The Journal of Neuroscience, August 13, 2003, 23(19):7368-7375
Previous Article | Next Article 
Absence of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Gene or Activity Impairs Mouse Cerebellar Motor Learning
Nicholas W. Seeds,
Mark E. Basham, and
Jayne E. Ferguson
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Motor learning is thought to involve modulation of synaptic inputs in the
cerebellar cortex, including granule neuron/Purkinje neuron contacts. During a
complex motor task requiring mice to walk across irregularly spaced pegs,
cerebellar granule neurons show a rapid and transient induction of mRNA for
the extracellular protease tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). This induction
of tPA mRNA is cerebellar specific, is not seen in the cerebella of exercised
or stressed animals, and is distinct from simple performance phenomena.
Knock-out mice lacking the tPA gene show a significant reduction in both rate
and extent of learning. Furthermore, blocking tPA activity during training
dramatically impaired motor learning. Thus, tPA plays an important role in
motor learning, in which tPA may facilitate remodeling of the active synaptic
zone.
Key words: tPA mRNA; protease inhibitor; PAI-1; granule neuron; synaptic plasticity; memory
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Long-term memory requires the synthesis of new proteins, which are thought
to bring about structural changes in synaptic connections within the brain
(for review, see Bailey and Kandel,
1993
). The cerebellar cortex has been implicated as an important
area of plasticity for motor learning. Black et al.
(1990
) have shown an increase
in the number of synapses per Purkinje cell in the molecular layer of the
cerebellar cortex of rats trained to perform complex motor tasks, whereas the
number of these parallel fiber synapses on Purkinje neurons does not change in
animals subjected to voluntary exercise. These synaptic changes are related to
the learning of a specific motor task and not merely increased synaptic
activity.
The plasminogen activators (PA) are serine proteases that play an important
role in tissue remodeling and cell migration
(Dano et al., 1985
;
Saksela and Rifkin, 1988
;
Seeds et al., 1999
);
therefore, they are potential candidate molecules to participate in synaptic
remodeling. PA are secreted by neurons during axonal growth and regeneration
and then bind with high affinity to the surface of the growth cone, where they
are poised to facilitate nerve outgrowth through a tissue matrix
(Krystosek and Seeds, 1981
;
Pittman et al., 1989
;
Verrall and Seeds, 1989
;
McGuire and Seeds, 1990
).
Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is the primary PA in brain, being expressed
at high levels in embryonic brain regions undergoing cell migration and tissue
remodeling (Friedman and Seeds,
1994
,
1995
). In general, tPA levels
are greatly reduced in the mature brain, except for the cerebellum and the
hippocampus, two regions associated with learning.
Several lines of evidence suggest that tPA is involved in CNS learning. tPA
expression increases in the cerebellum of rats during operant conditioning of
a complex motor task (Seeds et al.,
1995
). Overexpression of a tPA transgene enhances water maze
performance (Madani et al.,
1999
). Similarly, long-term potentiation (LTP) induction in
hippocampal slices (Qian et al.,
1993
) is associated with an increase in tPA expression, and
inhibitors of tPA activity impair late-phase LTP in hippocampal slices
(Baranes et al., 1998
). Because
the precise role tPA plays during learning is not known, we have investigated
the involvement of tPA in the consolidation phase of learning in mice and the
need for tPA gene expression and proteolytic activity during learning of a
complex motor task, as assessed in tPA knock-out mice, and in the presence of
specific tPA inhibitors.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Motor learning. All behavioral testing was done with adult (3-6
months of age) male C57BL/6 wild-type (tPA+/+), heterozygote (tPA-/+), or tPA
knock-out (tPA-/-) mice placed on a >98% C57BL/6 background (Jackson Labs,
Bar Harbor, ME). Mutant mice having different grandmothers were bred in our
colony and back-crossed to wild-type controls every 10 generations to prevent
strain divergence. Gene knock-outs were confirmed by the absence of tPA
activity in zymography and amidolytic assays
(Krystosek and Seeds, 1986
).
The mice were housed singly and given food ad libitum, but during
training and testing were given limited access to water and maintained at
85-90% of their starting body weight. All animal protocols were approved by
the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of our university. During
motor learning, mice must learn to traverse a runway by placing their paws on
the aluminum pegs that protrude horizontally from the walls of the runway; a
task that is dependent on cerebellar function
(Watson and McElligott, 1983
;
Bickford, 1993
;
Seeds et al., 1995
).
Initially, mice are shaped and trained on a regular (REG) peg pattern that
conforms to their normal gait (Fig.
1). Water (0.07 ml) is used to reinforce running across the
apparatus, and water delivery is associated with a loud tone that serves as a
signaling stimulus and secondary reinforcer. Mice were water deprived
overnight before training. Shaping of water drinking and running was achieved
with the rods covered by sheets of cardboard. The mice were maintained under
these conditions for several days until they were able to run successfully
back and forth on the runway. After shaping of the runway performance,
training proceeded by gradually removing pieces of the cardboard that covered
the regular pegs. After shaping and training on the REG pattern, the mice were
not exposed to the runway for 10 -14 d. The testing phase of the learning
experiment consisted of daily sessions of 20 trials conducted on a novel
irregular-spaced (IRR) pattern of pegs for 6 -9 consecutive days. The average
traverse time for each mouse was calculated daily; the percentage decrease
from that mouse's average on day 1 was used as an index of the amount learned.
Both the tPA+/+ and tPA-/- mice showed runtimes on day 1 ranging from 8.3-16.1
sec, with average times of 11.1 and 10.9 sec, respectively. Similarly, there
was no significant difference between the saline-infused and tPA
inhibitor-infused groups for day 1 runtimes. Because each mouse's run time on
day 1 was defined as 100%, data from day 1 were not included in the
statistical analysis. The percentage data from the subsequent days were
normalized through a rank transformation and a two-way, repeated measures
ANOVA performed on the data. Student's t tests were used to directly
compare learning between groups on each day of training.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Motor learning curve and apparatus. Mice were trained on a complex motor
task that involves learning to negotiate a runway consisting of aluminum pegs
placed in a specific pattern, as depicted in the inset on the top right.
Animals are shaped and trained with a water reward, delivered on the platform
at each end of the runway, on the Regular pattern (A), which closely
matches their normal gait. After a 10-d interval, the animals are tested for
their motor learning of the Irregular pattern (B). Running times are
expressed as a percentage of each mouse's initial runs on day 1 (C). The
majority of the improvement in running times (i.e., learning) takes place
between days 1 and 2.
|
|
In situ hybridization. Mice were trained as described and
euthanized at specific times after training. The cerebella were rapidly
removed and frozen, then embedded in O.C.T. (Miles, Elkhart, IN), and the
paramedian lobule was cut in 16 µm sections. Hippocampal tissue was removed
from some of the same mice and similarly processed. The sections were fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde-PBS for 15 min, then processed for hybridization as
described by Friedman and Seeds
(1995
) using the procedure of
Simmons et al. (1989
). The
hybridization was performed with 5 x 10 6 cpm/ml of a
515-base 35S-cRNA (antisense or sense) riboprobe to part of the
kringle 2 and the catalytic domains of mouse tPA in 50% formamide at 62°C
for 16 hr. Slides were processed through descending concentrations of 0.15
M NaCl, 30 mM Na citrate (SSC), and a final wash in
0.1x SSC at 65°C for 30 min. The slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2
emulsion and exposed 3 weeks, developed, and viewed by dark-field
illumination. Pixel counting of digitized images of brain sections from the
different experimental conditions, and at different exposure times, was used
to quantify tPA mRNA with National Institutes of Health Image software.
Multiple sections from three different mice were examined for each
experimental condition.
Inhibition of protein synthesis. Protein synthesis was inhibited
by anisomycin injection following the protocol of Squire and Davis
(1975
). Mice were given a
subcutaneous injection of either saline or anisomycin (150 mg/kg body weight)
immediately before training on day 1. Similarly, mice that had already learned
the irregular peg running paradigm after 5 d of training were given similar
injections before training on day 6. Both sets of animals were tested for
irregular peg walking on the following day.
Osmotic pumps. Forty-six C57BL/6 wild-type mice were implanted
with osmotic pumps to deliver either artificial CSF (ACSF) (n = 22),
plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) (n = 16), or tPA-STOP
(n = 8) to the cerebellum during training on the IRR pegs (Alzet).
Microosmotic pumps (100 µl capacity; Direct Corp., Cupertino, CA) were
filled with either ACSF (148 mM NaCl, 3.0 mM KCl, 1.4
mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, 0.8
mM Na2HPO4, and 0.2 mM
NaH2PO4), PAI-1 (11.6 µM; Calbiochem, La
Jolla, CA), or tPA-STOP (1 mM; American Diagnostica, Greenwich,
CT). The PAI-1 used for this study is a recombinant, mutant form that remains
stable and active for an extended period (t1/2 = 145 hr at
37°C) (Berkenpas et al.,
1995
). Similarly, tPA-STOP was shown in amidolytic assays to be
quite stable at 37°C for up to 2 weeks as a 1 mM solution (0.01
µmoles of tPA-STOP completely inhibited 160 IU of tPA activity). All pumps
were attached to 1.5 cm of ACSF-filled tubing and an infusion cannula (Alzet).
The pumps were preincubated overnight in saline at 37°C, allowing the
pumps to begin to expel the ACSF initially present in the tubing and cannulae.
On the day of surgery, mice were weighed and anesthetized with ketamine HCl
(120 mg/kg) and xylazine HCl (10 mg/kg). A pump was placed in a mid-scapular,
subcutaneous pocket, and the cannula was placed in a hole in the skull and
cemented in place with cyanoacrolate such that the cannula protruded into the
paramedian cerebellum. Each pump delivered 0.5 µl/hr for
7 d. After
surgery, mice were allowed to recover in their home cage, and the first day of
training on the IRR pegs commenced 2 d after surgery. A second group of mice
received pumps (ACSF, 12; PAI-1, 6; tPA-STOP, 7) after the fifth day of
training on the IRR pegs. After surgery and recovery, training resumed for
another 4 d. At the end of each experiment, mice were sacrificed, and the
brains were removed and examined to verify proper cannula placement. All
osmotic pumps were empty at the time of sacrifice. All animal surgery and
testing protocols were approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee.
Amidolytic assay. To determine the extent to which PA activity was
inhibited in the cerebellum during PAI-1 infusions, we measured the PA
inhibitory activity in the cerebellum 3, 7, and 10 d after pump implantation.
Mice were implanted with either ACSF- or PAI-1-filled pumps as described
previously. After 3 (ACSF, n = 3; PAI-1, n = 3), 7 (ACSF,
n = 2; PAI-1, n = 4), or 10 (ACSF, n = 2; PAI-1,
n = 2) days, the cerebella were removed and homogenized in buffer Z
(1:4 w/v; 0.05 M Tris, 0.15 mM NaCl, 0.16 mM
EDTA, and 1% Tween 80) with 1.5% SDS. Samples were spun at 15,000 rpm for 5
min, and the soluble fraction was heated to 37°C for 30 min. Twenty
microliters of the soluble fraction were then incubated at 37°C with
recombinant tPA (Genentech, San Francisco, CA), a plasmin-sensitive
chromogenic substrate (S2251; 1.6 µM; American Diagnostica), 2.5
µg of high molecular weight poly-D-lysine, and .0625 U of
plasminogen. The ability of tPA to convert plasminogen to plasmin was
monitored by measuring the absorbance at 405 µM wavelength every
2 min for 80 min with a Bio-Tek (Winooski, VT) microplate reader. By comparing
the results with those from a simultaneously processed standard curve with
known amounts of tPA activity, the amount of inhibition of tPA activity in the
cerebellar samples was determined. Student's t tests comparing ACSF-
and PAI-1-infused groups were performed for each time point. Amidolytic assays
were also used to confirm the tPA inhibitory activity of tPA-STOP and the
stability of this activity at 37°C.
 |
Results
|
|---|
To investigate the involvement of tPA in the consolidation phase of
learning in mice, we used a complex motor task of irregular peg walking to
receive a water reward. A previously described
(Watson and McElligott, 1983
;
Seeds et al., 1995
) apparatus
for rats was modified to accommodate mice in a narrower (4 cm wide) runway
with more closely spaced pegs, which matched the mouse's normal gait.
Initially, the mice were shaped and trained on a REG peg pattern
(Fig. 1A). After
remaining in their home cage for 2 weeks, the mice were again placed in the
runaway; however, the pegs were now in an IRR pattern
(Fig. 1B). The average
running time for each mouse was compared with its average speed for the 20
trials on day 1. The mice readily learned to navigate this novel peg pattern,
as indicated by their improved running times on days 1-5 of training
(Fig. 1C); after this
time the curve becomes asymptotic. As with many learning paradigms, the
greatest improvement (i.e., learning) was seen between testing day 1 and day 2
(Fig. 1C). The
critical nature of this time window for consolidation of learning was
confirmed by its dependence on new protein synthesis as shown in
Table 1. Mice receiving a
saline injection before training on day 1 show a 23% improvement in running
times on the irregular pegs on day 2; however, those mice receiving an
injection of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin showed no improvement
(i.e., learning) during training on day 2. To demonstrate that the anisomycin
effect was on motor learning and not on peg running performance, mice that
already learned the irregular peg running paradigm by day 6 were given similar
injections on day 6, and there was no difference between the running
performance of saline- or anisomycin-injected mice when tested on day 7.
Thus, mouse cerebella were examined during this active phase of learning
for the expression of tPA mRNA. Cerebella were collected from mice at various
times after training on day 1 and rapidly frozen. Fresh frozen sections were
processed for in situ hybridization with a radiolabeled antisense
cRNA probe to mouse tPA mRNA. The localization of tPA mRNA was visualized by
dark-field illumination microscopy. Induction of tPA mRNA expression in mouse
cerebellar granule neurons was quite dramatic within 0.5-1 hr after training
on day 1 (Figs. 2A,
3), when compared with
cerebellar sections of motor activity control mice that were simply exercised
by freely running over covered-pegs (Fig.
2C), or untrained naive mice (data not shown). Sense cRNA
probes failed to show specific binding to the cerebellar tissue. The induction
of tPA mRNA appears restricted to the granule neuron layer and is noticeably
absent from Purkinje neurons in mice, which is in distinct contrast to what we
described in rats (Seeds et al.,
1995
). In rats, there was a dramatic induction of tPA mRNA in
cerebellar Purkinje neurons and to a lesser extent in granule neurons.
Furthermore, in contrast to other studies in rats
(Ware et al., 1995
), we have
not seen tPA mRNA expression in mouse Purkinje neurons at any developmental
stage examined (Friedman and Seeds,
1994
,
1995
). This is most probably
because of mouse and human tPA genes lacking the cAMP-responsive element used
by the rat tPA gene and having a phorbol ester-responsive AP-1 site at this
same position (Rickles et al.,
1989
; Feng et al.,
1990
). However, cAMP can promote tPA expression in some mouse
cells (Holmberg et al.,
1995
).

View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. tPA mRNA induction in cerebellar granule neurons during motor learning. tPA
mRNA is rapidly induced in mouse cerebellar granule neurons as seen by in
situ hybridization on a tissue section taken 1 hr after training
(A) on the irregular peg pattern on day 1 with dark-field microscopy
of folia V. Mice subjected to stress (B), by being confined and
having to cling to the pegs for 30 min, show background levels of tPA mRNA
similar to untrained naive mice, or mice exercised (C) by repetitive
running over covered pegs. Mice that have already learned the task by day 6
also show a very low level of tPA mRNA expression from simply performing
(D) this task as seen 1 hr after running on the irregular pegs on day
6. Scale bar (in D), 250 µm.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. tPA mRNA induction during complex motor learning as quantified by
35S-antisense cRNA probe binding to cerebellar sections from mice
at various times (0.5, 1, 4, and 24 hr) after training on day 1, or at 1 hr
after training on day 6, or mice subjected to conditions of simple exercise or
stress and sampled 1 hr later. tPA mRNA induction is seen as early as 30 min
after the training session on day 1, and tPA mRNA increases threefold by 4 hr
after training. Exercised, stressed, and learned mice all show background
levels of tPA mRNA similar to those seen in naive mice. Thus, tPA mRNA is
rapidly induced in cerebellar granule neurons during the early stages of
learning and is distinct from exercise, stress, or a simple performance
response.
|
|
Because tPA appears to be an immediate early gene and is under the
influence of an AP-1 promoter in mice
(Rickles et al., 1989
), it was
important to rule out the possibility that this tPA induction was mediated by
stress-related increases in c-fos
(Ryabinin et al., 1995
), a
known activator of AP-1 sites (Holmberg et
al., 1995
). Stress-control mice were allowed to walk out onto the
irregular pegs, and then their path was blocked both in front and behind, such
that they were confined and had to hold onto the pegs for the entire 30 min.
session to prevent their falling through the runway. Similar to the exercised
controls (Fig. 2C),
the stressed-mice did not show an increase in cerebellar tPA mRNA expression
(Fig. 2B).
Furthermore, this induction of tPA mRNA is not simply related to motor
performance, because mice that have already learned the complex motor task by
training day 6 also show a very low level of tPA mRNA expression from simply
performing this task, as seen 1 hr after running on the irregular pegs on day
6 (Fig. 2D).
The tPA mRNA levels in the granule neuron layer of these mice
(Fig. 2) 1 hr after training,
as well as tPA mRNA levels from cerebella taken at various times after the
training session, have been quantified.
Figure 3 shows the mean grain
density of the tPA cRNA probe binding to these different cerebellar sections.
tPA mRNA induction is rapid, with significant levels being seen as early as
0.5 hr after training on day 1. tPA mRNA expression increases threefold,
reaching maximal levels by 4 hr after training on day 1, and then
declines.
The induction of tPA mRNA after motor learning is specific for the
cerebellum. Although tPA mRNA is readily detectable in the mouse hippocampus,
there is no significant increase in tPA mRNA levels in the CA1, CA3, or
dentate gyrus regions of the hippocampus at 1 hr (or 4 hr) after complex motor
learning, when compared with the exercised control mice
(Fig. 4).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. No induction of tPA mRNA expression in the mouse hippocampus during
irregular peg running. The CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus regions of the
hippocampus show no significant induction tPA mRNA at 1 hr after the complex
motor learning paradigm.
|
|
The dependence of cerebellar motor learning on the presence of tPA was
assessed using mice lacking both copies of the tPA gene. These tPA-/-
knock-out mice were maintained on a >98% C57BL/6 genetic background. tPA
knock-out mice were compared with tPA heterozygotes and to wild-type mice for
their ability to learn the irregular peg walking paradigm. The irregular peg
performance of tPA heterozygotes did not differ from wild-type mice, so both
groups were pooled as controls in Figure
5. Knock-out mice missing both tPA genes show impaired motor
learning with a significant (two-way ANOVA; p < 0.03) reduction in
both their rate and extent (28% decrease) of learning compared with their
heterozygous and normal littermate controls.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5. Cerebellar motor learning is impaired in tPA knock-out mice. Knock-out mice
lacking the tPA (-/-) gene show impaired motor learning with a significant
(two-way ANOVA; p < 0.03) reduction in both their rate and extent
(28% decrease) of learning this complex motor paradigm of irregular peg
running, as compared with their heterozygous and normal littermate
controls.
|
|
To test whether the proteolytic activity of tPA was necessary for motor
learning, specific inhibitors of tPA were infused into the cerebellum via
micro-osmotic pumps during motor learning. These micropumps deliver
0.5
µl/hr for
7 d. The effectiveness of infused PAI-1 to inhibit
endogenous cerebellar tPA activity was assessed in cerebellar homogenates as
compared with mice infused with ACSF. Table
2 shows that tPA activity of homogenates of cerebella infused with
PAI-1 and prepared on day 2 of training (i.e., 3 d after pump implantation)
was significantly inhibited 78% (t = -7.468; p = 0.002) as
compared with tPA activity in those cerebella receiving ACSF. Homogenates
prepared on training day 6 or day 9, after the pumps are empty, showed no
significant differences and lacked any inhibitory activity. The use of
125I-PAI-1 to monitor its diffusion showed that PAI-1 diffusion was
restricted to the cerebellum, was heavily distributed within a 1.5 mm radius,
and was seen at a maximal radius of 4.5 mm from the cannula site; thus,
covering >90% of the 0.9 -1-cm-wide mouse cerebellum.
A group of mice were shaped and trained on the REG peg pattern for 5 d
until their running times became asymptotic. After a 2 week interval, the mice
were implanted with micro-osmotic pumps containing either ACSF or PAI-1.
Cerebellar infusions of PAI-1 impaired learning of the IRR peg pattern
compared with ACSF infusions. Mice in which PAI-1 was infused into the
cerebellum showed an overall smaller percentage decrease in run times than
mice receiving ACSF infusions (two-way, repeated measures ANOVA; p =
0.042; Fig. 6A). Mice
receiving ACSF infusions had a 27% reduction in average traverse time on the
second day of training. In contrast, mice receiving PAI-1 infusions had only a
12% decrease in average traverse time on day 2. Notably, PAI-1-infused mice
showed significantly less learning than ACSF-infused mice after training on
day 1 (t = -2.0; df = 30; p = 0.05), when the majority of
learning occurs and when tPA mRNA expression in the cerebellum is highest.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6. Intracerebellar infusions of PAI-1 impaired motor learning but not
performance of a previously learned motor task. A, Mice that received
continuous intracerebellar infusions of PAI-1 showed significantly less
learning than those receiving ACSF infusions (two-way, repeated measures
ANOVA; p = 0.042). Error bars represent SEM. *Days in
which the average percentage decrease from initial run time was significantly
different between the two groups (p 0.05);
**p < 0.01. B, All mice were initially trained
on an IRR peg pattern (open symbols). After 5 d of training, mice were
implanted with cerebellum-directed pumps filled with either PAI-1 or ACSF.
After pump implantation, mice in both groups (solid symbols) continued to
perform the motor task at levels similar to those before surgery.
|
|
PAI-1 infusions did not decrease the activity level of the mice, and no
differences were observed between groups in the mice's motivation to perform
the motor task. All mice, regardless of treatment would immediately drink the
water reward after each successful crossing, indicating similar levels of
motivation, and all mice consumed similar amounts of water during the daily
post-training ad libitum access. Importantly, the groups did not
differ in the average number of crossings per day (data not shown); the
PAI-1-infused mice just ran slower; so all mice had a similar amount of
experience on the irregular peg pattern.
Pump implantation and subsequent infusion of either ACSF or PAI-1 did not
impair the mice's ability to perform a previously learned motor task. Mice
that had been trained on the irregular peg pattern for 5 d and that had shown
no significant decrease in traverse times after the fourth training day were
implanted with either ACSF- or PAI-1-filled pumps. Subsequent training on the
irregular peg pattern showed no significant differences in performance between
groups and no significant increase in average run time when compared with day
4 and day 5 run times (Fig.
6B).
Because PAI-1 is a large molecule and forms a 115 kDa complex with tPA, it
was important to see whether a small, active site-specific tripeptide
inhibitor would also inhibit motor learning. Similar to the results with
PAI-1, infusion of the small 400 Mr tPA-STOP into the
cerebellum inhibits tPA activity and impairs motor learning. Mice implanted
with cerebellum-directed pumps filled with 1 mM tPA-STOP showed
significantly impaired motor learning compared with mice receiving ACSF-filled
pumps (two-way, repeated measures ANOVA; p = .007;
Fig. 7A). As seen with
the PAI-1 infusions, tPA-STOP did not impair the mice's ability to perform a
previously learned task (Fig.
7B).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Intracerebellar infusions of tPA-STOP impaired motor learning but not
performance of a previously learned motor task. A, Mice that received
continuous intracerebellar infusions of tPA-STOP showed significantly less
learning than those receiving ACSF infusions (two-way, repeated measures
ANOVA; p = 0.007). Error bars represent SEM. *Days in
which the average percentage decrease from initial run time was significantly
different between the two groups (p < 0.05).
**p < 0.01 In B, All mice were initially
trained on an IRR peg pattern (open symbols). After 5 d of training, mice were
implanted with cerebellum-directed pumps filled with either tPA-STOP or ACSF.
After pump implantation, mice in both groups (solid symbols) continued to
perform the motor task at levels similar to those before surgery.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
These studies have shown that learning to negotiate a complex motor task
leads to a rapid and dramatic induction of tPA mRNA in cerebellar granule
neurons of mice. Induction of the extracellular protease tPA occurs during the
critical consolidation phase of learning. Most importantly, tPA appears to
play a necessary role in learning, because mice without the tPA genes show
significantly impaired motor learning, as did mice whose cerebellar tPA
activity was inhibited. These findings support the hypothesis that tPA may
have a fundamental role in synaptic remodeling associated with synaptic
plasticity.
With complex motor learning paradigms, it is important to distinguish those
events that are simply related to performing the motor task from those events
that reflect the learning associated with the motor task. Many of the rodent
learning tasks, either spatial or motor, show similar learning curves over a
period of a few days, where the greatest learning or improvement occurs after
the first or second day of trials. Consolidation of learning, which requires
new gene expression and protein synthesis, occurs during this critical time
window. However, those events related to just performing the task are
reproduced with each trial. When the learning curves become asymptotic, the
mice have learned the task. Therefore, in contrast to gene activities
expressed early in the trials that may be part of the learning process, those
gene activities expressed after the task is mastered primarily reflect
performance. In trained mice, simply performing the motor task of irregular
peg walking after 6 d of trials does not induce tPA gene expression
(Fig. 2D); however, in
those mice in the process of learning to navigate the irregular pegs, training
does induce tPA gene expression (Fig.
2A). Furthermore, this induction of tPA gene expression
was independent of induced stress or physical exercise
(Fig. 2B,C).
The requirement for tPA gene expression during motor learning, as
demonstrated here by the impaired motor learning in tPA knock-out mice, is in
agreement with two other studies showing abnormal late-phase hippocampal LTP
(Frey et al., 1996
) and poor
performance on two-way active avoidance, a striatal-dependent task
(Huang et al., 1996
), in tPA
knock-out mice on a heterogeneous (C57BL/SV129) genetic background. Additional
support for a role for tPA expression in learning is seen in the enhanced
performance in the Morris water maze and the homing holeboard tasks by mice
overexpressing the tPA gene (Madani et
al., 1999
).
Surprisingly, learning deficits in PAI-1- or tPA-STOP-infused mice persist
throughout the 9 d of training despite the fact that, by training day 6, the
pumps are exhausted and inhibition levels have dropped to baseline,
ACSF-infused levels. This finding may reflect the time course over which tPA
effects motor learning. The majority of improvement in traverse time occurs
during the first 2 d of training, and no significant reductions in traverse
time are seen after the fourth day of training. Similarly, training during
days 1 and 2 elicits significant increases in tPA expression in the
cerebellum; by training day 6, tPA mRNA remains at baseline levels after
training. Therefore, inhibition of tPA activity during the initial period of
motor training, when tPA expression is elevated, leads to impaired performance
of the motor task that persists both in the absence of increased tPA
expression and in the absence of inhibition of tPA activity when the pumps run
out. This finding is consistent with a model in which only the initial stage
of motor learning involves tPA activity and is, therefore, sensitive to
inhibition of PA. One possibility is that sensory signals from missteps on the
pegs elicit increases in tPA mRNA expression in the cerebellum and that this
increased tPA expression is permissive of motor learning. After several
training days, the number of missteps may decline to the point where increased
tPA expression is no longer elicited and motor learning is less probable.
Although inhibition of plasminogen activator activity impairs motor
learning, these treatments did not prevent improvement on the motor learning
task. Some of this residual learning could be because of residual tPA
activity. Although cerebellum homogenates from PAI-1-implanted mice show
extensive inhibition of tPA on the second day of training, there may not be a
complete block of endogenous tPA activity. Alternatively, some aspects of
motor learning may not require tPA, as indicated in the tPA knock-out mouse
(Fig. 5). These results are
similar to hippocampal LTP, in which inhibiting tPA activity or knocking out
the tPA gene attenuates, but does not abolish, late-phase LTP
(Baranes et al., 1998
).
The acquisition of complex motor skill is associated with increased
cerebellar activity and structural remodeling of synapses in the cerebellar
cortex (Black et al., 1990
;
Steitz and Roland, 1992
).
There is a quantitative increase in the number of granule neuron parallel
fiber synapses on Purkinje cell dendrites in the cerebellar cortex during
complex motor learning that is not seen with simple motor activity
(Kleim et al., 1998a
).
Although the deep cerebellar nuclei are implicated in the acquisition of motor
skills (Lavond and Steinmetz,
1989
), there is no readily apparent structural plasticity in this
region (Kleim et al., 1998b
).
Furthermore, Hesslow et al.
(1999
) have shown that motor
input via mossy fibers onto cerebellar granule neurons leads to memory storage
in the cerebellar cortex during motor learning. Similarly, Attwell et al.
(2002
) have shown that motor
memory consolidation is mediated by the cerebellar cortex. Thus, synaptic
remodeling of a qualitative and quantitative nature in the cerebellar cortex
is associated with complex motor learning.
The finding that motor learning involves tPA is consistent with a model in
which motor learning consists, in part, of persistent changes in the strength
of connections among neurons in the cerebellum. Motor learning causes an
increase in tPA mRNA within the cerebellar granule cell layer, in which
in-coming mossy fibers synapse on granule cells. Granule cell bodies in the
granule layer extend axons that give rise to parallel fibers that synapse on
Purkinje cell dendrites and dendrites of inhibitory interneurons in the
molecular layer. LTP has been demonstrated at the mossy fiber-granule cell
synapse, and both LTP and long-term depression (LTD) have been demonstrated at
the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapse
(Ito et al., 1982
;
Salin et al., 1996
;
D'Angelo et al., 1999
). These
long-lasting excitability changes develop in the cerebellum over a period of 2
hr after the induction stimulus (Jorntell
and Ekerot, 2002
). Although it is not known whether cerebellar LTP
requires tPA activity, these findings suggest a role for tPA in the cerebellum
that is similar to the role tPA may play in the hippocampus. That is, motor
learning may involve LTP (and LTD) at mossy fiber-granule cell and/or parallel
fiber-Purkinje cell synapses, and loss of tPA activity may impair learning by
impairing LTP/LTD.
Induced expression of tPA mRNA and protein
(Seeds et al., 1995
) in the
cerebellum of mice and rats occurs within the first 4 hr after initial
training for a complex motor learning paradigm. Importantly, this time frame
coincides closely with the consolidation phase of working memory, the
5
hr time window required before a motor skill can be learned and retained for
the long term, before being tested on a conflicting second motor task
(Shadmehr and Brashers-Krug,
1997
).
In fact, tPA may play a general role in facilitating structural changes
related to synaptic plasticity. In the hippocampus, LTP leads to
synaptogenesis (Engert and Bonhoeffer,
1999
; Toni et al.,
1999
) and involves increases in tPA expression. In the visual
cortex, reverse occlusion-induced plasticity that involves synaptogenesis is
sensitive to tPA inhibitors, whereas plasticity that involves the loss of
connections without synaptogenesis is not sensitive to tPA inhibitors
(Müller and Griesinger,
1998
). In the cerebellum, motor learning leads to an increase in
the number of synapses per Purkinje cell
(Black et al., 1990
) and, as
shown here, induces tPA expression, and inhibition of tPA activity in the
cerebellum impairs motor learning. The increasing number of examples of an
association between tPA and synaptogenesis suggests that tPA may be part of a
common mechanism for activity-dependent structural remodeling.
Synaptic plasticity associated with learning may include the modification
of neuronal receptors, the formation of new synaptic sites, as well as the
expansion of the synaptic active zone on preformed synapses. The participation
of tPA in various forms of tissue remodeling throughout the body make it a
likely candidate molecule for synaptic remodeling during learning. tPA may act
directly to cleave and activate substrates, including the NMDA-R1 receptor
subunit (Nicole et al., 2001
)
and the latent neurotrophic growth factor HGF/SF
(Mars et al., 1993
;
Thewke and Seeds, 1996
), or
its more notable substrate, plasminogen, which is expressed in both the adult
cerebellum (Basham and Seeds,
2001
) and hippocampus (Tsirka
et al., 1997
). Neuronal secreted tPA bound to the neuronal surface
or extracellular matrix would locally activate plasminogen; the widely active
plasmin may digest cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions, cell surface
receptors, or expose cryptic sites for synaptogenesis. Thus, tPA may
facilitate synaptic plasticity during motor learning by synapse activation or
initiating structural changes and synaptic remodeling.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received Apr. 3, 2003;
revised Jun. 5, 2003;
accepted Jun. 17, 2003.
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants
NS-09818 and NS-44129 to N.W.S. and National Institute of Mental
Health-National Research Service Award MH12142 to M.E.B. We thank Dr. Peter
Carmeliet for his gift of the initial tPA knock-out mice and the expert
technical assistance of Lisa Beckelheimer and Lisa Akison.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Nicholas W. Seeds, Department
Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, UCHSC B-138, 4200 East Ninth Avenue,
Denver, CO 80262. E-mail:
Nicholas.Seeds{at}uchsc.edu.
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience
0270-6474/03/237368-08$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Attwell PJ, Cooke SF, Yeo CH (2002) Cerebellar
function in consolidation of a motor memory. Neuron
34: 1011-1020.[Web of Science][Medline]
Bailey CH, Kandel ER (1993) Structural changes
accompanying memory storage. Annu Rev Physiol
55: 397-426.[Web of Science][Medline]
Baranes D, Lederfein D, Huang Y-Y, Chen M, Bailey CH, Kandel ER
(1998) Tissue plasminogen activator contributes to the late phase
of LTP and to synaptic growth in the hippocampal mossy fiber pathway.
Neuron 21:
813-825.[Web of Science][Medline]
Basham ME, Seeds NW (2001) Plasminogen expression in
the neonatal and adult mouse brain. J Neurochem
77: 318-325.[Medline]
Berkenpas MB, Lawrence DA, Ginsburg D (1995) Molecular
evolution of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 functional stability.
EMBO J 14:
2969-2977.[Web of Science][Medline]
Bickford P (1993) Motor learning deficits in aged rats
are correlated with loss of cerebellar noradrenergic function. Brain
Res 620:
133-138.[Web of Science][Medline]
Black JE, Isaacs KR, Anderson BJ, Alcantara AA, Greenough WT
(1990) Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity
causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 87:
5568-5572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
D'Angelo E, Rossi P, Armano S, Taglietti V (1999)
Evidence for NMDA and mGlu receptor-dependent long-term potentiation of mossy
fiber-granule cell transmission in rat cerebellum. J
Neurophysiol 81:
277-287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Dano K, Andreasen P, Grondhal-Hansen J, Kristensen P, Neilsen P
(1985) Plasminogen activators, tissue degradation and cancer.
Adv Cancer Res 44:
139-166.[Web of Science][Medline]
Engert F, Bonhoeffer T (1999) Dendritic spine changes
associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity.
Nature 399:
66-70.[Medline]
Feng P, Ohlsson M, Ny T (1990) The structure of the
TATA-less rat tissue plasminongen activator gene. Species specific divergences
in the promoter predict differences in regulation of gene expression. J
Biol Chem 265:
2022-2027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Frey U, Muller M, Kuhl D (1996) A different form of
long-lasting potentiation revealed in tissue plasminogen activator mutant
mice. J Neurosci 16:
2057-2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Friedman GC, Seeds NW (1994) Tissue plasminogen
activator expression in the embryonic nervous system. Brain Res Dev
Brain Res 81:
41-49.[Medline]
Friedman GC, Seeds NW (1995) Tissue plasminogen
activator mRNA expression in granule neurons coincides with their migration in
the developing cerebellum. J Comp Neurol
360: 658-670.[Web of Science][Medline]
Hesslow G, Svensson P, Ivarsson M (1999) Learned
movements elicited by direct stimulation of cerebellar mossy fiber afferents.
Neuron 24:
179-185.[Web of Science][Medline]
Holmberg M, Leonardsson G, Ny T (1995) The
species-specific differences in the cAMP regulation of the tissue plasminogen
activator gene between rat, mouse and human is caused by a one-nucleotide
substitution in the cAMP-responsive element of the promoters. Eur J
Biochem 231:
466-474.[Medline]
Huang Y-Y, Bach ME, Lipp H-P, et al (1996) Mice
lacking the gene encoding tissue-type plasminogen activator show a selective
interference with late-phase long-term potentiation in both Schaffer
collateral and mossy fiber pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93: 8699-8704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P (1982) Climbing fibre
induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate
sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol
324: 113-134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jorntell H, Ekerot C-F (2002) Reciprocal bidirectional
plasticity of parallel fiber receptive fields in cerebellar Purkinje cells and
their afferent inter-neurons. Neuron 34:
797-806.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kleim JA, Armstrong K, Napper R, Jones T, Greenough WT
(1998a) Selective synaptic plasticity within the cerebellar
cortex following complex motor skill learning. Neurobiol Learn
Mem 69:
274-289.[Web of Science][Medline]
Kleim JA, Pipertone M, Czerlonis C, Greenough WT
(1998b) Structural stability within the lateral cerebellar
nucleus of the rat following complex motor learning. Neurobiol Learn
Mem 69:
290-306.[Medline]
Krystosek A, Seeds NW (1981) Plasminogen activator
secretion by granule neurons in cultures of developing cerebellum. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 78:
7810-7812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Krystosek A, Seeds NW (1986) Normal and malignant
cells including neurons deposit plasminogen activator on the growth
substratum. Exp Cell Res 166:
31-46.[Medline]
Lavond DG, Steinmetz JE (1989) Acquisition of
classical conditioning without cerebellar cortex. Behav Brain
Res 33:
113-164.[Web of Science][Medline]
McGuire PG, Seeds NW (1990) Degradation of underlying
extracellular matrix by sensory neurons during neurite outgrowth.
Neuron 4:
633-642.[Web of Science][Medline]
Madani R, Hulo S, Toni N, Madani H, Steimer T, Muller D, Vassalli
J-D (1999) Enhanced hippocampal long-term potentiation and
learning by increased neuronal expression of tissue-type plasminogen activator
in transgenic mice. EMBO J 18:
3007-3012.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mars WM, Zarnegar R, Michalopoulos GK (1993)
Activation of hepatocyte growth factor by the plasminogen activators uPA and
tPA. Am J Pathol 143:
949-958.[Abstract]
Müller CM, Griesinger CB (1998) Tissue
plasminogen activator mediates reverse occlusion plasticity in visual cortex.
Nat Neurosci 1:
47-53.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nicole O, Docagne F, Ali C, Margaill I, Carmeliet P, Mackenzie ET,
Vivien D, Buisson A (2001) The proteolytic activity of tissue
plasminogen activator enhances NMDA receptor-mediated signaling. Nat
Med 7:
59-64.[Web of Science][Medline]
Pittman RN, Ivins J, Buettner H (1989) Neuronal
plasminogen activators: cell surface binding sites and involvement in neurite
outgrowth. J Neurosci 9:
4269-4286.[Abstract]
Qian Z, Gilbert ME, Colicos MA, Kandel ER, Kuhl D
(1993) Tissue plasminogen activator is induced as an
immediate-early gene during seizure, kindling and long-term potentiation.
Nature 361:
453-456.[Medline]
Rickles RJ, Darrow A, Strickland S (1989)
Differentiation-responsive elements in the 5' region of the mouse tPA
gene confer two-stage regulation by retinoic acid and cAMP in teratocarcinoma
cells. Mol Cell Biol 9:
1691-1704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ryabinin AE, Melia K, Cole M, Bloom F, Wilson M (1995)
Alcohol selectivity attenuates stress induced c-fos expression in rat
hippocampus. J Neurosci 15:
721-730.[Abstract]
Saksela O, Rifkin D (1988) Cell associated plasminogen
activation: regulation and physiological function. Annu Rev Cell
Biol 4:
93-126.[Web of Science][Medline]
Salin PA, Malenka R, Nicoll R (1996) Cyclic AMP
mediates a presynaptic form of LTP at cerebellar parallel fiber synapses.
Neuron 16:
797-803.[Web of Science][Medline]
Seeds NW, Basham ME, Haffke SC (1999) Neuronal
migration is retarded in mice lacking the tissue plasminogen activator gene.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:
14118-14123.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Seeds NW, Williams BL, Bickford PC (1995) Tissue
plasminogen activator induction in Purkinje neurons after cerebellar motor
learning. Science 270:
1992-1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T (1997) Functional stages
in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci
17: 409-419.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Simmons DM, Arriza J, Swanson L (1989) A complete
protocol for in situ hybridization of mRNAs in brain and other tissues with
radiolabeled single-stranded RNA probes. J Histotech
12: 169-181.
Squire LR, Davis HP (1975) Cerebral protein synthesis
inhibition and discrimination training. Behav Biol
13: 49-57.[Web of Science][Medline]
Steitz RJ, Roland PE (1992) Learning of sequential
finger movements in man: combined kinematic and PET study. Eur J
Neurosci 4:
154-165.[Web of Science][Medline]
Thewke DP, Seeds NW (1996) Expression of hepatocyte
growth factor/scatter factor, its receptor, c-met, and tissue-type plasminogen
activator during development of the murine olfactory system. J
Neurosci 16:
6933-6944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Toni N, Buchs P-A, Nikonenko I, Bron CR, Muller D
(1999) LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between
a single axon terminal and a dendrite. Nature
402: 421-425.[Medline]
Tsirka SE, Rogove AD, Bugge TH, Degen JL, Strickland S
(1997) An extracellular proteolytic cascade promotes neuronal
degeneration in the mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci
17: 543-552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Verrall S, Seeds NW (1989) Characterization of
125I-tissue plasminogen activator binding to cerebellar granule
neurons. J Cell Biol 109:
265-271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ware JH, DiBenedetto AJ, Pittman RN (1995)
Localization of tPA mRNA in adult rat brain. Brain Res Bull
37: 275-281.[Web of Science][Medline]
Watson M, McElligott J (1983) 6-OH-DA induced effects
upon the acquisition and performance of specific locomotor tasks in rats.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:
927-934.[Medline]
Zhuo M, Holtzman D, Li Y, Osaka H, DeMaro J, Jacquin M, Bu G
(2000) Role of tissue plasminogen activator receptor LRP in
hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Neurosci
20: 542-549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Paspalas, C. C. Perley, D. V. Venkitaramani, S. M. Goebel-Goody, Y. Zhang, P. Kurup, J. H. Mattis, and P. J. Lombroso
Major Vault Protein is Expressed along the Nucleus-Neurite Axis and Associates with mRNAs in Cortical Neurons
Cereb Cortex,
July 1, 2009;
19(7):
1666 - 1677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Zhang, J. An, D. K. Strickland, and M. Yepes
The Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 1 Mediates Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator-Induced Microglial Activation in the Ischemic Brain
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2009;
174(2):
586 - 594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhang, R. Polavarapu, H. She, Z. Mao, and M. Yepes
Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator and the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein Mediate Cerebral Ischemia-Induced Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Pathway Activation
Am. J. Pathol.,
October 1, 2007;
171(4):
1281 - 1290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Benchenane, H. Castel, M. Boulouard, R. Bluthe, M. Fernandez-Monreal, B. D. Roussel, J. P. Lopez-Atalaya, S. Butt-Gueulle, V. Agin, E. Maubert, et al.
Anti-NR1 N-terminal-domain vaccination unmasks the crucial action of tPA on NMDA-receptor-mediated toxicity and spatial memory
J. Cell Sci.,
February 15, 2007;
120(4):
578 - 585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Miles, N. M. Andronicos, N. Baik, and R. J. Parmer
Cell-Surface Actin Binds Plasminogen and Modulates Neurotransmitter Release from Catecholaminergic Cells
J. Neurosci.,
December 13, 2006;
26(50):
13017 - 13024.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, J. Imitola, E. Y. Snyder, and R. L. Sidman
Neural stem cells rescue nervous purkinje neurons by restoring molecular homeostasis of tissue plasminogen activator and downstream targets.
J. Neurosci.,
July 26, 2006;
26(30):
7839 - 7848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, Y. Ma, Y. D. Teng, K. Zheng, T. K. Vartanian, E. Y. Snyder, and R. L. Sidman
Purkinje neuron degeneration in nervous (nr) mutant mice is mediated by a metabolic pathway involving excess tissue plasminogen activator
PNAS,
May 16, 2006;
103(20):
7847 - 7852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fernandez-Monreal, J. P. Lopez-Atalaya, K. Benchenane, M. Cacquevel, F. Dulin, J.-P. Le Caer, J. Rossier, A.-C. Jarrige, E. T. MacKenzie, N. Colloc'h, et al.
Arginine 260 of the Amino-terminal Domain of NR1 Subunit Is Critical for Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator-mediated Enhancement of N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 3, 2004;
279(49):
50850 - 50856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yepes and D. A. Lawrence
New Functions for an Old Enzyme: Nonhemostatic Roles for Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator in the Central Nervous System
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
December 1, 2004;
229(11):
1097 - 1104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kvajo, H. Albrecht, M. Meins, U. Hengst, E. Troncoso, S. Lefort, J. Z. Kiss, C. C. H. Petersen, and D. Monard
Regulation of Brain Proteolytic Activity Is Necessary for the In Vivo Function of NMDA Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
October 27, 2004;
24(43):
9734 - 9743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Y. Shin, M. Kundel, and D. G. Wells
Rapid, Activity-Induced Increase in Tissue Plasminogen Activator Is Mediated by Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor-Dependent mRNA Translation
J. Neurosci.,
October 20, 2004;
24(42):
9425 - 9433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|