 |
Correction
for Gao et al., J. Neurosci. 23 (5) 1859-1866.
The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2003, 23(11):4791
 Previous Article
Correction
Vol. 23 (2003) 1859–1866
In the article "Optical Imaging of Long-Term Depression in the Mouse
Cerebellar Cortex In Vivo," by Wangcai Gao, Robert L. Dunbar,
Gang Chen, Kenneth C. Reinert, John Oberdick, and Timothy J. Ebner, which
appeared on pages 1859–1866 of the March 1, 2003 issue, there is an
error in Figure 4B.
The line graph in Figure
4B was inadvertently replaced by a copy of Figure
1C during the editing of proofs. The corrected
Figure 4 and legend are shown
below.
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Two additional control experiments. Average, aligned beam intensity profile
(A) and time course of the normalized optical signal (B) in
normal mice in which only the inferior olive was stimulated instead of the
conjunctive stimulation. Data are from four animals. There was no significant
change in the beam intensity after conjunctive stimulation either in the
region in which parallel fiber beam and climbing fiber band overlap
(overlapping) or in the neighboring regions (non-overlapping). C,
Average, aligned beam intensity profile in the mGluR4 knock-out mice and its
time course (D). Data are from four animals. After conjunctive
stimulation, the normalized optical signal in the interaction region was
reduced throughout the 60 min observation period. There was no change in the
response in the non-interaction region. *p < 0.05 indicates a
significant change relative to the baseline response (Duncan's test).
|
|
|
|
