The Journal of Neuroscience, July 9, 2003, 23(14):5984-5997
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Representation of Retinal Blood Vessels in Primate Striate Cortex
Daniel L. Adams and
Jonathan C. Horton
Beckman Vision Center, University of California, San Francisco, San
Francisco, California 94143-0730
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The blood vessels that nourish the inner retina cast shadows on
photoreceptors, creating "angioscotomas" in the visual field. We
have found the representations of angioscotomas in striate cortex of the
squirrel monkey. They were detected in 9 of 12 normal adult animals by
staining flatmounts for cytochrome oxidase activity after enucleation of one
eye. They appeared as thin profiles in layer 4C radiating from the blind spot
representation. Angioscotomas can be regarded as a local form of amblyopia.
After birth, when light strikes the retina, photoreceptors beneath blood
vessels are denied normal visual stimulation. This deprivation induces
remodeling of geniculocortical afferents in a distribution that corresponds to
the retinal vascular tree.
Angioscotoma representations were most obvious in monkeys with fine ocular
dominance columns and were invisible in monkeys with large, well segregated
columns. In monkeys without columns, their width corresponded faithfully to
the inducing retinal shadow, making it possible to calculate the minimum
shadow required to produce a cortical representation. The "amblyogenic
threshold" was calculated as the fraction of the pupil area eclipsed to
trigger remodeling of geniculocortical afferents. It was found to be constant
over retinal eccentricity, vessel size, and shadow size. Ambliogenic shadows
only three to four cones wide were sufficient to generate a cortical
representation, testifying to the remarkable precision of the cortical map.
The representations of retinal blood vessels separated by only 0.65° were
resolvable in the cortex, yielding an upper limit on cortical resolution of
340 µm in layer 4C.
Key words: amblyopia; deprivation; angioscotoma; ocular dominance column; cytochrome oxidase; retina
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Purkyn
(1819
)
discovered by transilluminating the sclera with candlelight that he could see
his own retinal vessels. He took advantage of this phenomenon to become the
first person to draw his own retinal vasculature. The easiest way to see one's
own vessels is to hold a penlight at the lateral canthus and wiggle it over
the closed eyelids. The retinal vessels become instantly visible as a dark
pattern silhouetted against a red background. Constant movement is necessary,
because stabilized retinal images fade quickly
(Ditchburn and Ginsborg, 1953
;
Riggs et al., 1953
). Coppola
and Purves (1996
) have shown
that entoptic vascular images disappear in <80 msec once motion ceases.
von Helmholtz (1924
) was
the first to discover that the retinal blood vessels give rise to scotomas in
the visual field. His plot of the blind spot showed three short protrusions,
located where one would expect the major retinal vessels to cross the edge of
the optic disc (von Helmholtz,
1924
, his Fig. 2).
Evans (1926
) later coined the
term "angioscotomas" to refer to the defects in the visual field
resulting from retinal blood vessels. Under optimal conditions an extensive
pattern of scotomas from retinal vessels can be plotted
(Dashevsky, 1938
;
Evans, 1938
;
Welt, 1945
;
Goldmann, 1947
;
Zulauf, 1990
;
Safran et al., 1995
;
Remky et al., 1996
;
Benda et al., 1999
;
Schiefer et al., 1999
).
Figure 1 demonstrates how to
find one's own angioscotomas.

View larger version (174K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Monkey K. Fundus pictures showing the optic discs and retinal vessels.
Below are single CO sections through layer 4C showing the representations of
the optic discs pictured directly above. The left eye was enucleated, so the
right blind spot representation (represented in the left cortex) appears pale.
The thin lines radiating from the blind spot representations are the
representations of angioscotomas from shadows cast by retinal vessels leaving
the optic disc. Tissue between the arrows is shown in cross section in
Figure 5. The leftmost vessel,
an artery, is indicated below in the cortex by an arrowhead.
|
|

View larger version (5K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. To detect one's own angioscotomas, close the right eye and stare at the X
while holding the page 40 cm away. The oval will disappear into your
blind spot. Slowly move the page a bit closer or farther away. The black dash
above the blind spot will disappear when it falls into the angioscotoma
created by your inferior temporal retinal vein. Next, shift your gaze
methodically from one letter to the next. As you proceed leftward, you will
lose the black dash again. This occurs when it falls in the angioscotoma of
the inferior temporal artery.
|
|

View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Monkey K. Plastic section (1 µm) of the right eye, stained with
Toluidine blue, passing between the arrows shown in
Figure 2. The precise location
was pinpointed by the junction between the vein and its branch, which can be
seen in the retinal photograph, although it is a bit out of focus. Near the
optic disc, large vessels are situated in the nerve fiber layer, which becomes
especially thickened. The vein branch enters and disrupts the ganglion cell
layer. The artery on the left, the angioscotoma representation of which is
marked by an arrowhead in Figure
2, has a lumen diameter of 57 µm. This was calculated by
measuring the lumen circumference and dividing by (we assumed the oval
shape was a postmortem artifact). The small arrows denote four ellipsoids of
cone inner segments, located underneath the artery. NFL, Nerve fiber layer;
GCL, ganglion cell layer; IPL, inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear
layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; IS, inner
segments; OS, outer segments; PE, pigment epithelium.
|
|
Geniculate inputs to striate cortex serving the left and right eyes are
segregated into stripes within layer 4 that are known as ocular dominance
columns (Hubel and Wiesel,
1969
,
1977
;
Horton and Hedley-Whyte, 1984
;
LeVay et al., 1985
). These
columns can be labeled by staining the cortex for cytochrome oxidase (CO)
activity after enucleation of one eye
(Wong-Riley, 1979
;
Horton and Hubel, 1981
;
Horton and Hedley-Whyte,
1984
). Because CO levels reflect physiological activity, loss of
staining occurs in the columns formerly driven by the missing eye. A mosaic of
regular, alternating light (enucleated eye) and dark (intact eye) stripes
emerges throughout the representation of the visual field, except in two
monocular areas: the blind spot and temporal crescent. Columns are absent in
these regions because only one eye is represented.
For many years, the squirrel monkey was regarded as an anomaly among
primates because it was shown repeatedly to lack ocular dominance columns
(Tigges et al., 1977
,
1984
;
Hendrickson et al., 1978
;
Rowe et al., 1978
;
Hendrickson and Wilson, 1979
;
Humphrey and Hendrickson,
1983
; Hendrickson and Tigges,
1985
; Livingstone,
1996
). However, we have demonstrated that ocular dominance columns
exist in squirrel monkeys, although they are often quite fine (450 µm per
pair in width) and indistinct (Horton and
Hocking, 1996b
). In this previous study, we failed to locate the
representation of the blind spot or the monocular crescent. We now describe
these features and in addition show that the representation of a third
monocular compartment, the angioscotomas, can be detected using CO in squirrel
monkey striate cortex.
This discovery has provided new insight into the physiological basis of
angioscotomas. It has also yielded new data concerning the mechanisms
underlying the formation of ocular dominance columns and the role of visual
experience in the development of the cortex. Finally, it has revealed more
clearly the precision of the visual field representation in layer 4C.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Experimental animals. These experiments were performed on 12 adult
squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) from an indoor colony at the
California Regional Primate Research Center (Davis, CA). All procedures were
approved by the University of California San Francisco Committee on Animal
Research. Each animal was normal, verified by complete ophthalmological
examination under ketamine anesthesia (15 mg/kg, i.m.). During this
examination, the ocular fundi were photographed with a model TRC-FE camera
(Topcon Medical Systems, Paramus, NJ) mounted on a platform that allowed easy
pivoting around the center of the optical axis on the corneal front surface.
These photographs were montaged using Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose,
CA).
After the photographic montages of the fundi were prepared (usually
1
week later), each animal was brought back to the laboratory for calibration of
the pictures by projection of retinal landmarks onto a tangent screen. Each
animal was given ketamine HCl (15 mg/kg, i.m.), intubated, and respirated with
2% isoflorane in a 50:50 mixture of O2/N2O. Under
general anesthesia the following parameters were monitored continuously:
temperature, EKG, heart rate, respiratory rate, tidal volume, end-tidal
CO2, SpO2, inspiratory and expiratory isoflorane,
O2, and N2O concentrations. Paralysis was induced with
succinylcholine HCl at an infusion rate of 45 mg/kg, i.v.
The animal was placed in a stereotaxic frame mounted on a model 413
professional tripod (Gitzo, Créteil, France). The tripod allowed us to
orient the stereotaxic frame to align the eye's visual axis perpendicular to
the center of a 6 x 9 foot tangent screen located 57 inches away. The
pupils were dilated with 2.5% neosynephrine HCl and 0.125% scopolamine HCl
drops. A hard 7.5 mm diameter contact lens was used to prevent corneal
drying.
The fundus montage (prepared in advance) was used to select a prominent
retinal landmark (e.g., a vessel bifurcation). The landmark was then
identified through the fundus camera in the anesthetized, paralyzed animal.
The crosshair of the camera was focused on the landmark and locked in place.
Next, a mirror was placed flush against the barrel of the objective lens, and
the shutter was tripped with the back of the camera open. This reflected a
small circle of light back to the tangent screen at a position corresponding
to the retinal landmark. With practice, retinal landmarks in the central
30° could be projected with an accuracy of ±0.1°. After
plotting
15 landmarks, we rechecked the position of the first few to
ensure that no eye movements had occurred during the hour required for retinal
calibration. Eye movements were rare because of the high dose of
succinylcholine used during these brief measurements. The calibration process
was repeated in the fellow eye, after the tripod was adjusted to position its
optical axis perpendicular to the tangent screen. Positioning the optical axis
perpendicular to the tangent screen made it easy to convert distance (
)
on the tangent screen from the foveal projection point to degrees eccentricity
(
) by using the formula
= arctan
/57.
After finishing the calibration process for each retina, we enucleated one
eye using sterile technique. This procedure was necessary to reveal the
angioscotomas (Fig. 1) in the
cortex with CO. The animal was then reawakened and returned to its cage. A
potent analgesic, Buprenorphine HCl (0.03 mg/kg, i.m.), was given every 8 hr
until the animal had recovered completely. In many animals, we recorded from
striate cortex for 24 hr before enucleating one eye. These data will be
presented in another paper.
Measurements of newborn squirrel monkey eyes. Angioscotoma
representations form in striate cortex soon after birth, induced by the
shadows cast by retinal blood vessels
(Adams and Horton, 2002
). To
determine the size of these shadows, one must know the diameter (p)
of the pupil and the distance (d) from the pupil to the retina in
baby monkeys.
In infants, the pupil is smaller, less reactive to light, and less variable
in size than in adults (Isenberg et al.,
1989
; Roarty and Keltner,
1990
). To determine the average size of the pupil in baby squirrel
monkeys, we took pictures of their eyes using a camera with a ring flash on a
100 mm macro lens. We photographed five babies at age 1 week from the colony
at the California Regional Primate Research Center. Pictures were taken in the
same housing facility and under the same lighting conditions that were present
during the infancy of six animals used in this study (monkeys C, D, E, O, P,
Q). No anesthesia (which might affect pupil size) was needed, because squirrel
monkeys can be handheld at age 1 week. We allowed plenty of time between flash
pictures for the pupil to recover. The mean pupil diameter (p),
determined from scanned photographs, was 1.9 mm ± 0.03 mm SEM,
n = 10, range 1.72.0 mm. Mean corneal diameter was 6.1 mm.
The distance (d) from the pupil to the retina was measured with a
Humphrey-Allergan Model 820 A-ultrasound unit (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin,
CA) in three newborn squirrel monkeys. The mean value was 8.4 ± 0.12 mm
SEM. Mean axial length was 10.1 ± 0.12 mm SEM.
These measurements provided figures for the size of the entrance pupil and
the position of the real pupil in the baby squirrel monkey. Calculation of
angioscotoma dimensions depends on the size and position of the exit pupil.
Vakkur and Bishop (1963
) have
compared the diameter of the entrance and exit pupil in the cat eye. They
differ by <250 µm for a pupil up to 5 mm in diameter. Therefore,
assuming that the squirrel monkey is similar, little error is introduced by
measuring the diameter of the entrance pupil rather than the exit pupil.
Vakkur and Bishop (1963
) also
determined the relative positions of the real pupil and exit pupil in the cat
eye. They are located within 100 µm of each other for a pupil up to 5 mm in
diameter. Thus, location of the real pupil provides an adequate estimate of
the location of the exit pupil, at least for our purposes.
To determine the size of a vascular shadow, one must also know the retinal
blood vessel lumen diameter (c) and the distance (s) from
the blood vessel to the cone inner/outer segment junction. Measurements of
these parameters were made in adult eyes that were postfixed in 2%
paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde, followed by embedding in
Epon-Araldite. These procedures induce a mean tissue shrinkage of 18%
(Perry and Cowey, 1985
). The
monkey eye increases in axial length from birth to adulthood by 22%
(Smith et al., 2001
). Because
tissue shrinkage from processing is approximately equal to the growth of the
eye from birth to adulthood, dimensions for c and s were
taken directly from plastic-embedded adult retinal tissue.
Histological procedures. We waited a minimum of 10 d to maximize
changes in cortical CO activity induced by monocular enucleation. We then
killed the animals with an injection of sodium pentobarbital (150 mg/kg). Each
monkey was perfused through the left ventricle with 1 l of normal saline
followed by 1l of 1% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer.
Flatmounts of striate cortex were prepared from each hemisphere
(Horton and Hocking, 1996a
),
cut with a freezing microtome at 3040 µm, mounted on slides,
air-dried, and reacted for CO. In every animal, the eyes were saved for
subsequent histological processing, which included preparation of retinal
whole mounts or embedding in Epon-Araldite for semithin sectioning.
Data analysis. Cortical CO flatmounts were imaged at 600 dots per
inch on an Arcus II flatbed scanner (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) fitted with a
transparency adapter to prepare montages of layer 4C
. Autoradio-graphs,
retina, and high-power cortex pictures were taken with a Spot RT Slider camera
(Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) mounted on an SZH10 (Olympus
Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) or an Axioskop microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY).
Images were imported into Illustrator 9.0 or Photoshop 6.0 (Adobe Systems) to
prepare the Figures. Measurements were made using CADtools (Hotdoor Inc.,
Grass Valley, CA) for Illustrator. Adjustments in brightness and contrast were
made of individual sections used to assemble cortical montages with Photoshop.
In addition, blood vessels were removed using the "dust and
scratches" noise filter. It assigned the white pixels in an empty blood
vessel lumen to the mean local color value in surrounding cortex. This step
removed the distracting profiles of cortical blood vessels from the montages,
making it slightly easier to see the angioscotoma representations.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Representation of angioscotomas in striate cortex
Figure 2 shows the optic
discs and cortical blind spot representations from monkey K. This animal had
only a faint trace of ocular dominance columns, visible in a limited region of
the cortex near the monocular crescent representation. No ocular dominance
columns were visible in the cortex surrounding the blind spot representations.
By the term "blind spot" representation, we are referring to a
region of cortex corresponding to the visual field location of the blind spot.
For example, the blind spot of the left eye is represented in the right
cortex, and it receives input derived exclusively from the right (ipsilateral)
eye.
Figure 2 shows raw data,
namely, single cortical sections before application of the dust and scratches
filter and the preparation of montages. The sections pass mostly through layer
4C
but graze deeper layers. The blind spot representation in the right
cortex appeared dark, because it was supplied solely by the remaining right
eye. Conversely, the blind spot representation in the left cortex was pale,
because the left eye was enucleated.
In the right cortex, approximately eight thin dark threads radiated out
from the blind spot representation of the left eye. These were the cortical
representations of angioscotomas created by blood vessels emanating from the
left optic disc. They were dark, like the blind spot representation, because
they received input only from the intact right eye. In the left cortex, the
representations of the angioscotomas were also visible; however, they were
pale rather than dark, because their input derived exclusively from the
enucleated left eye. Fewer angioscotomas are visible in this section because
portions skimmed layer 5.
The angioscotomas were seen best in layer 4C
. They were also present
in layer 4C
, but lower in contrast. They could not be detected in any
other cortical layer. Figure
3A shows the array of CO patches in layer 3. No hint of
the angioscotomas or the blind spot representation was apparent. Moreover, the
trajectory of the angioscotomas in layer 4C
bore no relationship to the
CO patches in other layers (Fig.
3B). In layer 4A (Fig.
3C), the blind spot representation was slightly darker
than surrounding cortex, but no angioscotomas were seen. In layer 5
(Fig. 3D), neither the
blind spot nor the angioscotomas were seen.

View larger version (177K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Monkey K. A, Single section of layer 3, cut through the same
region of the right cortex shown in Figure
2 (see bottom left panel) but 210 µm more superficial. CO
patches are present throughout the area. No effect of monocular enucleation is
visible. The blind spot representation is not apparent, because the upper
layers in squirrel monkey contain highly binocular cells. B, Same
section as in A, with the locations of the blind spot and
angioscotomas from layer 4 outlined with dots. The patches neither skirt nor
follow the path of the angioscotomas. C, Single section grazing layer
4A, immediately adjacent to the section shown above. The region overlying the
blind spot representation appears slightly darker than surrounding cortex, but
the angioscotomas are not visible. D, Single section cut mostly
through layer 5, 105 µm below the section shown from layer 4C in
Figure 2, bottom left. No hint
of the blind spot or angioscotomas is seen.
|
|
These findings highlight a fundamental difference between the organization
of striate cortex in macaque monkeys and squirrel monkeys. In macaques, the
patches outside layer 4C are organized in rows aligned with an ocular
dominance column (Horton and Hubel,
1981
; Horton,
1984
). Because patches are aligned with ocular dominance columns
and receive a monocular konio-cellular input
(Hendry and Yoshioka, 1994
;
Horton and Hocking, 1996a
,
1997
), their cells tend to be
monocular (Livingstone and Hubel,
1984
). Consequently, after monocular enucleation the rows of
patches in register with columns of the missing eye turn pale. The blind spot
representation becomes visible in every layer because ocular dominance is
perpetuated outside layer 4C (Fig.
4). However, its contrast is lower outside layer 4C because the
segregation of ocular inputs is weaker.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Macaque monkey. A, Single CO section through layer 4C, after
enucleation of the contralateral eye. This experiment was done in connection
with an unrelated project and is shown here simply for comparison with
Figure 2, bottom left panel.
The blind spot representation appears dark, as in the squirrel monkey. The
striking difference is that the surrounding cortex is organized into
high-contrast, large, sharply defined ocular dominance columns. B,
Section from the same region, 315 µm more superficial, passing through
layer 3. The patches in every other row appear pale, as opposed to the
squirrel monkey, in which all patches retain the same level of CO activity
after monocular enucleation. In addition, the blind spot representation is
visible as an oval dark zone matching its shape in layer 4C. The blind spot
representation is visible in all layers because the cortex outside layer 4
retains greater monocularity than in the squirrel monkey.
|
|
In the squirrel monkey, the patches have no relationship to ocular
dominance columns in layer 4. All patches in the upper layers are labeled
after a tracer injection into one eye
(Horton and Hocking, 1996b
).
Their cells are far more binocular than those in the macaque
(Livingstone and Hubel, 1984
).
Consequently, after monocular enucleation, the blind spot representation can
be seen in CO sections of layer 4 but not other layers. The CO levels in other
layers are maintained by activity driven by the remaining eye. This means that
the retinotopic map must be quite coarse outside layer 4, because inputs from
the remaining eye are imported from outside its blind spot representation. Our
CO data therefore support the evidence from physiological recordings that
receptive field size and scatter are greater in layers outside 4C
(Hubel and Wiesel, 1974
). The
precision of retinotopic organization is likely to be similar in the upper
layers of squirrel monkey and macaque cortex. Therefore, the visibility of the
blind spot outside layer 4C in macaques is probably caused mainly by stronger
monocularity.
Shadows cast by retinal blood vessels
Figure 5 shows a 1 µm
cross section from the right eye of monkey K that extends between the two
arrows in Figure 2. The section
contains two prominent arteries, flanking a vein, in the nerve fiber layer.
Large retinal vessels emanating from the optic disc pass directly into the
nerve fiber layer. They descend into the ganglion cell layer as their distance
from the optic disc increases (Snodderly
and Weinhaus, 1990
; Snodderly
et al., 1992
). In the ganglion cell layer they create channels,
disrupting the normal cellular architecture. This can be seen in
Figure 5 by tracing the path of
the small tributary to the big vein, which enters the ganglion cell layer. In
the vicinity of this venous branch, the ganglion cells have been displaced.
One might propose that gaps in the ganglion cell layer from blood vessels give
rise to angioscotomas. This idea is dispelled by the large artery in
Figure 5 located above the
ganglion cell layer. It produced an angioscotoma in the cortex
(Fig. 2) but no disruption of
the ganglion cell layer beneath it. Therefore, physical displacement of
ganglion cells by blood vessels is not responsible for angioscotomas.
Angioscotomas arise from light absorption by hemoglobin within red blood
cells, resulting in a shadow cast on photoreceptors beneath. The blood vessel
wall is virtually transparent to light. Therefore, only lumen diameter is
pertinent to the following optical calculations.
Figure 6A shows a
schematic drawing with rays of light traced from the edge of the pupil to a
retinal vessel. Any object (e.g., a retinal vessel) illuminated by a non-point
source (e.g., the pupil) creates a shadow composed of a central umbra
surrounded by a penumbra (Fig.
6B). The width of these shadows depends on four
variables: p = exit pupil diameter; d = distance from exit
pupil aperture to retinal blood vessel; s = distance from blood
vessel to the junction between cone inner/outer segments; c = retinal
blood vessel lumen diameter.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. A, Schematic scale drawing of the squirrel monkey eye illustrating
the paths of light from the pupil to the retina. The dimensions used to
calculated the size of shadows cast by retina blood vessels are labeled:
p, pupil diameter; d, pupil aperture to blood vessel
distance. B, The boxed region of retina from A shown at
higher magnification. The rays of light are shown superimposed onto a 1 µm
plastic section of squirrel monkey retina. A single artery of lumen diameter
c is present in the retinal ganglion cell layer at a distance
s from the photoreceptor inner/outer segment transition plane (the
shadow plane). The shadow cast by this vessel comprises a central total shadow
(umbra) bordered by a peripheral partial shadow (penumbra).
|
|
Mean pupil diameter (p) was 1.9 mm and mean distance from the exit
pupil to the retina (d) was 8.4 mm (see Materials and Methods).
The distance s was sampled in 1 µm plastic cross sections
throughout the retina from three fixed adult specimens.
Figure 7A shows a
series of aligned sections, which are stacked to show retinal blood vessels in
cross section from the fovea to the optic disc. One can identify individual
vessels in the fundus photograph and find their corresponding cross section in
the 1 µm plastic sections to determine s and c at any
point (Fig. 7C,D). For
vessels visible in the photograph, s ranged between 165 and 253
µm. In the macula, s was large because the ganglion cell and Henle
fiber layers were thick. Near the optic disc and along the major vascular
arcades, s was large because the nerve fiber layer was thick. In
peripheral nasal retina, s was small because the retinal layers were
thin; it measured only 115 µm at 50° (angioscotomas were visible rarely
in the cortex beyond this eccentricity).

View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Monkey Q, right retina. A, Stacked series of 20 plastic cross
sections (1 µm), each 125 µm apart, compiled to measure s
(distance from center of blood vessel lumen to cone inner/outer segment
junction) for individually identified vessels at different locations. Boxed
vessel is shown in panels below. B, Photograph of right fundus,
outlining the retina illustrated histologically (A) with a rectangle.
The fine vertical white lines indicate the positions of cross sections shown
below. C, High-power view of venule only 28 µm in lumen diameter
(calculated assuming circular cross section), the representation of which was
visible in the cortex. The vessel was located at an eccentricity of 7.5°
and cast only penumbra, equal to 83 µm (gradient between thin black lines),
on the basis of values s = 243 µm, p = 1.9 mm, d
= 8.4 mm. D, The same venule, but at an eccentricity of 4.1°,
cast only penumbra, measuring 64 µm, on the basis of the indicated
parameters. This shadow did not induce a visible representation in the cortex.
OD, Optic disc.
|
|
The width of vessel shadows can be calculated using similar triangle
geometry in Figure 6
(Applegate et al., 1990
):
Figure 8A is a
graph of vessel diameter versus shadow width calculated from the above
formulas using fixed values of s = 200 µm, d = 8.4 mm,
and four different pupil diameters. The shadow contains two components: the
umbra (solid line) and the penumbra. Total shadow width (dotted line) equals
the umbra plus twice the penumbra. The graph provides shadow widths cast by
blood vessels of various lumen diameter. For example, a vessel of diameter 40
µm illuminated through a 1.0 mm pupil casts a shadow 65 µm wide, the
umbra of which occupies the central 17 µm. If the vessel is small enough,
or the pupil large enough, the shadow will consist of penumbra alone. For
example, the same 40 µm diameter vessel illuminated through a 3 mm pupil
will cast no umbra on the photoreceptors but will cast a penumbra measuring
111 µm wide.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. A, Graph showing the widths of shadows cast onto photoreceptors by
retinal vessels of different lumen (c) at various pupil diameters
(p). Solid lines represent the width of the umbra alone, and dotted
lines represent the width of the whole shadow (umbra + twice penumbra). Pupil
diameters of 1, 3, and 4 mm are shown, plus 1.9 mm, the experimentally
determined value for an infant squirrel monkey. The values of s and
d were 200 µm and 8.4 mm, respectively. B, Graph showing
the widths of shadows cast onto photoreceptors by retinal vessels of different
lumen (c), at various distances (s) from the photoreceptor
layer. Solid lines represent the width of the umbra alone, and dotted lines
represent the width of the total shadow. Five values of s are shown:
100300 µm. For this graph, p and d were fixed at
1.9 and 8.4 mm, respectively.
|
|
Figure 8A shows
shadow widths for a pupil diameter of 1.9 mm, the mean pupil size in infant
squirrel monkeys, as well as for diameters of 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0 mm. From
inspection of the graph, it is evident that most vessels in the ganglion cell
layer of the infant monkey cast only a penumbra on photoreceptors. In fact,
vessels <44 µm in diameter cast no umbra when the pupil diameter equals
1.9 mm. Only the largest vessels, which form the main vascular arcades of the
retina, give rise to an umbra. For example, the large artery in
Figure 5 (and
Fig. 2, top right panel) has a
lumen diameter of 57 µm, producing an umbra of 13 µm and a total shadow
of 104 µm.
With spontaneous changes in pupil diameter, shadows from blood vessels will
fluctuate in size and density. As described in a later section, the
representation of vessels with a lumen as small as 28 µm can be detected in
the cortex. An umbra forms transiently under such small vessels only during
moments of extreme pupil constriction. Therefore, we suspect that in many
cases penumbra alone is sufficient to induce an angioscotoma representation in
the cortex.
The minimum vessel size of 44 µm for umbra formation calculated above
used a value of 200 µm for the distance (s) from the blood vessel
to the photoreceptor layer. Because s is a critical factor, we
plotted shadow width as a function of s, setting pupil diameter
(p) to 1.9 mm (Fig.
8B). Measurements in retinal cross sections from three
animals revealed that s is never <150 µm for retinal blood
vessels in the central 24°, whose angioscotomas are visible in the cortex.
For p = 1.9 mm, s = 150 µm, the smallest vessel casting
an umbra would have a lumen of 33 µm. As noted above, smaller vessels are
represented in the cortex. These calculations, based on conservative values
for p and s, confirm that many angioscotomas are induced by
penumbra, without umbra.
We propose that angioscotoma representations are generated by the same
process that leads to shrinkage of ocular dominance columns after early
monocular eyelid suture or cataract (Hubel
et al., 1977
). The penumbras (and occasionally umbras) of blood
vessels that fall on photoreceptors cause local deprivation in the retina,
leading to remodeling of geniculocortical afferents during the critical
period. After enucleation in the adult animal, the blind spot and the
angioscotomas are revealed by CO.
According to this hypothesis, angioscotomas mapped in adults do not arise
from vascular shadows (although they were induced by them during childhood)
but represent a secondary phenomenon from amblyopia. This would explain why
angioscotomas tend to be wider than the diameters of the blood vessels
themselves (Remky et al.,
1996
). If one could somehow make an adult's retinal vessels
transparent, angioscotomas would persist. This conclusion leads one to predict
that angioscotoma width in adults does not depend directly on pupil size. Once
the retina has become amblyopic, angioscotoma width should be fixed and hence
independent of the width of the inducing shadow. If the pupil were made large
(by instillation of mydriatic drops), blood vessels would throw large, weak
penumbras on the retina. Nevertheless, angioscotomas would remain discrete and
dense, because they correspond to a zone of "amblyopic"
photoreceptors, not a vascular shadow. Extreme constriction of the pupil,
however, might create an umbra even wider than the angioscotoma defined by
amblyopic photoreceptors.
Mapping angioscotoma representations in striate cortex
Figure 9 shows the
angioscotoma representations in the right cortex of monkey L. This animal had
rudimentary ocular dominance columns. The montages of layer 4C were slightly
uneven because of seams from the montaging process and fluctuations in CO
density with varying depth in layer 4C
. The near absence of columns in
monkey L was genuine rather than a failure of CO staining, because CO readily
labeled the blind spots and angioscotomas. Successful labeling of these
monocular zones means that if ocular dominance columns had been present, CO
would have revealed them.

View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9. Monkey L, right hemisphere. A, CO flatmount montage, showing dark
blind spot and angioscotoma representations after enucleation of the left eye.
Except for some fluctuations in CO density near the monocular crescent, ocular
dominance columns were essentially absent in this animal. B,
Photomontage of the left fundus. C, Drawing of angioscotomas.
D, Drawing of retina, with color-coded vessels represented in the
cortex.
|
|
The angioscotoma representations were thinnest in animals with rudimentary
columns, as in monkey L or monkey K (Fig.
2). Their pattern was drawn by eye
(Fig. 9C) to estimate
their total area and perimeter. In the right cortex of monkey L, the
angioscotomas had an area of 20.8 mm2 and a perimeter of 240.6 mm.
Mean angioscotoma width, obtained by dividing the area by half the perimeter,
was 172 µm. In the left cortex, the angioscotomas had an area of 13.1
mm2 and a perimeter of 148.7 mm. These values yielded a mean
angioscotoma width of 176 µm.
In monkey Q, the next animal, the ocular dominance columns were better
developed than in monkey L (Fig.
10A, compare with Fig.
9A). Nonetheless, they were too indistinct to draw
accurately. To gain an impression of their periodicity, the spatial Fourier
spectrum of the CO montage was analyzed using Matlab 5.0 (Math-works, Natick,
MA). The power spectrum had a peak at 1.94 cycles per millimeter,
corresponding to a single column width of 258 µm. For the sake of
illustration, we bandpass filtered the CO montage
(Fig. 10A) to create
a pattern similar in periodicity to the ocular dominance columns. This pattern
was used to provide the background columns in the schematic drawing of the
cortical angioscotomas (Fig.
10C).

View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 10. Monkey Q, right hemisphere. A, Layer 4C CO montage, showing blind
spot with 12 radiating angioscotoma representations. They are pale because the
right eye was enucleated. The angioscotomas are particularly extensive and
obvious in this animal. A fine pattern of rather indistinct ocular dominance
columns is present. B, Retinal montage, compiled from fundus pictures
taken in vivo. C, Color-coded drawing of angioscotomas visible in
A. A few angioscotomas of reversed (dark) CO contrast, induced by
vessels in the temporal retina of the right eye, are shown in black.
D, Drawing showing 12 vessels in nasal retina represented in the
right cortex.
|
|
Monkey Q had an unusually clear and complete pattern of cortical
angioscotomas. They appeared so extensive, as we propose in the next few
pages, because the periodicity of the animals' ocular dominance columns was
ideal for their visualization. In monkey Q's right cortex, the angioscotomas
had an area of 55.3 mm2, a perimeter of 358.1 mm, and a width of
310 µm. In the left cortex, the angioscotomas had an area of 82.2
mm2 and a perimeter of 528.7 mm, yielding a mean angioscotoma width
of 310 µm. Compared with monkey L, the angioscotomas were much wider (310
vs 174 µm) and more fully represented.
Monkey E (Fig. 11) had
clearly defined ocular dominance columns throughout striate cortex in both
hemispheres. The columns were coarser than those in monkeys L and Q. Fourier
analysis yielded an average single column width of 452 µm. Representations
of only a few of the largest fundus vessels were visible. Combining data from
both hemispheres, we found that the angioscotoma representations occupied just
36 mm2. They had a mean width of 344 µm.

View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 11. Monkey E, right hemisphere. A, CO flatmount montage, showing dark
blind spot and angioscotoma representations after enucleation of the left eye.
A pattern of "intermediate" ocular dominance columns can be seen
throughout the cortex except in the representation of the blind spot and
monocular crescent. Only the largest blood vessels are represented within the
ocular dominance mosaic. B, Single fundus photograph including the
optic disk, major retinal vessels, and fovea. C, Drawing of
angioscotomas. Dotted line represents striate cortex corresponding to the
extent of the fundus photograph. D, Drawing of retina, with
color-coded vessels represented in the cortex. Star, Fovea.
|
|
Monkey N had well segregated ocular dominance columns
(Fig. 12). For a squirrel
monkey, they were extraordinarily large. Mean single column width by Fourier
analysis was 608 µm. No representations of retinal blood vessels were
recognizable in the cortex; however, the blind spot and monocular crescent
representations were seen easily.

View larger version (189K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 12. Monkey N, right cortex. A highly segregated pattern of coarse ocular
dominance columns (reminiscent of macaque and human striate cortex) precludes
the formation of angioscotoma representations.
|
|
Among normal squirrel monkeys, there is enormous inherent variability in
the expression of ocular dominance columns
(Adams and Horton, 2003a
). In
some animals, like monkey K (Fig.
2) or monkey L (Fig.
9), they were nearly absent. In other animals, such as monkey N
(Fig. 12), they were as
prominent as those found in macaques and humans. The 12 monkeys in this study
could be grouped into four categories on the basis of the appearance of their
ocular dominance columns. This was useful for illustration of our data, but we
do not mean to suggest that such discrete categories exist in nature. Four
monkeys (I, J, K, L) had rudimentary columns, and four (C, M, P, Q) had fine
(
250 µm wide), rather indistinct columns. Two monkeys (D, E) had
medium (
450 µm wide), well defined columns, and two (N, O) had large
(
600 µm), highly segregated columns. A consistent relationship was
found between the visibility of angioscotomas and the periodicity of ocular
dominance columns. Figure 13
shows schematically the influence of column periodicity on the appearance of
angioscotoma representations.

View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of the relationship between ocular dominance column
periodicity and angioscotoma visibility in the cortex. The pattern of
geniculate afferents from the left and right eye is represented as black and
white. The region of striate cortex shown here contains the superior half of
the blind spot representation. The four panels show examples of different
column periodicities: A, rudimentary columns (monkeys L, K);
B, fine columns (monkeys C, Q); C, intermediate columns
(monkey E); D, coarse columns (monkey N). Note that angioscotomas are
best seen in animals with fine columns, because they are highlighted by
columns serving the other eye. Angioscotomas are not well seen in animals with
coarser, better segregated columns, because the columns override the
angioscotoma pattern.
|
|
In animals with rudimentary columns, the width of angioscotoma
representations is a faithful reflection of shadow width, shadow density, and
local cortical magnification factor. In animals with better developed ocular
dominance columns, the situation is more complex. Assume that ocular dominance
columns in squirrel monkey, when they occur, are present at birth, as they are
in macaques. Under these circumstances, ocular dominance columns must be
remodeled in the cortex for angioscotomas to become visible. Territory
belonging to the eye in which photoreceptors are obscured is taken over by the
eye that has an unencumbered view of the visual scene. Consequently, solid
channels develop, cutting swaths through the mosaic of ocular dominance
columns. Enucleation reveals the angioscotomas because they are tantamount to
remodeled ocular dominance columns. These remodeled ocular dominance columns
are centered on the retinotopic position of retinal blood vessels but are not
necessarily equal to their retinotopic width.
Because angioscotoma representations are simply ocular dominance columns,
their width appears to be strongly influenced by the inherent periodicity of
the ocular dominance columns present in any given animal. The angioscotoma
representations are wider in animals with fine or intermediate columns (Figs.
10,
11) than in animals with
rudimentary columns (Fig. 9).
Their enhanced width makes them easier to detect. This helps explains why more
of the retinal vascular tree is represented in monkey Q than in monkey L. It
appears that the cortex strings together "pixels" about the size
of ocular dominance columns to create the angioscotoma representations.
As the periodicity of columns increases beyond an optimal range
(200300 µm single column width), fewer and fewer retinal blood
vessels are represented. In monkey E (Fig.
11), an animal with a mean column width of 450 µm (calculated
from the peak in the spatial Fourier spectrum of the CO montage), only the
largest retinal vessels were represented. They appeared similar to the
underlying mosaic, and in many places, their paths became disrupted by the
column pattern. In monkey N, whose mean column width was 608 µm, no
angioscotomas could be discerned at all
(Fig. 12). We suspect that in
such animals columns are unable to remodel to form angioscotoma
representations. This may reflect the tendency for larger columns to be better
segregated. In such animals, greater "repellency" between the
geniculocortical afferents serving the two eyes may render it impossible for
the afferents of one eye to carve a narrow channel (corresponding to an
angioscotoma) through a large ocular dominance column serving the other
eye.
In animals with fine or intermediate columns, the cortical angioscotoma
representations were flanked by zones of opposing contrast, producing an
optical density profile resembling an inverted Mexican hat
(Adams and Horton, 2002
). The
presence of this "frosting" of opposite contrast served to
highlight angioscotoma representations, rendering them more obvious. This
explains in part why the angioscotomas were so apparent in monkey Q.
Why are the angioscotoma representations flanked by zones of opposite
contrast in monkeys with fine columns? In such animals, an angioscotoma
representation consists of a continuous channel created by remodeled ocular
dominance columns. As explained previously, this channel is larger than the
retinotopic width of the vessel. Consequently, the angioscotoma representation
also incorporates slivers of visual field flanking the blood vessel. To
balance the local representation of each eye, the angioscotoma representation
becomes bracketed by cortex serving the other eye. This means, essentially,
that an exchange of cortical territory must occur during early development.
One eye takes over a solid swath of territory, corresponding to the location
of the blood vessel of the other eye, plus some surrounding visual field. In
return, it abandons all territory along a strip flanking either side of the
angioscotoma representation.
In animals with rudimentary columns, the angioscotoma representations
faithfully represent the amblyogenic width of shadows cast by retinal vessels.
They are not flanked by columns serving the other eye. Consequently, they are
more difficult to detect in the cortex, because of the lack of
"highlighting" by the other eye and their finer caliber. Animals
with fine columns, like monkey Q, have the most extensive pattern of cortical
angioscotomas because their columns amplify the width of the angioscotomas and
create a frosting effect. Animals with large columns (Figs.
11,
12) have fewer cortical
angioscotomas because their columns are less capable of remodeling. Thus,
there is an optimal width of ocular dominance column (
250 µm wide) in
the squirrel monkey that results in maximum visibility of angioscotomas in the
cortex.
Precision of the cortical retinotopic map
The retinal vascular tree is transformed by cortical magnification
(M) to form the pattern of angioscotoma representations in the
cortex. The largest vessels in the squirrel monkey retina are the arteries and
veins emerging from the optic disc. They follow an arcuate course into the
temporal fundus, maintaining an eccentricity of
15°. Consequently,
their cortical representations follow a fairly straight course from the optic
disc representation to the V1/V2 border (vertical meridian representation).
Along their arcuate course, the caliber of the largest retinal vessels remains
quite constant. Because their diameter and eccentricity change little, their
cortical representations also remain quite constant in width.
As retinal vessels branch toward the fovea, they rapidly diminish in
caliber. Their taper is offset by a rise in M, maintaining cortical
angioscotomas at a fairly constant width. At an eccentricity of
45°, however, angioscotoma representations disappear abruptly in
the cortex. Do they vanish because retinal vessels become too thin to cast an
amblyogenic shadow or because their cortical representations become too small
to see?
To address this issue, we determined the expected width of the cortical
representation of vessels coursing toward the fovea. For example, the penumbra
of the vessel featured in Figure 7,
C and D, was calculated to be 83 µm at
7.5° and 64 µm at 4.1°. In the squirrel monkey the equation for
M along an isoeccentricity ring is Me =
188(6.45 + E)-1.85, where E = eccentricity in degrees
(Adams and Horton, 2003b
, their
Fig. 4). Determination of
M along this dimension is appropriate because the vessel is oriented
radially to the fovea. Application of the formula yields 1.43 mm/° at
7.5° and 2.41 mm/° at 4.1°. The retinal magnification factor in
squirrel monkey central retina is 161 µm/°
(Adams and Horton, 2003b
).
Accordingly, the predicted width of the angioscotoma representations are 737
µm at 7.5° and 958 µm at 4.1°. Thus, if angioscotoma
representations were simply a reflection of M, they would increase in
width toward the foveal representation. The fact that they disappear leads one
to conclude that retinal vessels eventually become too thin to cast a shadow
sufficiently dense to induce remodeling of geniculocortical afferents.
Parenthetically, we note that 737 µm is far greater than the actual width
of the angioscotoma representation in the cortex at 7.5°. This point is
discussed below.
As vessels flow into peripheral nasal retina, they become smaller; in
addition, M diminishes. Therefore, few angioscotomas are represented
in the cortex at eccentricities >30°. Only a single animal, monkey Q,
had angioscotoma representations that reached the monocular crescent
(Adams and Horton, 2002
, their
Fig. 4).
Thus two distinct phenomena conspire to concentrate angioscotoma
representations in a belt of cortex extending from 5° to 30°. At
<5°, shadow contrast is too low to deprive retinal photoreceptors. At
>30°, vessel size and M are too small to create a cortical
representation large enough to be detected with CO. Between 5° and
30°, vessel diameter and M are balanced to produce angioscotomas
of quite constant width.
The largest vessels represented in the cortex are the veins that emanate
from the optic disc. They attain a diameter in squirrel monkey retina of
nearly 100 µm (0.62°). What is the smallest retinal vessel represented
in the cortex? As discussed in the previous section, angioscotoma
representations are a direct product of shadow width only in animals with
rudimentary ocular dominance columns. To answer this question, therefore, we
examined monkey K, an animal with virtually no ocular dominance columns.
Figure 14 shows the cortical
representation of a venule in the left retina. It was one of the smallest
vessels with a detectable cortical representation in this animal. Because the
venule crossed a prominent artery, its location could be pinpointed in the
retinal whole mount. It had a lumen diameter of 30 µm, corresponding to
11.2 min of arc, at an eccentricity of 12.5°. The cone outer segments in
this portion of the retina had a diameter of 78 µm. Therefore, the
vessel, when projected directly onto the cone mosaic, had a width of
approximately four cones (Fig.
14E); it cast, of course, a much wider shadow. The vessel
lumen was centered 180 µm above the cones. Inserting values of s =
180 µm, c = 30 µm into the graph in
Figure 8B yields a
shadow 72 µm (0.45°) in width that consists entirely of penumbra.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 14. Monkey K. A, Diagram showing vessels represented in cortex of
monkey K, an animal with only rudimentary ocular dominance columns. A
photograph of the left optic disc is shown in
Figure 2. The boxed region is
shown in C. B, Diagram showing the angioscotomas visible in the right
cortex, color-coded to vessels in A. The angioscotomas near the optic
disc are shown in Figure 2.
C, View of a small venule (red arrows) crossing the inferotemporal
artery at an eccentricity of 12.5°. D, Single CO-stained section,
showing representation of the venule, which measured 102 µm in the cortex.
E, Photomicrograph of the unstained retinal whole mount, showing the
boxed region in C where the venule crosses the artery. At this
location the venule had a lumen diameter of 30 µm. The cobblestone pattern
of cones is shown for comparison with the size of the blood vessels. This
figure was prepared by photographing the retinal layers containing the cones
and vessels separately. Photoshop 6.0 was then used to superimpose the vessels
on the cone mosaic. Cones underneath the blood vessels are obscured by red
cells. F, Graph showing the fraction of pupil occlusion as a function
of distance on the retina from the center of the penumbra cast by the venule
in E. The shadow eclipsed a maximum of 86% of the pupil. The central
20 µm (between vertical dashed lines) of the 72 µm penumbra had
sufficient contrast to produce a representation in the cortex, corresponding
to an amblyogenic threshold of 66% pupil occlusion. Pupil occlusion is
illustrated schematically by red vessel eclipsing gray pupil at five different
positions.
|
|
Applying the formula for Me, one can determine
that a shadow 0.45° wide at 12.5° eccentricity will produce an
angioscotoma representation 364 µm wide in the cortex. In fact, the
angioscotoma representation measured only 102 µm across
(Fig. 14D). This
discrepancy indicates that only the central portion (102/364 µm = 28%) of
the shadow was dense enough to cause remodeling of geniculocortical afferents
and hence to become represented in the cortex. This corresponds to the central
20 µm (20/72 µm = 28%) of the shadow.
Figure 14F shows the
density profile of the penumbra cast by this vessel. In this example, the
vessel eclipsed a maximum of 86% of the pupil. At 10 µm from the shadow
center, where the vessel eclipsed only 66% of the pupil, the shadow density
fell below the threshold required to induce a cortical representation. In
terms of optical density, a shadow ranging between 0.85 and 0.45 log units was
required to cause amblyopia.
Angioscotoma representations are smaller than the visual angle subtended by
the vessel shadow, because only the densest central portion of the shadow is
amblyogenic. The proportion of the shadow represented in the cortex varies
according to s, d, p, and c. It also depends on the shadow
contrast required to induce deprivation. It is unknown whether this
"amblyogenic threshold" varies throughout the retina. To address
this point, the analysis was repeated for five other vessels at points that
could be located reliably by vessel crossings or bifurcations
(Table 1). A wide range of
blood vessel diameters (3078 µm) and eccentricities
(12.520°) was sampled. Some of the blood vessels measured were
sufficiently large and close enough to the photoreceptor layer to cast an
umbra, whereas others were not. The amblyogenic threshold showed a narrow
range, between 52 and 66% pupil eclipse.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. Pupil occlusion (amblyogenic threshold) corresponding to edges of the
representations of six retinal vessels in monkey K
| |
For the 30 µm venule in Figure
14, only 20 µm of the shadow was represented in the cortex. The
cones in the vicinity of the venule (located at 12.5°) had a diameter of
67 µm. Thus, the visuotopic map in layer 4C is sufficiently precise
to resolve patterns of CO activity created by amblyogenic shadows just three
cones wide. The true grain of the map is probably even finer and may approach
the discrete representation of individual cones.
Another measure of the fidelity of the cortical map can be derived by
examining the representation in layer 4C of closely spaced retinal vessels.
Figure 15 shows the
representation of the superior artery and vein in the left retina of monkey C.
As the vessels emerge from the optic disc and course along the retina, their
separation gradually increases. At the top of
Figure 15 (
8° from
the optic disc), each vessel is distinctly represented in the cortex. As one
follows the retinal vessels back to the optic disc, they become closer
together but remain discrete; however, their cortical representations merge
2 mm above the optic disc representation. At the merger point, the
centers of the vessel representations are separated by 340 µm. Thus, in
layer 4C, the retinotopic resolution of squirrel monkey striate cortex is 340
µm. This value is an upper estimate, of course, because it may reflect a
limitation of the CO technique. At the merger point, the centers of the artery
(0.45° width) and vein (0.59°) were separated by 0.65°. This value
is probably quite close to the aggregate receptive field size at this
eccentricity.

View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 15. Monkey C. A, Upper pole of the left optic disc, showing an
emerging superior retinal artery and vein. The vessels (blue arrowheads)
remain completely separate along their retinal course. B,
Corresponding region from the right striate cortex, showing the cortical
representation of the vessels in layer 4C (blue arrowheads). They merge 2
mm above the optic disc representation. At this point, the centers of the
retinal vessels are 0.65° apart and their cortical representations are 340
µm apart.
|
|
Previously, deoxyglucose and optical imaging have been used to derive
estimates of cortical resolution (Tootell
et al., 1988
; Grinvald et al.,
1994
). Blasdel and Campbell
(2001
) obtained a value of 1200
µm in macaque striate cortex. This figure reflects the fact that optical
images are derived mostly from the upper layers, where neurons have greater
retinotopic scatter in receptive field position.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Helmholtz discovered 135 years ago that scotomas corresponding to the
Purkyn
retinal tree can be plotted in the visual field. We now show
that these scotomas can be detected in striate cortex.
The representation of angioscotomas in V1 provides an intriguing glimpse of
the role played by visual experience in the development of the cortex. Its
development proceeds according to an innate plan, which is refined by sensory
stimulation after birth. Ocular dominance columns provide a classic example of
this interplay between genetic instructions and visual experience. Their
formation occurs without visual experience
(Horton and Hocking, 1996a
;
Crowley and Katz, 1999
,
2000
), but they are still
indistinct at birth (Rakic,
1977
). Several weeks of postnatal life are required for their
complete segregation (LeVay et al.,
1978
,
1980
). In the cat,
dark-rearing results in poor segregation of columns, demonstrating that visual
experience is vital during these postnatal weeks
(Swindale, 1981
;
Mower et al., 1985
). In the
macaque, the effect of dark-rearing from birth has never been tested. One
might find perfectly segregated columns, because the innate drive for column
formation is so powerful in this species. Whatever the case, many experiments
have provided abundant evidence that visual experience is necessary for normal
maturation of geniculocortical afferents, columnar systems, receptive field
properties, and visual function (Wiesel
and Hubel, 1965
; Sherman et
al., 1974
; Blakemore and Van
Sluyters, 1975
; Freeman et
al., 1981
; Swindale,
1988
; Movshon and Kiorpes,
1990
; Crawford et al.,
1991
; Blasdel et al.,
1995
; Antonini and Stryker,
1998
; Crair et al.,
1998
; Hübener,
1998
; White et al.,
2001
).
Amblyopia supplies a classic example of how visual experience can influence
the development of the cortex. Kittens and monkeys raised with monocular
eyelid suture, to simulate congenital cataract, show expansion of the columns
serving the open eye at the expense of those belonging to the deprived eye
(Hubel et al., 1977
;
Shatz and Stryker, 1978
;
LeVay et al., 1980
;
Wiesel, 1982
;
Horton and Hocking, 1997
;
Schmidt et al., 2002
). This
result proves that the competition for synaptic connections with cells in
layer 4C can be biased toward one eye by handicapping the other eye. However,
in these studies the handicap to one eye is global and arises by means of an
artificial manipulation that never occurs as part of normal development.
Our finding that angioscotomas are represented in the brain allows one to
generalize from observations in lid-sutured animals to the process of cortical
development in normal animals. In some squirrel monkeys, ocular dominance
columns are so weakly expressed that vascular shadows have an unfettered
ability to rearrange geniculocortical afferents. In these cases, the narrow
channel carved through the cortex reflects faithfully the "amblyogenic
threshold" of the shadow (Fig.
14F). In other animals, with better developed columns,
shadows also induce rearrangement of geniculocortical afferents but do so by
reallocating units approximately the size of ocular dominance columns. The
angioscotoma representations thus appear widened, or amplified, because they
subtend more visual field than the amblyogenic portion of the blood vessel
shadow. Remarkably, they become surrounded on either side by columns serving
the other eye. This frosting makes the angioscotomas more conspicuous in
cortical flatmounts. The frosting phenomenon arises, we suspect, because the
ocular dominance columns possess an intrinsic periodicity. Vascular shadows
perturb the local balance of neural activity in the cortex, tipping column
formation in favor of one eye. The other eye is compensated by reciprocal
assignment of the nearest adjacent cortex. Such mechanisms are proposed, on
theoretical grounds, to underlie the crystallization of patterns of ocular
dominance columns in striate cortex
(Willshaw and von der Malsburg,
1976
; von der Malsburg,
1979
; Swindale,
1980
; Miller et al.,
1989
; Jones et al.,
1991
; Goodhill,
1998
).
The discovery that angioscotomas are represented in the cortex demonstrates
that neuronal activity can influence the pattern formed locally by ocular
dominance columns; however, there are inherent limits to the spatial scale of
this process. Squirrel monkeys manifest enormous natural heterogeneity in
their expression of ocular dominance columns
(Adams and Horton, 2003a
). This
must be under genetic control (Kaschube et
al., 2002
), for we cannot imagine any early visual environmental
factor that could produce such radical variability (especially because, in
many cases, animals with fine, fuzzy columns and coarse, crisp columns were
raised contemporaneously in the same vivarium). Angioscotoma representations
are present only in squirrel monkeys with relatively fine columns. They are
invisible in squirrel monkeys with large, well segregated columns. Over the
past decade we have used CO to reconstruct the complete pattern of ocular
dominance columns in 18 macaques and 6 humans. No angioscotoma representations
have been observed. Presumably, their formation is blocked by extreme
repellency between left eye and right eye columns, which may be mediated by
molecular cues that tag the geniculocortical targets of each eye
(Flanagan and Vanderhaeghen,
1998
; Donoghue and Rakic,
1999
). Postnatal eyelid suture, however, can shrink the columns,
no matter how wide they are. Apparently deprivation of the entire eye
overwhelms repulsion at column borders, perhaps by producing a sufficiently
powerful gradient of activity-mediated trophic factors
(Katz and Shatz, 1996
;
McAllister et al., 1999
;
Lein and Shatz, 2000
).
However, when deprivation is highly local, as in the case of a vascular
shadow, the afferents serving one eye are unable to penetrate large columns
belonging to the other eye.
Another possi