,
December 15, 2003;
553(3):
695 - 706.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Leblond, M. L'Esperance, D. Orsal, and S. Rossignol
Treadmill Locomotion in the Intact and Spinal Mouse
J. Neurosci.,
December 10, 2003;
23(36):
11411 - 11419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Pearson, A. Mouihate, Q. J. Pittman, and P. J. Whelan
Peptidergic Activation of Locomotor Pattern Generators in the Neonatal Spinal Cord
J. Neurosci.,
November 5, 2003;
23(31):
10154 - 10163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|