The Journal of Neuroscience, August 13, 2003, 23(19):7381-7384
Previous Article | Next Article 
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Corticothalamic Projections from the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Herbert P. Killackey and
S. Murray Sherman
Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California,
Irvine, Irvine, California 92717, and Department of Neurobiology, State
University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794-5230
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
To study the cells of origin of corticothalamic inputs to the ventral
posterior and posterior medial nuclei of the somatosensory thalamus in rats,
we injected small aliquots of tracer into each nucleus and analyzed the
pattern of retrograde labeling in the posteromedial barrel subfield of primary
somatosensory cortex, which can be divided into barrel and nonbarrel zones.
The ventral posterior nucleus is innervated by neurons in layer VIa of both
zones, whereas the posterior medial nucleus is innervated by neurons in layers
Vb and VIb of both zones with additional innervation from layer VIa of
nonbarrel cortex. Thus, only the posterior medial nucleus receives a layer Vb
input. Because the layer Vb input is interpreted as the initiation of a
feedforward cortico-thalamocortical pathway, this implies that the target of
the posterior medial nucleus, which includes the nonbarrel cortex, is a
higher-order cortical area. We thus suggest that this cortical zone, which is
classically considered part of the primary somatosensory cortex, should be
reclassified as higher-order cortex.
Key words: thalamus; cortex; somatosensory; higher-order; first-order; barrel cortex; ventral posterior nucleus
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Within the posteromedial barrel subfield of primary somatosensory cortex in
the rat (Woolsey and Van der Loos,
1970
) is an unusual pattern of thalamocortical projections. This
cortex includes the snout representation, in which each barrel represents a
single mystacial vibrissa. For purposes of description, we divide this cortex
into "barrel cortex" and "nonbarrel cortex." The
former includes clusters of dense staining within layer IV, as revealed by
various metabolic markers, whereas nonbarrel cortex is that into which the
barrels are embedded, and this includes what has in the past been referred to
as "septal" and "dysgranular" cortex (for review, see
Killackey, 1983
). Of interest
in this context is the observation that the thalamic innervation of layer IV
differs between barrel cortex and nonbarrel cortex; layer IV of the former is
innervated by the main portion of the ventral posterior nucleus of the
thalamus, whereas that of the latter is innervated by the posterior medial
nucleus (Koralek et al., 1988
;
Lu and Lin, 1993
). In
addition, however, there is evidence that some innervation from the ventral
posterior nucleus above and below layer IV spreads into nonbarrel cortex
(Lu and Lin, 1993
).
Furthermore, Pierret et al.
(2000
) distinguish a central
"core" of the ventral posterior medial nucleus, which projects
essentially only to barrel cortex, and a ventral "tail" region of
the nucleus, which extends a projection into nonbarrel cortex and the second
somatosensory area. Nonetheless, if we focus on the core region of the ventral
posterior nucleus, it appears that its projection to layer IV is effectively
limited to barrel cortex, whereas that of the posterior medial nucleus
innervates nonbarrel cortex, and thus there is a clear difference between the
thalamocortical projections to layer IV between these thalamic nuclei.
The purpose of the present study is to clarify the extent to which the
projections from the primary somatosensory cortex to these thalamic nuclei
differ between barrel and nonbarrel regions. Although there have been previous
studies of the corticothalamic projection from the primary somatosensory area
in the rat (Chmielowska et al.,
1989
; Bourassa et al.,
1995
; Deschênes et al.,
1998
; Veinante et al.,
2000
), none to date has distinguished between the contributions of
barrel versus nonbarrel cortex. To do so is the purpose of the present
study.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Animals. Thirty adult Sprague Dawley rats of both sexes were used
in this study. Rats were housed under the Association for Assessment and
Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care approved conditions. All experiments
were conducted with previous approval of the University of California, Irvine,
animal subjects committee and according to the guidelines established by the
Society for Neuroscience.
Surgical procedures-tracer injections. Rats were anesthetized with
ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (3 mg/kg) and placed in a
stereotaxic apparatus. Aseptic conditions were maintained throughout the
surgery. The animal's body temperature was kept at 37°C using a thermal
pad. Respiration rates were monitored, and supplements of anesthesia were
administered when needed.
Injections of either rhodamine- or fluorescein-conjugated microspheres
(Lumafluor Corp., Naples, FL) were made from a vertical approach into the
ventral posterior nucleus or the posterior medial nucleus using stereotaxic
guidance. After a midline incision, 0.02-0.15 µl of tracer was injected
into each of the intended targets through a small hole in the skull. The rate
and volume (0.02-0.15 µl per 300 sec) of injections were controlled by
using calibrated micropipettes (tip diameter, 30-40 µm) and a pressurized
air injection system. Operated animals were placed on a thermal pad and
observed until fully recovered and were then returned to home cage.
Histology. After 48 hr of postinjection survival, animals were
deeply anesthetized with Nembutol (100 mg/kg) and perfused transcardially with
warm (37°C) 0.1 M Sorensen's PBS, pH 7.4, followed by 2-4%
paraformaldehyde, 0.1-0.5% glutaraldehyde, and 2% sucrose in phosphate buffer
(PB). Brains were removed from the skull, postfixed for 1-2 hr, and
cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PB at 4°C. Brains were sectioned on the
freezing microtome at 40 µm in the coronal plane. Brain sections were
stored in 0.1 M PB.
The tissue was processed for fluorescence microscopy as described
previously (Katz et al.,
1984
), and a series of alternate coronal sections were reacted for
CO according to the method described by Wong-Riley
(1979
). Sections were
collected in and mounted from 0.1 M phosphate buffer with 0.001%
bisbenzamide as a counterstain to establish nuclear boundaries of the thalamus
and reveal areal and cytoarchitectural features of the neocortex. Those
sections reacted for CO were used to reveal the body surface map of the
primary somatosensory cortex of the rat
(Land and Simons, 1985
) and to
determine the boundary between the posterior medial (CO-poor) and ventral
posterior (CO-rich) nuclei for analysis of injection sites.
Sections were mounted on chromalum-subbed slides, air-dried for 1-2 hr,
defatted in xylene (30 sec), and coverslipped with flouromount (Atomergic
Chemetals Corp., Farmingdale, NY). Sections reacted for CO were not dehydrated
in alcohol to prevent differences in shrinkage between matching adjacent
sections processed for fluorescence, which were also not dehydrated.
Analysis. Specimens were observed using a Leitz (Wetzlar, Germany)
Orthoplan epifluorescent microscope equipped with the standard rhodamine
(TRITC; BP, 55-560 nm; RKP, 580 nm; LP, 580 nm), fluorescein (FITC; BP,
450-490 nm; RKP, 510 nm; LP, 525 nm), and ultraviolet (UVA; BP 340 -380 nm,
RKP 400 nm, LP 430 nm) filter cubes. Photomicrographs were taken using a Leitz
Vario-Orthomat 2 camera system. Bright-field photomicrographs were obtained
using an auxiliary neutral density filter (ND2).
Sections through the mystacial vibrissae representation, or posteromedial
barrel subfield, which were processed for CO histochemistry, were photographed
through the microscope under bright-field illumination, and the adjacent
sections were photographed at the same magnification under fluorescent
illumination. Special care was taken to match pairs of photomicrographs so
that landmarks in the tissue and magnification of the images matched
precisely. Pairs of photomicrographs were confirmed to match by additional
microscopic analysis of tissue borders and blood-vessel landmarks using
dark-field illumination. With this method, the exact distribution of
retrogradely labeled neurons can be determined with respect to relevant
cytoarchitectonic features (barrels and septa) as revealed by corresponding
(rich and poor) density of CO staining
(Wong-Riley and Welt, 1980
;
Land and Simons, 1985
).
 |
Results
|
|---|
Restriction of injection sites to the ventral posterior medial
nuclei
Only those cases in which individual injections were confined to either the
central region of the ventral posterior nucleus or the posterior medial
nucleus, and thus equivalent to the core region of Pierret et al.
(2000
), were used in the
present analysis. Twelve cases with an injection into the ventral posterior
nucleus and eight into the posterior medial nucleus were analyzed.
Representative injection sites are illustrated in
Figure 1, A and
B.

View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Injection sites and resultant retrograde labeling. A, B, Examples
of injection sites limited to the ventral posterior or posterior medial
nucleus. The dashed line indicates the border between these two nuclei.
C, Retrograde labeling of primary somatosensory cortex after
injection into the ventral posterior nucleus. The layers are indicated and
were determined from staining with bisbenzamide and viewed through the
appropriate filter (image not shown). Furthermore, alternate sections were
stained with cytochrome oxidase to demonstrate the location of barrel and
nonbarrel cortex as in F and G. D, E, Retrograde labeling of
primary somatosensory cortex after injection into the posterior medial
nucleus. The layers are indicated and were determined as in C. F, G,
Alternate sections showing cytochrome oxidase staining (F) and
retrograde labeling (G). The arrows in F indicate barrels
and are repeated in G.
|
|
Laminar origin of corticothalamic neurons
Injection of microspheres into the ventral posterior nucleus results in
retrogradely labeled neurons in primary somatosensory cortex evenly
distributed in a single dense band confined to the top portion of layer VI
(VIa). In what follows, we use the nomenclature established by Lorente de
Nó (1922
) in the mouse
and Valverde et al. (1989
) in
the rat; that is, we subdivided layers V and VI into two parts, a top sublayer
(a) and bottom sublayer (b). Occasionally, neurons in layers VIb and Vb are
also labeled after an injection limited to the ventral posterior nucleus, but
these are exceedingly rare and will not be discussed further. The distribution
of neurons in layer VIa that are labeled from the ventral posterior nucleus is
uninterrupted (Fig.
1C). The majority of labeled layer VIa neurons have the
morphology of medium-sized pyramidal neurons with their presumed apical
dendrites oriented vertically toward the cortical surface.
In contrast, injection of microspheres into the posterior medial nucleus
results in a bilaminar distribution of labeled neurons.
Figure 1, D and
E, shows two representative examples of labeling from the
posterior medial nucleus. Figure
1D shows a region through the somatosensory cortex
showing regions of barrels separated by prominent nonbarrel cortex (barrel
cortex and nonbarrel cortex are defined in the Introduction). Here, labeled
neurons are evident in layers Vb, VIa, and VIb. In layer VIa, however, the
distribution of labeling is discontinuous, because it is limited to the
nonbarrel cortex. This is unlike the distribution of continuous labeling from
the ventral posterior nucleus in layer VIa
(Fig. 1C).
Figure 1E shows barrel
cortex in which any nonbarrel regions are too small to detect, and here there
is a continuous and relatively dense band of labeled neurons in layer VIb and
a less dense, yet continuous band of labeled neurons in layer Vb. The
morphology of the labeled neurons in layer Vb is clearly that of large
pyramidal neurons with their apical dendrite oriented toward the cortical
surface. The morphology of the smaller labeled neurons in layer VIb is
considerably more variable. The presumed apical dendrite of many of these
labeled neurons is oriented obliquely or horizontally.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Figure 2 summarizes the
pattern of corticothalamic projections that we have described that is also
integrated with other related data. Previous studies have shown that
thalamocortical afferents to layer IV from the ventral posterior nucleus are
effectively limited to barrel cortex, whereas those from the posterior medial
nucleus target only nonbarrel cortex
(Koralek et al., 1988
;
Lu and Lin, 1993
). Regarding
corticothalamic innervation patterns, the ventral posterior nucleus receives
afferents from neurons located in layer VIa that form a continuous band across
both barrel and nonbarrel cortex. Little or no innervation of this thalamic
nucleus arises from layers Vb or VIb. In contrast, the posterior medial
nucleus receives afferents from neurons located in layers Vb and VIb that form
a continuous band across both barrel and nonbarrel cortex. Additional
projections to the posterior medial nucleus arise from layer VIa, but this is
primarily limited to nonbarrel cortex. A key difference illustrated in
Figure 2, and also reported
previously (Veinante et al.,
2000
), is that the ventral posterior nucleus receives
corticothalamic input only from layer VI, but the posterior medial nucleus
receives such input from both layers Vb and VI.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Schematic representation of relationships between thalamus and cortex
involving the ventral posterior and posterior medial nuclei on the one hand
and the primary somatosensory cortex on the other. See Results for details.
SI, Primary somatosensory cortex; SII, secondary somatosensory cortex.
|
|
Comparison with visual pathways
This pattern of corticothalamic innervation in the somatosensory system is
remarkably similar to that described for the visual system. In rats, the
lateral geniculate nucleus (which is analogous to the ventral posterior
nucleus; see below) receives input from the primary visual cortex (which is
analogous to the primary somatosensory cortex, especially the barrel cortex;
see below) only from layer VI, whereas the lateral posterior-pulvinar complex
(which is analogous to the posterior medial nucleus) receives such input from
both layers V and VI (Bourassa and
Deschênes, 1995
). Furthermore, the layer VI input to the
lateral geniculate nucleus arises mostly from the top part of the layer,
whereas that to the lateral posterior-pulvinar complex arises from the lower
part (Bourassa and Deschênes,
1995
). Similarly, in cats, the lateral geniculate nucleus also
receives primary visual cortical input only from layer VI, whereas the lateral
posterior-pulvinar complex receives such input from layer V as well
(Gilbert and Kelly, 1975
;
Abramson and Chalupa, 1985
).
Finally, in monkeys, the pattern is similar to that of rats and cats, because
the lateral geniculate nucleus receives visual cortical input only from layer
VI, and the lateral posterior-pulvinar complex is innervated as well from
layer V (Lund et al., 1975
;
Fitzpatrick et al., 1994
).
Implications for functional organization of primary somatosensory
cortex
As noted above, a major difference between the ventral posterior and the
posterior medial nuclei is that the latter receives input from layer Vb of
cortex, although both receive input from layer VI. This is interesting in the
context of the scheme proposed by Guillery and Sherman
(Guillery, 1995
;
Sherman and Guillery, 2003
).
They suggested that thalamic relays can be divided into first and higher
order. Both orders receive modulatory inputs from cortical layer VI.
First-order relays transmit information from the periphery to cortex and
thereby represent the first relay to cortex of such information. Examples are
the lateral geniculate and ventral posterior nuclei, which transmit
information from the optic tract and medial lemniscus, respectively. In
contrast, higher-order relays serve as a transthalamic link between cortical
areas (the route involving a projection from layer Vb of the first cortical
area to a higher-order thalamic relay and then to a second cortical area).
Examples of such higher-order relays are the lateral posterior nucleus and the
pulvinar in the visual system and the posterior medial nucleus in the
somatosensory system.
A logical implication of this hypothesis is that any cortical area in
receipt of input from a higher-order thalamic relay is by definition a
higher-order cortical area and not, for instance, a primary visual or
somatosensory cortical area. This is particularly interesting in the context
of Figure 2, because this
requires that nonbarrel cortex, which is innervated by the posterior medial
nucleus, is a higher-order cortical area, although it is conventionally
regarded as part of the primary somatosensory cortex. We thus suggest that
this conventional concept be reconsidered; namely, that what is regarded as
primary somatosensory cortex in the rat is a mosaic of true primary cortex
(i.e., barrel cortex) and a higher-order area (i.e., nonbarrel cortex).
It should be noted that previous authors have demonstrated other
differences between barrel and nonbarrel cortex. For example, there are the
differences in input from thalamus, because barrel cortex is innervated by the
ventral posterior nucleus, whereas nonbarrel cortex is innervated by the
posterior medial nucleus (Koralek et al.,
1988
; Lu and Lin,
1993
). Also, there are differences in functional properties and
intrinsic circuitry between the two cortical zones
(Chapin and Lin, 1984
;
Koralek et al., 1990
;
Kim and Ebner, 1999
). However,
to our knowledge, no one has yet suggested that this difference between areas
includes a higher-order designation for nonbarrel cortex.
One final proviso needs to be considered. It is logical to think of the
transthalamic corticocortical route involving layer Vb to be a feedforward
pathway. This makes sense in regards to the layer Vb projection from barrel
cortex to the posterior medial nucleus to nonbarrel cortex. However, what of
the observation that nonbarrel cortex also sends a layer Vb projection to the
posterior medial nucleus? This would be a feedback pathway if the relay cells
innervated by this input projected back to nonbarrel cortex. However, as
Figure 2 indicates, the
posterior medial nucleus also projects to cortical areas beyond the nonbarrel
cortex, such as the second somatosensory cortex and motor cortex
(Donoghue and Parham, 1983
;
Spreafico et al., 1987
). It is
thus possible that this input to the posterior medial nucleus from layer Vb of
nonbarrel cortex also represents the initiation of a feedforward pathway,
although this remains to be determined.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received Apr. 22, 2003;
revised Jun. 5, 2003;
accepted Jun. 18, 2003.
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS90-22168
and United States Public Health Service Grant EY03038. We thank Karen Good for
help with collection of data.
Correspondence should be addressed to S. Murray Sherman, Department of
Neurobiology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5230.
E-mail:
s.sherman{at}sunysb.edu.
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience
0270-6474/03/237381-04$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Abramson BP, Chalupa LM (1985) The laminar
distribution of cortical connections with the tecto- and cortico-recipient
zones in the cat's lateral posterior nucleus. Neuroscience
15: 81-95.[ISI][Medline]
Bourassa J, Deschênes M (1995) Corticothalamic
projections from the primary visual cortex in rats: a single fiber study using
biocytin as an anterograde tracer. Neuroscience
66: 253-263.[ISI][Medline]
Bourassa J, Pinault D, Deschênes M (1995)
Corticothalamic projections from the cortical barrel field to the
somatosensory thalamus in rats: a single-fibre study using biocytin as an
anterograde tracer. Eur J Neurosci 7:
19-30.[ISI][Medline]
Chapin JK, Lin CS (1984) Mapping the body
representation in the SI cortex of anesthetized and awake rats. J Comp
Neurol 229:
199-213.[ISI][Medline]
Chmielowska J, Carvell GE, Simons DJ (1989) Spatial
organization of thalamocortical and corticothalamic projection systems in the
rat SmI barrel cortex. J Comp Neurol
285: 325-338.[ISI][Medline]
Deschênes M, Veinante P, Zhang ZW (1998) The
organization of corticothalamic projections: reciprocity versus parity.
Brain Res Brain Res Rev 28:
286-308.[Medline]
Donoghue JP, Parham C (1983) Afferent connections of
the lateral agranular field of the rat motor cortex. J Comp
Neurol 217:
390-404.[ISI][Medline]
Fitzpatrick D, Usrey WM, Schofield BR, Einstein G
(1994) The sublaminar organization of corticogeniculate neurons
in layer 6 of macaque striate cortex. Vis Neurosci
11: 307-315.[ISI][Medline]
Gilbert CD, Kelly JP (1975) The projections of cells
in different layers of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol
(Lond) 163:
81-106.
Guillery RW (1995) Anatomical evidence concerning the
role of the thalamus in corticocortical communication: a brief review.
J Anat 187:
583-592.
Katz LC, Burkhalter A, Dreyer WJ (1984) Fluorescent
latex microspheres as a retrograde neuronal marker for in vivo and
in vitro studies of visual cortex. Nature
310: 498-500.[Medline]
Killackey HP (1983) The somatosensory cortex of the
rodent. Trends Neurosci 6:
425-429.
Kim U, Ebner FF (1999) Barrels and septa: separate
circuits in rat barrels field cortex. J Comp Neurol
408: 489-505.[ISI][Medline]
Koralek KA, Jensen KF, Killackey HP (1988) Evidence
for two complementary patterns of thalamic input to the rat somatosensory
cortex. Brain Res 463:
346-351.[ISI][Medline]
Koralek KA, Olavarria J, Killackey HP (1990) Areal and
laminar organization of corticocortical projections in the rat somatosensory
cortex. J Comp Neurol 299:
133-150.[ISI][Medline]
Land PW, Simons DJ (1985) Cytochrome oxidase staining
in the rat SmI barrel cortex. J Comp Neurol
238: 225-235.[ISI][Medline]
Lorente de Nó R (1922) La corteza
cerebral del ratón. (Primera contribución. La corteza
acústica.) Trabajos del Laboratorio de Investigaciones
Biológicas de la Universidad de Madrid 20:
41-78.
Lu SM, Lin RC (1993) Thalamic afferents of the rat
barrel cortex: a light- and electron-microscopic study using Phaseolus
vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde tracer. Somatosens Mot
Res 10:
1-16.[ISI][Medline]
Lund JS, Lund RD, Hendrickson AE, Bunt AH, Fuchs AF
(1975) The origin of efferent pathways from the primary visual
cortex, area 17, of the macaque monkey as shown by retrograde transport of
horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol
164: 287-303.[ISI][Medline]
Pierret T, Lavallée P, Deschênes M (2000)
Parallel streams for the relay of vibrissal information through thalamic
barreloids. J Neurosci 20:
7455-7462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Sherman SM, Guillery RW (2003) The role of thalamus in
the flow of information to cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol
Sci 357:
1695-1708.
Spreafico R, Barbaresi P, Weinberg RJ, Rustioni A
(1987) SII-projecting neurons in the rat thalamus: a single- and
double-retrograde-tracing study. Somatosens Res
4: 359-375.[ISI][Medline]
Valverde F, Facal-Valverde MV, Santacana M, Heredia M
(1989) Development and differentiation of early generated cells
of sublayer VIb in the somatosensory cortex of the rat: a correlated Golgi and
autoradiographic study. J Comp Neurol
290: 118-140.[ISI][Medline]
Veinante P, Lavallée P, Deschênes M
(2000) Corticothalamic projections from layer 5 of the vibrissal
barrel cortex in the rat. J Comp Neurol
424: 197-204.[ISI][Medline]
Wong-Riley M (1979) Changes in the visual system of
monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase
histochemistry. Brain Res 171:
11-28.[ISI][Medline]
Wong-Riley MT, Welt C (1980) Histochemical changes in
cytochrome oxidase of cortical barrels after vibrissal removal in neonatal and
adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:
2333-2337.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H (1970) The structural
organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral
cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete
cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res 17:
205-242.[ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Groh, C. P. J. de Kock, V. C. Wimmer, B. Sakmann, and T. Kuner
Driver or Coincidence Detector: Modal Switch of a Corticothalamic Giant Synapse Controlled by Spontaneous Activity and Short-Term Depression
J. Neurosci.,
September 24, 2008;
28(39):
9652 - 9663.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Chakrabarti, M. Zhang, and K. D. Alloway
MI Neuronal Responses to Peripheral Whisker Stimulation: Relationship to Neuronal Activity in SI Barrels and Septa
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2008;
100(1):
50 - 63.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Bokor, L. Acsady, and M. Deschenes
Vibrissal Responses of Thalamic Cells That Project to the Septal Columns of the Barrel Cortex and to the Second Somatosensory Area
J. Neurosci.,
May 14, 2008;
28(20):
5169 - 5177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Alloway
Information Processing Streams in Rodent Barrel Cortex: The Differential Functions of Barrel and Septal Circuits
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2008;
18(5):
979 - 989.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Landisman and B. W. Connors
VPM and PoM Nuclei of the Rat Somatosensory Thalamus: Intrinsic Neuronal Properties and Corticothalamic Feedback
Cereb Cortex,
December 1, 2007;
17(12):
2853 - 2865.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. J. de Kock, R. M. Bruno, H. Spors, and B. Sakmann
Layer- and cell-type-specific suprathreshold stimulus representation in rat primary somatosensory cortex
J. Physiol.,
May 15, 2007;
581(1):
139 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gervasoni, S.-C. Lin, S. Ribeiro, E. S. Soares, J. Pantoja, and M. A. L. Nicolelis
Global Forebrain Dynamics Predict Rat Behavioral States and Their Transitions
J. Neurosci.,
December 8, 2004;
24(49):
11137 - 11147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Trageser and A. Keller
Reducing the Uncertainty: Gating of Peripheral Inputs by Zona Incerta
J. Neurosci.,
October 6, 2004;
24(40):
8911 - 8915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Reichova and S. M. Sherman
Somatosensory Corticothalamic Projections: Distinguishing Drivers From Modulators
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2004;
92(4):
2185 - 2197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Pluto, R. D. Lane, and R. W. Rhoades
Local GABA Receptor Blockade Reveals Hindlimb Responses in the SI Forelimb-Stump Representation of Neonatally Amputated Rats
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2004;
92(1):
372 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|