Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2002, 22(7):2550-2560
Glutamate But Not Glycine Agonist Affinity for NMDA Receptors Is
Influenced by Small Cations
Rinat
Nahum-Levy*,
Eyal
Tam*,
Sara
Shavit, and
Morris
Benveniste
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of
Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel
 |
ABSTRACT |
NMDA receptor currents desensitize in an agonist-dependent manner
when either the glutamate or glycine agonist is subsaturating. This may
result from a conformational change in the NMDA receptor protein that
lowers glutamate and glycine binding site affinity induced by
co-agonist binding, channel opening, or ion permeation. We have used
whole-cell voltage clamp of cultured hippocampal neurons with agonist
paired-pulse protocols to demonstrate that glutamate and glycine
dissociate 7.9- and 6.8-fold slower in the absence of their respective
co-agonists than when their co-agonists are present. Paired-pulse and
desensitization protocols were used to show that co-agonist binding and
channel opening are sufficient to cause a reduction in glycine
affinity, but extracellular sodium or magnesium binding was required in
addition to conformational changes leading to channel opening to reduce
glutamate binding-site affinity. Use of cesium or potassium as the
major extracellular cation prevented the reduction of glutamate
affinity. In addition, the use of choline-, sodium-, or cesium-based
intracellular solutions did not alter desensitization characteristics,
indicating that the site responsible for reduction of glutamate
affinity is not in the intracellular domain. The fact that the
reduction of glutamate affinity is dependent on certain small
extracellular cations whereas the reduction of glycine affinity is
insensitive to such cations indicates that conformational changes
induced by the binding of glutamate are not completely paralleled by
the conformational changes induced by glycine. Although glutamate and
glycine are essential co-agonists, these data suggest that they have
differential roles in the process of NMDA receptor activation.
Key words:
glutamate; glycine; NMDA receptor; ion permeation; desensitization; channel gating; channel activation
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Activation of NMDA receptors can
cause both membrane depolarization and calcium influx into the
postsynaptic neuron. Such a response can initiate changes in cellular
physiology that may include induction of intracellular cascades, gene
activation, and possible changes in synaptic strength (for review, see
Ozawa et al., 1998
; Dingledine et al., 1999
). Among ligand-gated ion channels, NMDA receptors have a unique requirement for the binding of
two different types of agonist, glutamate and glycine, for channel
activation (Kleckner and Dingledine, 1988
). Glutamate and glycine
agonist binding sites have separate locations in the multimeric protein
complex. Dose-response analysis of mutant NMDA channels suggests that
the glycine binding site is located within the NR1 subunit (Hirai et
al., 1996
), and the glutamate binding site is located within the NR2
subunit (Laube et al., 1997
; Anson et al., 1998
).
In whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments, sustained glutamate and
glycine agonist applications of constant concentration can result in a
decay or "desensitization" of the receptor response. One type of
NMDA receptor desensitization can be observed at saturating glutamate
and glycine agonist concentrations and may be sensitive (Legendre et
al., 1993
; Medina et al., 1995
; Krupp et al., 1996
, 1999
) or
insensitive (Sather et al., 1990
; Tong and Jahr, 1994
) to the
extracellular calcium concentration. A second type of NMDA receptor
desensitization can be observed when NMDA receptors are activated by a
nearly saturating pulse of glutamate agonist, NMDA, in the continual
presence of a subsaturating background concentration of the co-agonist,
glycine (Benveniste et al., 1990a
; Lerma et al., 1990
; Vyklicky et al.,
1990
). A third type of desensitization is also observed when channels
are activated by a saturating pulse of glycine agonist,
L-alanine, in the continual presence of a subsaturating
background concentration of the co-agonist, glutamate (Nahum-Levy et
al., 2001
). For these latter two types of desensitization, the extent
of desensitization is reduced as the concentration of the continually
present "background" agonist increases. The extent of
desensitization does not change once concentrations of the background
agonist saturate. These results suggest that agonist binding affinities
may be weakened as NMDA receptor channels are activated (Benveniste et
al., 1990a
; Vyklicky et al., 1990
; Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
).
High activity of glutamate and glycine transporters near the
synaptic cleft of many excitatory synapses may reduce glutamate and
glycine concentrations to subsaturating levels (Bergles et al., 1999
;
Gadea and Lopez-Colome, 2001
), suggesting that affinity changes at the
glutamate and glycine binding sites may play a role in NMDA receptor
synaptic and extra-synaptic signaling. A weakening of agonist affinity
implies that both high- and low-affinity binding states exist for both
glutamate and glycine agonists and that the transitional trigger for
the reduction in agonist affinity could depend on co-agonist binding,
conformational changes that cause channel opening and ion binding, and
permeation through the open NMDA channel. In this paper, we show that
high-affinity binding states exist for glutamate and glycine when
channels are not in an activated state and further that small cations
influence glutamate but not glycine affinity.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Dissociated neuronal cultures. Sprague Dawley
postnatal day 1 rat pups were decapitated, and 14 hippocampal
hemispheres were removed. The tissue was digested with papain (100 U;
Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 20 min, triturated to a single-cell
suspension, and plated at a density of 150,000 cells per milliliter on
a substrate of bovine collagen type IV and 100 µg/ml
poly-L-lysine in 35 mm dishes. The culture medium
consisted of Modified Eagle's Medium containing 5% horse serum
(Biological Industries, Beit HaEmek, Israel), B-27 neuronal supplement
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine. D-Glucose was supplemented to a final
concentration of 6 gm/l. Cytosine-1-
-D-arabinofuranoside (5 µM) was added after ~5 d to arrest glial cell
division. All cultures were maintained at 36°C in humidified air
containing 5% CO2.
Electrophysiology and agonist application. Whole-cell
voltage-clamp experiments were conducted using an Axopatch 200A
amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) at room temperature
between 1 and 2 weeks after neurons were plated. The holding potential was
60 mV unless indicated otherwise. Data were acquired with a
Macintosh PPC 7600 computer equipped with an ITC-16 analog-to-digital converter (Instrutech Corp., Port Washington, NY) using a free Macintosh-based electrophysiological software package (Synapse, Synergistic Systems, Bromma, Sweden).
The standard extracellular control solution consisted of 160 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 0.2 mM
CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 400 nM tetrodotoxin, 5 µM bicuculline methochloride, and 10 µg/ml phenol red
and was adjusted to pH 7.3 and 325 mOsm. In some cases, 160 mM choline chloride, CsCl, or KCl was substituted for NaCl. Unless indicated otherwise, the standard intracellular solution consisted of 125 mM CsMeSO3, 15 mM CsCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
Cs4BAPTA, and 2 mM
Na2ATP and was adjusted to pH 7.2 and 305 mOsm.
In some cases, 140 mM NaCl replaced
CsMeSO3 and CsCl, and BAPTA-free acid was used
instead of its cesium salt and titrated with NaOH. In other cases, 140 mM choline chloride replaced CsMeSO3 and CsCl, and BAPTA-free acid was used instead of its cesium salt and
titrated with Trizma base; and Tris-ATP was used instead of its sodium salt.
Experimental solutions were perfused continuously over the whole neuron
from a flow pipe consisting of an array of eight glass barrels (
400
µm outer diameter) that was positioned ~100 µm away from the
neuronal soma as described previously (Nahum-Levy et al., 1999
). The
time constant for exchange between perfused solutions was measured as
described previously (Vyklicky et al., 1990
; Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
)
and is ~10 msec.
Four different agonists were used in this study. In general for
desensitization experiments, the background agonist present before NMDA
receptor-channel activation had a relatively high affinity such that
desensitization kinetics could be observed at subsaturating
concentrations [for more details, see Nahum-Levy et al. (2001)
].
Low-affinity agonists were used as the pulsing agonist because they can
be applied at high concentration quickly, and NMDA receptor responses
diminished rapidly on their removal. Glutamate, which has a
steady-state EC50 of 1.7 µM and is
saturating at 10 µM (Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
), was the
high-affinity glutamate agonist; NMDA, which has a steady-state
EC50 of 36 µM and is saturating at
300 µM (Benveniste et al., 1990b
), was the low-affinity
glutamate agonist; glycine, which has a steady-state
EC50 of 0.4 µM and is saturating at
10 µM (Vyklicky et al., 1990
), was the high-affinity glycine agonist; and L-alanine, which has a steady-state
EC50 of 35 µM and is saturating
above 300 µM (Benveniste et al., 1990b
), was the
low-affinity glycine agonist. For agonist paired-pulse experiments,
both the pulsing agonist and the agonist whose dissociation kinetics
was being measured were applied at saturating concentrations to insure
a high signal-to-noise ratio.
Two different treatments were used to reduce the level of NMDA receptor
activation resulting from the application of glutamate agonists and low
concentrations of endogenous glycine agonists present in our
hippocampal cultures. For experiments in which 1 mM
L-alanine was the pulsing agonist, solutions lacking
L-alanine contained 10 mM
5-methyl-indole-2-carboxylic acid (5MeI2CA), a low-affinity glycine
site competitive antagonist (Huettner, 1989
). 5MeI2CA dissociates
within the time for solution exchange around the neuron (Nahum-Levy et
al., 2001
). For some paired-pulse experiments in which glycine
dissociation was evaluated, 0.5 µM 5,7-dichloro-kynurenic acid (5,7-diClKyn), a high-affinity glycine site competitive antagonist (McNamara et al., 1990
), was included in all solutions to lower responses caused by endogenous glycine. In addition, during exogenous glycine application, the glycine concentration was raised to 100 µM to ensure saturation of glycine binding sites with
glycine in the presence of 5,7-diClKyn.
 |
RESULTS |
Glutamate and glycine bind with high affinity in the absence
of co-agonist
Previously, it has been estimated from analysis of desensitization
experiments that a three- to eightfold difference exists between low-
and high-affinity agonist binding states (Vyklicky et al., 1990
;
Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
). The desensitization observed could result
from (1) entrance of the NMDA receptor channel into a long-lived
nonconducting state once agonist binds or (2) reduction of the binding
affinity of the subsaturating background agonist once channels become
activated such that desensitization reflects the re-equilibration of
that agonist with a lower affinity state (Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
).
This second source of desensitization predicts that a high-affinity
agonist binding state exists if only one type of agonist is bound and
the channel is not activated.
Testing for changes in apparent agonist affinity in the absence of the
respective co-agonist cannot be measured at equilibrium, because
electrophysiological experiments cannot directly measure channel states
other than those that allow ion conduction, and no NMDA
receptor-mediated ion conduction can occur in the absence of either the
glutamate or the glycine co-agonist (Kleckner and Dingledine, 1988
).
Yet, if solution switching is rapid in comparison to agonist
dissociation kinetics, then paired-pulse experiments can be used to
probe dissociation of one agonist in the absence of its co-agonist by
pulsing with that co-agonist at various delay intervals after the
agonist is removed.
To determine whether a high-affinity glutamate binding state exists in
the absence of a glycine co-agonist, a paired-pulse protocol was used
as shown in Figure 1A.
A control response was elicited by application of 10 µM glutamate and 1 mM
L-alanine. L-alanine was
then removed, and after a 2.5 sec re-equilibration period, glutamate
was removed. After a delay period of ~25 msec, a test pulse of
L-alanine (in the absence of exogenously applied glutamate) revealed the population of channels still bound with glutamate. The experiment was then repeated at various delay periods (Fig. 1A). Analysis of the peak amplitudes resulting
from the L-alanine test pulses yielded a single
exponential decay time constant of 1.3 ± 0.1 sec
(n = 7 cells), which reflects the apparent dissociation
of glutamate in the absence of a glycine co-agonist (Fig.
1B, Table 1). Current
decay during the L-alanine test pulse should
reflect the apparent glutamate dissociation rate when both types of
agonist are bound (Fig. 1C). The exponential current decay
time constant measured during the L-alanine test
pulse of the first paired-pulse record was significantly faster than
the time constant measured from the peak test pulse amplitudes in Figure 1B (Table 1). The average current decay time
constant measured for the test L-alanine pulse of
the first paired-pulse record was
= 171.3 ± 38.1 msec
(n = 13 cells). For comparison, apparent glutamate
dissociation time constants were also measured by pulsing 10 µM glutamate in the continual presence of 1 mM L-alanine. Decays of the
glutamate-elicited current could only be measured with the sum of two
exponentials (Table 1). The weighted average of these exponentials,
w = 221.5 ± 14.0 msec, approximates the
measured from the test L-alanine pulse. The
slower apparent dissociation of glutamate analyzed from the
paired-pulse protocol suggests that glutamate is bound with higher
affinity in the absence of the glycine co-agonist than when
L-alanine is present.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Glutamate dissociates slowly in the absence of a
glycine co-agonist. A, Overlay of 18 paired-pulse
records from a single hippocampal neuron. Inward currents were elicited
when 10 µM glutamate (striped bar) was
applied simultaneously with a 600 msec control pulse of 1 mM L-alanine (open bars). A
re-equilibration period of 2.5 sec followed the L-alanine
control pulse after which the exogenous glutamate was removed. To
reduce activation of NMDA receptors by glutamate and endogenous
glycine, 10 mM 5MeI2CA was included in all solutions
lacking L-alanine. An L-alanine test pulse then
followed at various delay times after the removal of the glutamate. The
current observed reflects receptors bound with L-alanine
that still have glutamate bound. The value represents exponential
analysis of the peak current amplitudes elicited by the test pulses
with respect to time after glutamate removal for this cell.
B, Plot of peak amplitudes of the L-alanine
test pulse normalized to the amplitude measured near the end of the
L-alanine control pulse plotted against the delay time
between exogenous glutamate removal and the peak of the test pulse for
each record. Peak measurements are indicative of the rate of glutamate
dissociation in the absence of L-alanine. Each
symbol type represents the data from a different cell.
from the fit (line) of the data with a single
exponential is noted on the graph. C, Enlargement of the
current elicited during the L-alanine test pulse
(open bar) from the first paired-pulse record shown in
A (arrow), where the delay time between
exogenous glutamate removal and the second L-alanine
application was ~25 msec. The value represents the single
exponential decay time constant for this trace. Average fitted
parameters are listed in Table 1.
|
|
To determine whether a high-affinity glycine binding state exists in
the absence of a glutamate co-agonist, the converse experiment was
conducted (Fig. 2A).
NMDA (300 µM), a low-affinity glutamate binding
site agonist, was applied for 600 msec in the presence of 10 µM glycine. Exogenous glycine was removed after
a re-equilibration period of 2.5 sec, and an NMDA test pulse was
applied at various times after the removal of glycine. Analysis of the
peak responses versus time after exogenous glycine removal yielded an
exponential time constant of 0.9 ± 0.2 sec (n = 11 cells; data not shown). The peaks of the test pulses decayed to an
offset of 46.1 ± 3.3%, indicating that peak responses to NMDA in
the presence of endogenous glycine were significant. To lower the
response resulting from the presence of endogenous glycine, 0.5 µM 5,7-diClKyn was added to all solutions.
Paired-pulse experiments conducted in the presence of 5,7-diClKyn (Fig.
2A) lowered the offset to 20.2 ± 3.3% and slowed the time constant measured from the plot of test pulse peak
amplitudes (Fig. 2B) to 1.5 ± 0.2 sec
(n = 7 cells,). The average decay time constant of
current during the test pulse of NMDA in the paired-pulse protocol
should reflect apparent dissociation of glycine in the presence of NMDA
(Fig. 2C). This value was 219.7 ± 60.2 msec
(n = 8 cells) and approximates earlier measurements of
glycine apparent dissociation kinetics (Benveniste et al., 1990b
;
Priestley and Kemp, 1993
, 1994
). The current decay time constant during
the NMDA test pulse of the first paired-pulse record (Fig.
2C) is 6.8-fold faster than the exponential time constant
measured from the plot of the peak amplitudes of the test pulses (Fig.
2B). These results may indicate that glycine dissociates more rapidly in the presence of NMDA than when the glutamate co-agonist is absent and may suggest that glycine binds with
higher affinity to its binding site in the absence of a glutamate co-agonist when compared with when NMDA is present.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Glycine dissociates slowly in the absence of a
glutamate co-agonist. A, Overlay of 12 paired-pulse
records from a single hippocampal neuron. Inward currents were elicited
when 100 µM glycine (open bar) was applied
simultaneously with a 600 msec control pulse of 300 µM
NMDA (striped bar). 5,7DiClKyn (0.5 µM)
was present continuously throughout the experiment to limit activation
by NMDA with endogenous glycine. A re-equilibration period of 2.5 sec
followed the NMDA control pulse, after which the exogenous glycine was
removed. An NMDA test pulse then followed at various delay times after
the removal of the glutamate. The current observed reflects receptors
bound with NMDA that still have glycine bound. The value represents
exponential analysis of the peak current amplitudes elicited by the
test pulses with respect to time after glycine removal for this cell.
B, Plot of peak amplitudes of the NMDA test pulse
normalized to the amplitude measured near the end of the NMDA control
pulse plotted against the delay time between exogenous glycine removal
and the peak of the test pulse for each record. Peak measurements are
indicative of the rate of glycine dissociation in the absence of NMDA.
Each symbol type represents the data from a different
cell. Line indicates a fit to a single exponential + offset with a measured time constant, , indicated on the
graph. C, Enlargement of current elicited
during the NMDA test pulse (striped bar) from the first
paired-pulse record shown in A (arrow),
where the delay time between exogenous glycine removal and the NMDA
test pulse was ~25 msec. The measured single exponential time
constant for this trace ( ) is noted on the
graph.
|
|
Permeant ions may reduce the affinity for glutamate but not
for glycine
Figures 1 and 2 suggest that agonist binding is in an apparent
high-affinity state in the absence of co-agonist when the channel is in
a nonactivated state, and agonist binding is in an apparent low-affinity state when the co-agonist is bound and the channel is
activated. We measure receptor activation by current flow through open
channels. This depends on (1) glutamate and glycine agonist binding,
(2) conformational changes in the protein allowing channel opening once
the agonists are bound, and (3) ion permeation through the open
channel. Each of these three events could trigger a change in agonist
binding from a high- to a low-affinity state.
To examine whether ion permeation through open NMDA channels leads to a
transition in glutamate apparent affinity from a high- to low-affinity
state, paired-pulse experiments were conducted in which neurons were
bathed with 10 µM glutamate and 1 mM
L-alanine in the presence of nonpermeating 160 mM choline chloride. The control pulse was initiated by
switching the choline chloride to NaCl for 600 msec after which choline
again replaced sodium as the main extracellular cation. After a 2.5 sec
re-equilibration time in the presence of glutamate,
L-alanine, and choline chloride, exogenous glutamate was
removed while L-alanine remained. Test pulses of NaCl were
elicited at various delay times after the removal of glutamate (Fig.
3A). A plot of the peak
amplitudes of the second sodium pulse as a function of the delay time
between glutamate removal and the peak of the second sodium pulse may serve as a measure of glutamate apparent dissociation from the NMDA
receptor in the absence of permeant ions but in the presence of
co-agonist L-alanine (Fig. 3B). This
plot could not be well fit with a single exponential (Fig.
3B). Thus, these data were fit with a sum of two
exponentials, and the parameters are presented in Table 1. The weighted
average for apparent glutamate dissociation in the absence of permeant
ions (
w = 382.5 msec) is considerably faster
than the time constant measured for glutamate apparent dissociation in
the absence of L-alanine (Fig.
1B, Table 1). Yet, this weighted average is also
1.7-fold slower than the weighted average measured for glutamate
apparent dissociation in the presence of co-agonist,
L-alanine (Table 1) and 2.4-fold slower than the single exponential time constant measured for the current decay from
the test pulse of the first record of this paired-pulse experiment (159.9 ± 49.6 msec; n = 8 cells). The slower
apparent dissociation of glutamate in the presence of
L-alanine and extracellular choline in comparison
to when L-alanine is present with extracellular sodium suggests that glutamate may bind with a higher apparent affinity
when permeant ions are absent in comparison to when they are
present.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Glutamate but not glycine dissociation is slowed
in the absence of ion permeation through NMDA channels.
A, Overlay of 12 paired-pulse records from a single
hippocampal neuron. Inward currents were elicited when a sodium-based
extracellular solution (black bars) replaced a
choline-based extracellular solution (gray bars)
in the presence of 10 µM glutamate (striped
bar). L-alanine (1 mM) (open
bar) was present continuously throughout the experiment. The
initial sodium-based control pulse was 600 msec followed by a
re-equilibration period of 2.5 sec in choline-based extracellular
solution after which the exogenous glutamate was removed. A test pulse
of sodium-based extracellular solution then followed at various delay
times after the removal of the glutamate. The current observed reflects
receptors bound with L-alanine that still have glutamate
bound. B, Plot of peak current amplitudes elicited from the
sodium-based extracellular solution test pulse normalized to the
amplitude measured near the end of the sodium-based extracellular
solution control pulse plotted against the delay time between exogenous
glutamate removal and the peak of the test pulse for each record. Peak
measurements are indicative of the rate of glutamate dissociation in
the presence of L-alanine but in the absence of
permeant ions. Each symbol type represents the data from a
different cell. The continuous line indicates a fit to a sum
of two exponentials with the weighted average time constant
( w) noted on the graph. The fit
obtained from Figure 1B is shown for comparison
(dotted line). The fitted parameters are listed in Table 1.
C, Summary of results from the converse experiment testing
the rate of glycine dissociation in the absence of permeant ions. NMDA
(300 µM) was present continuously. In the
presence of 10 µM glycine, a sodium-based
extracellular solution replaced a choline-based extracellular solution
for 600 msec, creating a control pulse of inward current. After return
to the choline-based extracellular solution, the system was allowed to
re-equilibrate for 2.5 sec, after which exogenous glycine was removed.
This was followed by a test pulse of sodium-based extracellular
solution at various delay times after glycine removal. Note that
5,7DiClKyn was not used in this experiment. The figure represents the
plot of peak amplitudes of the sodium-based extracellular solution test
pulse normalized to the amplitude measured near the end of the
sodium-based extracellular solution control pulse plotted against the
delay time between exogenous glycine removal and the peak of the test
pulse for each record. Peak measurements are indicative of the rate of
glycine dissociation in the presence of NMDA but in the absence of
permeant ions. Each symbol type represents the data from a
different cell. The continuous line indicates a fit to one
exponential + offset with the time constant, , listed on the
graph. The fit obtained from Figure 2B is
shown for comparison (dotted line).
|
|
Our extracellular solutions routinely contained 0.2 mM
calcium. We have conducted paired-pulse experiments like those depicted in Figure 3A in which calcium was omitted from the
extracellular solution and 10 mM EGTA was added.
Under these conditions, the decay of peak amplitudes elicited by the
test sodium pulse with respect to the time after glutamate removal
yielded a single exponential time constant of 561.2 ± 156.2 msec
(n = 5 cells). This is consistent with our results
obtained under routine conditions (Fig. 3, Table 1), suggesting that
0.2 mM calcium does not cause the transition of
the glutamate site to a low-affinity state.
The influence of extracellular choline on glycine apparent dissociation
was also examined in an analogous paired-pulse experiment. Neurons were
bathed with 300 µM NMDA and 10 µM glycine
in the presence of choline chloride. Control currents were elicited by replacing the choline chloride with NaCl for 600 msec. Exogenous glycine was removed 2.5 sec after the end of the 160 mM
NaCl control pulse. Test pulses of sodium were then elicited at various
delay times after the removal of exogenous glycine. A plot of the peaks of the second sodium pulse as a function of the delay time between glycine removal and the peak of the normalized second sodium pulse serves as a measurement of glycine apparent dissociation from the NMDA
receptor in the absence of permeant ions (Fig. 3C). A single
exponential decay time constant of 346.1 ± 49.0 msec was measured
from six cells. Analysis of the current decay from the test pulse from
the first paired-pulse record yielded a
= 381.7 ± 126.1 msec (n = 7 cells), indicating that there is no
difference between glycine apparent dissociation when NMDA is present
in choline or sodium-based extracellular solutions.
Changes in extracellular sodium concentration can cause changes in
electrogenic transporter and exchanger activity that could influence
peak current amplitudes in our paired-pulse assay. Potential effects
resulting from electrogenic activity could be removed by conducting
experiments in the presence and absence of glutamate binding site
competitive antagonist, 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5). By
subtracting the traces acquired in the presence of 200 µM
AP5 from those acquired in the absence of AP5, NMDA receptor-mediated
currents could be isolated from other electrogenic activity. However,
acquisition of agonist dissociation data with paired-pulse protocols in
the presence and absence of AP5 required a large number of traces in
the same cell. This was technically very difficult. Therefore, we
designed a desensitization protocol in which desensitization is
modulated by subsaturating concentrations of either glutamate or
glycine (Fig. 4). This type of
desensitization results from agonist re-equilibration that takes place
after a decrease in agonist apparent affinity on channel activation
(Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
).

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Ion permeation can cause glutamate- but not
glycine-sensitive desensitization. A, Assay for
glutamate-sensitive desensitization in a hippocampal neuron. The
left trace shows current activated by a pulse of 1 mM L-alanine (open bars) with a
background concentration of 0.1 µM glutamate
(striped bars) in a 160 mM sodium-based
extracellular solution (black bars). The inward current
that was elicited peaks and desensitizes 69.0%. The right
trace shows current activated by switching a 160 mM
choline-based extracellular solution (gray bars)
for a 160 mM sodium-based solution (black
bar) in the continual presence of 1 mM
L-alanine and 0.1 µM glutamate in the same
cell. The peak amplitude of this current is 382% of the peak amplitude
of the left trace. The current in the right
panel desensitizes 92.4% and reaches a steady-state level
similar to that of the left trace. Note that all
solutions not containing L-alanine contained 10 mM 5MeI2CA to limit activation of NMDA receptors by
glutamate with endogenous glycine. B, Assay for
glycine-sensitive desensitization in a hippocampal neuron. The
left trace shows current activated by a pulse of 1 mM NMDA (striped bars) with a background
concentration of 0.1 µM glycine (open
bars) in a 160 mM sodium-based extracellular
solution (black bars). The inward current that was
elicited peaks and desensitizes 66.1%. The right trace
shows current activated by switching a 160 mM choline-based
extracellular solution (gray bars) for a 160 mM sodium-based solution in the continual presence of 1 mM NMDA and 0.1 µM glycine in the same cell.
Although the steady-state levels are similar in both the
left and right traces, no peak is
observed by current elicited by permeant ions (right
panel). To isolate NMDA receptor-mediated currents from
other electrogenic activity, the protocols depicted in A
and B were acquired in the presence of AP5 and
subtracted from those acquired in the absence of AP5. C,
Summary of the degree of glutamate-sensitive desensitization for three
different intracellular solutions in which cesium (black
bars), sodium (striped bars), or choline
(gray bars) is the major cation. The left
three bars summarize results from currents elicited by a 1 mM L-alanine test pulse (L-Ala)
in the continual presence of 0.1 µM glutamate in a
sodium-based extracellular solution (A, left
panel). The right three bars summarize
results from currents elicited by the switch from a choline-based
extracellular to a sodium-based extracellular solution
(Na) in the continual presence of 0.1 µM
glutamate and 1 mM L-alanine (A,
right panel). D, Summary of the
degree of glycine-sensitive desensitization for three different
intracellular solutions in which cesium (black bars),
sodium (striped bars), or choline (gray
bars) is the major cation. The left three bars
summarize results from currents elicited by a 1 mM NMDA
test pulse (NMDA), in the continual presence of 0.1 µM glycine in a sodium-based extracellular solution
(B, left panel). The right
three bars summarize results from currents elicited by the
switch from a choline-based extracellular to a sodium-based
extracellular solution (Na), in the continual presence
of 0.1 µM glycine and 1 mM NMDA
(B, right panel).
E, Summary of the degree of desensitization elicited by
changes of various extracellu- lar solutions containing 0.1 µM glutamate
and 1 mM L-alanine using a cesium-based
intracellular solution. Currents were elicited by a switch from either
a choline-based (black bars) or sucrose-based
(striped bars) extracellular solution to solutions in
which the major extracellular permeant cation was sodium
(Na), potassium (K), or cesium
(Cs). Note that only the switch to a sodium-based
extracellular solution exhibits high degrees of desensitization.
|
|
When incubating neurons with a subsaturating background concentration
of glutamate (0.1 µM) and pulsing with 1 mM
L-alanine in an extracellular solution containing sodium as
the predominating cation, a peak current is observed (Fig.
4A, left panel) that desensitizes
76.1 ± 14.3% (n = 13 cells). This
desensitization is similar to that observed previously for
subsaturating concentrations of glutamate and is diminished with
increasing background concentrations of glutamate (Nahum-Levy et al.,
2001
). To determine whether the decrease in agonist apparent affinity
results from the presence of permeant ions, a similar desensitization
protocol was constructed in which the same neuron was simultaneously
incubated with 1 mM L-alanine and 0.1 µM
glutamate in a choline-based extracellular solution. When sodium
rapidly replaced choline as the predominating cation, a peak current
was observed (Fig. 4A, right panel)
that was 363.9 ± 220.7% (n = 10 cells) of the
peak current elicited by a 1 mM
L-alanine pulse in the continual presence of 0.1 µM glutamate in extracellular sodium (Fig.
4A, left panel). The current elicited with the sodium pulse desensitized 80.6 ± 16.9%
(n = 13 cells) to a steady-state level (Fig.
4A, right panel), which was similar
to the steady-state current elicited by the
L-alanine pulse on the same cell (Fig.
4A, left panel). The observation of
a peak elicited by the pulse of sodium ions suggests that immediately before this pulse, the glutamate site was in a high-affinity state. Therefore, these results confirm the results from the paired-pulse protocols in Figure 3, A and B, and suggest that
the glutamate site switches from a high- to a low-affinity site when
extracellular sodium is present.
A similar strategy was used to test whether ion permeation could cause
a decrease in glycine binding site apparent affinity resulting in
glycine-sensitive desensitization. Figure 4B
(left panel) shows that when 1 mM NMDA is pulsed in the presence of a background
concentration of subsaturating glycine (0.1 µM)
in a sodium-based extracellular solution, a peak current is observed that desensitizes 65.7 ± 3.9% (n = 12 cells) in
accordance with previous observations (Benveniste et al., 1990a
;
Vyklicky et al., 1990
; Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
). The sensitivity of
glycine apparent affinity to permeant ions was tested by continually
incubating the same neuron with 1 mM NMDA and 0.1 µM glycine and eliciting current by switching
from a choline-based extracellular solution to a sodium-based
extracellular solution. In contrast to the results obtained for the
glutamate binding site, no initial peak current was observed (Fig.
4B, right panel). Instead, the
response to the sodium pulse was relatively square with a steady-state
current that was similar to the steady-state current observed in the
desensitizing trace elicited by the NMDA pulse (Fig.
4B). These results complement results obtained from
glycine apparent dissociation experiments in Figure 3C,
where no significant differences were observed between the time
constants of glycine apparent dissociation in the presence of
extracellular sodium or choline. Together these results suggest that
the transition from the high to low apparent affinity state for glycine
binding occurs regardless of the predominant extracellular cation.
Reduction in glutamate affinity by permeant ions is
sodium specific
We can use the desensitization protocol with different
intracellular and extracellular solutions to determine whether the transition from high to low apparent affinity glutamate or glycine binding states is specific to a particular monovalent cation. In
addition, such experiments might indicate whether the cation modulation
site is located in the intracellular or extracellular domains.
Experiments similar to those done with a cesium-based intracellular
solution (Fig. 4A,B), were
conducted with sodium-based and choline-based intracellular solutions.
Peak responses elicited by the switch from a choline-based to a
sodium-based extracellular solution in the presence of a background
concentration of 0.1 µM glutamate (Fig.
4A, right panel) were 248.0 ± 88.0 and 229.3 ± 71.6% of the peak elicited by an
L-alanine pulse (Fig. 4A,
left panel) for experiments done with sodium-based or
choline-based intracellular solutions, respectively. These responses
desensitized to similar degrees regardless of the intracellular
solution used (Fig. 4C). The extent of desensitization
observed when a background concentration of 0.1 µM glycine was used was also not dependent on
whether a sodium-based or choline-based intracellular solution was used
(Fig. 4D).
We also checked the specificity of extracellular cations in their
ability to reduce glutamate apparent affinity. Using a desensitization protocol, extracellular solutions were switched from a choline-based extracellular solution to a sodium-, potassium-, or cesium-based extracellular solution in the continual presence of 0.1 µM glutamate and 1 mM L-alanine.
High degrees of desensitization (>75%) were observed only when the
main extracellular cation was sodium (Fig. 4E),
suggesting that reduction of the glutamate apparent affinity may be
sodium specific.
Extracellular sucrose was also substituted for the choline cation to
reduce ion permeation in some experiments. Degrees of desensitization
for solution switches from sucrose to sodium or potassium were similar
to their choline counterparts (Fig. 4E), indicating
that reversion of the glutamate site to a high apparent affinity state
does not result from an interaction of choline with open NMDA channels.
Extracellular cesium and potassium do not cause large degrees of
desensitization when switching from a choline-based extracellular solution in the continual presence of 0.1 µM glutamate
and 1 mM L-alanine (Figs. 4E,
5A, right panel), suggesting that the
glutamate binding site remains in an apparent high-affinity state when
extracellular cesium and potassium are the main extracellular cations.
This enabled us to determine whether re-equilibration with the high apparent affinity state of the glutamate binding site could be observed. Neurons were incubated with 0.1 µM
glutamate and 1 mM L-alanine in a sodium-based extracellular
solution. This should cause the glutamate binding site of NMDA
receptors to revert to their low apparent affinity state. Indeed, only
a minimal amount of inward current is initially observed in Figure
5A (left
panel), because 0.1 µM glutamate is
well below the steady-state EC50 for glutamate
(Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
). After switching to a cesium-based extracellular solution, inward current increased slowly. The
exponential rate constant for the increase in current was 222.6 ± 115.6 msec (n = 15 cells) when 0.1 µM glutamate was used but decreased to 68.1 ± 22.2 msec when 0.3 µM glutamate
was used (n = 7 cells). Figure 5B shows that
the current relaxation rate increases with increasing glutamate
concentration. Similarly, the switch from a sodium-based extracellular
solution to a potassium-based extracellular solution in the presence of
0.1 µM glutamate and 1 mM
L-alanine caused an increase in current with a
time constant of 202.2 ± 85.0 msec (n = 5 cells).
These results would be expected if the increase in current reflected
the re-equilibration of glutamate with its high apparent affinity
receptor binding state.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Extracellular sodium reduces glutamate affinity.
A, A neuron was incubated in either a sodium-based
(left panel) or choline-based (right
panel) extracellular solution (gray
bars) in the continual presence of 1 mM
L-alanine. A minimal amount of inward current was elicited
after addition of 0.1 µM glutamate (striped
bar). After 1 sec, the extracellular solution was replaced with
a cesium-based solution (black bar) containing the same
agonist concentrations for 3 sec. Inward current increased rapidly for
the choline-to-cesium solution transition and did not desensitize
appreciably (right panel). In contrast, the
sodium-to-cesium solution transition caused a slow increase in inward
current until the same steady state was reached (left
panel). After changing the cesium-based solution back to
sodium (left panel), a rapid increase in inward
current was observed that then desensitized. Shown are records in which
the leak current has been subtracted by repeating each protocol in the
presence of 200 µM AP5. B, Plot of current
relaxation rates with increasing concentrations of glutamate in the
presence of extracellular cesium (black bars) or
potassium (striped bar) measured from experiments like
those in A (left panel). Changes
in current result from glutamate re-equilibration with a high-affinity
receptor state after the switch from a sodium-based extracellular
solution to either a cesium-based or potassium-based extracellular
solution. C, I-V relationship for NMDA
receptor-mediated currents elicited by 10 µM glutamate
and 1 mM L-alanine in the presence of a
sodium-based (Na), potassium-based
(K), or cesium-based (Cs)
extracellular solution. Currents depicted have been leak subtracted by
eliciting voltage ramps in the presence of AP5 and in the absence of
glutamate. D, Relative conductance of NMDA receptors in
different extracellular solutions from whole-cell recordings. In each
cell, I-V relationships were measured
for either sodium-based and cesium-based extracellular solutions or
potassium-based and cesium-based extracellular solutions. The reversal
potential was determined for each condition, in each cell, and the
conductance at 30 and +30 mV was calculated and averaged to provide
an average conductance value
(GCation) for each extracellular
cation tested. Relative conductances were determined by dividing
GCation by the average conductance value
determined for cesium (GCs) for each
cell. Results indicate that the relative conductances for cesium and
potassium are similar, but the relative conductance measured in a
sodium-based extracellular solution is more than threefold
larger.
|
|
After returning to a sodium-based extracellular solution from either a
potassium-based or cesium-based extracellular solution, currents
subsequently desensitized with a time course reminiscent of that
observed for choline-based to sodium-based extracellular solution
changes (Fig. 4A, right panel). This
desensitization further indicates that the glutamate binding site
reverted to a high apparent affinity state in the presence of
extracellular potassium or cesium.
It should also be noted that the switch from a cesium-based or
potassium-based extracellular solution to one in which the major cation
is sodium induces a rapid rise in inward current (Fig. 5A).
Steady-state NMDA receptor-mediated currents in the presence of either
extracellular potassium or cesium were 45.7 ± 10.5%
(n = 5 cells) or 42.7 ± 14.7% (n = 8 cells) of their peak currents in the presence of the sodium-based
extracellular solution (Fig. 5A, left
panel). This change in current amplitude may reflect differences between the permeabilities of the different extracellular monovalent cations or may indicate that channel gating changes when
sodium is present. Current-voltage (I-V)
relationships were measured for NMDA receptor channels activated with
10 µM glutamate and 1 mM
L-alanine in which the intracellular solution was
cesium-based and the extracellular solution was sodium-, potassium-, or
cesium-based. Comparison of the relative amplitudes of NMDA currents in
the presence of different extracellular solutions revealed that
currents measured when using a sodium-based extracellular solution were more than threefold larger than when potassium or cesium extracellular solutions were used (Fig. 5C). Outward rectification
observed at hyperpolarized potentials probably results from
contamination of solutions with micromolar amounts of magnesium.
Reversal potentials for NMDA currents elicited in extracellular
sodium-based and cesium-based solutions were 0.7 ± 3.0 mV (n = 9 cells) and 1.5 ± 3.7 mV (n = 13 cells), respectively, indicating a similarity in the extracellular
cation relative permeabilities. The potassium-based extracellular
solution yielded NMDA receptor-mediated currents with a slightly higher
reversal potential of 9.1 ± 3.2 mV (n = 9 cells).
We normalized for any differences in driving force by making
conductance calculations at ±30 mV. These potentials were chosen
because they are in the linear part of the I-V
curve. Conductances measured for NMDA receptor mediated currents at
±30 mV in either sodium-based or potassium-based extracellular
solutions were then averaged and normalized to similar measurements
made during perfusion with the cesium-based extracellular solution on
the same cell. Figure 5D indicates that cesium and potassium had similar overall conductances despite the differences observed in
their reversal potentials (Fig. 5C). In contrast, the
relative conductance of the population of NMDA channels was 3.5-fold
higher in a sodium-based extracellular solution in comparison with the cesium-based control. The differences in relative conductance despite
the similarity in reversal potentials for sodium-based and cesium-based
extracellular solutions suggests that the permeability of sodium and
cesium through NMDA channels is similar but that changes in channel
gating occur.
Magnesium binding also causes a reduction in
glutamate affinity
The data presented thus far are consistent with the possibility
that the cation binding site responsible for the reduction of glutamate
binding site apparent affinity may also be one of the sites that is
involved in ion permeation. Magnesium is known to block ion permeation
by binding within the channel pore. Because the key residue required
for magnesium binding within the pore also significantly affects
permeation properties (Burnashev et al., 1992
; Kawajiri and Dingledine,
1993
), magnesium binding within the pore may also trigger a reduction
in glutamate apparent affinity. To test this, paired-pulse experiments
were conducted in which 10 µM glutamate, 1 mM
L-alanine, and 2 mM magnesium were applied to a
cell held at
100 mV in the presence of a choline-based extracellular solution. Outward currents were evoked on relief of magnesium block by
stepping the holding potential to +60 mV (Fig.
6A). Subsequent test
voltage pulses were elicited at various delay times after the removal
of exogenous glutamate. Outward peak amplitudes from the test voltage
steps elicited after the removal of exogenous glutamate coincided with
the decrease in current from the test pulse of the first paired-pulse
record (Fig. 6A, arrow). Because the decay
of the test pulse of the first paired-pulse record may be indicative of
dissociation of glutamate from its binding site in a low-affinity
state, overlap of this decay with the peak amplitudes from the first
five records of the paired-pulse protocol suggests that glutamate
apparent dissociation during the paired-pulse protocol is from
glutamate binding sites in a low-affinity state. This is confirmed by
exponential analysis of the peak amplitudes of the test pulses as a
function of time since exogenous glutamate removal (Fig.
6B), which has a time constant comparable to that of
glutamate apparent dissociation in the presence of
L-alanine (Table 1). Because extracellular
choline does not cause glutamate affinity to enter a low-affinity state
(Figs. 3A, 4A), the 2 mM magnesium that is bound at hyperpolarized
potentials is probably responsible for transition of the glutamate
binding site into a low-affinity state.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Magnesium binding reduces glutamate affinity.
A, Overlay of seven paired-pulse records from a single
hippocampal neuron. The cell was incubated with 10 µM
glutamate (striped bar), 1 mM
L-alanine (open bar), and 2 mM
magnesium (gray bar) in a choline-based
extracellular solution at a holding potential of 100 mV. Outward
currents were elicited by relieving magnesium block with a control
voltage pulse to a holding potential to +60 mV for 1 sec. This was
followed by a re-equilibration period of 2.5 sec at a holding potential
of 100 mV, after which the exogenous glutamate was removed. A 1 sec
voltage test pulse to +60 mV then followed at various delay times. The
current observed reflects receptors bound with L-alanine
that still have glutamate bound. The arrow indicates the
test pulse of the first record. B, Peak current
amplitudes elicited by the voltage test pulse to +60 mV were normalized
to the steady-state current amplitude elicited by the voltage control
pulse from the same trace and plotted against the delay time between
exogenous glutamate removal and the peak of the test pulse for each
record. Peak measurements are indicative of the rate of glutamate
dissociation in the presence of L-alanine and magnesium but
in the absence of permeant ions. Each symbol type
represents the data from a different cell. Line
indicates a fit to a sum of two exponentials with the weighted average
time constant ( w) noted on the
graph. The fitted parameters are listed in Table 1.
C, A desensitizing current (black trace)
was elicited after switching from a choline-based (gray
bars) to a sodium-based (black bar)
extracellular solution during a continuous incubation with 0.3 µM glutamate and 10 µM glycine. When 2 mM magnesium was added to the choline-based control
solution, the peak current was only 46.6% of the peak current observed
in the absence of magnesium. In addition, currents desensitized 47.3 and 75.4% in the presence and absence of magnesium in the control
solution. The arrow indicates the point of a 23 msec
rise time delay from 10% of the amplitude of the peak current in the
absence of magnesium.
|
|
To confirm that magnesium binding can cause the glutamate binding
site to revert to a low-affinity state, a desensitization protocol was
designed in which a subsaturating concentration of glutamate (0.3 µM) and 10 µM glycine were applied to a
neuron in a choline-based extracellular solution in the presence or
absence of 2 mM magnesium at a holding potential of
60 mV
(Fig. 6C). While keeping agonist concentrations constant,
the choline-based extracellular solution was switched to a sodium-based
extracellular solution that was devoid of exogenous magnesium. The
sodium-induced currents elicited after incubation in the choline-based
extracellular solution lacking magnesium peaked and desensitized
71.4 ± 6.1% (n = 5 cells). In contrast, the
sodium-induced currents elicited after the incubation in the choline
solution containing magnesium produced a peak which was only 41.9 ± 6.5% of the peak produced when magnesium was absent from the
control. These currents subsequently desensitized 43.9 ± 6.5%
(n = 5 cells) to the same steady state (Fig.
6C). The 10-80% rise times of the peak currents were
22.6 ± 6.4 and 11.5 ± 1.5 msec for currents in which the
control solution contained or lacked magnesium, respectively. Although
the current rise time is slower when magnesium is present in the
control solution, this cannot account for the difference in peak
amplitudes observed. The amplitude of the current without magnesium in
the control would be only slightly reduced if the 10-80% rise time
were slowed to 23 msec (Fig. 6C, arrow). This
indicates that something other than slow recovery from magnesium block
of NMDA channels accounts for the striking peak amplitude reduction
when magnesium is present in the control solution and suggests that
magnesium binding causes a reduction of glutamate apparent affinity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Glutamate and glycine binding affinities systematically change
during NMDA receptor activation
A plausible model for NMDA channel activation should contain at
least three different states for the binding of each agonist (Fig.
7). The existence of an apparent
high-affinity glutamate binding state in the absence of a glycine
co-agonist has been confirmed by paired-pulse experiments that showed
an apparent dissociation constant for glutamate that is 7.9-fold slower
in the absence of L-alanine than in its presence (Fig. 1).
Similar experiments also showed that the apparent dissociation time
constant for glycine in the absence of NMDA was 6.8-fold slower than
when NMDA was present and the channel was activated (Fig. 2). These results confirm earlier desensitization studies (Benveniste et al.,
1990a
; Vyklicky et al., 1990
; Nahum-Levy et al., 2001
), which suggested
that when glutamate or glycine alone is bound, the receptor binding
site for that agonist is in an apparent high-affinity state (Fig.
7).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Model of NMDA receptor activation. Glutamate and
glycine binding sites exist in a high-affinity state before any ligand
binding. High-affinity states are represented by binding sites with
cusps. After binding of glutamate, a conformation change occurs to
convert the glycine binding site to low affinity
(semicircle without cusp). Note that
arrows in this drawing may indicate more than one
mechanistic step and thus may appear to violate the law of microscopic
reversibility. Exposure of the small cation modulatory site requires
the binding of glycine but may also require the binding of glutamate.
Sodium or magnesium can then freely bind, causing the glutamate binding
site to revert to a low-affinity state (square without
cusp). The exact location of the small cation modulatory
site should also not be inferred from the drawing. With both glutamate
and glycine bound, the channel can now undergo a transition to an open
state. Once in the open state, both glutamate and glycine become
irreversibly bound.
|
|
The conditions required for the reduction of glutamate apparent
affinity are somewhat different from those that are required for the
reduction of glycine apparent affinity. The process of agonist binding
and possibly channel opening is sufficient to cause the transition of
glycine binding to an apparent low-affinity state (Figs. 3C,
4B), whereas the reduction in glutamate apparent affinity also requires the presence of extracellular magnesium or
sodium (Figs. 3A,B,
4A). When the NMDA channel enters the open state,
both glutamate and glycine agonists may enter a third binding state
(Fig. 7). Studies conducted with voltage-dependent open channel
blocker, 9-aminoacridine, suggest that glutamate and glycine are
"locked on" to their binding sites when NMDA channels are in the
open state (Benveniste and Mayer, 1995
). Binding domain closure is also
supported by structural studies of the glutamate binding core of AMPA
channels (Armstrong and Gouaux, 2000
).
Nature of the small cation modulatory site that reduces
glutamate affinity
Data presented in this paper suggest that a reduction in glutamate
apparent affinity requires the binding of the glycine co-agonist and
small extracellular cations. Glutamate appears to dissociate slowly
from its binding site in the absence of L-alanine (Fig. 1)
and in the absence of sodium (Figs.
3A,B). Desensitization assays
suggest that glutamate starts to re-equilibrate with its binding site
in a low-affinity state only on addition of
L-alanine, although extracellular sodium was
already present (Fig. 4A, left panel). Yet, re-equilibration of glutamate with its
low-affinity binding site occurs on addition of extracellular sodium
when L-alanine is already present (Fig.
4A, right panel). Together, these
results suggest that dissociation of glutamate from its binding site in a low-affinity state can occur only after a binding site for small cations becomes exposed. These experiments cannot differentiate whether exposure of the cation binding site requires the binding of
glycine alone or the binding of both glutamate and glycine agonists
(Fig. 7).
The degree of current desensitization measured in the presence of
subsaturating glutamate (Figs.
4A,C) did not depend on the major
monovalent cation used in the intracellular solution, suggesting that
the small cation modulatory site that reduces glutamate affinity is not
in the intracellular domain of the protein. However, desensitization under subsaturating glutamate conditions was dependent on the major
monovalent extracellular cation. The desensitization observed on
switching from a choline-based extracellular solution to a sodium-based
extracellular solution (Fig. 4A, right
panel) suggests that glutamate binding was in a
high-affinity state in the choline-based extracellular solution before
sodium exposure.
Although desensitization was observed after switching from choline to
sodium in the presence of 0.1 µM glutamate and 1 mM L-alanine, switching the extracellular
solution from choline to either cesium or potassium did not cause
desensitization (Fig. 5A, right panel).
Furthermore, the switch from sodium to either potassium or cesium
caused an increase in NMDA receptor responses, the kinetics of which
became more rapid as glutamate concentration was raised (Fig.
5A,B). This suggests that although
glutamate and glycine agonists are bound, the presence of extracellular sodium causes a weakening of glutamate affinity, whereas extracellular cesium or potassium allows glutamate binding to remain in a high apparent affinity state.
In these same experiments (Fig. 5A), peak currents elicited
in the presence of extracellular sodium were larger than the maximal currents elicited in the presence of cesium or potassium. Under saturating agonist conditions, the relative whole-cell conductance observed with a sodium-based extracellular solution was 3.5-fold higher
relative to that measured in a cesium-based extracellular solution
(Fig. 5C,D). This difference does not result from
differences in permeation properties for cesium or sodium as was shown
for NR1 N598Q-NR2A recombinant channels (Schneggenburger and Ascher, 1997
), because reversal potentials were comparable for all three extracellular cations. However, channel open probability has been shown
to increase after intracellular sodium is raised (Yu and Salter, 1998
).
Thus, the larger relative whole-cell conductance observed in the
presence of extracellular sodium (Fig. 5C,D)
could possibly result from an increase in open probability induced by elevated intracellular sodium. The Nernst equation (Nernst, 1888
) predicts that the reversal potential for sodium should be approximately +90 mV under the conditions of the experiment (intracellular sodium ~4 mM; extracellular sodium = 160 mM), which suggests that sodium influx may be
significant at all tested potentials. Alternatively, the larger
relative whole-cell conductance observed in the presence of
extracellular sodium (Fig. 5D) may result from changes in
channel gating induced by sodium binding to an extracellular site on
the NMDA receptor. In any case, there is a correlation between the relative conductances of specific cations permeating NMDA channels (Fig. 5D) and the ability of those cations to cause
glutamate-dependent desensitization (Fig. 5A), suggesting
that a sodium-induced change in channel gating may be related to a
sodium-induced reduction in glutamate affinity.
It is possible that sodium, cesium, and potassium may generally
influence glutamate apparent affinity at an extracellular location not
involved with glutamate-dependent desensitization. We tested for this
by measuring outward current decays at a holding potential of +60 mV in
response to a 10 µM glutamate pulse in the presence of 1 mM L-alanine. The experiment was done with
cesium-, potassium-, or sodium-based extracellular solutions with a
sodium-based intracellular solution. The single exponential current
decay time constants were similar (555.9 ± 138.8, 444.2 ± 72.4, and 523.8 ± 51.0 msec for cesium-, potassium-, and
sodium-based extracellular solutions, respectively; n = 3-6 cells for each condition). This indicates that when sodium was the
primary monovalent cation flowing outward through the channel, changes
in the primary extracellular monovalent ion did not cause an allosteric
effect that influenced apparent glutamate dissociation.
Finally, channels exposed to magnesium have a glutamate apparent
dissociation rate similar to that of apparent low-affinity dissociation
(Fig. 6A, Table 1). In addition, the degree of
glutamate-dependent desensitization observed on switching from a
choline-based to a sodium-based extracellular solution was reduced when
magnesium was present in the choline-based solution (Fig.
6C). This also suggests that glutamate equilibrates with
binding site in a low-affinity state in the presence of magnesium. High
concentrations of magnesium can potentiate NMDA receptor responses,
raise glycine apparent affinity, reduce single-channel current
amplitudes, and cause voltage-dependent block of the pore (Paoletti et
al., 1995
). Although magnesium interactions with the NMDA receptor are
complex, the possibility exists that extracellular magnesium weakens
glutamate affinity by a mechanism similar to that of extracellular
sodium. Both sodium and magnesium associate with the ion pore and inner and outer vestibules (Antonov et al., 1998
; Antonov and Johnson, 1999
;
Zhu and Auerbach, 2001a
,b
). In addition, extracellular sodium and
magnesium potentiate NMDA receptor responses in a voltage-independent manner (Fig. 5C) (Paoletti et al., 1995
). We are currently
investigating these possibilities.
The fact that sodium and magnesium may permit a reduction of glutamate
binding site apparent affinity, whereas potassium and cesium cannot,
may indicate that access to the small cation modulatory site might be
governed by atomic size. Magnesium and sodium have empirical atomic
radii of 1.5 and 1.8 Å, respectively, whereas potassium and cesium
have much larger radii of 2.2 and 2.6 Å, respectively.
Physiological implications
Recent evidence suggests that powerful glycine uptake in the
synaptic cleft reduces glycine concentrations such that <50% of NMDA
channels may be activated during miniature EPSCs at some synapses (Berger et al., 1998
). Glutamate concentrations after synaptic
vesicle release also may be subsaturating (Bergles et al., 1999
; Mainen
et al., 1999
). The apparent high affinity of agonist binding sites of
the NMDA receptor may serve to maximize NMDA responses under
subsaturating agonist conditions, yet repetitive glutamate release at
~50-100 Hz might cause the postsynaptic glutamate binding sites to
become saturated and thus insensitive to continued repetitive stimuli.
The six- to eightfold lowering of glutamate and glycine affinity during
the NMDA activation process may provide a mechanism by which these
channels can maintain high sensitivity to agonists before activation
but can dissociate more rapidly to facilitate clearing of agonists from
the synaptic cleft.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Sept. 19, 2001; revised Jan. 9, 2002; accepted Jan. 10, 2002.
*
R.N.-L. and E.T. contributed equally to this work.
This research was supported by Grant 96-00245 from the United
States-Israel Binational Science Foundation, Jerusalem, Israel, and
Grant 572/99-16.0 from the Israel Science Foundation. We thank Professor Bernard Attali and Dr. Kathryn Partin for comments on this work.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Morris Benveniste, Department
of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv
University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel. E-mail: morrisb{at}post.tau.ac.il.
 |
REFERENCES |
-
Anson LC,
Chen PE,
Wyllie DJA,
Colquhoun D,
Schoepfer R
(1998)
Identification of amino acid residues of the NR2A subunit that control glutamate potency in recombinant NR1/NR2A NMDA receptors.
J Neurosci
18:581-589[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Antonov SM,
Johnson JW
(1999)
Permeant ion regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel block by Mg(2+).
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:14571-14576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Antonov SM,
Gmiro VE,
Johnson JW
(1998)
Binding sites for permeant ions in the channel of NMDA receptors and their effects on channel block.
Nat Neurosci
1:451-461[ISI][Medline].
-
Armstrong N,
Gouaux E
(2000)
Mechanisms for activation and antagonism of an AMPA-sensitive glutamate receptor: crystal structures of the GluR2 ligand binding core.
Neuron
28:165-181[ISI][Medline].
-
Benveniste M,
Mayer ML
(1995)
Trapping of glutamate and glycine during open channel block of rat hippocampal neuron NMDA receptors by 9-aminoacridine.
J Physiol (Lond)
483:367-384[ISI][Medline].
-
Benveniste M,
Clements J,
Vyklicky Jr L,
Mayer ML
(1990a)
A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartic ac