WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Serious about science: Serious about timing
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (130)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Champtiaux, N.
Right arrow Articles by Changeux, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Champtiaux, N.
Right arrow Articles by Changeux, J.-P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*Nucleotide
*Protein*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CYTISINE
*DOPAMINE
*NICOTINE
*NICOTINE TARTRATE

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, February 15, 2002, 22(4):1208-1217

Distribution and Pharmacology of alpha 6-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Analyzed with Mutant Mice

Nicolas Champtiaux1, Zhi-Yan Han1, Alain Bessis2, Francesco Mattia Rossi1, Michele Zoli1, 3, Lisa Marubio4, J. Michael McIntosh5, and Jean-Pierre Changeux1

1 Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité de Recherche Associée 2182, Récepteurs et Cognition, Institut Pasteur 75724 Paris, Cedex 15, France, 2 Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire de la Synapse, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France, 3 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy, 4 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, and 5 Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The alpha 6 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is expressed at very high levels in dopaminergic (DA) neurons. However, because of the lack of pharmacological tools selective for alpha 6-containing nAChRs, the role of this subunit in the etiology of nicotine addiction remains unknown. To provide new tools to investigate this issue, we generated an alpha 6 nAChR knock-out mouse. Homozygous null mutants (alpha 6-/-) did not exhibit any gross neurological or behavioral deficits. A careful anatomic and molecular examination of alpha 6-/- mouse brains demonstrated the absence of developmental alterations in these animals, especially in the visual and dopaminergic pathways, where the alpha 6 subunit is normally expressed at the highest levels. On the other hand, receptor autoradiography revealed a decrease in [3H]nicotine, [3H]epibatidine, and [3H]cytisine high-affinity binding in the terminal fields of retinal ganglion cells of alpha 6-/- animals, whereas high-affinity [125I]alpha -conotoxinMII (alpha CtxMII) binding completely disappeared in the brain. Moreover, inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding on striatal membranes, using unlabeled alpha CtxMII or cytisine, revealed the absence of alpha CtxMII-sensitive and cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding sites in alpha 6-/- mice, although the total amount of binding was unchanged. Because alpha CtxMII, a toxin formerly thought to be specific for alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs, is known to partially inhibit nicotine-induced dopamine release, these results support the conclusion that alpha 6 rather than alpha 3 is the partner of beta 2 in the nicotinic modulation of DA neurons. They further show that alpha 6-/- mice might be useful tools to understand the mechanisms of nicotine addiction, although some developmental compensation might occur in these mice.

Key words: nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; knock-out; alpha 6 subunit; alpha -conotoxinMII; dopaminergic system; visual system


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

As many drugs of addiction, nicotine is thought to exert its addictive properties through stimulation of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (Nac) (Pontieri et al., 1996; Di Chiara, 2000). This effect of nicotine has been attributed to a direct activation of nAChRs located on dopaminergic (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Indeed, nicotine is known to increase the firing rate of these neurons, both in vitro (Pidoplichko et al., 1997) and in vivo (Grenhoff et al., 1986). Moreover, nicotinic antagonists infused into the VTA prevent nicotine elicited dopamine release in the Nac and disrupt systemic nicotine self-administration in rats (Corrigall et al., 1994; Nisell et al., 1994). Therefore, nAChRs expressed by DA neurons represent valuable targets for the design of new pharmacological agents for the treatment of nicotine abuse, and much research has been devoted to the identification of their subunit composition.

Neuronal nAChRs are composed of five subunits belonging to a family of at least 12 genes exhibiting a discreet expression pattern (Sargent, 1993). DA neurons express alpha 3, alpha 4, alpha 5, alpha 6, alpha 7, beta 2, and beta 3 subunits (Le Novère et al., 1996; Charpantier et al., 1998; Klink et al., 2001). Furthermore, it was recently demonstrated that mice lacking the beta 2 subunit are no longer sensitive to nicotine-mediated dopamine release in the Nac and fail to self-administer nicotine (Picciotto et al., 1998). The same study demonstrated that beta 2-containing nAChRs, present on the soma of DA neurons, mediate a nicotine-induced increase of their firing rate. Among the other subunits expressed in VTA, only alpha 3, alpha 4, and alpha 6 are likely to associate with the beta 2 subunit to form a ligand binding site [beta 3 and alpha 5 are structural subunits, whereas alpha 7 forms homomeric pentamers (Le Novère and Changeux, 1995)]. Although pharmacological evidence suggests alpha 4 and alpha 3 subunits as likely partners of the beta 2 subunit (Kulak et al., 1997; Kaiser et al., 1998; Sharples et al., 2000), the existence of functional alpha 6-containing nAChRs on DA neurons should not be overlooked. Indeed, the alpha 6 subunit is specifically and highly expressed in catecholaminergic neurons and retina (Le Novère et al., 1996; Vailati et al., 1999). In addition, alpha 6 was recently implicated in the stimulating effect of nicotine on habituated locomotion (Le Novère et al., 1999), an effect known to be blocked by lesions of midbrain DA neurons (Boye et al., 2001). However, the absence of pharmacological information about alpha 6-containing nAChRs has been a deterrent to determining the exact contribution of these receptors to the nicotinic modulation of DA neurons.

To investigate this issue, we generated a strain of mice lacking the alpha 6 nAChR subunit gene. We describe the generation of these animals and their anatomical characterization. We first focus on the detection of possible developmental abnormalities in dopaminergic and visual pathways, because such alterations might secondarily affect behavior and have already been detected in beta 2 nAChR knock-out mice (Rossi et al., 2001). Then, we perform ligand binding experiments to investigate the pharmacology and distribution of native alpha 6-containing nAChRs and evaluate the representation of these receptors in the dopaminergic system.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

All animals were used in accordance with the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals.

Construction of the targeting vector

We used a PCR-based strategy (Israel, 1993) to screen a mouse genomic DNA library prepared from the 129Sv/d3 embryonic stem (ES) cells strain (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), using primers derived from the alpha 6 cDNA rat sequence. An 18 kb clone was isolated, and homologous flanking regions were cloned in KS bluescript (Stratagene), on either side of a Neomycin resistance gene. Ultimately, a diphtheria toxin expression cassette was introduced outside of the recombination arms. The construct was designed to generate a nonfunctioning allele by deleting a 4 kb EcoRI-HindIII fragment including exons 1 and 2 of the alpha 6 gene. The 5' flanking arm was a 5 kb EcoRI-EcoRI fragment, and the 3' flanking arm was a 2.4 kb HindIII-SalI fragment (Fig. 1).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.   Gene targeting of the neuronal nAChR alpha 6 subunit. a, Construction of the targeting vector. The homologous recombination event generated a 4 kb genomic deletion that removes exons 1 and 2. The targeting vector was designed to obtain a replacement mutation and contains a neomycin resistance gene (Neor) as a positive selection marker and the diphtheria toxin gene (DTA) as a negative selection marker. The expected wild-type and mutant restriction fragments after PstI digest and hybridization with the Southern blot probe are shown as dotted lines. Restriction enzymes are as follows: E, EcoRI; H, HindIII; P, PstI; S, SalI. b, Southern blot analysis of wild-type (Wt), heterozygous (alpha 6+/-), and homozygous null mutant mice (alpha 6-/-). Genomic tail DNA was digested with PstI and hybridized with an SalI-PstI probe, external to the targeting vector. The 4 kb band corresponds to the mutated allele. c, Detection of alpha 6 mRNA in the brain of Wt and alpha 6-/- animals, by in situ hybridization with an oligonucleotide located in the sixth exon of the alpha 6 gene. In Wt animals, alpha 6 mRNA is detected in SN-VTA neurons, LC and RGC. No signal above background levels is detected in alpha 6-/- animals.

Generating the chimeras

The targeting vector was linearized by ScaI and electroporated in ES cells derived from the 129Sv/Pas mouse strain (Kress et al., 1998). After 8 d of geneticin selection (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD), 200 resistant clones were screened by genomic Southern blot for homologous recombination. Three recombinant ES cells clones were obtained, one of which was used to generate mouse chimeras by aggregation (Khillan and Bao, 1997) with morulas obtained from CD1 mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA). One single germline transmitter was obtained and bred with CD1 mice.

Maintaining the colony

One F1 heterozygous male and one F1 heterozygous female were then mated to establish a set of F2 breeder animals (5 males and 10 females) of each genotype (mutant or wild-type). All the animals used in this study were derived either from the F2 or the F3 generation. Genetic diversity was maintained by randomly interchanging breeders.

Genomic Southern blot

Genomic Southern blot was performed according to standard methods (Sambrook et al., 1989). A PstI digest of mouse tail-derived genomic DNA probed with a SalI-PstI fragment (Fig. 1) was used to check the recombination at the 3' end (normal allele fragment is 8.1 kb and recombinant is 4.0 kb). Another probe (EcoRI-EcoRV fragment of the alpha 6 promoter), internal to the 5' recombination arm, was used to check for correct recombination on the 5' end, using an XbaI digest of genomic DNA. (Normal allele fragment is 9.9 kb and recombinant is 12.2 kb). This also excluded the eventuality of an additional random integration (data not shown).

In situ hybridization

Animals were killed by cervical dislocation, and the brain was quickly dissected out and frozen in dry ice powder. The tissues were stored at -80°C until cut on a cryostat (Leica, Deerfield, IL) (14-µm-thick sections). In situ hybridization was performed according to Zoli et al. (1995), using synthesized oligonucleotides (Eurogentec, Brussels, Belgium) according to rat or mouse sequence, when available (Table 1). The slides were then exposed for 15 d to Hyperfilm-3H (Amersham Biosciences, Arlington Heights, IL) together with microscale radioactive standards (Amersham Biosciences) to correct for nonlinearity of the film response. The semiquantitative analysis was performed on autoradiography films. On each section, an averaged optical density of the background level (obtained by cold competition with unlabeled oligonucleotide) was subtracted from that of the sampled area to obtain specific optical density value.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.   Oligodeoxynucleotide probes used for in situ hybridization

For nAChR subunits (alpha 3, alpha 4, alpha 5, alpha 6, alpha 7, beta 2, beta 4), the experiment was performed using 3-6 animals of each genotype. Sections were taken at 17 coronal levels (bregma levels: 3.0, 1.5, 0.9, 0.1, -0.6, -1.0, -1.8, -2.2, -2.7, -2.9, -3.1, -3.5, -3.8, -4.0, -4.8, -5.4, and -7.5 mm according to Franklin and Paxinos (1997).

For dopamine receptors (D1, D2), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and neuropeptides [cholecystokinin (CCK), preprotachykinin (PPT), and preproenkephalin (PPE)], the experiment was performed using seven animals of each genotype. Coronal sections were cut from bregma level 1.0-0.7 mm (striatal level) and from bregma level -3.1 to -3.5 mm (mesencephalic level). For each level, three adjacent sections per animal were used for quantitative analysis.

Spontaneous locomotor activity

The open-field apparatus consists of a transparent 31-cm-high × 49-cm-long × 25.4-cm-wide Plexiglas cage. Movements were detected by a set of 9 × 19 infrared photobeam detectors, 1.5 cm above the floor of the apparatus. Tests were performed in a quiet room with ambient fluorescent lighting. For this experiment we used 15 male alpha 6-/- mice and 15 wild-type (Wt) littermates controls derived from F2 heterozygous mating. Mice naive to the apparatus were placed in the cage at time point t = 0, and their movements were recorded for a 2 hr period, with time points taken at intervals of 5 min.

Intraocular injections

Mice were anesthetized with a solution of 1.5% ketamine and 0.05% xylazine in PBS (150 µl/30 gm body weight). Intraocular injections were performed using a glass needle inserted just behind the corneoscleral margin of the eye. One microliter of a 10 µg/µl solution of cholera toxin subunit B, Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was injected into the vitreous chamber of one eye and Alexa Fluor 594 into the other. After 24 hr, mice were anesthetized and perfused with 0.9% saline, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cryoprotected brains were cut on a freezing microtome into 40 µm coronal sections. Sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, air-dried, coverslipped, and then examined under an epifluorescent microscope.

Receptor autoradiography

Nicotinic receptor ligands. For [3H]cytisine (5 nM), [3H]nicotine (5 nM), [3H]epibatidine (400 pM), [125I]alpha -bungarotoxin (1.5 nM), and [125I]alpha -conotoxinMII (alpha CtxMII) (500 pM), binding procedures were performed as described in Zoli et al. (1998) and Whiteaker et al. (2000). For each ligand, 17 coronal levels (see in situ hybridization procedures), and one or two sections per level were examined, from three to five animals of each genotype. Nonspecific binding was determined by using a 1000× excess of unlabeled ligand.

Cytisine displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding was performed by adding 50 nM of cold cytisine to the incubation mix, according to Marks et al. (1998).

Except for [125I]-alpha CtxMII, which was a generous gift from Dr. J. Michael McIntosh (Departments of Biology and Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT), all radiolabeled ligands were purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Unlabeled cytisine, nicotine, epibatidine, and alpha -bungarotoxin were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); alpha CtxMII was obtained from Eurogentec.

Dopamine receptor ligands. Levels of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors were determined by equilibrium binding of [3H]SCH23390 (NEN, Boston, MA) and [3H]raclopride (NEN), respectively. Sections were preincubated for 30 min at room temperature in 50 mM Tris 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2 (SCH23390), or 50 mM Tris 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, and 5 mM KCl (raclopride). Slides were then incubated for 1 hr at room temperature in preincubation buffer plus 1.5 nM (SCH23390) or 3 nM (raclopride) of tritiated ligand. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of an excess (100×) of cold ligand (Research Biochemicals, Natick, MA). After incubation, the sections were washed three times for 5 min each in ice-cold 50 mM Tris and briefly rinsed in ice-cold water. Slides were exposed for 20 d (D1) or 40 d (D2) to Kodak (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) BioMax MS films (Amersham Biosciences). Eight animals of each genotype were used for quantification. Measures were made on three adjacent sections at mesencephalic and striatal levels (bregma -3.4 and 0.9 mm, respectively).

Histological analysis

Immunocytochemistry. Mice were anesthetized with 4% chloral hydrate (12 µl/gm) and transcardially perfused with 20 ml of 0.9% NaCl (37°C) followed by 100 ml of a 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS solution. Brains were dissected out and post-fixed overnight in the same fixative, rinsed in 12% sucrose-PBS at 4°C over 2 d, and frozen on dry ice powder. The brains were cut from bregma level 1.0-0.7 mm and from bregma level -3.1 to -3.5 mm on a cryostat (20-µm-thick sections). Sections were then processed according to standard immunoperoxidase protocols, using the avidin-biotin complex technique (Pedrazzi et al., 1998). Antibodies against rat tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), and dopamine transporter (DAT) (MAB369; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) were used at a 1:2000 dilution for TH and 1:1000 for DAT. Briefly, slides were incubated overnight at 4°C, in the presence of the primary antibody diluted in PBS supplemented with 0.2% Triton X-100 and 1% normal goat serum (NGS). After washing with PBS containing 0.1% NGS, sections were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature, with a biotinylated anti-rabbit (TH) or anti-rat (DAT) secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) diluted 1:200 in PBS/1% NGS. Sections were washed in PBS and incubated with an avidin biotinylated peroxidase complex (ABC) according to manufacturer's instructions (Vector Laboratories). After peroxidase detection using diaminobenzidine, sections were washed, dehydrated, and coverslipped.

Nissl staining. Rehydrated, fixed (4% PFA) brain sections were incubated with toluidine blue (0.1%), washed, dehydrated, and coverslipped.

Analysis. The semiquantitative evaluation of the intensity of TH and DAT immunostainings as well as automatic cell profile count of Nissl-stained preparations was performed by means of an automatic image analyzer (KS300; Zeiss Kontron, Munich, Germany) according to previously published methods (Zoli et al., 1992). Microdensitometric analysis of immunostaining was performed with a CCD camera connected to a microscope using a 2.5× objective. In mesencephalon, a thresholding procedure was used to determine the integrated optical density value. TH-immunoreactive cell counting in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) was performed manually on coded slides under a 20× objective using a calibrated eyepiece grid, at -3.5 mm bregma level. For each staining, the analysis was performed on two sections per animal. The average value per animal was used for statistical purposes.

For Nissl-stained preparations, automatic cell profile count was performed according to Zoli et al. (1993) with a CCD camera connected to a microscope using a 20× objective (rectangular sampled field, 310 × 235 µm). Briefly, stained profiles were separated from the background by means of a dynamic thresholding procedure. Then, a spatial threshold was placed to separate glial (diameter < 7.5 µm) from neuronal (diameter >=  7.5 µm) profiles, and the number of neuronal profiles per sampled field was measured.

Membrane binding. Membranes from striatum (dorsal and ventral) and superior colliculus (SC) were prepared according to Marks et al. (1998). Incubations were performed in 6 ml glass tubes, using 50 (Superior colliculus) or 200 µg (striatum) of membrane protein per tube. Membranes were diluted in 500 µl of binding buffer (NaCl 144 mM; KCl 1.5 mM; CaCl2 2 mM; MgSO4 1 mM; HEPES 20 mM, pH 7.5), containing [3H]epibatidine (500 pM) and the appropriate concentration of unlabeled ligand (300 pM to 10 µM for alpha CtxMII, and 30 pM to 3 µM for cytisine). For alpha CtxMII displacement, binding buffer was supplemented with BSA (0.1% w/v), 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, and 10 µg/ml each of aprotinin, pepstatin A, and leupeptin (Sigma), to protect the ligand from endogenous proteases. After 2 hr at room temperature, incubations were terminated by filtration on polyethilenimine-soaked (0.3%, Sigma) glass fiber filters (type GF/C; Whatman) and washing with 10 ml of ice-cold binding buffer. Nonspecific binding was determined by adding an excess (1000×) of unlabeled epibatidine to the incubation mix. All measures were made in triplicate. The epibatidine concentration and the volume used for the incubation ensured minimal ligand depletion (<5%). Results were first fitted to the Hill equation [B = Bo/(1 + (I/IC50)n) ] to determine the likeliness of a monophasic inhibition (B is the number of binding sites at inhibitor concentration, I, Bo is the binding in the absence of inhibitor, and n is the Hill coefficient). Depending on n value, results were fitted using one of the following equations for one or two binding sites: B Bo/(1+ (I/IC50)) or B = I B1/(1 + (I/IC50-1)) + B2/(1+ (I/IC50-2)), respectively. IC50 and Bo values are expressed as the means ± SEM of six independent determinations. The corresponding Ki value was determined assuming competitive inhibition: Ki = IC50/(1 + L/Kd), where L is the concentration of [3H]epibatidine (500 pM), and Kd is the equilibrium dissociation constant of [3H]epibatidine in striatum (19.3 µM, according to Marks et al. (1998).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was done with StatView software (SAS Institute). Data are given as means ± SEM; means were compared using a Student's t test.


    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of alpha 6 knock-out mice

Knock-out mice for the alpha 6 subunit of the nAChRs were generated by replacing the first two exons of the gene with a Neomycin resistance (Neor) cassette (Fig. 1a). These exons encode the ATG initiator codon, the signal peptide, and part of the N-terminal extracellular domain of the mature subunit. Southern blot analysis using a flanking genomic probe confirmed that the expected homologous-recombination had occurred (Fig. 1b). In situ hybridization using an oligonucleotide probe located in the sixth exon (downstream to the deletion) detected alpha 6 mRNA in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), locus coeruleus (LC), substantia nigra (SN) and VTA neurons of Wt animals, in agreement with previous observations in rat or chicken (Le Novère et al., 1996; Vailati et al., 1999). In heterozygous mice, the intensity of the signal decreased and completely disappeared in alpha 6-/- mice, demonstrating that the deletion of exon 1 and 2, and the insertion of the Neor cassette, is sufficient to prevent transcription (Fig. 1c). We then compared the levels of expression of alpha 3, alpha 4, alpha 5, alpha 7, beta 2, and beta 4 nAChR subunit mRNA in Wt and alpha 6-/- animals. Quantitative analysis of film autoradiography revealed no alteration in the relative abundance of the mRNA of these subunits to compensate for the loss of the alpha 6 subunit (Fig. 2). [Note that in agreement with Ross et al. (2000), alpha 3 mRNA was not detected in SN-VTA neurons.]



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.   Semiquantitative analysis of alpha 3, alpha 4, alpha 5, alpha 7, beta 2, and beta 4 nAChR subunit mRNAs in Wt and Mt mice using in situ hybridization. For each subunit, optical density value of the signal was measured and corrected for background and film linearity. This value was then normalized to 100 in the region where the signal was maximal. Results are expressed as means ± SEM of at least three animals. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student's t test (p < 0.05). Regions quantified were medial habenula (MHb), interpeduncular nucleus (IPN), thalamus (Th), cortex (Cx), VTA, and hippocampus (Hp). Note the absence of significant differences in the relative abundance of the mRNA of these subunits, in any brain region.

alpha 6 knock-out mice are viable and do not exhibit major defects

Homozygous null mutant mice are viable, present in the expected Mendelian proportion in litters, grow to normal size, and do not exhibit major physical or neurological defects. Home cage behavior of mutant mice appeared normal, and spontaneous locomotor activity in an open-field observed over a 2 hr period did not reveal significant differences between Wt and alpha 6-/- animals at any time point, either during the nonhabituated (first hour) or habituated period (second hour) of the experiment (data not shown). Furthermore, histological examination of toluidine blue-stained sections of alpha 6-/- mice did not reveal alterations in the size, shape, or location of the major brain nuclei (data not shown).

Absence of developmental adaptations in the dopaminergic and visual pathways of alpha 6-/- animals

One major drawback of knock-out animal studies is the possible existence of developmental abnormalities in mutant mice that might interfere with the interpretation of the results obtained from these studies. For instance, in mice lacking the beta 2 nAChR subunit, impairment of visual acuity derives from abnormal segregation of retinogeniculate projections during development (Rossi et al., 2001). To examine whether such alterations exist in alpha 6-/- animals, we performed a detailed examination of the anatomical regions where alpha 6 is known to be expressed.

In the visual system, histological staining of the retina showed that the cell layering and the RGC number is normal in alpha 6-/- mice compared with their Wt controls (data not shown). Moreover, we studied the distribution pattern of RGC projections in their thalamic target, the dorsolateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), in young (postnatal day 15) and adult animals. In Wt mice, retinal projections from the two eyes terminate into separated areas of the dLGN: an outer shell, that receives afferents exclusively from the contralateral eye and an inner core that is innervated by the ipsilateral eye. In alpha 6-/- mice the pattern of retinogeniculate labeling was not different from the one observed in Wt at the same age (data not shown).

The anatomy of the mesostriatal dopaminergic system was studied at both mesencephalic and striatal levels.

At the striatal level, the semiquantitative analysis of TH and DAT immunoreactivity failed to detect any alteration in DA nerve terminals of alpha 6-/- mice in the anatomical regions examined [caudate-putamen (Cpu), Nac, and olfactory tubercle (Tu)]. Intrinsic striatal neurons also appeared normal in terms of number and morphology, as assessed by Nissl staining. Using in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography, we examined the expression profile of several markers in these neurons: dopamine receptors, D1 and D2, and neuropeptide precursors, PPT and PPE. In Wt mice, D1 and D2 mRNA levels were found to be homogeneously expressed in Cpu, and Tu, and to a lesser extent in the Nac. The study of [3H]raclopride (D2) and [3H]SCH23390 (D1) binding revealed a similar pattern of expression at the protein level. PPT mRNA, coding for the precursor peptide of substance P, was strongly expressed in Tu and Nac shell and to a lesser extent in Cpu and Nac core. Finally, PPE mRNA, coding for the precursor peptide of methionine-enkephalin, was homogeneously expressed in Cpu, Nac, and Tu. In alpha 6-/- mice, the pattern and level of expression of these markers were not altered (Table 2).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2.   Comparison of the expression levels of dopaminergic markers in Cpu and SNc of alpha 6-/- and Wt mice

At the mesencephalic level, the morphology and number of DA neurons did not differ in Wt and alpha 6-/- mice when visualized by TH or DAT immunoreactivity. We then examined the expression of TH, dopamine receptors D1, D2, and neuropeptide CCK at the mRNA level. In Wt mice, TH and D2 mRNA was detected in VTA and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) only, whereas CCK was also expressed in cortex and hippocampus. D1 mRNA was not detected at the mesencephalic level. Ligand binding studies further revealed low levels of [3H]raclopride (D2) binding sites in VTA and SNc, whereas high levels of [3H]SCH23390 (D1) binding sites could be seen in SN reticulata. Statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in the expression of these markers, between Wt and alpha 6-/- animals (Table 2).

Distribution of high-affinity binding sites for nicotinic ligands in the brain of alpha 6-/- mice

We investigated the binding profile of several nicotinic ligands on coronal sections of alpha 6-/- mouse brains. Whereas the distribution of alpha -bungarotoxin binding sites was unchanged in alpha 6-/- compared with Wt animals, a decrease in the abundance of high-affinity binding sites for [3H]nicotine, [3H]epibatidine, and [3H]cytisine was found in the terminal regions of RGC (SC and dLGN) (Fig. 3a-c). Surprisingly, no other differences were detected, especially in the retina, SN-VTA, and striatum, brain regions containing cell bodies or terminals of neurons that express alpha 6. Small decreases, however, might have been masked because of the relative scarcity of alpha 6-containing nAChRs with respect to other major nAChR populations (e.g., alpha 4beta 2 containing nAChRs) that also bind these ligands. As shown in a previous paper (Marks et al., 1998), a subpopulation of [3H]epibatidine binding sites, enriched in the mesostriatal and visual pathways, has a relatively low affinity for cytisine ("cytisine-resistant" sites). We therefore, compared the distribution of [3H]epibatidine binding sites after displacement by low cytisine concentration (50 nM), in Wt and alpha 6-/- mice. In these conditions, autoradiography quantification revealed a significant decrease of the cytisine-resistant fraction of [3H]epibatidine binding sites in most regions of the visual and dopaminergic systems of mutant animals compared with Wt mice (Figs. 3d, 4).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.   Quantitative autoradiography for nicotinic agonists in the mouse brain. Quantitative analysis of [3H]cytisine (a), [3H]nicotine (b), [3H]epibatidine (c), and [3H]epibatidine in the presence of 50 nM unlabeled cytisine (d), in Wt and alpha 6-/- mice. The results are expressed as the mean specific optical density ± SEM, normalized to 100 in the dLGN of Wt animals. AU, Arbitrary unit. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student's t test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01) versus Wt controls. Regions quantified were SC, dLGN, retina (Ret), VTA, Cpu, IPN, MHb, and Cx.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.   Autoradiograms of cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding in the mouse brain. Sections were incubated with 400 pM [3H]epibatidine in the presence of 50 nM unlabeled cytisine. See Figure 3 for quantification.

Finally, we examined the distribution of [125I]alpha CtxMII binding sites. In Wt mice, our results were in agreement with those of Whiteaker et al. (2000). Briefly, the highest density of [125I]alpha CtxMII binding sites was found in the SC (zonal and superficial gray layer), optic tract (opt), geniculate nucleus, and olivary pretectal nucleus (OPN). Lower levels were found in the basal ganglia (including Cpu, Tu, and Nac), SN-VTA, interpeduncular nucleus (IPN), medial habenula (MHb), lateral habenula, fasciculus retroflexus (fr), and retina. It should be noted that these regions correspond to alpha 6-expressing neurons (Le Novère et al., 1996) and to their terminal fields. In alpha 6-/- mice, no signal was detected above background level, indicating a complete disappearance of high-affinity alpha CtxMII binding sites (Fig. 5).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.   Autoradiograms of [125I]alpha CtxMII binding in the mouse brain. Sections were incubated with 0.5 nM [125I]alpha CtxMII, as described in Materials and Methods. Residual signal seen on the eye section of alpha 6-/- animals corresponds to nonspecific binding to pigmented epithelium. MT, Medial terminal nucleus of the accessory tract; MVN, medial vestibular nucleus; VLGN, ventrolateral geniculate nucleus.

Disappearance of the alpha CtxMII-sensitive and the cytisine-resistant fractions of [3H]epibatidine binding sites in the striatum of alpha 6-/- mice

Receptor autoradiography experiments showed a high selectivity of alpha CtxMII for alpha 6-containing nAChRs (see above). Still, previous experiments showed that this ligand is a potent inhibitor of alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs (Cartier et al., 1996). We, therefore, examined whether some low-affinity alpha CtxMII binding sites remained in the striatum of mutant mice. We displaced [3H]epibatidine binding by unlabeled alpha CtxMII, in striatal membrane preparations. Consistent with our observation in autoradiography experiments, total [3H]epibatidine binding was not significantly different between Wt and alpha 6-/- animals (57.9 ± 2.0 and 53.8 ± 1.7 fmol/mg, respectively). In Wt mice, ~21% of [3H]epibatidine binding sites could be displaced by alpha CtxMII, in a monophasic manner (Hill coefficient, 0.96 ± 0.12), and results were fitted to a one site model to determine the Ki value (Table 3). On the contrary, in alpha 6-/- animals, alpha CtxMII had no effect on epibatidine binding at any concentration (up to 10 µM). Strikingly, the total number of alpha CtxMII-resistant epibatidine binding sites was significantly upregulated in alpha 6-/- mice (p < 0.01) (Fig. 6). We also performed the same experiment on SC membrane preparations and found residual alpha CtxMII sensitivity in alpha 6-/- mice, representing 16% of the alpha CtxMII-sensitive [3H]epibatidine binding population in Wt animals (Table 3). However, the low amount of these sites and problems with material availability prevented us from providing an accurate inhibition curve that could have demonstrated the low-affinity nature of these sites.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3.   alpha CtxMII inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding on superior colliculus and striatal membranes



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.   Displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding by alpha CtxMII in mouse striatal membranes. a, Comparison of total (gray bars) and alpha CtxMII-resistant (10 µM, white bars) [3H]epibatidine binding sites in Wt and alpha 6-/- animals. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of six separate determinations, expressed in femtomoles per milligram of protein. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student's t test. A statistically significant fraction (21%; *p < 0.01) of [3H]epibatidine binding sites is sensitive to alpha CtxMII displacement in Wt but not in alpha 6-/- animals. alpha CtxMII-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding sites are significantly (°p < 0.01) upregulated in alpha 6-/- animals compared with their Wt controls, whereas total [3H]epibatidine binding is unaffected by the genotype. b, Inhibition curve of [3H]epibatidine (500 pM) binding by alpha CtxMII (30 pM to 3 µM) in striatal membrane preparations of alpha 6-/- (filled symbols) and Wt (open symbols) animals. Nonspecific binding, determined in the presence of 500 nM unlabeled epibatidine, was subtracted from each measurement. Results were then expressed as a percentage of specific binding in the absence of alpha CtxMII. Each value is the mean ± SEM of six separate determinations. See also Table 3.

Because alpha CtxMII-sensitive and cytisine-resistant [3H]epibatidine binding sites have been suggested to represent the same receptor population (Whiteaker et al., 2000), we investigated the displacement of epibatidine binding by unlabeled cytisine. The resulting inhibition curves are shown in Figure 7. In Wt animals, the Hill coefficient was significantly <1 (n = 0.76 ± 0.03), suggesting that the inhibition of epibatidine binding by cytisine was not monophasic. Results were thus fitted using a two sites model that revealed the existence of cytisine-sensitive and cytisine-resistant epibatidine binding sites (Table 4), in agreement with the results of Marks et al. (1998). On the contrary, in alpha 6-/- animals, the inhibition curve appeared monophasic (Hill coefficient, 0.94 ± 0.05), and we could fit the data to a one site model to determine Ki value (Table 4). Using a two sites model to fit the data gave similar results because the calculated cytisine-resistant population represented <0.3% of total binding in alpha 6-/- animals. Moreover, the measured Ki value for cytisine inhibition of epibatidine binding in alpha 6-/- animals was comparable with the Ki value of the cytisine-sensitive fraction in Wt mice (0.32 ± 0.03 nM compared with 0.23 ± 0.03 nM, respectively).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.   Displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding by cytisine in mouse striatal membranes. a, Inhibition curve of [3H]epibatidine binding by cytisine: membrane samples were incubated with 500 pM [3H]epibatidine in the presence of (30 pM to 3 µM) unlabeled cytisine. Nonspecific binding, determined in the presence of 500 nM unlabeled epibatidine, was subtracted from each measurement. Results were then expressed as a percentage of specific binding in the absence of cytisine. Each point represents the mean ± SEM of five separate determinations. Data obtained from alpha 6-/- (filled symbols) or Wt (open symbols) striatal membranes preparations were fitted to a one- (dotted line) or two-site inhibition model (see Material and Methods), respectively, depending on the value of the Hill number (see below). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student's t test (*p < 0.05). b, Hill plot representation. Log(B/(Bo - B)) is plotted as a function of log([cytisine]), where B is the amount of specific [3H]epibatidine binding and Bo is the specific binding in the absence of cytisine. In these conditions, the slope of the curve represents the Hill number, nH. In Wt animals, nH is significantly <1 (p < 0.05), suggesting the existence of an heterogeneous population of binding sites. Conversely, in alpha 6-/- animals, nH = 0.94 ± 0.05, which suggests a homogeneous population of binding sites. See also Table 4.


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4.   Cytisine inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding on striatal membranes


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We describe the generation and phenotypic characterization of an alpha 6 nAChR subunit knock-out mouse, focusing on the anatomy of neuronal structures where alpha 6 is normally expressed and on the pharmacological properties of native alpha 6-containing nAChRs. Deletion of the first two exons of the alpha 6 gene was sufficient to impair its transcription, as evidenced by the absence of residual alpha 6 mRNA in homozygous null mutant mice. These animals exhibit normal general appearance, survival, growth, anatomy, and locomotor behavior.

The anatomy of the dopaminergic and visual pathways is preserved in alpha 6-/- animals

Because alpha 6 mRNA is abundantly expressed in catecholaminergic neurons and RGCs, we examined whether developmental alterations occurred in the dopaminergic and visual systems of alpha 6-/- animals as a consequence of the loss of the alpha 6 subunit.

In the dopaminergic system, no anatomical alterations could be detected in either midbrain DA neurons at the somatic and terminal levels, or in intrinsic striatal neurons. Moreover, the expression of various molecular markers, including the dopamine biosynthetic enzyme and transporter (TH and DAT, respectively), dopamine receptors (D1, D2) and neuropeptides (CCK, PPT, PPE) were normal in alpha 6-/- mice, although the expression of some of these markers has been reported to be modulated by nicotine or endogenous acetylcholine (Wiener et al., 1989; Smith et al., 1991; Houdi et al., 1998; Drew et al., 2000). In the visual system, retinal cell layering as well as the organization of retinothalamic projections were preserved in alpha 6-/- animals. Relying on our results, we conclude that alpha 6 is not necessary for normal development of visual and mesostriatal dopaminergic pathways. Therefore, these mutant animals are likely to be suitable models for studying the function of alpha 6 in adults.

Moreover, our results contribute to the identification of the subunit composition of nAChRs responsible for the segregation of retinothalamic projections. In the visual system of mammals, the projections of the RGC from each eye are initially intermixed in their thalamic target, the dLGN, and subsequently segregate into eye-specific layers. This phenomenon is dependent on spontaneous retinal activity, termed retinal waves, driven by the activation of nicotinic receptors located on RGC (Feller et al., 1996; Penn et al., 1998). It was recently demonstrated that mice lacking the beta 2 but not the alpha 4 nAChR subunit, display abnormal segregation of retinogeniculate projections (Rossi et al., 2001). In this context, our finding that adult alpha 6-/- mice exhibit normal segregation, suggests that nAChRs involved in the segregation process do not contain alpha 6, although the substitution of alpha 6 by another alpha  subunit cannot be ruled out (see below). These results further support the hypothesis of Bansal et al. (2000), who proposed alpha 3 as the likely partner of beta 2 in the genesis of normal retinal waves.

The alpha 6 nAChR subunit is a critical component of native alpha CtxMII binding sites

Null mutant mice exhibit a complete disappearance of high-affinity [125I]alpha CtxMII binding sites. Therefore, all these sites appear to correspond to alpha 6-containing nAChRs. Three distinct anatomical systems contain detectable levels of [125I]alpha CtxMII binding. High levels were shown in the visual system, including retina, RGC fibers (opt), and their terminal fields (geniculate nucleus, SC, OPN). Lower binding density was found in two other systems: the mesostriatal dopaminergic system, which includes SN-VTA neurons and their projection structures (Tu, Nac, Cpu, lateral habenula), and the habenulo-interpeduncular system (MHb, fr, and IPN). On the basis of the distribution of alpha 6 mRNA-expressing neurons, we infer that alpha 6-containing nAChRs in the SN-VTA, MHb, and retina are somatodendritic receptors. In other regions, these receptors are likely to be transported to a presynaptic or preterminal localization, as confirmed by the presence of high levels of [125I]alpha CtxMII binding in axon systems (optic nerve and tract, fr). Our results expand those of Goldner et al. (1997), who detected alpha 6 immunoreactivity only in the SN-VTA. However, it should be noted that alpha CtxMII-insensitive alpha 6-containing nAChRs might also exist, as suggested by the fact that alpha 6 mRNA was detected in areas, such as the LC (Le Novère et al., 1996; Lena et al., 1999), where no [125I]alpha CtxMII binding was detected.

Although alpha CtxMII was thought to be a specific inhibitor of alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs (Cartier et al., 1996), the sensitivity of alpha 6-containing nAChRs to this toxin is not surprising. Indeed, alpha 3 and alpha 6 are highly homologous subunits with 67.3% residue identity in their mature N-terminal domains, and critical residues for alpha CtxMII selectivity are conserved in alpha 6 (Harvey et al., 1997). Moreover, it was recently demonstrated that native alpha 6beta 4-containing nAChRs, purified from chick retina, are blocked by this toxin (Vailati et al., 1999). Finally, chimeric subunits containing the extracellular domain of the human alpha 6 subunit fused to the rest of alpha 3 or alpha 4 subunits can form functional nAChRs, sensitive to alpha CtxMII, when expressed with beta 2 or beta 4 in Xenopus oocytes (Kuryatov et al., 2000). More intriguing, however, is the fact that alpha CtxMII binding sites completely disappear in alpha 6-/- mice, although alpha 3 is still expressed. It is possible that alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs are not detected because of the scarcity of these sites. In the SN-VTA, alpha 3 mRNA is barely detectable using in situ hybridization (Le Novère et al., 1996; Ross et al., 2000; present study), whereas in regions where alpha 3 mRNA is abundant (e.g., in MHb), alpha CtxMII-insensitive alpha 3beta 4-containing nAChRs are likely to form (Quick et al., 1999). Another explanation would be that alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs form low-affinity alpha CtxMII binding sites, which could not be detected using receptor autoradiography. In the SC, this hypothesis is supported by our results on alpha CtxMII displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding on membrane preparations and the findings of Dougherty et al. (2000), which suggest that some non-alpha 6-containing nAChRs with low affinity for alpha CtxMII are present in this region. In the striatum however, such sites are unlikely to exist because in Wt mice, in agreement with Whiteaker et al., (2000), we report a monophasic of inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding by alpha CtxMII, and because, in alpha 6-/- animals, residual [3H]epibatidine binding is insensitive to alpha CtxMII displacement (up to 10 µM).

Overall, our results prompt a new interpretation of previous works describing the pharmacological actions of alpha CtxMII on DA neurons. This toxin partially inhibits nicotine-induced dopamine release in striatal synaptosomes (Kulak et al., 1997; Kaiser et al., 1998). Moreover, patch-clamp recordings revealed alpha CtxMII-sensitive nAChR-mediated currents in midbrain DA neurons (Klink et al., 2001). Relying on the supposed selectivity of alpha CtxMII, it was proposed that alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs mediate these nicotinic effects. We demonstrate here that this is unlikely to be the case. First, the selectivity of alpha CtxMII for alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs is questionable because native alpha 6-containing nAChRs exhibit nanomolar affinity for this toxin. Moreover the absence of residual alpha CtxMII binding sites in the striatum of alpha 6-/- animals, and the low abundance of alpha 3 mRNA in the SN/VTA suggest that alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChRs are very scarce in the dopaminergic system. Consequently, the role of the alpha 6 subunit in the nicotinic modulation of DA neurons and its importance for nicotine addiction should be reevaluated taking alpha 6beta 2-containing nAChR rather than alpha 3beta 2-containing nAChR as the likely candidate for these effects.

Evidence for the existence compensatory mechanisms in alpha 6-/- animals

Pharmacological characterization of native alpha 6-containing nAChRs was completed using various nicotinic agonists. Cytisine displacement of [3H]epibatidine binding on striatal membranes strongly suggested the identity of cytisine-resistant and alpha CtxMII-sensitive epibatidine binding sites in the striatum, becaus