The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2003, 23(11):4645-4656
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Distribution of Climbing and Mossy Fiber Collateral Branches from the Copula Pyramidis and the Paramedian Lobule: Congruence of Climbing Fiber Cortical Zones and the Pattern of Zebrin Banding within the Rat Cerebellum
Jan Voogd,2
Joanne Pardoe,1
Tom J. H. Ruigrok,2 and
Richard Apps1
1 Department of Physiology, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD Bristol, United
Kingdom, and
2 Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The
Netherlands
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Individual cerebellar cortical zones defined by the somatotopy of climbing
fiber responses and by their olivo-cortico-nuclear connections located in the
paramedian lobule and the copula pyramidis of the rat cerebellum were
microinjected with cholera toxin B subunit. Collateral branches of climbing
and mossy fibers were mapped and related to the pattern of zebrin-positive and
-negative bands of Purkinje cells. Climbing fiber collaterals from the copula
distribute to the anterior lobe: from the paramedian lobule mainly to lobulus
simplex and rostral crus I. Climbing fibers terminating in particular zones
(X, A2, C1, CX, C2, C3,
D1, and D2) in the paramedian lobule or the copula
collateralize to one or two corresponding zones in lobulus simplex, crus I and
II, the paraflocculus, and/or the anterior lobe. These zones can be defined by
their relationship to the pattern of zebrin banding. Collaterals from mossy
fibers, labeled from the same injection sites in the copula and paramedian
lobule, often distribute bilaterally in a symmetrical pattern of multiple but
ill-defined longitudinal strips in the anterior lobe and/or lobulus simplex.
One or more of these longitudinal aggregates of mossy fiber collaterals was
always found subjacent to the strip(s) of labeled climbing fiber collaterals
arising from the same locus in the paramedian lobule or the copula.
Corticonuclear projections focused on the target nucleus of each zone,
although a bilateral plexus of thinner axons, presumably of mossy fiber
collateral origin, was sometimes also present in several other regions of the
cerebellar nuclei. Overall, these results suggest that climbing fiber zones
and zebrin banding reflect a common organizational scheme within the
cerebellar cortex.
Key words: cerebellum; cholera toxin B unit; climbing fiber collaterals; mossy fiber collaterals; zebrin pattern; zonal organization
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The role played by different parts of the cerebellum in motor control is
thought to depend critically on differences in afferent and efferent
connectivity. In particular, the inferior olive climbing fiber projection to
the Purkinje cells of the cerebellar cortex is highly topographically
organized, so that small groups of olive cells target different rostrocaudally
oriented cortical zones. In turn, the Purkinje cells in each cortical zone are
thought to project to specific cerebellar nuclei to influence different
descending motor pathways (for review, see
Brodal and Kawamura, 1980
;
Voogd and Bigaré, 1980
;
Buisseret-Delmas and Angaut,
1993
; Voogd and Ruigrok,
1997
; Garwicz,
2000
). Evidence has also been obtained to suggest that the other
major afferent input to the cerebellum, the mossy fibers, which arise from a
variety of sources within the CNS, also terminate in the cerebellar cortex in
parasagittal strips, although the pattern is generally more diffuse than that
described for the climbing fiber afferent system
(Voogd, 1969
;
Tolbert et al., 1993
;
Ji and Hawkes, 1994
;
Wu et al., 1999
;
Serapide et al., 2001
).
However, perhaps the most striking evidence for a zonal compartmentation of
the cerebellar cortex comes from studies of the distribution of biochemical
markers. Most notable is the distribution of zebrin, which is confined to a
subset of Purkinje cells, resulting in highly reproducible parasagittal bands
of high and low immunoreactivity within the rodent cerebellar cortex
(Hawkes and Leclerc,
1987
).
To date, few attempts have been made to correlate the distribution of these
different patterns of parasagittal organization, and none have attempted to
correlate individual, functionally identified climbing fiber zones with the
pattern of zebrin banding within the same experimental animal. It therefore
remains unclear whether the rostrocaudal organization of climbing fiber (and
mossy fiber) inputs and of zebrin banding reflect a common organizational
scheme within the cerebellar cortex.
Within the cerebellar cortex, both climbing and mossy fiber afferents are
known to collateralize (Armstrong et al.,
1973a
,b
;
Oscarsson and Sj
lund,
1977a
,b
;
Ekerot and Larson, 1982
;
Wiklund et al., 1984
;
Heckroth and Eisenman, 1988
;
Sugihara et al., 1999
,
2001
;
Wu et al., 1999
), and cholera
toxin B subunit (CTb) has been found to be particularly effective at labeling
these collaterals (Chen and Aston-Jones,
1998
). In the present study, we therefore made small injections of
CTb into selected climbing fiber cortical zones within the paramedian lobule
(PMD) and copula pyramidis (COP) of the rat cerebellum and mapped the
distribution of CTb-labeled climbing and mossy fiber collaterals. In all
cases, we also used the parasagittal distribution of zebrin-positive (P+) and
zebrin-negative (P-) Purkinje cells as a topographical marker
(Hawkes and Leclerc,
1987
).
Our study allows conclusions on the spatial distribution of climbing fiber
and mossy fiber collaterals arising from different functionally defined zones
and on the more general question of the relationship of these zones to the
pattern of zebrin banding in the cerebellar cortex.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
A total of 18 injections of CTb were made in 13 adult male Wistar rats
(Table 1). For complete
documentation of the cases indicated with an asterisk in
Table 1, see our website:
http://www.erasmusmc.nl/voogd-cfcollaterals.
In seven animals, injections were made into an electrophysiologically
identified climbing fiber zone in the PMD or COP. These experiments were
performed at the Department of Physiology, University of Bristol in accordance
with the UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act of 1986 and were approved by the
institutional animal license advisory group. The injections in the remaining
animals were performed at the Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical
Center of Rotterdam, using anatomical landmarks as a guide. For these
experiments, permission was obtained from the local committee overseeing
animal experiments.
Injections of CTb. The general procedures and electrophysiological
techniques have been described in full in previous papers
(Atkins and Apps, 1997
;
Pardoe and Apps, 2002
). In
brief, after a surgical level of anesthesia was established (sodium
pentobarbitone, 60 mg/kg, i.p.), the rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame,
and a small craniotomy was made to expose the left side of the posterior lobe
of the cerebellum. The paramedian lobule and the copula pyramidis were
selected for study because a detailed electrophysiological map of climbing
fiber-evoked potentials is available for this region of the rat cerebellum
(Fig. 1). Pairs of percutaneous
needles were inserted into different body parts (ipsilateral and contralateral
forelimbs, contralateral face, and ipsilateral hindlimb), and bipolar
electrical stimulation of a particular body region was used (single or double
0.1 msec pulse, 1 kHz once every 1.5 sec) to evoke climbing fiber field
potentials on the cerebellar surface. The responses were recorded with a
tungsten-in-glass microelectrode (impedance of
50 k
) and relayed
through a Humbug device (5060 Hz noise eliminator; Quest Scientific,
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) before being bandpass filtered (30
Hz to 5 kHz).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Posterior view of the right side of the rat cerebellum showing the location
in the PMD and COP of climbing fiber zones identified by their peripheral
input, according to the key shown at the bottom (based on
Atkins and Apps, 1997 ).
A2, C1, C2, C3, Climbing fiber
zones A2, C1, C2, and C3; ipsi,
ipsilateral; contra, contralateral.
|
|
The surface of the cerebellum was then mapped from medial to lateral at 0.1
or 0.2 mm intervals, and each recording position was marked on a map of the
cerebellar cortex. In five animals, a single pressure injection of 125
nl of 1% CTb (List Biologic, Campbell, CA) in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (PB) was made with a glass micropipette (20 µm tip diameter) into
approximately the center of one of the cortical zones of climbing fiber-evoked
responses in PMD or COP at a depth of 0.30.5 mm below the cerebellar
cortical surface.
In two additional animals, electrophysiological techniques guided the
injection, but iontophoresis was used to deliver the tracer through the glass
micropipette (tip diameter, 1014 µm) by passing anodal current
pulses (4 µA, 7 sec on, 7 sec off) for a period of 10 min. Because this
method can produce small, well defined injection sites of tracer material
(Ruigrok et al., 1995
;
Teune et al., 1998
), it was
also used in the six additional animals in which injections were placed using
anatomical landmarks and measurements as a guide. In five of these rats,
injections were made bilaterally and, in one rat, unilaterally. All animals
were monitored daily and recovered uneventfully.
Histology. After a survival period of 7 d, all animals were deeply
reanesthetized with barbiturate and perfusion fixed (initial flush of 500 ml
of 0.9% heparanised saline, followed by 1 l of 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1%
glutaraldehyde, and 4% sucrose). The brain was removed and postfixed in the
perfusate for an additional 23 hr and subsequently was rinsed and
stored overnight in 0.05 M PB, pH 7.4, containing 10% sucrose. The
caudal brainstem and cerebellum were blocked and embedded in gelatin (10%),
which was hardened for 3 hr in formaldehyde (4%) containing 30% sucrose, and
then rinsed and stored overnight in 30% sucrose in PB (at 4°C).
Transverse sections of the gelatin blocks were cut at 40 µm on a
freezing microtome and were serially collected in eight glass vials containing
PB. Vials were selected for either CTb processing alone or CTb processing
followed by zebrin immunostaining. For both procedures, the sections were
incubated first in anti-CTb (raised in goat, 1:15,000; List Biologic) in Tris
buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl and 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 8.6 (TBST),
for 48 or 72 hr (at 4°C). The sections were then rinsed with TBST and
incubated in biotinylated donkey anti-goat (1:2000 in TBST; List Biologic).
After rinsing and overnight incubation (at 4°C) with the
avidinbiotin complex (ABC Elite; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA),
the sections were thoroughly rinsed with PB before diaminobenzidine (DAB)
incubation. Sections destined to be processed for zebrin II were incubated
with DABcobalt (0.025% DAB, 0.01% CoCl2, and 0.005%
H2O2 for 1015 min), resulting in a black reaction
product. The remaining sections were processed in the same DAB solution
without cobalt ions but for a longer time period (up to 45 min). The CTb
DABcobalt processed sections were incubated overnight with a monoclonal
mouse antibody (zebrin II; 1:150 in TBST containing 2% normal horse serum;
kindly provided by Dr. Richard Hawkes, Calgary, Canada). The sections were
then rinsed and incubated with peroxidase-labeled rabbit anti-mouse (1:150 in
TBST plus 2% normal horse serum) for 2 hr and thoroughly rinsed and incubated
in DAB (see above), resulting in a brown staining of the zebrin bands
(Hawkes and Leclerc, 1987
;
Voogd and Ruigrok, 1997
).
After final rinses in PB, sections from each vial were mounted serially, air
dried, lightly counterstained with thionin, and coverslipped.
Plotting and reconstruction. Sections were digitized with a
Minolta (Osaka, Japan) slide scanner, and labeled structures in every other
section from each experiment were plotted by hand or by using ITRACER (Camino
de la Costa, La Jolla, CA) to localize structures in the digitized sections.
Outlines of zebrin-positive bands of Purkinje cells were checked by direct
observation under the microscope and drawn on prints of the digitized
sections. Graphical reconstructions of the cerebellum were made by stacking
sections, using the floor of the fourth ventricle and the outline of the
cerebellum as a guide. In these reconstructions, data on the zebrin pattern
and on the localization of labeled climbing and mossy fibers were combined. To
enhance their visibility, the width of the labeled strips of climbing fibers,
which in many instances involved only one or a few climbing fibers, is
generally exaggerated in these diagrams. In addition, only the most
superficially located mossy fiber terminals are included to avoid
overprojection. The reconstructions of mossy fiber terminals give, therefore,
only an approximate impression of their localization. Reconstructions were
made of the rostral and dorsal surfaces of the anterior lobe (ANT), of the
rostral, dorsal, and caudal surfaces of lobulus simplex (SI), of the rostral
surface of crus I, and of the dorsal and caudal surfaces of the posterior
lobe. Retrogradely labeled cells in the inferior olive were plotted onto
unfolded projections of the inferior olive and onto standard transverse
diagrams, approximately corresponding to the levels illustrated in
Figure 2 A.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Corticonuclear and olivocerebellar projection zones of the rat cerebellum.
The cortical zones (B), the subnuclei of the inferior olive that
innervate particular zones (A), and their cerebellar and vestibular
target nuclei (C) are indicated with the same symbols. The sections
in A and C are viewed in the transverse plane, with sections
12 (A) and 8(C) being the most rostral. Redrawn from
Buisseret-Delmas and Angaut
(1993 ), with the addition of
the A2 zone
(asterisks)(Buisseret-Delmas,
1988a ) and the X and CX zones (Buiseret-Delmas et al.,
1993). AD2, Zones AD2; COP, copula
pyramidis; CrI, crus I; CrII, crus II; DAOc, caudal part of dorsal accessory
olive; DAOr, rostral part of dorsal accessoryolive; dl, dors all amina of the
PO; DLH, dorsolateral hump; DLP, dorsolateral protuberance of the fastigial
nucleus; DM, dorsomedial subnucleus of the PO; F, fastigial nucleus; FL,
flocculus; IA, anterior interposed nucleus; IC, interstitial cell groups; IP,
posterior interposed nucleus; I-X, lobules IX; L, lateral cerebellar
nucleus; LV, lateral vestibular nucleus; MAO, medial accessory olive; PFL,
paraflocculus; PMD, paramedian lobule; PO, principal olive; SI, lobulus
simplex; vl, ventral lamina of the PO; Y, group Y.
|
|
 |
Results
|
|---|
Definition of zones
In the present study, individual, rostrocaudally oriented cerebellar
cortical zones in the rat are defined by their inferior olive (climbing fiber)
and Purkinje cell corticonuclear connections as reported by Buisseret-Delmas
and coworkers (Buisseret-Delmas,
1988a
,b
;
Buisseret-Delmas and Angaut,
1989
,
1993
;
Buisseret-Delmas et al., 1993
)
(Fig. 2). Several differences
from this scheme in the connections of the C and D zones are considered below
(see also Discussion).
In some of the present experiments, climbing fiber-evoked responses on the
cerebellar cortical surface were also charted to delineate the zones
electrophysiologically (for additional details, see Materials and Methods).
Because the use of climbing fiber responses to identify the zonal organization
of the PMD and the COP in rats has already been described in detail by Atkins
and Apps (1997
) (see also
Pardoe and Apps, 2002
),
additional details are not repeated here. In brief, however, zones
A2, C1, C2, and C3 can be
identified from medial to lateral in PMD and COP on the basis of differences
in the peripheral stimulation that evokes the largest climbing fiber responses
within each zone (Fig. 1).
In cats, zones C1 and C3 can be further subdivided
into medial and lateral subzones (termed medial C1, Cx, and medial
and lateral C3). These subzones are linked into pairs because of
branching of axons of single olivary neurons. For example, medial
C1 shares climbing fiber input with medial C3, whereas
Cx shares climbing fiber input with zone X (Ekerot and Larson,
1979
,
1982
;
Apps et al., 1991
). This
characteristic has not been substantiated in the rat. Zones X and
CX share their electrophysiological properties with the
C1 and C3 zones but differ from them anatomically
because they receive climbing fibers from intermediate levels of medial
accessory olive (MAO) instead of rostral dorsal accessory olive (DAO)
(Campbell and Armstrong, 1985
;
Trott and Armstrong,
1987a
,b
;
Buisseret-Delmas et al.,
1993
).
The zebrin pattern
The molecular marker zebrin II is expressed in a subset of cerebellar
Purkinje cells, which can be revealed by immunohistochemical techniques
postmortem (see Materials and Methods). Rostrocaudally oriented bands of
immunoreactive (zebrin-positive) Purkinje cells alternate with cells that are
zebrin negative (see Fig. 6, left side). The nomenclature used in the present paper for these
zebrin-positive and -negative bands was introduced by Hawkes and Leclerc
(1987
), and a total of seven
zebrin-positive bands can be identified in the rat cerebellum (termed P1+ to
P7+). Zebrin-negative bands P1- to P6-are indicated with the number of the
next-medial zebrin-positive band. With the exception of the P3+ band in the
anterior cerebellum, the zebrin-positive bands are distinct and clearly
delineated, whereas some of the unnumbered "satellite" bands of
Hawkes and Leclerc (1987
)
occur regularly and have been indicated in the present study with the letters
a, b, d, and e. In the figures in the present report, only the zebrin-positive
bands are indicated with their respective numbers.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Summary of the present results and interpretation in relation to zebrin
banding. Dorsal view of the flattened surface of the rat cerebellum, showing
the zebrin nomenclature on the left and on the right the distribution of
climbing fiber collaterals, arising from injections into different climbing
fiber zones in the paramedian lobule and copula pyramidis, with their
corresponding zonal identification. The block diagram contains the color code
for the collateral projections for individual zones. The origin of these
climbing fiber collaterals is shown in the horizontal projection diagrams of
the contralateral inferior olive at the bottom. The putative CX
zone in SI is indicated with an open arrowhead. Reasons for the localization
of the DO and D2 zones in anterior P5- and P6+ and
posterior P6- and P7+ bands, respectively, are given in Results and
Discussion. 17, Zebrin-positive bands P1+ to P7+; A, subnucleus A of
caudal MAO; A2, climbing fiber zone A2; ae,
zebrin satellite bands a, b, d, and e; ANT, anterior lobe; beta,
subnucleus of caudal MAO; C, subnucleus C of caudal MAO;
C1C3, climbing fiber zones
C1C3; COP, copula pyramidis; IIVII,
lobules VIVII; CrI, crus I; CrII, crus II; CX, climbing
fiber zone CX; D1, climbing fiber zone D1;
dc, dorsal cap; dm, dorsomedial subnucleus of PO; DAOc, caudal dorsal
accessory olive; DAOr, rostral dorsal accessory olive; dl, dorsal lamella of
PO; dmcc, dorsomedial cell column; fI, primary fissure; fps, posterior
superior fissure, MAO, medial accessory olive; PFL, paraflocculus; PMD,
paramedian lobule; PO, principal olive; r, rostral; SI, lobulus simplex; vl,
ventral lamella of PO; vlo, ventrolateral outgrowth; X, climbing fiber zone
X.
|
|
In lobules VIb,c and VII, the nodulus, caudal crus I, the flocculus, and
the paraflocculus, all Purkinje cells stain for zebrin and no bands can be
distinguished. In crus II and PMD, two additional narrow zebrin-positive bands
are located between P4+ and P5+ (indicated in the figures as bands P4b+ and
P5a+), and bands P6+ and P7+ occupy the lateral part of crus II. In PMD, the
pattern shifts laterally relative to crus II, and the P6+ and P7+ bands are
often fused. This lateral shift is clearly visible in the oblique position of
the bundle containing zebrin-stained axons of the P5+ band (see
Fig. 4C). Fusion of
P4b+ and P5a+ occurs in the ventral part of PMD and COP, and the latter
contains an additional, ill-defined zebrin-positive patch
("e").

View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. A, Transverse section showing distribution of CTb-labeled mossy
and climbing fiber collaterals in lobules IV and V. Note the regular and
bilateral parcellation of mossy fiber terminals and two strips of labeled
climbing fiber collaterals (asterisks), which convergeventrally. Case CTB8.
Compare with Figure
5C. Scalebar, 500 µm.B, Transverse section
showing CTb-labeled mossy and climbing fiber collaterals at higher power. Case
CTB7, adjacent section to view shown in D. Scale bar, 50 µm.
C, Oblique bundle of zebrin-immunoreactive axons belonging to
zebrin-positive band P5+ in the lateral paramedian lobule. Case 925. Scale
bar, 500 µm. D, Strips of CTb-labeled mossy and climbing fiber
collaterals on facing surfaces of lobules V and VI, separated by the primary
fissure, and located in zebrin-negative band P4-. The P4+ band is just visible
in the top left corner. Case CTB7. Scale bar, 200 µm. E, Medial
lobule of the paraflocculus containing a band of CTb-labeled mossy and
climbing fiber collaterals. Case CTB4 (compare with
Fig. 7F, panel 2).
Scale bar, 500 µm. F, Collaterals of mossy and climbing fibers in
the paraflocculus at higher power; for location, see box f in E. Case
CTB4. Scale bar, 50 µm. G, Plexus of fine, CTb-labeled varicose
axons in the dorsolateral protuberance of the fastigial nucleus, contralateral
to the injection site. Case CTB18. Scale bar, 50 µm. H, Plexus of
coarse, CTb-labeled varicose axons in the dorsolateral protuberance of the
fastigial nucleus, ipsilateral to the injection site. Case CTB18. Same
magnification as G. cf, Climbing fiber collaterals; m, midline; mf,
mossy fiber collaterals; P4+, P5+, P5-, zebrin positive and negative bands
P4+, P5+, and P5-; PFL, paraflocculus; V, VI, lobules V and VI.
|
|

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Example injections into the copula pyramidis. In A and F,
the caudal surface of the cerebellum has been reconstructed for two cases
(CTB8 and 924-r, respectively). B, G and C,H are
reconstructions of dorsal and rostral views of the anterior lobe.
Zebrin-positive (P) bands are indicated in black and shown with their
corresponding P numbers. The injection site and labeled parallel fibers are
indicated in orange, and labeled mossy fiber rosettes are depicted as blue
dots. Red contours indicate the position of labeled climbing fiber
collaterals. For case CTB8, B' and C' show the
right side of the cerebellum as depicted in B and C but
without the mossy fiber labeling to show more clearly the relationship between
the pattern of zebrin banding and the distribution of climbing fiber
collateral labeling (indicated with red hatching). For both cases, the
localization of retrogradely labeled neurons in the contralateral inferior
olive is indicated in purple on an unfolded horizontal projection of DAO
(E) and MAO (J) and on transverse sections through the olive
(D, I). Scattered labeled cells are indicated with dots. The level of
the transverse sections in D and I are indicated with a
black horizontal line in E and J (numbers refer to levels
depicted in Fig. 2 A).
The broken vertical line in E indicates the junction between the
dorsal and the ventral folds of DAO. 17, Zebrin-positive bands P1 + to
P7 +; a, b, e, zebrin-positive satellite bands a, b, and e; BETA, subnucleus
of caudal MAO; COP, copulapyramidis; IIVII, lobules
IIVII; CrI, crusI; CrII, crusII; DAOc, caudal part of DAO; DAOr,
rostral part of DAO; DMCC, dorsomedial cell column; i, injection site; MAO,
medial accessory olive; med, medial; NOD, nodulus; PMD, paramedian lobule; PO,
principal olive; UV, uvula.
|
|

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Transverse sections containing mossy fiber and climbing fiber collateral
and cerebellar nuclear labeling in six cases with unilateral injections in COP
or PMD. Injection sites and other particulars are documented at our website.
A, CTB5; B, CTB8; C, CTB18; D, CTB7;
E, 864; F, CTB4. Boxed area in D, panel 2, is taken
from a more rostral section than the nuclei on the right side. Regions in the
cerebellar nuclei containing labeled coarse varicose fibers are indicated with
solid green, and labeled thin varicose fibers are stippled in green. Other
conventions as in Figure 5.
17, Zebrin-positive bands P1+ to P7+; a, zebrin-positive satellite band
a; ANT, anterior lobe; b, zebrin-positive satellite band b; CrI, crus I; CrII,
crus II; d, zebrin-positive satellite bands d; DLH, dorsolateral hump; DLP,
dorsolateral protuberance; F, fastigial nucleus; FI, primary fissure; FLO,
flocculus; FPS, posterior superior fissure; IA, anterior interposed nucleus;
IIVI, lobules IIVI; L, lateral cerebellar nucleus; NOD, nodulus;
PFL, paraflocculus; PMD, paramedian lobule; SI, simplex lobule.
|
|
The zebrin pattern, as described here, is highly reproducible. Small
deviations from the sequence are sometimes visible in the reconstructions of
individual cases, although such deviations are usually attributable to
staining artifacts, missing sections, or errors in stacking of sections.
General features of CTb injection sites and labeling
The CTb injection sites usually encompassed both the molecular layer and
the underlying granular layer of the cerebellar cortex. Because most injection
sites were situated in the apex of the lobules, they involved the white matter
only to a limited extent. They were well circumscribed, although extensive
labeling of parallel fibers and retrograde labeling of granule cells sometimes
obscured their boundaries. Typically, iontophoresis resulted in small and
discrete injection sites (range of 0.10.03 mm3), whereas
pressure injections tended to produce larger injection sites (range of
0.40.04 mm3) and cause more extensive tissue damage.
Figure 3 shows the location and
extent of the individual injection sites as seen projected onto a posterior
view of the rat cerebellum.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Location of cerebellar cortical injection sites in the 18 cases used in the
present study. Sites of injection projected onto the surface of a
reconstruction of the caudal surface of the rat cerebellum. For additional
details, see Table 1.
Zebrin-positive bands are shaded and indicated with their numerals. COP,
Copula pyramidis; CrII, crus II; NOD, nodulus; PMD, paramedian lobule; UV,
uvula; VII, VIII, lobules VII and VIII.
|
|
In all cases, a bundle of faintly stained axons was evident that could be
followed from the injection site into the white matter in the direction of the
cerebellar nuclei. Within the cerebellar nuclei, these gave rise to one or
more plexuses of intensely stained, fairly coarse, varicose axons
(Fig. 4H). Climbing
fibers labeled as a result of axonal collateralcollateral transport of
CTb (referred to as climbing fiber collaterals in the present study) could be
present near the injection site and/or in other parts of the cerebellum. In
our transversely sectioned material, they usually appeared as two thin
parallel lines of varicose axonal fragments, delineating the dendrites of
Purkinje cells (Fig.
4B). Only in the paraflocculus was the complete
arborization of individual climbing fibers observed
(Fig. 4E,F), whereas
the parent axons of labeled climbing fiber collaterals were only at best
weakly labeled. In addition, in all but one experiment mossy fiber collaterals
were labeled with CTb, although only in terminal rosettes
(Fig. 4A,B,D,F); mossy
fiber axons were never found stained.
Climbing fiber collateral labeling from CTb injections in the
COP
Two cases with injections in COP are illustrated in
Figure 5. In case CTB8, a large
pressure injection was made into the medial half of COP, at a site where
climbing fiber potentials were evoked by stimulation of the ipsilateral
hindlimb. The injection site was located between the P4+ band medially and the
lateral, zebrin-positive pole (P5+/P7+) of COP and included the
zebrin-positive patch e (Fig.
5A). Retrograde labeling in the contralateral inferior
olive was present mainly in caudolateral portions of the rostral half of the
DAO. A few labeled cells were also present in the lateral pole of the MAO
(Fig. 5D,E) and more
caudally in subnucleus B of caudal MAO (data not shown). On the basis of its
electrophysiological characteristics and connections with DAO, this region of
the cerebellar cortex was considered as part of the C1 zone by
Buisseret-Delmas (1988b
) and
Atkins and Apps (1997
). In
experiment 924, two small, iontophoretic injections were made, one on either
side of the cerebellum into the lateral zebrin-positive pole (P5+/7+) of COP
(in Fig. 5FJ,
only the injection site on the right hand side of the cerebellum is shown,
case 924-r). The pattern of retrograde labeling in rostral MAO indicated that
the two injections in this experiment were both confined to the C2
zone (compare Fig.
5I,J with Fig.
2).
The collateral labeling of climbing fibers in these and all other cases
with injections in COP was restricted to the ANT. The injection into the
C1 zone (case CTB8) resulted in two strips of extensive collateral
labeling: one medial and one lateral to the P4+ band in lobules IIIV
(Figs. 4A,
5B',C').
The medial strip overlapped the P3+ band and was delimited medially by
Purkinje cells of zebrin-positive satellite band b
(Fig. 5C'). A
few climbing fiber collaterals were also present in the P4+ band in two of the
sections. The lateral strip was located within the P4-band.
In comparison, collateral labeling of climbing fibers after the injection
into the C2 zone (case 924-r) was almost entirely restricted to the
zebrin-positive P4+ band, with some climbing fibers in the zebrin-negative
region immediately medial to it in lobules IIIV of ANT
(Fig. 5FH). The
labeling in this zebrin-negative region may have arisen because of diffusion
of tracer material medially to involve the P4-band in the copula. Similar
observations were made in case CTB5, with a small injection in the
C1 zone, limited to the zebrin-positive patch e of the COP, and in
case 924-l, with an injection of its zebrin-positive lateral pole (for
complete documentation of these and other cases, see our website:
http://www.erasmusmc.nl/voogd-cfcollaterals).
The results on the collateral climbing fiber projection of COP are
summarized in Figure 6. We
interpret the collateral climbing fiber labeling in the anterior lobe P2-,
P3+, and P3-zebrin bands as corresponding to the C1 zone
(Fig. 6, red) and the labeling
in the lateral P4-band as the C3 zone
(Fig. 6, red). The intervening
P4+ band in the anterior lobe, which receives climbing fibers from the
lateral, zebrin-positive pole of the COP, therefore, corresponds to the
C2 zone (Fig. 6,
dark blue).
Injections located at the medial border of the zebrin-positive pole of COP
(Fig. 3, cases 910l, 911l) (see
also our website) resulted in a different pattern of labeling with climbing
fiber collaterals occupying two narrow strips, one immediately medial to P4+
and the other lateral to P2+ in lobules IIIV of ANT
(Fig. 6, green). Retrograde
labeling in the olive was present laterally in the contralateral MAO at
intermediate levels, extending caudally into subnucleus A
(Fig. 6, green). Together with
the anterograde labeling in a region corresponding to the interstitial cell
groups of Buisseret-Delmas et al.
(1993
) (compare with
Fig. 2), these results
therefore suggest that the injection site in these cases was centered on the
CX zone. The same pattern of climbing fiber branching in the
anterior lobe has also been observed in studies of the projection of the
inferior olive after injections of the anterograde tracer Phaseolus
vulgaris lectin at intermediate levels of MAO
(Voogd et al., 1993
;
Voogd and Ruigrok, 1997
).
Branching of climbing fibers from similar regions of MAO to the vermal X zone
and the CX zone has also been observed in ANT by using
double-retrograde axonal tracer techniques in the cat
(Apps et al., 1991
). Thus, the
zebrin-negative strips medial to P4+ and lateral to P2+ in ANT of the rat
cerebellum may be identified, respectively, as the CX and X zones,
receiving climbing fiber collaterals from a presumed CX zone
located at the border between the C1 and C2 zones in
COP. The empty strip between the X and C1 zones corresponds to the
B zone, where climbing fibers could be labeled from injections of caudal DAO
(Voogd and Ruigrok, 1997
)
(Fig. 2).
Climbing fiber collateral labeling from CTb injections in the
PMD
Three injections in PMD were centered on the medial region, containing the
narrow, zebrin-positive bands P4b+ and P5a+
(Fig. 3, cases CTB18, 910r,
911r), the zebrin-positive P5+ band (cases CTB6 and 864), the zebrin-negative
bands P5a- and P5-, which border on either side of P5+ (cases 890l and 890r),
and the zebrin-positive bands P6+ and P7+ in the lateral part of the lobule
(cases CTB4 and 889l). These, and some other cases with injections including
more than one zebrin-positive or negative band, are fully documented at our
website. Climbing fiber collateral labeling in cases with injections in PMD
was mostly restricted to the SI and the adjoining crus I in the caudal bank of
the posterior superior fissure (Fig.
6).
Cases with injections into the P4b+/5a+ region in the medial part of PMD
resulted in retrograde labeling restricted to subnucleus C of caudal MAO
(Fig. 6, yellow) and a plexus
of coarse axons labeled in the dorsolateral protuberance of the fastigial
nucleus (Fig. 7C,
panel 2, right nuclei). These injections were therefore situated in the
A2 zone (compare with Fig.
2). Collateral climbing fiber labeling occurred in the P4-, P4b+,
and P5a+ bands in medial crus II and in the region of the d stripes, medial to
P4+ in caudal SI and the rostral aspect of crus I
(Fig. 6, yellow). These regions
are therefore considered to represent extensions of the A2
zone.
In cases with injections limited to the P5+ band in PMD (CTB6 and 864),
retrograde labeling in the inferior olive was present medially in rostral MAO
(Fig. 6, light blue). The
injections, therefore, were situated in the C2 zone. Collateral
climbing fiber labeling was restricted to P5+ in ventral crus II and to P4+ in
caudal SI and in crus I in the rostral bank of the posterior superior fissure,
with a few labeled fibers in the medially adjoining zebrin-negative P4-area
(Fig. 6, arrowhead). The latter
may be attributable to diffusion of the tracer to zebrin-negative regions
neighboring on P5+, which, by analogy with our findings on ANT, may represent
the CX zone (cf. Pardoe and
Apps, 2002
). The P4+ zebrin band in SI and crus I is therefore
interpreted as corresponding to the C2 zone
(Fig. 6, light blue).
In experiment 890, two small iontophoretic injections were made in PMD into
the zebrin-negative areas on either side of P5+ (i.e., medial and lateral to
the C2 zone). Both injections labeled cells in rostromedial DAO
(Fig. 6, orange). The medial
(case 890-r) and lateral (case 890-l) injection sites were confined,
therefore, to the C1 and C3 zone, respectively
(Fig. 3). In case 890-r,
collateral labeling of climbing fibers extended into the P4b-band of the crus
II. On both sides of the cerebellum, several narrow strips of one or two
climbing fiber collaterals were located in the zebrin-negative P4-area in
rostral SI, extending into ANT. This region is located lateral to P4+ (which
corresponds to the C2 zone) and is likely, therefore, to correspond
to the C3 zone in SI (Fig.
6, orange) (cf. Pardoe and
Apps, 2002
). Collateral climbing fiber projections from the
C1 or C3 zones in PMD to a presumed C1 zone
in SI (i.e., to a region medial to the P4+ band) were not found in these
cases. However, a collateral projection to SI may be present in other
experiments in which injections involved the C1 zone in PMD (cases
CTB1, CTB7, and 889-r), although in such cases the labeling could not be
definitely attributed to branching from this zone because the injection sites
also involved the neighboring A2 and/or CX zones. The
location of a presumed C1 zone in SI is therefore left blank in
Figure 6.
Two injections were located laterally in PMD. In case CTB4, with an
injection medially in the fused zebrin-positive P6+and P7+ bands of PMD,
retrograde labeling in the olive was located mainly in the ventral lamella of
the principal olive (PO) (Fig.
6, pink). Collateral labeling of climbing fibers was widespread,
with labeling present in the P5+ band in ANT, in rostral crus I, and also in
the P6+ band in PMD and crus II. Caudally, the collateral climbing fiber
labeling extended into a strip in the dorsal paraflocculus (Figs.
4E,F,
6, pink). Similar observations
were also made in case 889-l, with a more laterally located injection in PMD
(Fig. 3). Retrograde labeling
in the olive was found mainly in the dorsal lamella and the bend of PO, and
collateral labeling extended into the P6+ band in ANT and SI and into the P7+
band in crus I, II, and PMD, and also included the paraflocculus.
In PMD, the fused P6+ and P7+ bands receive their climbing fiber
projections from PO and therefore represent the D1 and
D2 zones. Because the more medial injection site in case CTB4
resulted in retrograde labeling entirely within the ventral lamella of PO, it
seems likely that the injection site in this case was confined to the
D1 zone. Climbing fiber collaterals were found in the P6+ band in
crus II and the P5+ band in crus I and ANT, which therefore represent the
D1 zone in these lobules (Fig.
6, pink). By inference, the anterior P6+ and posterior P7+ bands
therefore correspond to the D2 zone. A D0 zone,
receiving climbing fibers from the dorsomedial subnucleus of PO (DM) and
projecting to the dorsolateral hump
(Buisseret-Delmas and Angaut,
1989
) (Fig. 2),
could not be identified in our experiments. This may have been because our
investigation was confined to a study of collateralization from PMD and COP.
In a previous report, the D0 zone was found to be located in the
zebrin-negative P5-band in ANT and in the P6-band in crus II
(Voogd et al., 1993
). In PMD,
P6+ and P7+ usually fuse and P6-is absent.
Correspondence between electrophysiologically defined climbing fiber
zones and the zebrin pattern
In all cases with injections into electrophysiologically identified
climbing fiber zones in COP and PMD (summarized in
Table 1), the observations of
Atkins and Apps (1997
) could be
confirmed on their cortical location and the pattern of retrograde olivary
labeling from these zones (Fig.
1) (see also our website). Injections into the face-receiving
A2 zone in medial PMD (i.e., a medial region of cortex containing
climbing fiber potentials evoked by contralateral face stimulation) were
located in the region of the narrow P4b+ and P5a+ zebrin bands. Injections
into the hindlimb-receiving part of the C1 zone in the medial half
of COP (i.e., a region of cortex just lateral to the A2 zone
containing climbing fiber potentials evoked at short latency by ipsilateral
hindlimb stimulation) were located within the zebrin-negative P4-area,
containing the zebrin-positive patch e. Injections into the corresponding
forelimb-receiving part of the C1 zone in medial PMD included the
zebrin-negative P4b-band. Injections targeted at a more lateral region of PMD,
which receives climbing fiber input from both forelimbs and, therefore,
corresponds to the C2 zone, were located in zebrin band P5+.
Finally, the location of the electrophysiologically defined C3 zone
in relation to the zebrin bands could not be directly demonstrated but is
likely to correspond to the P5-band. In case CTB4, the injection was targeted
at this zone (i.e., at a narrow lateral region of PMD containing climbing
fiber potentials evoked at short latency by ipsilateral forelimb stimulation),
but the injection pipette deviated laterally and ended up in the neighboring
P6+ band.
Mossy fiber collateral labeling resulting from injections in COP and
PMD
Most, if not all, of the injections were not confined to the molecular
layer but penetrated into the granular layer, resulting in labeling of mossy
fiber collaterals. These were usually present bilaterally in the lobule
containing the injection site (Fig.
5A). Similar to the distribution of climbing fiber
collateral labeling, mossy fiber collaterals were mainly restricted to ANT in
cases with injections in COP and to lobules of the posterior lobe in cases
with injections in PMD. However, in contrast to the climbing fiber collateral
labeling, mossy fiber collaterals were often distributed bilaterally, in
patterns of multiple, symmetrically arranged, but ill-defined strips or
patches. This pattern was most evident in cases with large injections centered
on the A2, C1, or D zones (Figs.
4A,
5A,B,
7) (see also our website). One
highly consistent feature in these cases was the topographical correspondence
between the labeled climbing fiber strips, with a strip of labeled mossy fiber
collaterals in the subjacent granular layer (Figs.
4A,B,D,F,
5B,C,
7AF). This was
also evident in experiments with smaller injections, although the mossy fiber
collateral labeling was usually sparse
(Fig. 7A,E). Cases
with injections into the C2 zone produced little (924, 864) or no
(CTB6) collateral mossy fiber labeling, which, in case 864, was confined to
multiple patches on the ipsilateral side. In experiments with bilateral
injections, similar patterns of mossy fiber labeling were observed on both
sides of the cerebellum. Clearly, the injection site origin of the patterns of
mossy fiber collaterals could not be established in such cases. However, it is
noteworthy that, even for these results, the mossy fiber collateral labeling
was consistently observed subjacent to strips of labeled climbing fibers.
The corticonuclear projection of COP and PML
One or more foci of labeled coarse, varicose fibers were present in the
cerebellar nuclei in all experiments (Figs.
4 H,
7) (see also our website). The
localization of these plexuses was in general accordance with
Buisseret-Delmas' description of the target nuclei of the corticonuclear
projection zones in rats (Fig.
2). The A2 zone projected to the dorsolateral
protuberance of the fastigial nucleus (Fig.
7C, panel 2, right cerebellar nuclei); the C1
and C3 zones targeted the anterior interposed nucleus
(Fig. 7 A, B, panel 2,
right nuclei); the C2 zone targeted the posterior interposed
nucleus (Fig. 7E,
panel 2); and the D1 and D2 zones targeted the lateral
cerebellar nucleus (Fig.
7F). Cases with climbing fiber collateral labeling of the
X and CX zones displayed terminal labeling in the interstitial cell
groups (cases 910-r, 911-r; see our website). However, with respect to the
projections to the anterior and posterior interposed nuclei, our observations
differed from the scheme proposed by Buisseret-Delmas
(1988b
): the C1 and
C2 zones never projected to both nuclei but always found their
exclusive target in either the anterior interposed nucleus (in the case of the
C1 zone) or the posterior interposed nucleus (in the case of the
C2 zone). In experiments with coarse terminal labeling in both
interposed nuclei, the injection site always included both C zones
(Fig. 7D, panel 2,
right nuclei).
In several cases, an additional plexus of labeled fine, varicose fibers was
distributed bilaterally and symmetrically over one or more of the cerebellar
nuclei (Figs. 4G,
7BD,F).
Bilateral labeling of the cerebellar nuclei was always found in combination
with a strong bilateral distribution of mossy fiber collaterals.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
In the present study, collaterals of olivocerebellar fibers terminating in
PMD and COP were found to distribute in a climbing fiber zone-specific
longitudinal pattern. This confirms the principle, established in the original
electrophysiological studies in cats by Armstrong et al.
(1973a
,b
)
and by Oscarsson and Sj
lund
(1977a
,b
),
that climbing fiber collateralization remains confined to particular
olivocerebellar zones.
With a few exceptions, to be discussed below, olivocerebellar fibers from
rostral DAO innervate the zebrin-negative territory of the C1 and
C3 zones, whereas rostral MAO and PO innervate respectively the
zebrin-positive territory of the C2 and D zones. The A2
zone corresponds to the region of the P4b+ and P5a+ bands in medial PMD and
SI. In comparison, mossy fibers terminating in PMD and COP collateralize in an
often bilateral pattern of longitudinal strips and patches. At least one of
these longitudinal aggregates of mossy fiber terminals is always found
directly underneath a strip of climbing fiber collaterals labeled from the
same injection site.
Methods and interpretations
Our study confirms the observations of Chen and Aston-Jones
(1998
) on the ability of CTb
to label climbing and mossy fiber collaterals. Although extensive labeling of
climbing fiber collaterals was observed in cases with large injections (Figs.
4A,
5B,C, case CTB8), the
labeling in cases with small injections generally consisted of one or more
longitudinal strips with a width of one or a few climbing fibers. These
observations are in accordance with the spatial distribution of individual,
biotinylated dextran amine (BDA)-labeled olivocerebellar fibers
(Sugihara et al., 2001
).
Mossy and climbing fiber collaterals both terminate in the cerebellar
nuclei. In the present experiments, it was not possible, however, to identify
climbing fiber collateral projections to the nuclei, because these overlap
with the Purkinje cell corticonuclear projection
(Ruigrok and Voogd, 2000
). On
the other hand, mossy fiber collaterals are likely to be responsible for the
multinuclear, bilateral plexus of thin-diameter axons in many of our cases.
Such a bilateral nuclear collateral projection has been demonstrated for the
lateral reticular nucleus, the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis, and the
spinal cord (Mihailoff, 1994
;
Ruigrok et al., 1995
;
Wu et al., 1999
;
Matsushita and Xiong, 2001
).
In contrast, Panto et al.
(2001
) proposed the Purkinje
cells as the origin of the multiple foci of axonal labeling in different
cerebellar nuclei, observed after their injections of BDA into individual
cerebellar cortical zones in rats. However, the possibility of a mossy fiber
collateral projection was not considered by these authors, and no mention was
made of the presence of contralateral labeling. The latter is one of the main
reasons in favor of this type of nuclear labeling being attributable to
collateralization of mossy fibers.
Climbing fiber zones and the zebrin pattern
The pattern of zebrin banding is caused by the alternation of
zebrin-positive and -negative Purkinje cells
(Hawkes and Leclerc, 1987
),
whereas the longitudinal pattern in the olivocerebellar projection is made up
of climbing fiber zones innervated by different olivary subnuclei. Previous
studies have found a correlation between the position of anterogradely labeled
longitudinal strips of climbing fibers and the zebrin pattern but were unable
to show a precise correspondence of specific zebrin-positive or -negative
bands with the olivocerebellar projection arising from individual olivary
subnuclei (Gravel et al.,
1987
; Wassef et al.,
1992
). The present results therefore significantly extend these
previous findings by showing that, to some degree, the two cortical patterns
of zebrin bands and climbing fiber zones appear to coincide.
This conclusion would seem to be at odds with the results of Voogd and
Ruigrok (1997
), who found that
the borders of some climbing fiber zones in the uvula of the rat are located
in the middle of zebrin-positive bands. The discrepancy may have arisen
because different regions of the cerebellum were investigated in the two
studies and/or because of differences in the resolution of the techniques
used. However, in several instances, discrete climbing fiber zones were found
to share a single zebrin-negative band (i.e., X and B within P2- and
C1 and CX within P3-).
The distribution of olivocerebellar fibers from rostral DAO to the
zebrin-negative zones C1 and C3 confirms previous
observations on the termination of climbing fibers after discrete injections
into different subnuclei of the olive
(Voogd et al., 1993
;
Voogd and Ruigrok, 1997
).
These previous reports also provided evidence that caudal DAO projects to the
zebrin-negative P2-band, which therefore, at least partially, corresponds to
the B zone. In contrast, rostral MAO and PO project to zebrin-positive
territories. Rostral MAO projects to anterior P4+ and posterior P5+
(corresponding to the C2 zone), whereas cells at intermediate
levels of the MAO project to the junction of the P4- and P5+ bands in COP and
to two narrow zebrin-negative strips in ANT, located lateral to P2+ and medial
to P4+ (corresponding to the X and Cx zones, respectively).
Regarding the lateral D zones, the present findings differ from the
original description of these zones in the rat by Azizi and Woodward
(1987
) and by Buisseret-Delmas
and Angaut (1989
)
(Fig. 2). Voogd et al.
(1993
) found the DM-innervated
D0 zone to target the zebrin-negative anterior P5- and posterior
P6-bands, whereas in the present study, we found the D1 zone to
project to the more medially located anterior P5+ and posterior P6+ bands. By
inference, the D2 zone corresponds to anterior P6+ and posterior
P7+. Thus, the medial to lateral sequence of the D zones as proposed by us
(D1,D0, and D2) and their innervation by the
ventral and dorsal lamellae of the PO differ from the original data.
Overall, the zebrin pattern of the rat cerebellar hemisphere can be
considered, therefore, to be the result of zebrin-negative zones innervated by
DAO, DM, and intermediate MAO, interdigitating with zebrin-positive zones
innervated by rostral MAO and PO. In crus I and the paraflocculus, in which
zebrin-negative zones are not represented, the Purkinje cells are uniformly
zebrin positive. Thus, the shift in numbering of the zebrin bands,
corresponding to particular climbing fiber zones, between the anterior and
posterior cerebellum, can be explained by the absence of zebrin-negative DAO
and DM-innervated zones in crus I. The uniform zebrin-positive appearance of
crus I prevented Hawkes and Leclerc
(1987
) from establishing their
continuity. It remains to be determined whether this distinction between
zebrin-negative and -positive zones is linked to the fact that subnuclei of
the olive innervating the former all receive a somatotopically organized input
from the periphery (Molinari et al.,
1996
; Yatim et al.,
1996
), whereas olivary subnuclei innervating the latter are
dominated by afferent connections from higher levels of the brainstem.
Collateralization of mossy fibers and their relationship to climbing
fiber collaterals
In cases with large unilateral injections, mossy fiber collaterals were
found to be distributed in a bilateral symmetrical pattern with an ipsilateral
predominance, occupying ill-defined parasagittal compartments. A similar,
multiple zonal distribution of mossy fiber collaterals was demonstrated in the
rat by Heckroth and Eisenman
(1988
). In the present
experiments, the nuclear origin of labeled mossy fiber collaterals could not
be studied in any detail, although retrograde cell labeling was noted in many
brainstem structures known to provide mossy fiber projections to the
cerebellum (e.g., the vestibular, trigeminal, lateral reticular, pontine, and
reticular tegmental nuclei).
The location of mossy fiber collateral labeling in the granular layer
directly underneath the labeled climbing fiber collaterals was observed in all
cases but one. Recent studies of tactile projections to crus II of the rat
cerebellum (Brown and Bower,
2001
) revealed a similarity in the peripheral receptive field
organization of Purkinje cell complex spikes (generated by activity in
climbing fibers) and the immediately subjacent granule cells (which receive
their extracerebellar input from mossy fibers). Although the patchy
distribution of mossy and climbing fibers described by Brown and Bower
(2001
) clearly differs from our
observations of a longitudinal zonal arrangement, there is agreement
nonetheless on the congruence in the spatial organization of these two
cerebellar afferent systems (cf. Eccles et
al., 1972
; Ekerot and Larson,
1973
,
1980
;
Garwicz et al., 1998
).
Functional considerations
The presence of two regions in the cerebellum, one in the anterior lobe and
the other in the posterior lobe, with a similar zonally organized input from
climbing and mossy fiber afferents that send branches to both regions, a
corresponding zebrin pattern, and projections to the same cerebellar nuclei,
appears to be a redundant feature of the cerebellum. However, some
observations may mitigate this negative view. For example, Apps
(2000
) used double-retrograde
tracing techniques in cats and found that only
7% of the total population
of olivary neurons innervating the forelimb-receiving parts of the
C1 zone in ANT and PMD have axons that branch to supply climbing
fibers to both regions of cortex. Thus, at least different rostrocaudal parts
of the C1 zone appear to have primarily independent climbing fiber
input, and similar conclusions may also apply to their mossy fiber connections
(Herrero et al., 2002
).
In addition, the anterior and posterior lobes of the rat cerebellum differ
significantly in the relative mediolateral widths of individual zones.
Zebrin-negative zones are wide anteriorly, whereas zebrin-positive zones
dominate the posterior cerebellum. The output of a mossy fiber signal,
transmitted by the parallel fibers to the Purkinje cells in different
zebrin-positive and -negative zones may differ therefore for the anterior and
posterior cerebellum. Nevertheless, a unifying hypothesis on the functional
significance of the features that distinguish zebrin-positive and -negative
Purkinje cells remains to be determined (for review, see
Voogd et al., 1996
;
Hawkes and Eisenman, 1997
;
Dehnes et al., 1998
;
Fritschy et al., 1999
).
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received Jul. 19, 2002;
revised Feb. 27, 2003;
accepted Mar. 11, 2003.
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom)
and the European Economic Community. We thank Rachel Bissett, Clare Everard,
and Erika Sabel-Goedknegt for histological processing of the material, Eddy
Dalm for his help in the processing of the illustrations, Dr. Richard Hawkes
for making the Zebrin II antibody available, and the Benjamin Meaker
Foundation, which supported J. V. during his appointment as a visiting
professor at the University of Bristol. The website
http://www.erasmusmc.nl/voogd-cfcollaterals
was prepared by Bram Schaareman, Erasmus MC Rotterdam.
Correspondence should be addressed to J. Voogd, Department of Neuroscience,
Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail:
j.voogd{at}erasmusmc.nl.
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience
0270-6474/03/234645-12$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Apps R (2000) Rostrocaudal branching within the
climbing fibre projection to forelimb-receiving areas of the cerebellar
cortical C1 zone. J Comp Neurol 419:
193204.[Web of Science][Medline]
Apps R, Trott JR, Dietrichs E (1991) A study of
branching in the projection from the inferior olive to the x and lateral
c1 zones of the cat cerebellum using a combined
electrophysiological and retrograde fluorescent double-labelling technique.
Exp Brain Res 871:
141152.
Armstrong DM, Harvey RJ, Schild RF (1973a) The spatial
organisation of climbing fibre branching in the cat cerebellum. Exp
Brain Res 18:
4058.[Web of Science][Medline]
Armstrong DM, Harvey RJ, Schild RF (1973b) Branching
of inferior olivary axons to terminate in different folia, lobules or lobes of
the cerebellum. Brain Res 54:
365371.[Medline]
Atkins MJ, Apps R (1997) Somatotopical organisation
within the climbing fibre projection to paramedian lobule and copula pyramidis
of the rat cerebellum. J Comp Neurol
389:
249263.[Web of Science][Medline]
Azizi SA, Woodward DJ (1987) Inferior olivary nuclear
complex of the rat: morphology and comments on the principles of organization
within the olivocerebellar system. J Comp Neurol
263:
467484.[Web of Science][Medline]
Brodal A, Kawamura K (1980) Olivocerebellar
projection: a review. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol
64: 1137.
Brown IE, Bower JM (2001) Congruence of mossy fibre
and climbing fibre tactile projections in the lateral hemispheres of the rat
cerebellum. J Comp Neurol 429:
5970.[Web of Science][Medline]
Buisseret-Delmas C (1988a) Sagittal organization of
the olivocerebellonuclear pathway in the rat. I. Connections with the nucleus
fastigii and the nucleus vestibularis lateralis. Neurosci Res
5: 475493.[Medline]
Buisseret-Delmas C (1988b) Sagittal organization of
the olivocerebellonuclear pathway in the rat. II. Connections with the nucleus
interpositus. Neurosci Res 5:
494512.[Web of Science][Medline]
Buisseret-Delmas C, Angaut P (1989) Sagittal
organisation of the olivocerebellonuclear pathway in the rat. III. Connections
with the nucleus dentatus. Neurosci Res
72: 131143.
Buisseret-Delmas C, Angaut P (1993) The cerebellar
olivo-corticonuclear connections in the rat. Prog Neurobiol
40: 6387.[Web of Science][Medline]
Buisseret-Delmas C, Yatim N, Buisseret P, Angaut P
(1993) The X zone and CX subzone of the cerebellum in the rat.
Neurosci Res 16:
195207.[Web of Science][Medline]
Campbell NC, Armstrong DM (1985) Origin in the medial
accessory olive of climbing fibres to the x and lateral c1 zones of
the cat cerebellum: a combined electrophysiological/WGA-HRP investigation.
Exp Brain Res 58:
520531.[Medline]
Chen S, Aston-Jones G (1998) Axonal
collateral-collateral transport of tract tracers in brain neurons: false
anterograde labelling and useful tool. Neuroscience
82:
11511163.[Web of Science][Medline]
Dehnes Y, Chaudhry FA, Ullensvang K, Lehre KP, Storm-Mathisen J,
Danbolt NC (1998) The glutamate transporter EAAT4 in rat
cerebellar Purkinje cells: a glutamate-gated chloride channel concentrated
near the synapse in parts of the dendritic membrane facing astroglia. J
Neurosci 18:
36063619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Eccles JC, Sabah NH, Schmidt RF, Táboøiková H
(1972) Integration by Purkyne
cells of mossy and climbing fibres inputs from cutaneous mechanoreceptors.
Exp Brain Res 15:
498520.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ekerot C-F, Larson B (1973) Correlation between
sagittal projection zones of climbing and mossy fibre paths in cat cerebellar
anterior lobe. Brain Res 64:
446450.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ekerot CF, Larson B (1979) The dorsal
spino-olivocerebellar system in the cat. I. Functional organization and
termination in anterior lobe. Exp Brain Res
36: 201217.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ekerot CF, Larson B (1980) Termination in overlapping
sagittal zones in cerebellar anterior lobe of mossy and climbing fibres paths
activated from dorsal funiculus. Exp Brain Res
38: 163172.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ekerot CF, Larson B (1982) Branching of olivary axons
to innervate pairs of sagittal zones in the cerebellar anterior lobe of the
cat. Exp Brain Res 48:
185198.[Web of Science][Medline]
Fritschy JM, Meskenaite V, Weinmann O, Honer M, Benke D, Mohler H
(1999) GABAB-receptor splice variants GB1a and GB1b in rat brain:
developmental regulation, cellular distribution and extrasynaptic
localization. Eur J Neurosci 11:
761768.[Web of Science][Medline]
Garwicz M (2000) Micro-organisation of cerebellar
modules controlling forelimb movements. Prog Brain Res
124:
187199.[Medline]
Garwicz M, J
rntell H, Ekerot CF
(1998) Cutaneous receptive fields and topography of mossy fibres
and climbing fibres projecting to cat cerebellar C3 zone. J Physiol
(Lond) 512:
277293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gravel C, Eisenman L, Sasseville R, Hawkes R (1987)
Parasagittal organization of the rat cerebellar cortex: a direct correlation
between antigenic bands revealed by mabQ113 and the topography of the
olivocerebellar projection. J Comp Neurol
265:
294310.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hawkes R, Eisenman LM (1997) Stripes and zones: the
origins of regionalization of the adult cerebellum. Perspect Dev
Neurobiol 5:
95105.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hawkes R, Leclerc N (1987) Antigenic map of the rat
cerebellar cortex: the distribution of parasagittal bands as revealed by
monoclonal antiPurkinje cell antibody mabQ113. J Comp Neurol
256: 2941.[Web of Science][Medline]
Heckroth JA, Eisenman LM (1988) Parasagittal
organization of mossy fibre collaterals in the cerebellum of the mouse.
J Comp Neurol 270:
385394.[Medline]
Herrero L, Pardoe J, Apps R (2002) Pontine and lateral
reticular projections to the c1 zone in lobulus simplex and
paramedian lobule of the rat cerebellar cortex. Cerebellum
1: 185199.[Medline]
Ji Z, Hawkes R (1994) Topography of Purkinje cell
compartments and mossy fiber terminal fields in lobules II and III of the rat
cerebellar cortex: spinocerebellar and cuneocerebellar projections.
Neuroscience 61:
935954.[Web of Science][Medline]
Matsushita M, Xiong G (2001) Uncrossed and crossed
projections from the upper cervical spinal cord to the cerebellar nuclei in
the rat, studied by anterograde axonal tracing. J Comp Neurol
432:
101118.[Medline]
Mihailoff GA (1994) Identification of pontocerebellar
axon collateral synaptic boutons in the rat cerebellar nuclei. Brain
Res 648:
313318.[Web of Science][Medline]
Molinari HH, Schultze KE, Strominger NL (1996)
Gracile, cuneate, and spinal trigeminal projections to inferior olive in rat
and monkey. J Comp Neurol 375:
467480.[Medline]
Oscarsson O, Sj
lund B
(1977a) The ventral spino-olivocerebellar system in the cat. I.
Identification of five paths and their termination in the cerebellar anterior
lobe. Exp Brain Res 28:
469486.[Web of Science][Medline]
Oscarsson O, Sj
lund B
(1977b) The ventral spino-olivocerebellar system in the cat. II.
Termination zones in the cerebellar posterior lobe. Exp Brain
Res 28:
487503.[Medline]
Panto MR, Zappala A, Parenti R, Serapide MF, Cicirata F
(2001) Corticonuclear projections of the cerebellum preserve both
anteroposterior and mediolateral pairing patterns. Eur J
Neurosci 13:
694708.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pardoe J, Apps R (2002) Structure-function relations
of two somatotopically corresponding regions of the rat cerebellar cortex:
olivo-corticonuclear connections. Cerebellum
1: 165184.[Medline]
Ruigrok TJ, Voogd J (2000) Organization of projections
from the inferior olive to the cerebellar nuclei in the rat. J Comp
Neurol 426:
209228.[Web of Science][Medline]
Ruigrok TJ, Cella F, Voogd J (1995) Connections of the
lateral reticular nucleus to the lateral vestibular nucleus in the rat. An
anterograde tracing study with Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin.
Eur J Neurosci 7:
14101413.[Medline]
Serapide MF, Panto MR, Parenti R, Zappala A, Cicirata F
(2001) Multiple zonal projections of the basilar pontine nuclei
to the cerebellar cortex of the rat. J Comp Neurol
430:
471484.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sugihara I, Wu H, Shinoda Y (1999) Morphology of
single olivocerebellar axons labeled with biotinylated dextran amine in the
rat. J Comp Neurol 414:
131148.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sugihara I, Wu HS, Shinoda Y (2001) The entire
trajectories of single olivocerebellar axons in the cerebellar cortex and
their contribution to cerebellar compartmentalization. J
Neurosci 21:
77157723.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Teune TM, van der Burg J, de Zeeuw CI, Voogd J, Ruigrok TJ
(1998) Single Purkinje cells can innervate multiple classes of
projection neurons in the cerebellar nuclei of the rat: a light microscopic
and ultrastructural triple-tracer study in the rat. J Comp
Neurol 392:
164178.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tolbert DL, Alisky JM, Clark BR (1993) Lower
thoracic-upper lumbar spinocerebellar projections in rats: a complex
topography revealed in computer reconstructions of the unfolded anterior lobe.
Neuroscience 55:
755774.[Medline]
Trott JR, Armstrong DM (1987a) The cerebellar
corticonuclear projection from lobule Vb/c of the cat anterior lobe: a
combined electrophysiological and autoradiographic study. I. projections from
the intermediate region. Exp Brain Res
66: 318338.[Web of Science][Medline]
Trott JR, Armstrong DM (1987b) The cerebellar
corticonuclear projection from lobule Vb/c of the cat anterior lobe: a
combined electrophysiological and autoradiographic study. II. projections from
the vermis. Exp Brain Res 68:
339354.[Medline]
Voogd J (1969) The importance of fibre connections in
the comparative anatomy of the mammalian cerebellum. In: Neurobiology
of cerebellar evolution and development (Llinas R ed), pp
493514. Chicago: AMAERF Institute for
Biomedical Research.
Voogd J, Bigaré F (1980) Topographical
distribution of olivary and corticonuclear fibres in the cerebellum: a review.
In: The olivary nucleus. Anatomy and physiology (de Montigny C,
Courville J, eds) pp 207234. New York:
Raven.
Voogd J, Ruigrok TJ (1997) Transverse and longitudinal
patterns in the mammalian cerebellum. Prog Brain Res
114: 2137.[Medline]
Voogd J, Eisenman LM, Ruigrok TJH (1993) Relation of
olivocerebellar projection zones to zebrin pattern in rat cerebellum.
Soc Neurosci Abstr 19:
1216.
Voogd J, Jaarsma D, Marani E (1996) The cerebellum,
chemoarchitecture, and anatomy. In: Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy,
Vol 12, Integrated systems of the CNS, Pt III,
Cerebellum, basal ganglia, olfactory system. (Swanson LW,
Bj
rklund A,
H
kfelt T, eds), pp
1369. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wassef M, Angaut P, Arsenio-Nunes L, Bourrat F, Sotelo C
(1992) Purkinje cell heterogeneity: its role in organizing the
topography of the cerebellar cortex connections. In: The cerebellum
revisited (Llinas R, Sotelo C, eds), pp
521. New York: Springer.
Wiklund L, Toggenburger G, Cuénod M (1984)
Selective retrograde labelling of the rat olivocerebellar climbing fibre
system with D-[3H]aspartate. Neuroscience
13: 441468.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wu HS, Sugihara I, Shinoda Y (1999) Projection
patterns of single mossy fibres originating from the lateral reticular nucleus
in the rat cerebellar cortex and nuclei. J Comp Neurol
411: 97118.[Web of Science][Medline]
Yatim N, Billig I, Compoint C, Buisseret P, Buisseret-Delmas C
(1996) Trigeminocerebellar and trigemino-olivary projections in
rats. Neurosci Res 25:
267283.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Prevosto, W. Graf, and G. Ugolini
Cerebellar Inputs to Intraparietal Cortex Areas LIP and MIP: Functional Frameworks for Adaptive Control of Eye Movements, Reaching, and Arm/Eye/Head Movement Coordination
Cereb Cortex,
May 22, 2009;
(2009)
bhp091v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Willson, C. McElnea, J. Mariani, A. M. Lohof, and R. M. Sherrard
BDNF increases homotypic olivocerebellar reinnervation and associated fine motor and cognitive skill
Brain,
April 1, 2008;
131(4):
1099 - 1112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. V. Sillitoe, S.-H. Chung, J.-M. Fritschy, M. Hoy, and R. Hawkes
Golgi Cell Dendrites Are Restricted by Purkinje Cell Stripe Boundaries in the Adult Mouse Cerebellar Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
March 12, 2008;
28(11):
2820 - 2826.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Pijpers, B. H. J. Winkelman, R. Bronsing, and T. J. H. Ruigrok
Selective Impairment of the Cerebellar C1 Module Involved in Rat Hind Limb Control Reduces Step-Dependent Modulation of Cutaneous Reflexes
J. Neurosci.,
February 27, 2008;
28(9):
2179 - 2189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wang, B. Nadarajah, A. C. Robinson, B. W. McColl, J.-W. Jin, F. Dajas-Bailador, R. P. Boot-Handford, and C. Tournier
Targeted Deletion of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 4 Gene in the Nervous System Causes Severe Brain Developmental Defects and Premature Death
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2007;
27(22):
7935 - 7946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Sugihara and Y. Shinoda
Molecular, Topographic, and Functional Organization of the Cerebellar Nuclei: Analysis by Three-Dimensional Mapping of the Olivonuclear Projection and Aldolase C Labeling
J. Neurosci.,
September 5, 2007;
27(36):
9696 - 9710.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Williams, K. Yaddanapudi, M. Hornig, and W. I. Lipkin
Spatiotemporal Analysis of Purkinje Cell Degeneration Relative to Parasagittal Expression Domains in a Model of Neonatal Viral Infection
J. Virol.,
March 15, 2007;
81(6):
2675 - 2687.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Pijpers, R. Apps, J. Pardoe, J. Voogd, and T. J. H. Ruigrok
Precise Spatial Relationships between Mossy Fibers and Climbing Fibers in Rat Cerebellar Cortical Zones.
J. Neurosci.,
November 15, 2006;
26(46):
12067 - 12080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Croci, S.-H. Chung, G. Masserdotti, S. Gianola, A. Bizzoca, G. Gennarini, A. Corradi, F. Rossi, R. Hawkes, and G. G. Consalez
A key role for the HLH transcription factor EBF2COE2,O/E-3 in Purkinje neuron migration and cerebellar cortical topography
Development,
July 15, 2006;
133(14):
2719 - 2729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Odeh, R. Ackerley, J. G. Bjaalie, and R. Apps
Pontine Maps Linking Somatosensory and Cerebellar Cortices Are in Register with Climbing Fiber Somatotopy
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2005;
25(24):
5680 - 5690.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Sugihara and Y. Shinoda
Molecular, Topographic, and Functional Organization of the Cerebellar Cortex: A Study with Combined Aldolase C and Olivocerebellar Labeling
J. Neurosci.,
October 6, 2004;
24(40):
8771 - 8785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|