The Journal of Neuroscience, July 23, 2003, 23(16):6608-6616
Previous Article | Next Article 
Multiple Trafficking Signals Regulate Kainate Receptor KA2 Subunit Surface Expression
Zhao Ren,1
Nathan J. Riley,1
Elizabeth P. Garcia,1
James M. Sanders,2
Geoffrey T. Swanson,2 and
John Marshall1
1Departments of Molecular Pharmacology,
Physiology, and Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
02912, and 2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology,
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The kainate receptor subunit KA2 does not form functional homomeric
channels despite its structural similarity to the functional glutamate
receptor 5-7subunits and high agonist binding affinity in in vitro
assays. In this study, we first demonstrate that homomeric KA2 receptors fail
to reach the plasma membrane and then identify the molecular mechanisms
preventing surface expression. Specifically, we show that KA2 subunits form
homooligomeric receptors that are confined to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).
We then demonstrate that, in both heterologous expression systems and primary
neurons, the intracellular retention of KA2 is not caused by subunit
misfolding but, rather, is mediated through discrete protein trafficking
signals, including an arginine-rich ER retention/retrieval motif and a
di-leucine endocytic sequence in the C terminus of the KA2 subunit. Disruption
of these motifs results in ER exit and surface expression of KA2 homomeric
receptors that remain nonfunctional. Furthermore, our data suggest that the ER
retention/retrieval signal in KA2 is sterically shielded during heteromeric
assembly, allowing delivery of functional heteromeric receptors to the plasma
membrane. Taken together, our results illustrate novel regulatory mechanisms
that control the intracellular trafficking and surface expression of kainate
receptors.
Key words: kainate receptors; KA2 subunit; intracellular trafficking; ER retention; arginine-rich motif; di-leucine motif; heteromeric assembly
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The three types of ionotropic glutamate receptors, NMDA, AMPA, and kainate,
are the major mediators of excitatory neurotransmission in the mammalian CNS
(Seeburg, 1993
;
Hollmann and Heinemann, 1994
).
Studies with recombinant kainate receptors in oocytes and mammalian cells
demonstrate that glutamate receptor (GluR) 5-7 subunits alone or in
combination can generate functional homomeric or heteromeric receptors
(Bettler et al., 1990
;
Schiffer et al., 1997
;
Swanson et al., 1997
;
Cui and Mayer, 1999
;
Paternain et al., 2000
). In
contrast, the KA1 and KA2 subunits are functional only when incorporated into
heteromeric channels with the GluR5-7 subunits
(Wenthold et al., 1994
;
Schiffer et al., 1997
).
The intracellular trafficking and surface delivery of multimeric
transmembrane proteins, such as the kainate receptors, are likely to be
tightly controlled processes requiring proper folding and assembly of
constituent subunits, so that only fully assembled functional receptors can be
expressed on the plasma membrane. A number of mechanisms that regulate
receptor trafficking have been discovered in recent years; some of which
function in early secretory steps, whereas others participate in later events,
such as endocytosis and protein degradation. Studies done on immune receptors
identified the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as the primary checkpoint of protein
trafficking and revealed a control mechanism for the proper assembly and
delivery of multimeric complexes to the plasma membrane
(Teasdale and Jackson, 1996
).
These studies demonstrate that individual subunits contain discrete ER
retention motifs and that these signals are masked and disabled in the fully
assembled heterooligomeric receptors
(Letourneur et al., 1995
).
Alternatively, unassembled or partially assembled subunits may be retained in
the ER because of misfolding and subsequent recognition by chaperone proteins
(Kowalski et al., 1998
). The
ER retention mechanisms can also be coupled to protein degradation processes,
adding another level of regulation (Keller
et al., 2001
).
Recent studies have revealed additional discrete ER retention signals, most
of which consist of positively charged residues (e.g., arginine or lysine).
For example, a novel RXR (arginine-a large neutral or positively charged
residue-arginine) ER retention motif was found in both ion channels and a
G-protein-coupled receptor. In the ATP-sensitive potassium channel
(KATP) and GABAB receptor, the RXR sequences present in
individual subunits are shielded in the mature complexes to enable egress from
the ER (Zerangue et al., 1999
;
Margeta-Mitrovic et al.,
2000
). The RXR motif is also shown to mediate the ER retention of
several splice variants of NMDA receptor subunit NR1
(Standley et al., 2000
;
Scott et al., 2001
). In
addition, several anterograde trafficking signals have been identified in
potassium channels and AMPA receptors, adding another level of complexity to
the modulation of protein trafficking (Ma
et al., 2001
; Stockklausner et
al., 2001
; Xia et al.,
2002
).
In the present study, we investigated the assembly-dependent trafficking of
the kainate receptor subunit KA2. We now report that KA2 subunits are retained
in the ER despite their ability to assemble into homooligomeric receptors. The
intracellular retention is not initiated by subunit misfolding but, rather, is
mediated through discrete protein trafficking signals, namely an arginine-rich
motif and a di-leucine sequence in the C-terminal tail of KA2. Disruption of
these motifs results in subsequent ER exit and surface expression of KA2
homomeric receptors. During heteromeric assembly, these trafficking signals
may be sterically masked, allowing delivery of functional heteromeric
receptors to the plasma membrane. Interestingly, surface-expressed mutant KA2
homomeric receptors remain nonresponsive to agonists, indicating that only
fully assembled heteromeric KA2-containing receptors are functional, and their
efficient assembly and surface expression are ensured by multiple trafficking
checkpoints along the secretory pathway.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cell culture. Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, normal
rat kidney (NRK) cells, and COS-7 cells [American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC), Manassas, VA] were grown in DMEM (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD)
supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 U/ml penicillin and streptomycin (37°C,
5% CO2). For immunocytochemistry experiments, cells were plated
onto poly-D-lysine-coated glass coverslips in the same growth
medium. Primary cultures of hippocampal neurons were obtained from embryonic
day 18 (E18) rat embryos. Briefly, the hippocampus was dissected from E18
Sprague Dawley rats and dissociated with trypsin. Dissociated cells were then
plated onto glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) at a density of 7500 cells/cm2 in Neurobasal medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with Glutamax and B27. AraC (5 µM) was
added 3 d after plating, and cells were fed twice weekly thereafter.
Molecular biology. Primers containing coding sequences for
hemagglutinin (HA; YPYDVPDYA) or FLAG (DYKDDDDK) were used to amplify the KA2
C terminus by PCR; both PCR fragments were then digested with EcoRI
and XbaI, and used to replace the corresponding piece in KA2-pcDNA3
expression vector. Both tags were inserted after the last residue of KA2. A
sequence containing five myc (MEQKLISEEDLNE) epitopes in tandem was amplified
by PCR from a pCS2+MT vector and inserted after residue 14 (counted from the
initiator methionine) of KA2, using an NruI site created by
QuikChange (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The green fluorescent protein
(GFP)-tagged GluR6-pcDNA3 construct was a generous gift from Dr. Steve
Heinemann (The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA). An EcoRI site was
engineered into the beginning of the GluR6 C terminus by QuikChange to
facilitate the generation of chimeras. Two chimeras, GFP-GluR6/KA2 (GFP-tagged
GluR6 with the C terminus of KA2) and myc-KA2/G6 (myc-tagged KA2 with the C
terminus of GluR6), were generated by a PCR method. The C termini of GluR6 and
KA2 were amplified by PCR, and both fragments were then digested with
EcoRI and XbaI and used to replace their counterparts in the
respective expression vectors. Another KA2 chimera (named myc-KA2-G6C), with
an appended C terminus from GluR6, was generated with a two-stage PCR method,
using two sets of overlapping primers that also code a six-glycine linker. The
PCR fragment containing both C termini in tandem was then digested with
EcoRI and XbaI and used to replace the corresponding piece
in KA2-pcDNA3. The pMLSV N1/N4 expression vector for human Tac was purchased
from ATCC. The Tac coding sequence was then amplified by PCR and subcloned
into a HindIII-XbaI site in pcDNA3. To generate the Tac-KA2
chimera, we first amplified the N-terminal and transmembrane sequences of Tac,
as well as the C terminus of KA2 by PCR, and then ligated both fragments into
a HindIII-XbaI site in pcDNA3 after digestion. By taking
advantage of an endogenous EcoRI site at the beginning of the KA2
C-terminal coding sequence, no extra residues were inserted. Deletion mutants
of Tac-KA2 were made by PCR amplification of the desired sequences and
subsequent subcloning into the HindIII-XbaI site in the
pcDNA3 expression vector. The R850-854A mutation in both KA2 and Tac-KA2 was
generated through the two-stage PCR method, using two sets of overlapping
primers that code the desired mutation. The PCR fragment containing the
desired mutation was digested with EcoRI and XbaI and used
to replace the corresponding piece coding the wild-type sequence. The Tac-KA2
(T858S859-DD) mutant was made with the same method. The Tac-KA2 and KA2 double
mutants (R862-866A and LL874-875VV or LL908-909VV) were also made with a
similar method, using the R862-866A mutant as a template. The pEGFP-C2 and
pDsRed2-ER vectors were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). A
GFP-GluR6C fusion protein was generated by PCR amplification of the C-terminal
sequence and subsequent insertion into an EcoRI-XbaI site in
pEGFP-C2. GluR5-pRK5 and postsynaptic density (PSD)-95pGW vectors were gifts
from Dr. Peter Seeburg (Max-Planck Institute for Medical Research, Heidelberg,
Germany) and Dr. Morgan Sheng (Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA), respectively. All the inserted oligonucleotides and
PCR-derived sequences were entirely sequenced.
Transfection. HEK293, COS-7, and NRK cells were transfected using
the Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis,
IN), following the manufacturer's recommended protocol for transient
transfection of adherent cells. Cultured hippocampal neurons (in
vitro day 7) were transfected with the LipofectAMINE 2000 transfection
reagent (Invitrogen), using the manufacturer's recommended protocol. Surface
expression and intracellular protein expression were analyzed 48 hr after
transfection.
Antibodies. Monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Covance, Princeton, NJ)
was used at 1:1000 or 1:150, respectively for Western blots or
immunoprecipitation. Monoclonal anti-FLAG (Sigma) was used at 10 µg/ml for
Western blots and 1:1000 for immunoprecipitation. Monoclonal
anti-autofluorescent protein (AFP) (E-6) antibody (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA) was
used at 1:100 for immunofluorescence. Monoclonal anti-GFP (B-2) antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used at 1:200 for Western
blots. Monoclonal anti-myc (9E10) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used
at 1:200 for immunofluorescence and Western blots and 1:1000 for flow
cytometry. Polyclonal anti-KA2 and anti-GluR6/7 (Upstate, Charlottesville, VA)
were used at 9 µg/ml for immunofluorescence and 1 µg/ml for Western
blots. Monoclonal anti-Tac (Covance) was used at 1:800 or 1:2000 for
immunostaining of heterologous cells or hippocampal neurons and 1:4000 for
flow cytometry. Monoclonal anti-PSD-95 (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid,
NY), anti-trans-Golgi network (TGN)-38 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA),
anti-mannosidase II (Covance), and polyclonal anti-giantin (Covance) were used
at 1:1000 for immunofluorescence of heterologous cells. Polyclonal
anti-calnexin was used at 1:200 for immunostaining. All secondary antibodies
conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin, rhodamine
red-X, or 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West
Grove, PA) were used at 1:200.
Protein preparation, immunoblotting, and immunoprecipitation.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, HEK cells grown in 60 mm culture dishes
were washed once with cold Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and homogenized in 1 ml
of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 in TBS with 0.1 mM PMSF, 10
µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 2
mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The samples were then solubilized for 1 hr at
4°C and clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 x g for 30
min. The supernatants were then used for immunoblotting and
immunoprecipitation experiments. Immunoprecipitations were performed by
incubating extracts with 4 µg of the appropriate antibodies for 12 hr at
4°C, followed by incubation with 50 µl of a 50% protein G-Sepharose
(Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) slurry for 1 hr and four washes in
Salter lysis buffer (0.1% SDS, 0.5% deoxycolate, and 1% NP-40 in TBS with 0.1
mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
pepstatin A, and2mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Bound proteins were eluted from
the beads by boiling in 1x sample buffer and then separated by 8%
SDS-PAGE. Gels were then Western-blotted, immunostained, and visualized with
Super-signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Biotinylation of cell surface protein. Transfected HEK cells grown
in poly-D-lysine-coated 60 mm culture dishes were washed three
times with ice-cold PBS and incubated 15 min with 1.0 mg/ml EZ-link
sulfo-N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS)-S-S-biotin (Pierce) in cold
PBS, pH 8.0, with gentle agitation at 4°C. Cells were washed once and
incubated with a quenching buffer (192 mM glycine and 25
mM Tris in PBS) for 10 min. Next, cells were rinsed twice and
scraped in cold PBS, pelleted down, and homogenized in lysis buffer as
mentioned above. Supernatants were then incubated with 50 µl of a 50%
slurry of streptavidin-Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences) for 2 hr at
4°C. Beads were pelleted by brief centrifugation, and aliquots of the
supernatant were taken to represent the unbound intracellular pool. Beads were
then washed three times with Salter buffer, and biotinylated proteins were
eluted, SDS-PAGE-separated, and immunoblotted as previously described.
Immunofluorescence. For selective labeling of surface receptors,
transfected live COS-7 cells were incubated with appropriate primary
antibodies (anti-Tac, anti-myc, or anti-AFP) diluted in DMEM supplemented with
5% FBS for 1 hr at 4°C. The cells were then washed with cold PBS and fixed
with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and 4% sucrose on ice for 20 min. After
fixation, the cells were washed with PBS and labeled with
fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies. Next, cells were permeabilized
at room temperature with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 min. Intracellular expression
was then determined by sequentially incubating with proper primary antibodies
(anti-Tac, anti-GluR6, or anti-KA2) and secondary antibodies for 2 or 1 hr,
respectively. A slightly modified protocol was used for staining of the
transfected hippocampal neurons. Briefly, for surface labeling, cultured live
neurons were incubated with anti-Tac diluted in PBS with 5% normal goat serum
(NGS) for 30 min at room temperature, fixed, and incubated with a
rhodamine-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody. To detect intracellular
expression, neurons were then permeabilized and sequentially incubated with
anti-Tac and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody diluted in PBS with
10% NGS. Both surface and intracellular expression were captured on an
Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) coupled to a CCD
camera (Hamamatsu, Hamamatsu City, Japan) and analyzed by OpenLab imaging
software (Improvision, Coventry, UK). Co-localization images were obtained
with the permeabilized staining protocol, captured with a Zeiss LSM410
confocal microscope, and analyzed with Renaissance imaging software
(Microcosm, Columbia, MD).
Flow-assisted cytometry. Transfected live HEK293 cells grown in
six-well tissue culture plates were incubated with monoclonal anti-Tac or
anti-myc antibodies diluted in DMEM supplemented with 5% serum for
1hrat4°C. Cells were then washed with PBS and incubated with FITC- or
phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibodies in PBS for 1 hr at
4°C. After extensive washing, cells were detached from the plates with 500
µl of PBS plus 5 mM EDTA and transferred to 12 x 75 mm
polystyrene test tubes (VWR Scientific, South Plainfield, NJ). Finally, 500
µl of 4% PFA in PBS was added to the tubes to fix the cells. Surface
expression was quantified using a FACScalibur cell sorter (BD Biosciences).
The background fluorescence was determined using HEK293 cells transfected with
Tac or myc-KA2 but incubated without corresponding primary antibodies. Mean
fluorescence intensity was acquired and plotted with Origin 5.0 software
(Microcal Software, Northampton, MA).
Electrophysiology. HEK293 cells were plated on glass coverslips
coated with 100 µg/ml collagen and poly-D-lysine. The following
day, the cells were transfected with plasmids containing the myc-KA2 or mutant
cDNA alone (1.0 µg/coverslip) or in combination with GluR5(Q) cDNA [0.5
µg of GluR5 and 1.5 µg of myc-KA2 or mutant DNA per coverslip] using the
Fugene 6 transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. A
plasmid DNA containing enhanced GFP was included (0.2 µg/coverslip) to
allow fluorescent identification of transfected cells. Whole-cell patch-clamp
recordings were made with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster
City, CA) 3 d after transfection. The external bath solution contained (in
mM): 150 NaCl, 2.8 KCl, 10 glucose, 2 CaCl2, 1.0
MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.3 with NaOH. The internal
solution was composed of (in mM): 110 CsF, 30 CsCl, 4 NaCl, 0.5
CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 5 EGTA, adjusted to pH 7.3 with CsOH. For
rapid agonist application exchange, cells were lifted from the coverslip into
a laminar solution stream exiting a three-barrel glass pipette (Vitro
Dynamics, Rockaway, NJ) pulled to an internal barrel diameter of
80 µm
and mounted on a piezo-ceramic bimorph. The solution stream was rapidly moved
across the transfected cells by applying voltage to the bimorph with a
stimulation-isolation unit triggered by a digital signal from pClamp 8
software. Data was acquired and analyzed using pClamp 8 software (Axon
Instruments) and Origin 6.0 (Origin Lab Corp., Northampton, MA).
 |
Results
|
|---|
The KA2 subunits form homooligomeric receptors that are retained in
the ER
Functional ionotropic glutamate receptors are believed to be tetrameric
complexes, with each constituent subunit contributing to ligand binding and
channel pore formation (Laube et al.,
1998
; Rosenmund et al.,
1998
; Bowie and Lange,
2002
). Heterologous expression of the KA2 protein does not yield
functional channels, which might result from impaired assembly of KA2 subunits
into homooligomeric receptors. To address this possibility, we tested whether
KA2 subunits with different fusion tags could coimmunoprecipitate with each
other when expressed in a heterologous cell line. KA2 constructs tagged with
either HA or FLAG epitopes at the extreme C termini (named KA2-HA and
KA2-FLAG, respectively) were generated
(Fig. 1A). When
cotransfected into HEK293 cells, both tagged KA2 subunits were expressed well
and were incorporated into KA2 homomeric complexes
(Fig. 1B). This
clearly indicates that KA2 subunits are capable of forming homo-multimeric
(i.e., at least homodimeric) receptors, although the precise stoichiometry
remains to be defined.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. KA2 subunits form homomultimeric receptors in heterologous cells.
A, Schematic diagrams of the KA2 constructs used for the experiments.
HA and FLAG tags are inserted after the last residue of KA2, and M1-M4
indicate the transmembrane domains. NH2, N terminus. B, KA2-HA and
KA2-FLAG form an oligomeric complex in HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells were
cotransfected with KA2-HA and KA2-FLAG as indicated. Cell lysate was
immunoprecipitated (IP w/) using anti-HA or anti-FLAG antibody, and the
precipitates were immunoblotted with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibody,
respectively.
|
|
Retention of homomeric KA2 receptors in intracellular compartments may also
explain their lack of channel activity. To investigate whether heterologously
expressed KA2 homomeric receptors are expressed on the plasma membrane, we
inserted a tag (consisting of five myc epitopes in tandem) into the N terminus
of KA2. The myc-KA2 fusion protein behaves the same way as the wild-type
subunit, evident by its ability to form functional heteromeric receptors with
GluR5 (see Fig. 6) and GluR6
subunits (see Fig.
7B). We then transfected the myc-KA2 into COS-7 cells and
used a live immunofluorescence method to visualize cell surface-expressed
receptors. No surface expression of KA2 could be detected
(Fig. 2, left panels), even
after repeated attempts in several different cell lines (data not shown).
Instead, permeabilized staining revealed that KA2 receptors were localized to
a mesh network-like intracellular compartment reminiscent of ER morphology,
with most of the staining concentrated at a perinuclear region. In contrast,
GFP-tagged GluR6 was detected on the plasma membrane with the same staining
protocol (Fig. 2, right
panels).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Elimination of the arginine-rich domain or di-leucine motif in KA2 does not
alter receptor function. A, Representative current traces evoked by
fast application of glutamate (10 mM, 100 msec; gray bar) to HEK
293 cells expressing homomeric KA2(R/A) and KA2(R/A+LL908-9VV) receptors.
Despite robust surface expression, these homomeric receptors remain
unresponsive to glutamate. B, Representative current traces evoked by
fast application of glutamate to cells expressing homomeric GluR5(Q),
GluR5/KA2, GluR5/KA2(R/A), and GluR5/KA2(R/A+LL908-9VV) receptors. Heteromeric
GluR5/KA2 receptors desensitized significantly faster than homomeric GluR5
receptors. C, Mean peak amplitudes (left half) and mean
desensitization rates (right half) of heteromeric GluR5/KA2, GluR5/KA2(R/A),
and GluR5/KA2(R/A+LL908-9VV) receptors were not significantly different
(n = 4, 13, and 8, respectively, for amplitudes; n = 4, 12,
and 8, respectively, for desensitization rates). The desensitization was
determined by fitting the current decay with a single exponential function.
The holding potential in each case was -70 mV. Also note that both the
wild-type KA2 and the mutants are tagged with N-terminal myc epitopes.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. The ER retention/retrieval signal is sterically masked by heteromeric
assembly. A, Both GluR6 and GluR6/1 chimeras can assemble with KA2 in
heterologous cells. HEK293 cells were cotransfected with myc-KA2 and GFP-GluR6
(or GFP-GluR6/1 chimera) as indicated. The cell lysate was immunoprecipitated
(IP w/) using anti-myc antibody, and the precipitates were immunoblotted with
anti-myc or anti-GFP antibodies. B, Surface expression of a KA2
mutant with a disrupted ER retention signal and heteromerically assembled
wild-type KA2 shown by FAC quantification. HEK293 cells were transfected with
myc-KA2 [or myc-KA2(R/A) mutant] alone or together with other subunits (GluR6,
GluR1, or GluR6/1) as indicated. Data represent means ± SEM of
fluorescence intensities from 50,000 transfected cells stained for surface
expression of KA2. *p < 0.05 relative to KA2 minus
primary antibody control, Student's unpaired t test.
|
|

View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Intracellular retention of KA2 homomeric receptors. Surface and
intracellular expression of myc-KA2 and GFP-GluR6 in COS-7 cells is shown.
Live cells were labeled with anti-myc or anti-AFP antibodies (Surface),
permeabilized, and labeled with anti-KA2 or anti-GluR6 antibodies
(Intracellular). The constructs used for the staining are illustrated at the
top; white bars correspond to KA2 sequences, and gray bars correspond to GluR6
sequences. Asterisks indicate the antibodies used for staining. Note that
there is no surface staining for KA2.
|
|
To further confirm the intracellular retention of KA2, we performed a
surface biotinylation experiment. The membrane-impermeable
sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin bound covalently to surface proteins, which were then
separated from the intracellular pools using streptavidin beads. Once again,
we found that KA2 homomeric receptors were not expressed on the plasma
membrane but, rather, were retained intracellularly (see
Fig. 4B, left panel).
In contrast, GluR6 homomeric receptors were readily detected on the cell
surface (see Fig. 4B,
right panel), in agreement with the staining results.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. The C terminus of KA2 contains a signal sufficient and necessary for
intracellular retention. A, Surface and intracellular expression of
GluR6 and KA2 chimeras with swapped C termini, GFP-GluR6/KA2 (left) and
myc-KA2/GluR6 (middle). Also shown is the surface and intracellular expression
of another KA2 chimera with an appended GluR6 C terminus (right). Live cells
were labeled with anti-AFP or anti-myc antibodies (Surface), permeabilized,
and labeled with anti-KA2 or anti-GluR6 antibodies (Intracellular). The
constructs used for the staining are illustrated at the top; white bars
correspond to KA2 sequences, and gray bars correspond to GluR6 sequences.
Asterisks indicate the antibodies used. B, Surface expression of
wild-type and chimeric GluR6 and KA2 receptors evaluated by biotinylation.
Transfected live HEK293 cells were surface-biotinylated with
sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin, and the biotinylated (Bio) and intracellular (Int)
fractions of the cell extract were purified and immunoblotted with anti-myc or
anti-GFP antibodies. Myc-KA2 (left panel, third lane) and GFP-GluR6/KA2 (right
panel, fourth lane) are not present in the biotinylated fractions, whereas
myc-KA2/G6 (left panel, fourth lane) and GFP-GluR6 (right panel, third lane)
are detected.
|
|
The two major intracellular organelles involved in protein biogenesis and
trafficking are the ER and Golgi apparatus, both of which have distinctive
morphology and unique molecular markers. To determine the precise
intracellular location of the KA2 homomeric receptors, we compared their
distribution profile with those of the ER and Golgi markers. When expressed in
COS-7 or NRK cells, KA2 colocalized extensively with the ER markers calnexin
and DsRed-ER (Fig. 3A)
but showed no overlap with Golgi proteins giantin, mannosidase II, and TGN-38
(Fig. 3B).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. The KA2 homomeric receptors are retained in the ER. A, KA2
colocalizes with ER markers. In the left panel, COS-7 cells transfected with
myc-KA2 were permeabilized and stained with antibodies against myc (red) and
the ER marker calnexin (green); in the right panel, COS-7 cells were
cotransfected with myc-KA2 (green) and DsRed-ER (red). Image overlays show
extensive colocalization (yellow) in both stains. B, KA2 does not
localize to Golgi or tans-Golgi network compartments. COS-7 or NRK
cells were transfected with myc-KA2 and costained with the Golgi markers
giantin (green), mannosidase II (red), and TGN-38 (red). Image overlays showed
no colocalization (yellow) in any stain.
|
|
Together these data suggest that the inability of KA2 to form functional
channels is not attributable to the lack of subunit oligomerization but,
rather, is determined by its ER retention and failed delivery to the plasma
membrane.
The C terminus of KA2 contains an arginine-rich ER
retention/retrieval signal and a di-leucine endocytic motif
Because ER retention signals have been identified in the cytoplasmic
C-terminal tail of the NMDA receptor subunit NR1, as well as many other
transmembrane proteins, we postulated that the KA2 subunit might also contain
ER retention signals in its C terminus. To test this hypothesis, we generated
chimeric receptors by exchanging the C-terminal domains of GluR6 and KA2
subunits. The resulting chimeras, GFP-GluR6/KA2 (GFP-tagged GluR6 with the C
terminus of KA2) and myc-KA2/G6 (myc-tagged KA2 with the C terminus of GluR6),
were then used to examine whether the C-terminal domains controlled the
trafficking profiles of both subunits. When expressed in COS-7 cells,
GFP-GluR6/KA2 showed an intracellular distribution pattern similar to that of
the wild-type KA2, with no detectable staining on the plasma membrane
(Fig. 4A, left
panels), whereas myc-KA2/G6 exited the ER and was readily detected on the cell
surface (Fig. 4A,
middle panels). In addition, simply attaching the GluR6 C terminus to KA2 did
not promote its surface expression (Fig.
4A, right panels). Similar results were also obtained by
surface biotinylation experiments (Fig.
4B). These data indicate that the KA2 C terminus contains
a trafficking signal(s) that is necessary and sufficient to confer ER
retention.
To facilitate the search for the precise ER retention signal in the KA2
C-terminal region and to avoid the complication of heteromeric assembly with
native subunits in neurons, we constructed a reporter molecule, the Tac-KA2
chimera. It consists of the N-terminal and transmembrane domains of the human
interleukin 2 receptor
subunit (Tac) and the C terminus of KA2
(Fig. 5A). Initial
experiments in both COS-7 cells and cultured hippocampal neurons confirmed
that, although the wild-type Tac showed strong surface expression
(Fig. 5B,C, first
panels), the Tac-KA2 chimera was intracellularly retained with no detectable
surface staining (Fig.
5B,C, second panels). Similar results were obtained by
using flow assisted cytometry (FAC) to quantify surface expression
(Fig. 5D). These
results not only validate the TacKA2 chimera as a legitimate substitute for
KA2 in the ensuing mutational analysis but also demonstrate the universal
nature of the putative ER retention/retrieval signal, which remains functional
even in the context of an unrelated protein.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Identification of an arginine-rich motif and a di-leucine sequence that
mediate intracellular retention of KA2. A, Schematic diagram
illustrating the structures of KA2 and Tac. M1-M4 indicate the four
membrane-spanning segments. The KA2 C terminus has 155 amino acids; the
arginine-rich motif and two di-leucine sequences are in bold letters and
underlined. The arrows indicate the points of truncation to generate
deletional mutants, open arrow for 113 and solid arrow for 118.
Tac has a single transmembrane domain with a long N-terminal region and a
short C-terminal tail. COOH, C terminus; NH2, N terminus. B, Surface
and intracellular expression of Tac and TacKA2 mutants in COS cells. Tac and
Tac-KA2 mutants containing deletion or point mutations of the arginine-rich
motif are expressed on the cell surface. C, Staining of the same
constructs expressed in the hippocampal neurons shows patterns identical to
those in COS cells. D, Flow cytometric quantification for the surface
expression of Tac and TacKA2 mutants in HEK293 cells. Note that the signal for
TacKA2(R/A) is only 20% of those for Tac and TacKA2 118, whereas
additional mutation (LL908-909VV) leads to full restoration of the surface
expression. Data represent means ± SEM of fluorescence intensities from
50,000 transfected cells stained for surface expression of Tac or TacKA2
chimeras. *p < 0.05 relative to Tac minus primary
antibody control, Student's unpaired t test.
|
|
The KA2 C-terminal domain contains several sequences that are potential
trafficking signals, including an arginine-rich motif (RRRRR862-866) similar
to the aforementioned RXR-type ER retention signal and two di-leucine motifs
(LL874-875 and LL908-909), which have potential roles in clathrin-dependent
endocytosis (Letourneur and Klausner,
1992
). Deletion of the last 113 amino acids (containing both
di-leucine motifs) from Tac-KA2 did not affect its ER retention
(Fig. 5B,C, third
panels), whereas deletion of the last 118 residues (also containing arginines
862-866) led to strong surface expression
(Fig. 5B,C, fourth
panels). These results suggest that the arginine-rich motif serves as an ER
retention signal. In support of this idea, we also found that another Tac-KA2
mutant (named Tac-KA2R/A), in which arginines 862-866 were mutated to
alanines, was readily immunostained on the cell surface
(Fig. 5B,C, fifth
panels). However, quantification data showed that Tac-KA2R/A had a much lower
surface expression level compared with the wild-type Tac and Tac-KA2
118
mutant (Fig. 5D). This
is unlikely to be a result of differential expression because all proteins are
expressed at comparable levels, evident from the intracellular staining
(Fig. 5B,C, bottom
panels) and Western blotting (data not shown). To explain the decreased
surface expression of TacKA2(R/A) mutant, we examined the potential role of
each di-leucine motif, using constructs that contain point mutations at
arginines 862-866 and either of the two di-leucine sites. The additional
mutation of LL874-875 to valines had no effect on the surface expression,
whereas a similar change at LL908-909 fully restored the expression level.
This finding is consistent with a scenario that the di-leucine motif (i.e.,
LL908-909) mediates the internalization of surface-expressed TacKA2R/A mutant
and its subsequent relocalization to the intracellular compartments.
Surface-expressed homomeric KA2 receptors remain nonfunctional
We next tested whether KA2 mutants with disrupted ER retention signals
[i.e., myc-KA2(R/A) and myc-KA2(R/A+LL908-9VV) mutants] could form functional
channels. When expressed as homomeric receptors, both myc-KA2(R/A) and
mycKA2(R/A+ LL908-9VV) remained nonresponsive to glutamate
(Fig. 6A) despite
robust surface expression (Fig.
7B). Pretreatment of receptor-expressing cells with 0.3
mg/ml concanavalin A, which potentiates steady-state kainate receptor
currents, did not yield detectable currents during glutamate application (data
not shown). When coexpressed with GluR5-2a subunits, the GluR5/KA2(R/A) and
GluR5/KA2(R/A+LL908-9VV) receptors gave glutamate with amplitude and kinetics
similar to those of the wild-type GluR5/KA2 receptors
(Fig. 6B,C),
suggesting that the mutations in KA2 did not affect its heteromeric assembly.
Together these data reaffirm the notion that trafficking checkpoints are in
place to prevent the surface expression of nonfunctional receptors but only
allow the delivery of functional heteromeric receptors to the plasma
membrane.
Heteromeric assembly sterically masks the ER retention/retrieval
signal
Because KA2-containing heteromeric receptors are expressed on the plasma
membrane, mechanisms must exist to occlude the ER retention/retrieval signal.
One possibility is that the presence of dominant forward-trafficking signals
in GluR5-7, which can overpower the retention signal in KA2. Alternatively,
the retention signal may be masked because of steric hindrance or specific
interaction among the C termini, as reported for other heteromeric receptors
(Margeta-Mitrovic et al.,
2000
; Keller et al.,
2001
). The first scheme is unlikely, because the GFP-GluR6/KA2
chimera was retained in the ER just like KA2
(Fig. 4A, left
panels). Furthermore, appending the GluR6 C-terminal sequence to KA2 did not
affect its ER retention (Fig.
4A, right panels). These data effectively eliminate the
existence of dominant forward-trafficking signals in GluR6.
We then focused on the latter hypothesis, exploring how this ER
retention/retrieval signal might be shielded in a heteromeric receptor
complex. A GFP fusion protein of the GluR6 C terminus was constructed to
examine whether it could bind directly to KA2, thus masking the retention
signal. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed no interaction between them,
and overexpression of this fusion protein did not promote KA2 egress from the
ER (data not shown). These data suggest that the signal-masking process is
unlikely because of specific interaction among the C termini of constituent
subunits but, rather, is mediated through nonspecific steric hindrance. To
further test this idea, we constructed a GFPGluR6/1 chimera, in which the C
terminus of GluR6 was replaced with that of AMPA receptor subunit GluR1.
Despite the minimal sequence homology between the two C-terminal domains (but
similarity in length), the GluR6/1 chimera effectively assembled with myc-KA2
(Fig. 7A) and enabled
the heteromeric receptors to pass through the secretory pathway onto the
plasma membrane (Fig.
7B). These results suggest that steric hindrance may play
a key role in masking the ER retention/retrieval signal during heteromeric
assembly.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The controlled surface expression of ionotropic glutamate receptors plays a
key role in modifying the strength of excitatory synapses. In particular, the
insertion and removal of AMPA receptors from synapses may mediate the
postsynaptic induction of long-term potentiation and long-term depression,
respectively (for review, see Barry and
Ziff, 2002
). Other studies demonstrate that trafficking signals
also exist to control surface expression of NMDA receptors
(Standley et al., 2000
;
Scott et al., 2001
). In
contrast, the mechanisms regulating surface expression of kainate receptors
remain unknown. Physiological studies demonstrate that the
"high-affinity" kainate receptor subunits KA1 and KA2 do not form
functional homomeric receptors (Herb et
al., 1992
), but the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been
defined. Here, we report the identification of two trafficking signals present
in the C terminus of KA2, namely an arginine-rich ER retention/retrieval motif
and a di-leucine endocytic sequence. Disruption of the ER retention/retrieval
signal allows surface expression of KA2 homomeric receptors that remain
nonfunctional. We further show that, during heteromeric assembly, the ER
retention/retrieval signal is likely masked by steric hindrance, thus allowing
surface expression of functional heteromeric receptors.
Intracellular retention of KA2 is mediated by discrete trafficking
signals
The molecular mechanisms that ensure proper folding, assembly, and delivery
of multimeric transmembrane proteins to their target compartments have been
extensively studied. ER retention/retrieval may serve as an important
checkpoint, ensuring that only fully assembled functional complexes are
expressed on the cell surface (Teasdale
and Jackson, 1996
). The unassembled subunits, misfolded subunits,
or both are retained in the ER and may be further targeted for degradation by
ubiquitination and cleavage in the proteosome (Keller et al.,
1998
,
2001
).
The ER retention/retrieval process can be initiated through the recognition
of discrete retention signals or protein misfolding. The best-characterized ER
retention signals are the luminal H/KDEL sequence and the cytoplasmic KKXX
motif (Teasdale and Jackson,
1996
). The H/KDEL sequences are found at the C termini of many
soluble proteins, whereas the KKXX motifs are present at the extreme
C-terminal regions of certain transmembrane proteins. Proteins that contain
these signals are retained in the ER on their retrieval from the
cis-Golgi or ER-Golgi intermediate compartment
(Teasdale and Jackson, 1996
).
In a series of recent reports, a novel RXR-type ER retention signal has been
characterized in several transmembrane proteins
(Zerangue et al., 1999
;
Margeta-Mitrovic et al., 2000
;
Standley et al., 2000
;
Scott et al., 2001
). This
motif functions in yeast, Xenopus oocytes, and mammalian cells,
suggesting that it is evolutionarily conserved and can be recognized by the
eukaryotic trafficking machinery (Zerangue
et al., 1999
).
In this study, we demonstrated, by domain swapping, that intracellular
retention signals existed in the C-terminal region of KA2. The exact motifs
were then identified through mutation analysis of a Tac-KA2 chimera. This
approach has been used extensively for the identification of trafficking
signals in the secretory pathway (Dittrich
et al., 1996
; Tan et al.,
1998
; Fu and Kreibich,
2000
; Aguilar et al.,
2001
) because of the monomeric nature of the Tac protein and the
existence of highly specific N-terminal antibodies.
Two mechanisms, which use distinct cellular machineries to control
intercompartmental traffic along the secretory pathway, are shown to mediate
the intracellular retention of KA2. Together they represent a coordinated
quality control mechanism that ensures that only fully assembled functional
receptors are expressed on the cell surface. The first mechanism regulates ER
retention/retrieval and is operated through the recognition of the
arginine-rich motif. Clearly this arginine-rich motif differs from the classic
KKXX and H/KDEL signals in both its amino acid requirement and its proximal
location in the C terminus. However, it is not entirely clear whether it
belongs to the aforementioned RXR family of ER retention/retrieval signals,
despite their similar residue composition. Further studies are necessary to
examine whether it shares other reported characteristics, in particular the
location independence feature proposed as a hallmark for the RXR-type signals
(Zerangue et al., 1999
). What
also remains undefined is the precise cellular machinery involved in this
poly-arginine-mediated ER retention/retrieval. Previous studies have revealed
that the H/KDEL- or KKXX-containing proteins use coatomer complex I as their
retrograde-trafficking vehicle (Teasdale
and Jackson, 1996
). Whether the poly-arginine-mediated event
resembles this scenario or uses its own unique mechanism is open to
investigation.
A di-leucine motif serves as the second checkpoint preventing inappropriate
surface expression. The KA2 subunits that escaped the ER retention can be
retrieved from the plasma membrane or the TGN back to endosomes or further to
the lysosomes for degradation. Adapter protein complexes are believed to
recognize the di-leucine sequence and to initiate these clathrin-dependent
trafficking processes (Teasdale and
Jackson, 1996
). The fact that only one of the two di-leucine
motifs seems functional is not entirely surprising, because this motif is well
documented to act in a context-dependent manner (for review, see
Kirchhausen, 1999
). The
di-leucine motif in KA2 is the first endocytic signal identified in kainate
receptor subunits. Although this study has not addressed its functional
significance in KA2-containing heteromeric receptors, it is conceivable that
this di-leucine motif may regulate the dynamic turnover of these receptors at
the cell surface, similar to the clathrin-dependent endocytosis reported for
AMPA receptors (for review, see Barry and
Ziff, 2002
).
The arginine-rich ER retention/retrieval signal, although functioning in
the KA2 homomeric receptors, is disabled in the KA2-containing heteromeric
complexes. Its occlusion on heteromeric assembly is likely mediated through
steric hindrance, rather than specific interaction among the C termini of
constituent subunits. In support of this idea, replacing the C terminus of
GluR6 with that of GluR1 does not impair its ability to occlude the ER
retention/retrieval signal. Although the precise molecular determinant remains
unclear, one or both of the following mechanisms are likely to be involved.
One possibility is that the signal-masking process relies on the steric
hindrance provided by the C termini of assembling partners (i.e., GluR5/6/7).
The other scenario is that some conformational changes acquired by KA2 during
heteromeric assembly are sufficient to complete this maneuver.
Finally, it is interesting to point out that there is a similar
arginine-rich motif in the C terminus of the KA1 subunit. It is tempting to
propose that KA1 may also be retained in the ER through a similar mechanism,
given its functional resemblance to KA2. Indeed, our preliminary experiments
suggest that mutating the arginine-rich sequence in KA1 promote its surface
expression.
Physiological implications of the trafficking signals in kainate
receptor function
The existence of an arginine-rich ER retention/retrieval signal and a
di-leucine endocytic motif in KA2 raises the interesting possibility that
these signals may control the supply and removal of KA2-containing kainate
receptors to and from the plasma membrane, thus regulating the number of these
receptors on the cell surface. The KA2-assembling partners (i.e., GluR5/6/7)
share high overall homology (
75-80%), but significant discrepancies still
exist in individual domains, such as the distinct C termini of GluR5 splice
variants. These differences may affect their ability to mask the trafficking
signals present in KA2, thus providing a mechanism that enables differential
surface expression of heteromeric kainate receptors with distinct subunit
compositions. In support of this idea, it has been shown that the RXR motif in
the KATP channel subunit sulfonylurea receptor is partially exposed
(i.e., may weakly interact with the retention machinery) in the fully
assembled heterooctameric channel
(Zerangue et al., 1999
).
Further study of this mechanism may provide valuable insights toward
understanding the functional diversity of kainate receptors.
The RXR-mediated ER retention of NR1 can be modulated by protein
phosphorylation and interaction with PDZ (postsynaptic density-95/Discs
large/zona occludens-1)-containing proteins
(Standley et al., 2000
;
Scott et al., 2001
). These
findings add another level of regulation regarding receptor assembly and
trafficking. Because consensus phosphorylation sites in KA2 are near the
arginine-rich motif, and KA2 is also known to interact with the
synapse-associated protein (SAP) 90/PSD-95 family of scaffolding proteins
through its C-terminal PXXP motifs (Garcia
et al., 1998
), we examined their potential roles in KA2
trafficking. Phosphorylation-mimicking mutation of the serine and threonine
residues in TacKA2 [i.e., Tac-KA2(TS/DD)] did not promote its egress from the
ER (Fig. 8A).
Coexpression of SAP90 with KA2 also had no effect on its ER retention
(Fig. 8B). These
discrepancies regarding KA2 and NR1 subunits indicate that either the two
poly-arginine signals are different despite their similar residue composition,
or they are simply regulated by distinct mechanisms. In fact, mounting
evidence suggests that kainate receptors may use unique trafficking mechanisms
different from those used by other ionotropic glutamate receptors. For
instance, it has been shown that certain synaptic contacts only contain
kainate receptors (DeVries and Schwartz,
1999
). Moreover, within a single neuron, kainate receptors can be
targeted to specific synaptic terminals, with no colocalization with NMDA or
AMPA receptors (for review, see Lerma et
al., 2001
). Clearly, future studies beyond the scope of this
report are necessary to address all these issues. Nonetheless, they further
highlight the extraordinary complexity of the molecular mechanisms regulating
intracellular trafficking, subunit assembly, and surface expression of kainate
receptors that we are just beginning to understand.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8. Protein phosphorylation and a KA2-interacting protein do not regulate the
ER retention of KA2. A, Surface (top) and intracellular (bottom)
expression of TacKA2 (T858S859-DD), a phosphorylation-mimicking mutant.
B, Surface (top) and intracellular (bottom left) expression of KA2,
as well as intracellular expression of cotransfected SAP90 (bottom right).
Note that there is no surface staining for either of the receptors.
|
|
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received Mar. 21, 2003;
revised May. 15, 2003;
accepted May. 19, 2003.
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS39309
and NS39063 (J.M.), American Heart Association Grant 9940131N (J.M.), Centers
of Biomedical Research Excellence Grant RR15578 (J.M.), and National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant NS44322 (G.T.S.). We thank Leigh
Needleman for providing the hippocampal culture and Dr. Leslie Blair for
critical reading of this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. John Marshall, Department of
Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology, Brown University, Box
G-B4, Providence, RI 02912. E-mail:
john_marshall{at}brown.edu.
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience
0270-6474/03/236608-09$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Aguilar RC, Boehm M, Gorshkova I, Crouch RJ, Tomita K, Saito T,
Ohno H, Bonifacino JS (2001) Signal-binding specificity of the
mu4 subunit of the adaptor protein co mplex AP-4. J Biol Chem
276: 13145-13152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Barry MF, Ziff EB (2002) Receptor trafficking and the
plasticity of excitatory synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol
12: 279-286.[Web of Science][Medline]
Bettler B, Boulter J, Hermans-Borgmeyer I, O'Shea-Greenfield A,
Deneris ES, Moll C, Borgmeyer U, Hollmann M, Heinemann SF (1990)
Cloning of a novel glutamate receptor subunit, GluR5: expression in the
nervous system during development. Neuron
5: 583-595.[Web of Science][Medline]
Bowie D, Lange GD (2002) Functional stoichiometry of
glutamate receptor desensitization. J Neurosci
22: 3392-3403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Cui C, Mayer ML (1999) Heteromeric kainate receptors
formed by the coassembly of GluR5, GluR6, and GluR7. J Neurosci
19: 8281-8291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
DeVries SH, Schwartz EA (1999) Kainate receptors
mediate synaptic transmission between cones and "Off" bipolar
cells in a mammalian retina. Nature 397:
157-160.[Medline]
Dittrich E, Haft CR, Muys L, Heinrich PC, Graeve L
(1996) A di-leucine motif and an upstream serine in the
interleukin-6 (IL-6) signal transducer gp130 mediate ligand-induced
endocytosis and down-regulation of the IL-6 receptor. J Biol
Chem 271:
5487-5494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Fu J, Kreibich G (2000) Retention of subunits of the
oligosaccharyltransferase complex in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol
Chem 275:
3984-3990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Garcia EP, Mehta S, Blair LA, Wells DG, Shang J, Fukushima T,
Fallon JR, Garner CC, Marshall J (1998) SAP90 binds and clusters
kainate receptors causing incomplete desensitization. Neuron
21: 727-739.[Web of Science][Medline]
Herb A, Burnashev N, Werner P, Sakmann B, Wisden W, Seeburg PH
(1992) The KA-2 subunit of excitatory amino acid receptors shows
widespread expression in brain and forms ion channels with distantly related
subunits. Neuron 8:
775-785.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hollmann M, Heinemann SF (1994) Cloned glutamate
receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci 17:
31-108.[Web of Science][Medline]
Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Taylor P (1998) Inhibition of
glucose trimming with castanospermine reduces calnexin association and
promotes proteasome degradation of the
-subunit of the nicotinic
acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 273:
17064-17072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Ellisman M, Taylor P (2001)
Adjacent basic amino acid residues recognized by the COP I complex and
ubiquitination govern endoplasmic reticulum to cell surface trafficking of the
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor
-subunit. J Biol Chem
276: 18384-18391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kirchhausen T (1999) Adaptors for clathrin-mediated
traffic. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15:
705-732.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kowalski JM, Parekh RN, Mao, Wittrup KD (1998) Protein
folding stability can determine the efficiency of escape from endoplasmic
reticulum quality control. J Biol Chem
273: 19453-19458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Laube B, Kuhse J, Betz H (1998) Evidence for a
tetrameric structure of recombinant NMDA receptors. J Neurosci
18: 2954-2961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lerma J, Paternain AV, Rodriguez-Moreno A, Lopez-Garcia JC
(2001) Molecular physiology of kainate receptors. Physiol
Rev 81:
971-998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Letourneur F, Klausner RD (1992) A novel di-leucine
motif and a tyrosine-based motif independently mediate lysosomal targeting and
endocytosis of CD3 chains. Cell 69:
1143-1157.[Web of Science][Medline]
Letourneur F, Hennecke S, Demolliere C, Cosson P
(1995) Steric masking of a di-lysine endoplasmic reticulum
retention motif during of the human high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin
E. J Cell Biol 129:
971-978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ma D, Zerangue N, Lin YF, Collins A, Yu M, Jan YN, Jan LY
(2001) Role of ER export signals in controlling surface potassium
channel numbers. Science 291:
316-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Margeta-Mitrovic M, Jan YN, Jan LY (2000) A
trafficking checkpoint controls GABA(B) receptor heterodimerization.
Neuron 27:
97-106.[Web of Science][Medline]
Paternain AV, Herrera MT, Nieto MA, Lerma J (2000)
GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptor subunits coexist in hippocampal neurons and
coassemble to form functional receptors. J Neurosci
20: 196-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Rosenmund C, Stern-Bach Y, Stevens CF (1998) The
tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. Science
280: 1596-1599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schiffer HH, Swanson GT, Heinemann SF (1997) Rat GluR7
and a carboxy-terminal splice variant, GluR7b, are functional kainate receptor
subunits with a low sensitivity to glutamate. Neuron
19: 1141-1146.[Web of Science][Medline]
Scott DB, Blanpied TA, Swanson GT, Zhang C, Ehlers MD
(2001) An NMDA receptor ER retention signal regulated by
phosphorylation and alternative splicing. J Neurosci
21: 3063-3072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Seeburg PH (1993) The molecular biology of mammalian
glutamate receptor channels. Trends Neurosci
16: 359-365.[Web of Science][Medline]
Standley S, Roche KW, McCallum J, Sans N, Wenthold RJ
(2000) PDZ domain suppression of an ER retention signal in NMDA
receptor NR1 splice variants. Neuron 28:
887-898.[Web of Science][Medline]
Stockklausner C, Ludwig J, Ruppersberg JP, Klocker N
(2001) A sequence motif responsible for ER export and surface
expression of Kir2.0 inward rectifier K(+) channels. FEBS Lett
493: 129-133.[Web of Science][Medline]
Swanson GT, Gereau RW, Green T, Heinemann SF (1997)
Identification of amino acid residues that control functional behavior in
GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptors. Neuron
19: 913-926.[Web of Science][Medline]
Tan PK, Waites C, Liu Y, Krantz DE, Edwards RH (1998)
A leucine-based motif mediates the endocytosis of vesicular monoamine and
acetylcholine transporters. J Biol Chem
273: 17351-17360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Teasdale RD, Jackson MR (1996) Signal-mediated sorting
of membrane proteins between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi
apparatus. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12:
27-54.[Web of Science][Medline]
Wenthold RJ, Trunpy VA, Zhu WS, Petralia RS (1994)
Biochemical and assembly properties of GluR6 and KA2, two members of the
kainate receptor family, determined with subunit-specific antibodies. J
Biol Chem 269:
1332-1339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Xia H, Von Zastrow M, Malenka RC (2002) A novel
anterograde trafficking signal present in the N-terminal extracellular domain
of ionotropic glutamate receptors. J Biol Chem
277: 47765-47769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Zerangue N, Schwappach B, Jan YN, Jan LY (1999) A new
ER trafficking signal regulates the subunit stoichiometry of plasma membrane
K(ATP) channels. Neuron 22:
537-548.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Coleman, T. Moykkynen, A. Jouppila, S. Koskelainen, C. Rivera, E. R Korpi, and K. Keinanen
Agonist Occupancy Is Essential for Forward Trafficking of AMPA Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
January 14, 2009;
29(2):
303 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gellersen, M.S. Fernandes, and J.J. Brosens
Non-genomic progesterone actions in female reproduction
Hum. Reprod. Update,
January 1, 2009;
15(1):
119 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-N. Zhang, Q. Li, C. Liu, H.-B. Wang, Q. Wang, and L. Bao
The voltage-gated Na+ channel Nav1.8 contains an ER-retention/retrieval signal antagonized by the {beta}3 subunit
J. Cell Sci.,
October 1, 2008;
121(19):
3243 - 3252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Barberis, S. Sachidhanandam, and C. Mulle
GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents
J. Neurosci.,
June 18, 2008;
28(25):
6402 - 6406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Villmann and C.-M. Becker
On the Hypes and Falls in Neuroprotection: Targeting the NMDA Receptor
Neuroscientist,
December 1, 2007;
13(6):
594 - 615.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Yi and M. D. Ehlers
Emerging Roles for Ubiquitin and Protein Degradation in Neuronal Function
Pharmacol. Rev.,
March 1, 2007;
59(1):
14 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. D. Salinas, L. A. C. Blair, L. A. Needleman, J. D. Gonzales, Y. Chen, M. Li, J. D. Singer, and J. Marshall
Actinfilin Is a Cul3 Substrate Adaptor, Linking GluR6 Kainate Receptor Subunits to the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 29, 2006;
281(52):
40164 - 40173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Bao, Z. Pang, M. A. Morgan, J. Parris, Y. Rong, L. Li, and J. I. Morgan
Cbln1 Is Essential for Interaction-Dependent Secretion of Cbln3
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2006;
26(24):
9327 - 9337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Coleman, T. Moykkynen, C. Cai, L. von Ossowski, E. Kuismanen, E. R. Korpi, and K. Keinanen
Isoform-Specific Early Trafficking of AMPA Receptor Flip and Flop Variants
J. Neurosci.,
October 25, 2006;
26(43):
11220 - 11229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nasu-Nishimura, D. Hurtado, S. Braud, T. T.-T. Tang, J. T. R. Isaac, and K. W. Roche
Identification of an Endoplasmic Reticulum-Retention Motif in an Intracellular Loop of the Kainate Receptor Subunit KA2
J. Neurosci.,
June 28, 2006;
26(26):
7014 - 7021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Vivithanaporn, S. Yan, and G. T. Swanson
Intracellular Trafficking of KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediated by Interactions with Coatomer Protein Complex I (COPI) and 14-3-3 Chaperone Systems
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 2, 2006;
281(22):
15475 - 15484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Fleck
Glutamate Receptors and Endoplasmic Reticulum Quality Control: Looking beneath the Surface
Neuroscientist,
June 1, 2006;
12(3):
232 - 244.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Cauvi, X. Tian, K. von Loehneysen, and M. W. Robertson
Transport of the IgE Receptor {alpha}-Chain Is Controlled by a Multicomponent Intracellular Retention Signal
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 14, 2006;
281(15):
10448 - 10460.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, S. Zhu, X. Song, Y. Shen, H. Chen, J. Yu, K. Yi, Y. Liu, V. J. Karplus, P. Wu, et al.
A Rice Glutamate Receptor-Like Gene Is Critical for the Division and Survival of Individual Cells in the Root Apical Meristem
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2006;
18(2):
340 - 349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-Q. Ren, S.-B. Cheng, M. W. Treuil, J. Mukherjee, J. Rao, K. H. Braunewell, J. M. Lindstrom, and R. Anand
Structural Determinants of {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Trafficking
J. Neurosci.,
July 13, 2005;
25(28):
6676 - 6686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Jaskolski, E. Normand, C. Mulle, and F. Coussen
Differential Trafficking of GluR7 Kainate Receptor Subunit Splice Variants
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 17, 2005;
280(24):
22968 - 22976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Dodd, B. Niederoest, S. Bloechlinger, L. Dupuis, J.-P. Loeffler, and M. E. Schwab
Nogo-A, -B, and -C Are Found on the Cell Surface and Interact Together in Many Different Cell Types
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12494 - 12502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Valluru, J. Xu, Y. Zhu, S. Yan, A. Contractor, and G. T. Swanson
Ligand Binding Is a Critical Requirement for Plasma Membrane Expression of Heteromeric Kainate Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
6085 - 6093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Druhan, J. Ai, P. Massullo, T. Kindwall-Keller, M. A. Ranalli, and B. R. Avalos
Novel mechanism of G-CSF refractoriness in patients with severe congenital neutropenia
Blood,
January 15, 2005;
105(2):
584 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Heine, B. Koch, S. Storch, A. Kohlschutter, D. N. Palmer, and T. Braulke
Defective Endoplasmic Reticulum-resident Membrane Protein CLN6 Affects Lysosomal Degradation of Endocytosed Arylsulfatase A
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 21, 2004;
279(21):
22347 - 22352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Jaskolski, F. Coussen, N. Nagarajan, E. Normand, C. Rosenmund, and C. Mulle
Subunit Composition and Alternative Splicing Regulate Membrane Delivery of Kainate Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
March 10, 2004;
24(10):
2506 - 2515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Yan, J. M. Sanders, J. Xu, Y. Zhu, A. Contractor, and G. T. Swanson
A C-Terminal Determinant of GluR6 Kainate Receptor Trafficking
J. Neurosci.,
January 21, 2004;
24(3):
679 - 691.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Ren, N. J. Riley, L. A. Needleman, J. M. Sanders, G. T. Swanson, and J. Marshall
Cell Surface Expression of GluR5 Kainate Receptors Is Regulated by an Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention Signal
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 26, 2003;
278(52):
52700 - 52709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|