Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 15, 2002, 22(6):2283-2298
Using Optical Flow to Characterize Sensory-Motor Interactions in
a Segment of the Medicinal Leech
Davide
Zoccolan and
Vincent
Torre
Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati and
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia, Unita' di
Trieste, c/o Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, 34014 Trieste, Italy
 |
ABSTRACT |
Activation of motoneurons innervating leech muscles causes the
appearance of a two-dimensional vector field of deformations on the
skin surface that can be fully characterized using a new technique
(Zoccolan et al., 2001
) based on the computation of the optical flow,
the two-dimensional vector field describing the point displacements on
the skin. These vector fields are characterized by their origin (i.e.,
the singular point) and by four elementary components that combine
linearly: expansion (or compression), rotation, longitudinal shear, and
oblique shear. All motoneurons can be classified and recognized
according to the components of the deformations they elicit:
longitudinal motoneurons give rise almost exclusively to longitudinal
negative shear, whereas circular motoneurons give rise to both positive
longitudinal shear and significant negative expansion. Oblique
motoneurons induce strong oblique shear, in addition to longitudinal
shear and negative expansion. Vector fields induced by the contraction
of longitudinal, circular, and oblique fibers superimpose linearly.
Skin deformations can therefore be attributed rather reliably to the
contraction of distinct longitudinal, circular, and oblique muscle
fibers. We compared the deformation patterns produced by touching the skin with those produced by intracellular stimulation of P, T, and N
cells: vector fields resulting from the activation of P cells were
almost identical to those produced by mechanical stimulation. Therefore, motor responses triggered by light or moderate touch are
almost entirely mediated by excitation of P cells, with minor contributions from T and N cells.
Key words:
sensory-motor interaction; motoneurons; optical flow; videomicroscopy; leech; mechanosensory neurons; computer vision
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A major goal of neuroscience is
describing the neuronal pathways linking sensory input and motor
output. Exhaustive analysis of these pathways is difficult in higher
vertebrates, but is possible in invertebrates (Nicholls and Baylor,
1968
; Stuart, 1970
; Byrne et al., 1974
; Castellucci and Kandel, 1974
;
Stent et al., 1978
; Kristan, 1982
; Wittenberg and Kristan, 1992a
,b
;
Tsau et al., 1994
; Frost and Kandel, 1995
). In the leech, mechanical
inputs are transduced by seven pairs of mechanosensory neurons; three
specific for light pressure (touch or T cells), two for strong pressure
(pressure or P cells), and two for noxious mechanical stimuli (N
cells), (Nicholls and Baylor, 1968
; Kristan et al., 1982
; Lewis and
Kristan, 1998a
; Pinato and Torre, 2000
). The leech motor system
consists of 19 pairs of excitatory motoneurons in each ganglion that
innervate longitudinal, oblique, and circular fibers (Stuart, 1970
; Ort et al., 1974
; Mason and Kristan, 1982
; Norris and Calabrese, 1987
). These motoneurons have been extensively investigated using force and
length transducers and electrophysiology tools (Stuart, 1970
; Kristan,
1982
; Mason and Kristan, 1982
; Norris and Calabrese, 1987
). However,
exhaustive analysis of the relation between mechanosensory stimulation
and motoneuron activation has not been performed.
We characterize here skin contractions of a segment of the leech
Hyrudo medicinalis by using videomicroscopy and computing optical flow from these images (Zoccolan et al., 2001
). Stimulation of each motoneuron induces a characteristic optical flow, a
two-dimensional vector field that can be characterized by specifying
where the contraction occurs, the location of the singular point (the
stationary point of the contraction), and the elementary deformations
of the vector field (Giachetti and Torre, 1996
; Zoccolan et al., 2001
).
The deformations induced by longitudinal, circular, and oblique
motoneurons are sufficiently different so that these classes can be
easily distinguished. Furthermore, deformations induced by different
motoneurons sum linearly, i.e., add in the simplest way. Any given skin
deformation can be decomposed into components caused by contraction of
longitudinal, circular, and oblique muscles. Therefore, by viewing a
piece of skin when different mechanosensory neurons are stimulated, it
is possible to identify which classes of motoneurons are activated.
We show that motor responses initiated by light or moderate mechanical
stimulation are almost entirely mediated by P cells. Mechanical
stimulation and electrical excitation of P cells induce contractions
with an almost identical shape and sustained by coactivation of both
longitudinal and circular fibers. T cells, when individually activated,
induce a much weaker skin contraction, with a different shape. They
have a minor role in mediating local motor responses, although when
coactivated with P cells, they can potentiate the contraction (Kristan,
1982
). The N cells are not activated by light mechanical stimulation
and do not contribute to local motor responses. These results indicate
that the local bending response (Kristan, 1982
; Lockery and Kristan,
1990a
,b
; Lewis and Kristan, 1998b
), during which the leech bends away
from the stimulated site, is sustained by coactivation of circular and
longitudinal motoneurons and is almost entirely mediated by P cell activation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Animals and preparations. Hirudo
medicinalis were obtained from Ricarimpex (Eysines, France) and
kept at 5°C in tap water dechlorinated by aeration for 24 hr. Three
preparations were used.
The first preparation consisted of a hemisection of the leech skin,
approximately three segments in length (15 annuli), isolated from the
rest of the body. One boundary of this preparation was formed by the
dorsal midline of the animal; the other boundary was between the
lateral line and the ventral midline of the animal. The skin was
flattened and fixed with small pins to the bottom of the recording
chamber, but allowed to deform during muscle contraction. The middle
segment was kept innervated by its ganglion. The connective and the
roots emerging from the opposite side of the ganglion were pinned to
allow easy intracellular recordings from the cell bodies of motoneurons
and mechanosensory neurons in the ganglion.
A second preparation was used to more precisely study the dependence of
motor response on the region of skin touched during mechanical
stimulation. In comparison with the previous preparation, the
differences were: (1) the inferior boundary coincided precisely with
the ventral midline of the animal body and (2) the ganglion innervating
the central segment was not exposed. This preparation offered two main
advantages: (1) the skin could be stimulated near the ventral midline
and (2) the roots innervating skin and muscles were perfectly intact
because they had not been cleaned and exposed. For these reasons this
preparation was used to verify that motor responses observed in the
first kind of preparation were not affected by some dissection induced
abnormality in muscle and skin innervation.
The third preparation was an intact leech. The head and the tail of the
animal were pinned on a Sylgard dish, and the body was stretched. Two
or three central segments were flattened and secured to the Sylgard
dish with four pins. This portion of body wall and various free
segments along the body were mechanically stimulated to verify the
consistency of the motor responses in the intact animal and reduced preparations.
All preparations were kept in a Sylgard-coated dish at room temperature
(20-24°C). During dissection the preparation was bathed in a
Ringer's solution with the following composition (mM): 115 NaCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 4 KCl, 12 glucose, and 10 mM Tris maleate, buffered to pH 7.4 with NaOH (Muller et
al., 1981
).
Imaging. One standard CCD camera (640 × 480 pixels)
was mounted on a dissecting microscope. Images of the contracting leech skin were acquired at 5 or 8.3 Hz and stored on a personal computer using a frame grabber DT3155 (Data Translation, Marlboro, MA) and the
acquisition software Axon Imaging Workbench 2.2 (Axon Instruments,
Foster City, CA).
Electrical recordings. The electrical activity of
motoneurons and mechanosensory neurons was monitored by intracellular
recordings with sharp electrodes (input resistance 30 M
filled with
4 M potassium acetate) using Axoclamp-2b
amplifiers (Axon Instruments). Depolarizing current pulses were passed
through the electrodes into the cell bodies to evoke a spike discharge.
Intracellular and extracellular voltage recordings were digitized at 10 kHz, stored on a personal computer, and analyzed with the program
Clampex 8 (Axon Instruments). Axon Imaging Workbench 2.2 and Clampex 8 can run simultaneously on the same computer, allowing the synchronized acquisition of images and electrical signals.
Mechanical stimulation. In some experiments a brief
(200-400 msec) mechanical stimulus was delivered to the skin. The
stimulus consisted of a poke with a nylon filament driven by a solenoid (347-652 RS components), as previously described (Lewis and Kristan, 1998a
; Pinato and Torre, 2000
). Different stimulus intensities were
achieved by changing the diameter and the length of the filaments (Levin et al., 1978
). A force transducer (HONEYWELL FSG-15N1A) measured
the force exerted by each filament that was used. Filaments delivering
stimulus intensities of ~20 and 50 mN were used.
Analysis of the skin deformations. Muscle fiber contraction
evokes in tissue a two-dimensional force field. Force or displacement transducers, providing a single scalar measure, cannot properly quantify this vector field. As described in Zoccolan et al. (2001)
, this problem can be circumvented by acquiring image sequences of the
contracting tissue and using standard vector analysis techniques to
analyze them.
Computing the optical flow. A window-matching algorithm that
searches for the most similar patterns of gray levels in consecutive images is used to track points from one image to the next one (Aggarwal
and Nandhakumar, 1988
; Anadan, 1989
; Aschwanden and Guggenbuhl, 1992
;
Giachetti, 2000
; Zoccolan et al., 2001
). When applied over a dense grid
of points, this algorithm obtains a dense representation of the
occurring displacements, referred to in computer vision as optical flow
(Horn and Schunck, 1981
; Verri and Poggio, 1989
; Giachetti, 2000
;
Zoccolan et al., 2001
). Given a sequence of images
I(x, y, i), with
i = 1,... ,N, and given a grid of
points
= (x, y) on the image plane, the optical
flow
Ti(
) = (uTi(
), vTi(
))
is the total displacement of the features centered on
from image 1 to image i.
uTi(
) and
vTi(
) are, respectively, the x and y component of the displacement at every
point
. In the following, the vector field of
deformations represented by the optical flow computed from an image
sequence will be simply referred to as the vector field induced by that
particular skin contraction.
To monitor the time evolution of a deformation, a sequence of
instantaneous optical flows
i can be
computed, where each flow
i is
the instantaneous displacement, i.e., the displacement from image
i
1to image i, of the features
(Zoccolan et al., 2001
).
Linear deformation theory. The obtained optical flows can be
further analyzed by linearizing them. In the case of a planar deformation, the optical flow
Ti(
) can often be
very well approximated by a linear vector field (Giachetti and
Torre, 1996
)
D(
) = L(
), where
is
the stationary point of the deformation (referred to in the following
as singular point) and L is the matrix describing the linear
planar deformation. It is well known (Sommerfeld, 1974
) that the matrix
L can be decomposed as:
|
(1)
|
where
|
(2)
|
are the elementary deformation components: expansion, rotation,
and shears, respectively (Giachetti and Torre, 1996
). Equation 1 states
that each linear planar vector field
D is simply the sum of four
elementary deformations, defined by the four matrixes in which matrix
L is decomposed. The coefficients E,
, S1, and
S2 determine which is the relative
weight of each elementary deformation of
D. A sketch of these four
elementary fields is provided in Figure
1.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
A sketch of the elementary deformations.
A, Expansion (E).
B, Rotation ( ). C,
Horizontal shear (S1).
D, Oblique shear
(S2).
|
|
The parameters E,
,
S1 and
S2, together with the coordinates
px and py of
the singular point
, completely determine every linear planar vector field
D.
In the following, the set of parameters E,
,
S1 and
S2 will be referred to as the
elementary deformations.
The singular point coordinates px and
py are measured in pixels. The elementary
deformation components E,
,
S1, and
S2 are pure numbers, and their
magnitude varies from deformation to deformation. Usually a component
can be considered negligible when its absolute value is at least five
times lower than the absolute value of the biggest component.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of the contractions induced by
leech motoneurons
The first preparation described in Materials and Methods was used
to characterize the leech skin contractions induced by excitatory motoneurons. Individual leech motoneurons were stimulated to obtain a
strong, sustained contraction of the corresponding muscles. The
resulting skin movements were viewed with a CCD camera mounted on a
dissecting microscope. Image sequences of the contracting skin were
acquired at 5 Hz and analyzed as described in Zoccolan et al. (2001)
and Materials and Methods to obtain optical flows: the two-dimensional
vector fields that described the displacement of a 30 × 20 point
grid on the leech skin. Each optical flow was computed from the resting
state to the time of maximal contraction.
Figure 2 shows the optical flows obtained
during maximal contraction produced by the stimulation of nine
motoneurons: longitudinal L (A); dorsal longitudinal
excitatory (DE) 3 (B); DE 5 (C); DE 107 (D); ventral longitudinal excitatory (VE) 8 (E); VE 108 (F); oblique excitatory
(OE) 110 (G); circular ventral (CV)
(H); and flattener excitatory (FE) 109 (I). In each panel the arrowheads indicate
movement direction and the arrow length indicates displacement. The
optical flows are drawn on a gray background showing pieces of body
wall whose contractions were analyzed.

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Optical flows associated with nine different leech
motoneurons. A-I show the optical flow computed on a
30 × 20 grid for the skin deformations caused by intracellular
stimulation of motoneurons L, 3, 5, 107, 8, 108, 110, CV, and 109, respectively. The data were obtained from seven different preparations.
Each motoneuron was stimulated with a depolarizing step of current
causing a spike discharge between 30 and 40 Hz and lasting from 1 to 6 sec. Optical flows were obtained as described in Zoccolan et al. (2001)
and Materials and Methods. A drawing of the segment annuli is shown in
gray in each panel, and annulus width is between 0.5 and
0.8 mm. Scale bars, 2 mm. The top boundary of the
preparation is the dorsal midline of the body; the
bottom boundary is between the lateral line and the
ventral midline. Anterior is to the left. The central
annulus of the innervated segment is, starting from
left: the sixth for A, G,
H, and I; the fifth for B,
D, and F; the fourth for
C; and the eighth for E. The region of
optical flow framed by the solid box was used to compute
the linear approximations shown in Figure 3. To make the direction of
the movement more clear, the fields shown in E,
F, G, and I are drawn with
a magnification respectively 1.5, 2, 1.5, and 2× larger.
|
|
These flows are in excellent agreement with the deformations expected
from previous descriptions of these motoneurons (Stuart, 1970
).
Motoneurons L, 3, 5, 107, 8, and 108 innervate longitudinal muscles,
muscles that run parallel to the length of the leech and are
responsible for its shortening (Nicholls and Purves, 1970
; Stuart,
1970
; Kristan, 1982
; Mason and Kristan, 1982
). The L motoneuron innervates the whole half-segment, and the corresponding contraction involves all of the skin, with the center approximately in the middle
of the half-segment. Motoneurons 3, 5, and 107 are dorsal excitors,
innervating only the dorsal fibers of the longitudinal muscles, and
their contraction involves mainly the dorsal side of the half-segment.
Motoneurons 8 and 108 are ventral excitors and deform the ventral part
of the skin. Cell 110 (Stuart, 1970
) excites oblique muscle fibers and
induces a contraction in an oblique direction in respect to the length
of the leech. The CV motoneuron innervates circular fibers situated in
the lateral ventral side of the half segment (Stuart, 1970
) and induces
a contraction in the transverse direction with a displacement field perpendicular to that induced by the longitudinal motoneurons. Motoneuron 109, referred to as the flattener (Stuart, 1970
), innervates dorsoventral fibers, responsible for the flattening of the leech body.
Its activation induces a transverse contraction similar to that
produced by the CV motoneuron.
The optical flows shown in Figure 2 can be approximated with linear
vector fields. Figure 3A-I
illustrates the best linear vector fields approximating the
corresponding optical flows reported in Figure 2. For each deformation,
the linear approximation was computed in a region surrounding the
stationary point. This linearization region is indicated by the window
drawn in each panel of Figures 2 and 3 (the position of the stationary
point is indicated by the X). Comparison of
corresponding panels in Figures 2 and 3 shows that the linear
approximation is satisfactory in the area of skin where the original
optical flow (Fig. 2) is large and poor outside it. This is not
surprising because almost all leech motoneurons innervate selectively
just a narrow region of muscles in a half segment. For this reason, in
almost all the panels of Figure 2 the contraction is restricted to a
small area of the skin. By definition, the amplitude of a planar vector
field increases linearly while moving away from the singular point
(Fig. 3). This explains why linear approximations have large amplitude
in areas where corresponding real optical flows are almost zero. For
example, in cell 3 (a dorsal excitor) the linear approximation is good not only inside the linearization region but also in a wider dorsal area of the skin where the deformation amplitude is significantly greater than zero (compare Figs. 2B and
3B). On the contrary, in the ventral region the deformation
is almost zero and a comparison with the linear approximation is not
appropriate. In summary, the contraction induced by each motoneuron is
approximately linear in the skin area that is being functionally
innervated. In this area, the optical flow and its linear approximation
are highly repeatable from preparation to preparation, allowing a
precise classification of the different classes of motoneurons (Fig.
5). Outside this area the optical flow is almost null, and its shape is
variable from preparation to preparation. This is because the observed
deformation is passively driven by the active part of the skin and it
is significantly influenced by the location of pins holding the
preparation.

View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Linear approximations of the optical flows.
A-I show the vector fields obtained by linearly
approximating the optical flows shown in the solid boxes
in the corresponding panels of Figure 2. In each, the X
indicates the position of the singular point. The drawings of the
segment annuli are the same as Figure 2. The agreement between the
original optical flow (Fig. 2), and the linear approximation (Fig. 3)
is good within the box and in the skin area mainly involved in the
contraction and poor outside.
|
|
Note that the use of linear approximations in characterizing motoneuron
contractions was primarily suggested by the finding that almost all
optical flows induced by leech motoneurons had only one singular point,
i.e., only one stationary point. This is the first requirement for a
vector field to be linear (Sommerfeld, 1974
). Indeed, all optical flows
shown in Figure 2 and in the following figures have only one singular
point. The only exception is the optical flow shown in Figure
2D, which has another singular point located in the
ventral side of the skin (sixth annulus from left; the vector field
rotates around it). This area, which is only passively moving, is not
included in the linearization region (Figs. 2D,
3D, box) for the reasons previously discussed. In
characterizing the contraction the only relevant singular point is
located inside the linearization region, in the dorsal side of the
skin, where the deformation is large (Fig. 3D,
X).
Approximating skin deformations with linear vector fields is a powerful
tool, because, as recalled in Materials and Methods, every planar
linear field is uniquely characterized by a set of six parameters
(Giachetti and Torre, 1996
; Zoccolan et al., 2001
). These parameters
are the coordinates px and
py of the singular point and the four
elementary deformations E,
,
S1, and
S2, defined by Equation 2. The
computation of these six parameters allows a quantitative and reliable
comparison among the deformations induced by different types of
motoneurons in the same preparation and in segments dissected from
different animals. The result of this comparison, for the nine types of
motoneurons previously analyzed in Figures 2 and 3, is reported in
Figures 4 and
5.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Distribution of the location of the singular
points for the skin deformations induced by individual motoneurons in
different preparations. A, The singular points of
longitudinal motoneurons L ( ), 3 (X), 5 ( ),
107 ( ), 8 ( ), and 108 ( ) in nine, seven, five, six, three, and
seven, different preparations, respectively. B, The
singular points of the oblique motoneuron 110 ( ), the circular
motoneuron CV ( ), and the flattener motoneuron 109 ( ) in eight,
seven, and four different preparations, respectively. The gray
background in A and B reproduces
the annular margins of a representative body wall preparation; the
arrow indicates the central annulus.
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
The average relative weights of the elementary
deformations for different leech motoneurons. A-I show
the mean relative weight of expansion (E),
rotation ( ), and the two shears
S1 and S2 for the
nine motoneurons analyzed in Figures 2 and 3. All components were
normalized to the largest of them before averaging. The number of
preparations used for each motoneuron is reported in the bottom
right corner of each panel. Error bars indicate
SEM.
|
|
Figure 4 shows the singular point positions of the various motoneurons
in different preparations. The gray background reproduces the annular
margins of a representative body wall preparation; the central annulus
is indicated by the arrow. A shows the singular point positions for the contractions induced by longitudinal
motoneurons 3, 5, 8, 107, 108, and L. In A six specific
regions, in which singular points of each motoneuron aggregate, are
apparent. The size of these regions varies from 1.5 to 3 mm in the
longitudinal direction (2-4 annuli) and from 1 to 2.5 mm in the
transverse direction. As shown in B, singular points of
oblique, circular, and flattener motoneurons aggregate in clusters of
slightly wider area (the singular points of motoneuron 110 span
approximately five annuli).
Figure 5 summarizes the relative weights of the four elementary
deformations E,
,
S1 and
S2, for the nine motoneuron types shown in the previous figures. In each histogram, the gray bars are the
mean relative weights of each elementary deformations (before being
averaged, the elementary deformations were normalized to the absolute
value of the largest of them). Negative longitudinal shear
S1 was the main deformation component
in contractions induced by longitudinal motoneurons
(S1 =
1, with SD = 0, for
almost all of the longitudinal motoneurons analyzed in the figure). The other elementary deformation components were negligible. Their mean
relative weight was usually lower than 0.15 (in absolute value) and if
it reached higher values (as the rotation component |
| > 0.25 for motoneurons 3, 107, and 108), its uncertainty was large.
Motoneurons inducing transverse contractions (cell CV and cell 109)
were characterized by high-positive longitudinal shear S1 and high-negative expansion
E. The oblique motoneuron (cell 110) was characterized by
high-negative oblique shear S2,
high-positive S1, and high-negative
expansion E. For all motoneurons inducing longitudinal and
transverse contractions, the main elementary deformation was
|S1| = 1 with no uncertainty,
i.e., 0 SD. The only exception was cell 108, in which, in one of seven
experiments, |
| was bigger than
|S1|, and for this reason the
uncertainty, and the SD, on S1 is not
0. The same consideration applies to cell 110, in which, in one of
eight experiments, |E| was bigger than the main
elementary deformation |S2|.
Figure 5 shows that the contractions induced by single motoneurons can
be classified on the basis of their main elementary deformations. This
classification is highly reliable because the uncertainty of the
relative weight of the main elementary deformations is low (see the
error bars in Fig. 5). Moreover, this classification is in strict
agreement with the anatomical arrangement of the leech muscle fibers
(Stuart, 1970
): (1) longitudinal (high
S1 < 0); (2) circular and flattener
(high S1 > 0 and
E1 < 0); (3) oblique (high
S2, S1 > 0, and E < 0). More precise classification of the
contractions can be achieved by exploiting the differences in the
location of the singular point for contractions induced by motoneurons
belonging to the same class (Fig. 4). Even finer classification can be
obtained by looking at the region of the skin involved in the
contraction, as originally done by visual inspection by Stuart (1970)
.
For example, motoneurons L and 3 produce almost a pure negative
longitudinal shear S1 (Fig.
5A,B), and the regions in which the singular points can be
found are partially overlapping (Fig. 4A).
Nevertheless, the deformation induced by motoneuron 3 is restricted to
the dorsal side of the skin (Fig. 2B), whereas the
contraction of motoneuron L affects both the ventral and dorsal part of
the skin (Fig. 2A). Also, the motoneurons CV and 109 have similar elementary deformations (Fig. 5H,I), but
the contraction of motoneuron 109 is primarily evident in the dorsal
part (Fig. 2I), whereas that of the CV motoneuron is
in the ventral part (Fig. 2H).
Table 1 summarizes these properties for
nearly well characterized excitatory motoneurons of the leech segmental
ganglion. In addition to the nine motoneurons previously described, the classification of other longitudinal (cells 4 and 106), circular (cells
12 and 112), and oblique (cell 111) motoneurons is provided on the base
of: (1) the area of skin involved in the contraction, (2) the location
of its singular point, and (3) its major elementary deformations. The
number of preparations used to validate the classification presented in
Table 1 ranges from 3 to 10, depending on the analyzed motoneuron.
Time evolution of the contractions induced by
single motoneurons
Figure 6 shows the time evolution of
the elementary deformations for the contractions induced by motoneurons
107 (A), 110 (B), and 12 (C), chosen as representative of the three possible classes of motoneuron contractions. The instantaneous values of the
elementary deformations for cells 107 and 110 were obtained by
computing and linearizing a sequence of 19 optical flows every five
frames of the original image sequence (100 images). In the same way,
nine optical flows were computed and linearized from the sequence of 50 images describing the contraction induced by cell 12. The bar in the
top of each panel gives the duration of the spike discharge induced in
each motoneuron. Note that the ordinate values are velocities; these
plots show how the rates of change of each elementary deformation
proceed throughout the contraction that each motoneuron induces.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Dynamics of the deformations induced by three
different classes of motoneurons. The time course of the elementary
deformations for the contractions induced by motoneurons 107 (A), 110 (B), and 12 (C) were obtained from the sequence of
instantaneous optical flows. The motoneurons were stimulated to fire at
a frequency between 20 and 40 Hz for 6 (cell 107 and 110) or 1 (cell
12) sec. The bar at the top of each panel shows
stimulation duration. The units in which the time varying deformations
are expressed in seconds 1 because the data were
calculated from every fifth image and the images were acquired at 5 Hz.
Each panel shows the time evolution of expansion E
( ), rotation ( ), longitudinal shear
S1 ( ), and oblique shear
S2 ( ).
|
|
Motoneuron 107 is an excitor of the ventral longitudinal muscles. Its
main elementary deformation was a negative longitudinal shear
S1 (Fig. 5D). The
contraction phase lasted from second 2 to second 6; the relaxation
phase started at second 9, 2 sec after the cessation of the stimulus.
From second 7 to second 8 the skin reached a stationary phase with not
appreciable movements. Figure 6A shows that the
relative amplitude of the four elementary deformations did not
appreciably change during the whole deformation.
S1 was consistently the main component
of the deformation, simply reversing its sign in the transition from
the contraction to the relaxation phase. Figure 6A
also shows that, for cell 107, the contraction phase was much shorter
and faster (high and narrow negative peak of
S1) than the relaxation phase (smaller
and broader positive peak of S1).
The time course of the deformation of motoneuron 110 was similar; the
deformation consisted of a short and rapid contraction, a stationary
phase, and a long slow relaxation. The main elementary deformations
(S2,
S1, and E), had an almost
identical time course.
Cell 12 (an excitor of the ventrolateral circular muscles)
showed a similar time course of its main elementary deformations: S1 and E. The main
difference from the previous contractions was that the relaxation phase
was shorter and faster: the peaks of S1 and E in the relaxation
phase were as large as their peaks in the contraction phase. As a
general rule, contractions induced by the excitors of circular muscles
always relaxed faster than the contractions induced by longitudinal and
oblique motoneurons (data not shown).
The elementary deformations of the other longitudinal and circular
motoneurons had similar time courses. For each motoneuron the relative
amplitudes of the four elementary deformations did not appreciably
change during the whole deformation. That is, although the amplitude of
the vectors changed with time, according to the intensity of the
contraction, the direction of the vectors was substantially constant,
simply reversing sign from contraction to relaxation.
Combination of vector fields induced by single motoneurons
The characterization of skin deformations described in the
previous sections was obtained when each motoneuron was stimulated individually. We next investigated how skin deformations induced by
individual motoneurons add when two or more motoneurons are simultaneously activated.
Let us first consider the case when two longitudinal motoneurons, such
as the L motoneuron and the dorsal longitudinal motoneuron 5, were
coactivated. Figure 7, A and
B, shows the optical flows induced by stimulation of
motoneurons L and 5 individually. C shows the optical flow
induced by identical simultaneous stimulation of the two motoneurons.
D compares the vector field shown in C (black) to the vector field obtained by linear superposition
of the vector fields shown in A and B
(red). The black and red vector fields are very similar,
indicating a simple linear summation of the skin deformations induced
by the individual motoneurons. E shows the values of the
elementary deformations for the contractions induced by the individual
stimulation of cells L (gray histogram) and 5 (white histogram). F shows: (1) in gray, the
elementary deformations for the contraction obtained by the
simultaneous stimulation of the two motoneurons and (2) in red, the sum
of the elementary deformations obtained for the individual stimulation of the two neurons (each red bar in F is the sum
of the corresponding gray and white bars in
E). E and F show that all three vector fields drawn in A-C are characterized by a large negative
value of S1 and negligible values of
E, S2, and
,
showing that the contraction resulting from the simultaneous activation
of two longitudinal motoneurons is still an almost pure negative
longitudinal shear. Moreover the gray and red bars in F are
almost identical, indicating that also the elementary deformations add
linearly.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Superposition of the deformations evoked by
motoneurons innervating the same class of muscle fibers.
A, Optical flow after longitudinal motoneuron L
stimulation with a current pulse lasting 5 sec and evoking a spike
discharge of ~14 Hz. B, Optical flow after
longitudinal motoneuron 5 stimulation with a current pulse lasting 5 sec and evoking a spike discharge of ~34 Hz. C,
Optical flow after identical simultaneous stimulations of both
longitudinal motoneurons. D, Sum of the optical flows
shown in A and B (red)
compared with the optical flow shown in C
(black). E, Elementary deformations of
the optical flows shown in A and B (L,
gray bars; 5, white bars).
F, Sum of the elementary deformations of motoneurons L
and 5 (red bars) compared with the elementary
deformations of the optical flow shown in C
(gray bars). The width of the annuli in
A-D is ~0.8 mm. Equal normalization in
E and F.
|
|
Let us now consider the case when two motoneurons innervating different
muscle fibers are simultaneously stimulated. Figure 8, A and B, shows
the optical flows induced by individual stimulation of circular
motoneuron 112 and of longitudinal motoneuron 5. C shows the
optical flow obtained by identical simultaneous stimulation of the two
motoneurons. D compares the vector field shown in
C (black) to the linear superposition of the
vector fields shown in A and B (red).
The black and red vector fields in D are very similar,
indicating that simultaneous activation of cells 5 and 112 induces a
skin deformation that is an almost perfect linear summation of the
deformations the individual motoneurons induced.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
Superposition of the deformations evoked by
motoneurons innervating different muscle fiber classes.
A, Optical flow after circular motoneuron 112 stimulation with a current pulse lasting 5 sec and evoking a spike
discharge of ~28 Hz. B, Optical flow after
longitudinal motoneuron 5 stimulation with a current pulse lasting 5 sec and evoking a spike discharge of ~42 Hz. C,
Optical flow after identical simultaneous stimulation of both
motoneurons. D, Sum of the optical flows shown in
A and B (red) compared
with the optical flow shown in C (black).
E, Elementary deformations computed for the optical
flows shown in A and B (112, gray
bars; 5, white bars). F, Sum of
the elementary deformations of motoneurons 112 and 5 (red
bars) compared with the elementary deformations of the optical
flow shown in C (gray bars). The
width of the annuli in A-D is ~1 mm. Equal
normalization in E and F.
|
|
The analysis of the elementary deformations shows that the combination
of a longitudinal and of a circular motoneuron leads to a vector field
characterized by a large negative value of E as the main
deformation component. In the following, we will refer to this kind of
skin deformation (characterized by large E and smaller
values of S1,
S2, and
) as a
compression. Figure 8E reports the values
of the elementary deformations induced by individual stimulation of
cells 112 (gray histogram) and 5 (white
histogram). As expected, the contraction induced by the
longitudinal motoneuron is almost entirely characterized by a large
negative value of S1, whereas that
induced by the circular motoneuron by a large positive value of
S1 and a large negative value of
E. Figure 8D shows the elementary
deformations induced by simultaneous stimulation of the two motoneurons
(gray bars) and the sum of the elementary deformations induced by individual stimulation of the two neurons (red bars). The gray and red bars in F are almost
identical, indicating that the elementary deformations add linearly.
Because of this linear summation, when a longitudinal and a circular
motoneuron are simultaneously activated the resulting vector field has
a small value of S1 but a
significant negative value of E, corresponding to a local
compression. This suggests that a compression requires the simultaneous
activation of at least one longitudinal and one circular motoneuron.
This deduction was supported by simultaneous recordings from different
pairs of longitudinal and circular (or flattener) motoneurons, such as:
motoneurons 3 and 112 (data not shown); motoneurons 108 and 12 (data
not shown); motoneurons L and 109 (data not shown). These experiments
clearly showed that when a longitudinal and a circular (or flattener)
motoneuron were coactivated, the resulting skin deformation was a
compression. Similarly, simultaneous recordings from different pairs of
longitudinal motoneurons confirmed the result shown in Figure 7: when
two longitudinal motoneurons were simultaneously stimulated, the
resulting skin deformation was an almost pure negative longitudinal
shear. When motoneurons innervating oblique muscles, such as
motoneurons 110 or 111, and a longitudinal or circular motoneuron were
simultaneously activated by depolarizing current, vector fields induced
on the leech skin similarly added linearly.
In summary, these experiments strongly support the hypothesis that skin
deformations induced by different motoneurons, during a light or
moderate mechanical stimulation, sum linearly as a general rule. In
turn this property of linear superposition enables complex deformations
to be decomposed into the muscle types sustaining them. For example,
when a skin deformation caused by a mechanical stimulation is indeed a
local compression, characterized by a large value of E
without a simultaneous large S1 or/and
S2, it can be inferred that
longitudinal and circular fibers are coactivated.
Note that real skin deformations sum linearly, but in general this is
not the true for their linear approximations. The linear sum of linear
approximations only holds for pairs of motoneurons innervating skin
areas that are at least partially overlapping. This is the case for
cells 112 and 5, both innervating dorsal muscles, and cells 5 and L,
whose deformations overlap in a wide dorsal area of the skin (Figs.
7F, 8F). On the contrary, when two
motoneurons innervating nonoverlapping skin regions are coactivated, their elementary deformations do not add linearly (data not shown). Nevertheless, the skin deformation resulting from their coactivation is
still generally linear around the singular point. Its elementary deformations are strictly related to those of individual motoneurons, so that it is still easy to infer which classes of motoneurons sustain
the contraction.
Comparison of skin deformations caused by mechanical stimulation
and electrical excitation of mechanosensory neurons
As a further example of the ability of optical flow analysis in
neurobiology, we analyzed the optical flows induced by mechanical stimulation of the leech skin to identify which muscle fibers are
primarily activated and which mechanosensory neurons mediate that
activation. In these experiments an intracellular electrode was
inserted into an identified mechanosensory neuron to: (1) measure the
number of spikes the mechanical stimulation induced in that neuron and
(2) characterize the vector fields induced by a controlled number of
spikes elicited in the mechanosensory neuron.
Ventral and dorsal P cells
Figure 9 shows data obtained from a
preparation in which both the ventral (A and B)
and dorsal (C and D) P cells were impaled. Mechanical stimulation of the skin in the ventral side, exerting a
force of ~20 mN for 300 msec (touch location is indicated by the
circle in A), induced 12 ventral P cell spikes
(bottom trace in A), and the vector field of skin
deformations shown in the top part of A. Induction of
similar P cell firing by current injection (bottom trace in
B), induced a very similar vector field and singular point
location (top part, B; singular points are
indicated by the "X" in A and B). Both vector
fields have the characteristic shape of a ventral compression with the
arrows pointing toward the center of the deformation. This qualitative
observation was confirmed by computing their elementary deformations
(Fig. 10A,B); both
vector fields have similar large negative E values. On the base of the
considerations reported in the previous section (Fig. 8C),
we concluded that both deformations were sustained by simultaneous activation of longitudinal and circular muscles.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Skin deformations caused by mechanical stimulation
and P cell intracellular stimulation. A, Optical flow
induced by mechanical stimulation (20 mN for 300 msec;
circle) in the ventral side of the segment. The
X is the location of the singular point. The
bottom traces show stimulus duration and the ventral P
cell response. B, Optical flow induced by ventral P cell
intracellular stimulation; note marked similarity. C,
Optical flow and dorsal P cell response induced by mechanical
stimulation (20 mN for 200 msec) in the dorsal side of the segment.
Symbols as in A. D, Optical flow induced by dorsal P
cell intracellular stimulation; note marked similarity. The width of
the annuli is ~0.9 mm.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10.
The elementary deformations induced by mechanical
stimulation and intracellular P cell stimulation. A-D
show the elementary deformations of the optical flows in the
corresponding panels of Figure 9. The elementary deformations were
computed by linearizing the optical flows shown in Figure 9 in the
regions indicated by the solid boxes. Equal
normalization in all panels.
|
|
Mechanical stimulation in the dorsal side of the skin
(circle) induced the vector field and dorsal P cell firing
shown in Figure 9C. Induction of similar P cell firing
induced a very similar vector field and singular point location (Fig.
9D, singular points marked by X). Both
contractions are characterized by a similar high negative value of the
expansion E (Fig. 10C,D). The higher values of
E and S1 in Figure
10C in comparison to those in Figure 10D
indicate that the compression induced by the mechanical stimulation was
slightly stronger than that induced by dorsal P cell intracellular stimulation, in accordance with the higher number of spikes elicited by
the mechanical stimulus.
Monitoring T cells
Figure 11 shows the results
obtained when a dorsal T cell was impaled. Mechanical stimulation of
the dorsal skin (circle, A) induced an ON discharge of ~4
spikes in the T cell followed by an OFF response of >10 spikes
(bottom trace in A). The induced vector field on
the leech skin was again a compression, characterized by a high
negative value of the expansion E, as is shown in C, which
plots the elementary deformations for the optical flow in A.
When the same T cell was forced to fire similarly by successive depolarizing current pulses, the induced vector field was qualitatively different and of much smaller amplitude (Fig. 9B) (note that
the magnification-gain is fivefold greater in this panel than in
A). The large difference in optical flow induced by
mechanical stimulation and T cell stimulation is also apparent in the
elementary deformation plots (Fig. 11C,D).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11.
T cell contribution to motor response.
A, Optical flow induced by mechanical stimulation (20 mN
for 400 msec) in the dorsal side of the segment. Symbols as in Figure
9. The bottom traces show the duration of the stimulus
and the spikes that it evoked in the dorsal T cell. B,
Optical flow induced by intracellular dorsal T stimulation cell with
successive depolarizing current pulses (bottom trace).
C, Elementary deformations computed for the vector field
shown in A. D, Elementary deformations computed for the
vector field shown in B. The boxes in
A and B are linearization regions for the
corresponding optical flows. The width of the annuli in
A and B is ~0.6 mm. Equal normalization
in C and D.
|
|
Relative contribution of P and T cells
The data presented so far clearly show that motor responses
initiated by a localized mechanical stimulation are primarily mediated
by P cells. This result is in agreement with previous studies (Kristan,
1982
; Lockery and Kristan, 1990a
; Wittenberg and Kristan, 1992a
) and
extends their findings to the global shape of the field of
deformations. One of these studies (Kristan, 1982
), however, reported
data showing: (1) response to skin stimulation approximately fourfold
greater than response to individual stimulation of P cell and (2) large
contribution of T cells in mediating the reflex when coactivated
simultaneously to P cells. We addressed these two points in a series of experiments.
Skin deformation induced by intracellular stimulation of ventral or
dorsal P cell was compared with deformation induced by mechanical
stimulation of the skin in several different preparations. In 15 of 17 preparations the shape of the optical flow and the relative weight of
the elementary deformations were almost identical for contractions
induced by P cell and mechanical stimulation. Alternatively, each T
cell stimulation (seven of seven) evoked a vector field of deformation
with a structure significantly different from that obtained by
mechanical stimulation.
An exact comparison between the intensities of deformations induced by
mechanical stimulation of the skin or electrical stimulation of a P
cell requires evoking the same number of spikes in the P cell in both
stimulations. In these cases (five experiments) the contraction induced
by mechanical stimulation was only slightly stronger than that evoked
by P cell stimulation (usually 1.1-1.5-fold larger) (compare Fig.
10A,B).
The role of T cells was further investigated by experiments in which a
T and a P cell were first alternatively and then simultaneously stimulated. Collected data exhibited some variability: four of seven
experiments clearly showed that the individual stimulation of T cells
was only slightly effective (Fig. 11), but the coactivation of T and P
cells was able to induce a contraction 1.5- to 2-fold greater than the
contraction induced by individual stimulation of P cells. In three of
seven experiments the skin deformations elicited by electrical
stimulation of the P cell or of the same P cell and another T cell were identical.
Experiments in which P and T cells were alternatively hyperpolarized
during mechanical stimulation were also performed. Hyperpolarization of
the P cell was able to reduce the strength of the contraction, without
changing its shape, in proportion to the reduction in the number of
evoked spikes. Hyperpolarization of T cells had a much lower effect on
the contraction strength.
Monitoring N cells
Figure 12 shows data obtained when
the medial N cell was impaled. Mechanical stimulation (circle,
A) induced in the medial N cell just 1 or 2 spikes or no spikes at
all (bottom trace, A). Measurable skin
deformation could only be evoked firing at least six spikes in the
medial N cell (nine spikes were elicited in the experiment shown in
B). Despite this increase in the N cell activity, the
deformation vector field induced by N cell firing was much smaller
(note magnification change in B) and qualitatively different
from that induced by the mechanical stimulation (A). C and D, which report the elementary deformations
for the optical flows drawn in A and B, support
the qualitative data shown in Figure 12, A and B;
mechanical stimulation induced a large negative E and a
slightly smaller positive S1, but N
cell stimulation evoked equally small negative E and
S1. Similar results were obtained by
impaling the lateral N cell.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 12.
N cell contribution to motor response.
A, Optical flow induced by mechanical stimulation (20 mN
for 200 msec) in the dorsal side of the segment. Symbols as in Figure
9. B, Optical flow induced by intracellular medial N
cell stimulation. C, Elementary deformations computed
for the vector field shown in A. D, Elementary
deformations computed for the vector field shown in B.
The boxes in A and B are
the linearization regions for the corresponding optical flows. The
width of the annuli in A and B is ~0.8
mm. Equal normalization in C and D.
|
|
Mechanical stimulation in more intact preparations and in
intact leech
The experimental results presented so far were obtained in
isolated leech segments. Some of these results, such as the major contribution of the P cells to the motor responses induced by mechanical stimulation, confirm and extend the classical descriptions of the local reflexes in the leech (Kristan, 1982
; Lockery and Kristan,
1990a
; Wittenberg and Kristan, 1992a
). In particular, coactivation of
longitudinal and circular muscles after mechanical stimulation (Figs.
9A,B, 11A, 12A) has not
previously been reported and suggests a more complex pattern of
activation for motoneurons and interneurons involved in such reflexes
(Lockery and Kristan, 1990a
,b
; Wittenberg and Kristan, 1992a
,b
). To
verify these data, these mechanical stimulations were repeated in more
intact preparations.
The second kind of preparation described in Materials and Methods (an
intact hemisection of body wall in which the ganglion and the roots
were not exposed and cleaned) was used to verify coactivation of
longitudinal and circular muscles by moderate mechanical stimulation of
leech skin. Vector fields similar to those shown in Figures
9A,B, 11A, and
12A, i.e., compressions with high negative values of
the expansion E as main elementary deformation, were
consistently observed in the great majority of intact body-wall preparations. The location of the singular point followed approximately the location of the mechanical stimulus. In a few preparations, almost
pure transverse (high-positive S1 and
high-negative E) or longitudinal (high-negative
S1) contractions were observed, indicating some degree of variability in motoneuron activation in
different preparations. A possible explanation to this variability is
suggested by three preparations that were kept under observation for
several hours, in which variability in the response to the same
mechanical stimulation, repeated at intervals of 30 min, was observed.
In these preparations, the transverse component of the deformation,
sustained by the circular muscles, decreased with time so that only the
longitudinal component was visible at the end of the experimental
session (after 3 or 4 hr). This is likely attributable to a faster
deterioration of circular muscle fibers in comparison to the
longitudinal muscle fibers.
Analysis of the vector fields induced by mechanical stimulation was
also repeated in intact leeches in which two or three segments were
secured to the Sylgard dish with four pins (the third preparation
described in Materials and Methods). In intact leeches, the mechanical
stimulations used in the experiments shown in Figures 9, 11, and 12
induced optical flows similar to those obtained in isolated segments.
However, whereas results in isolated segments were reproducible (except
for the slow run-down of circular muscle response), in intact leeches
the effect of mechanical stimulations was more variable. Often the same
mechanical stimulation evoked a clear local compression in some trials
but a longitudinal or a transverse deformation in others. This
variability in the intact leech may arise from the greater complexity
of the whole animal and the presence of feedback from other segments
and input from the head and tail brains.
Time evolution of the contraction caused by
mechanical stimulation
As shown in the previous section, mechanical stimulation can evoke
a complex pattern of skin deformations in which different classes of
motoneurons and muscles are involved. The dynamics of this complex
deformation, i.e., the timing with which different sets of muscles are
recruited, can again be described by analyzing the sequence of
instantaneous optical flows
computed for each video frame.
Figure 13 shows the dynamics of a
deformation induced by touching the skin in the lateral side (the
location of the touch is indicated by the circle in
A). Every fifth frame of the original image sequence (50 images) acquired at 5 Hz was selected, and a sequence of nine
instantaneous optical flows was obtained. A-C show the
instantaneous vector fields at three different times during the skin
contraction. D shows the time course of the elementary deformations during the first 9 sec of the deformation. The thick horizontal bars on the top of D indicate the time intervals
in which longitudinal and circular muscles are supposed to contract (gray) or relax (white). The thin black
bar indicates the duration of the mechanical stimulus (20 mN for 200 msec).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 13.
Dynamics of a complex contraction induced by a
mechanical stimulation. A-C show the instantaneous
vector fields at three different times during skin contraction. The
location of the mechanical stimulus is indicated in A by
the circle. The Xs represent the
positions of singular points. The time interval during which each flow
occurred is shown in the top of each panel.
D shows the time course of the elementary deformations:
expansion E ( ), rotation ( ),
longitudinal shear S1 ( ), and oblique
shear S2 ( ), during the first 9 sec of
the deformation. The thick horizontal bars on the
top of D indicate the time intervals in
which longitudinal and circular muscles are presumed to contract
(gray) or relax (white). The
thin bar indicates the duration of the mechanical
stimulus (20 mN for 200 msec). The boxes in A-C are the
linearization regions for the corresponding optical flows. The width of
the annuli in A-C is ~0.7 mm.
|
|
Direct observation of the shape of the vector fields reveals at least
three different phases of the deformation. The initial phase shown in
A is a dorsal local compression. The successive phase
(B) is a ventral longitudinal shear. The third phase
(C), computed several seconds later when the
deformation is in the relaxation phase, looks like a longitudinal
shear, but the parallel direction of the arrows suggests the presence
also of a strong expansion component. These qualitative observations
are confirmed by the time course of the elementary deformations
(D). In the initial phase of the contraction, from
second 0 to second 2, the main component of the deformation was the
negative expansion E. We concluded that in this phase the
longitudinal and circular muscles were coactivated to produce the
dorsal compression drawn in A. Immediately after (from
seconds 2-4), the expansion coefficient vanished, and the contraction
was sustained by only negative longitudinal shear
S1 (B). Presumably
in this phase circular muscles had ceased contracting and the
deformation was driven only by the longitudinal muscles. At second 5 the circular muscles started to relax. The expansion coefficient
E became positive and increased until it reached the same
magnitude as S1, but with opposite
sign (compare with the transverse relaxation in C). The
longitudinal relaxation began later, after the termination of the
acquired image sequence.
Figure 13 shows that the dynamics of a deformation induced by a
mechanical stimulation can be complex. The dynamics exhibited some
variability from preparation to preparation, but in the same preparation were usually reproducible over 30-40 min. Sometimes longitudinal and circular muscles seemed to contract and relax in
clearly distinct phases, as for the experiment described in Figure 13,
but other times the longitudinal and circular muscles seemed to
contract and relax simultaneously.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have shown here that, by using a recently developed technique
based on the computation of optical flow (Zoccolan et al., 2001
), a
more accurate classification of the contraction different muscles
induce, and a better characterization of sensory-motor responses, in
leech skin can be obtained. Using this technique it is possible to
infer which muscles are activated by mechanical stimuli and to identify
which mechanosensory neurons primarily mediate these local reflexes.
Motoneuron classification and optical flow
Table 1 and Figures 4 and 5 show that by analyzing the optical
flow of contracting pieces of skin, it is possible to more completely
characterize leech excitatory motoneuron actions. This is possible
because optical flow provides a two-dimensional characterization of
muscle contraction that cannot be adequately measured by conventional force transducers, which measure only scalar quantities. Quantitative properties of the optical flow (i.e., the location of the singular point and its elementary deformations) produced by the excitation of a
given motoneuron were highly reproducible in different leech segments
and in different leeches. This quantitative two-dimensional description
represe