 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, January 15, 2003, 23(2):422-429
Loss of Kainate Receptor-Mediated Heterosynaptic Facilitation of
Mossy-Fiber Synapses in KA2 / Mice
Anis
Contractor1,
Andreas W.
Sailer1,
Melanie
Darstein1,
Cornelia
Maron1,
Jian
Xu1,
Geoffrey T.
Swanson2, and
Stephen F.
Heinemann1
1 Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute
for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, and
2 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1031
 |
ABSTRACT |
Multimeric assemblies of kainate (KA) receptor subunits form
glutamate-gated ion channels that mediate EPSCs and function as
presynaptic modulators of neurotransmitter release at some central
synapses. The KA2 subunit is a likely constituent of many neuronal
kainate receptors, because it is widely expressed in most neurons in
the CNS. We have studied the effect of genetic ablation of this
receptor subunit on synaptic transmission at the mossy-fiber-CA3
pyramidal cell synapse in hippocampal slices, where kainate receptors
are localized to both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. We found that
both postsynaptic and presynaptic mossy-fiber kainate receptor function
is altered in neurons from KA2 / mice. The
presynaptic facilitatory autoreceptor, which modulates glutamate
release from mossy-fiber terminals, had a reduced affinity for
exogenous agonists and synaptic glutamate. Although presynaptic facilitation attributable to homosynaptic glutamate release was normal
at mossy-fiber synapses in KA2 / neurons,
heterosynaptic kainate receptor-mediated facilitation resulting from
the spillover of glutamate from CA3 collateral synapses was absent.
Consistent with a decrease in glutamate affinity of the receptor, the
half-decay of the postsynaptic kainate-mediated EPSC was shorter in the
knock-out mice. These results identify the KA2 subunit as a determinant
of kainate receptor function at presynaptic and postsynaptic
mossy-fiber kainate receptors.
Key words:
KA2 kainate receptor subunit; knock-out mice; presynaptic kainate receptors; CA3 pyramidal neurons; hippocampus; mossy-fiber
 |
Introduction |
Neuronal kainate (KA) receptor
function has been studied most extensively in the hippocampus. These
inotropic receptors are formed from heteromeric combinations of five
individual subunits: the low-affinity subunits glutamate receptor 5 (GluR5), GluR6, and GluR7 form functional homomeric glutamate
receptors, whereas the high-affinity subunits KA1 and KA2 do not
function as homomeric receptors. When expressed with the low-affinity
subunits, KA1 and KA2 can coassemble and alter kainate receptor
functional properties (Herb et al., 1992 ; Lomeli et al., 1992 ; Schiffer
et al., 1997 ). Each of these receptor subunits is expressed at
different levels in the principal neurons of the hippocampus, but only
the KA2 subunit shows a nearly ubiquitous expression (Bahn et al.,
1994 ; Bureau et al., 1999 ).
Kainate receptors are present either presynaptically or
postsynaptically at a number of distinct hippocampal synapses
(Kullmann, 2001 ), although only at mossy-fiber synapses, formed between
the axons of dentate gyrus granule cells and thorny excrescences of CA3
pyramidal neurons, are they found on both sides of the same synapse.
Postsynaptic mossy-fiber kainate receptors mediate a small component of
the EPSC (Castillo et al., 1997 ; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997 ).
This current has slow rise and decay kinetics, which is
inconsistent with the biophysical properties of kainate receptors
described in recombinant expression systems (Dingledine et al., 1999 ).
The kainate-mediated EPSC (EPSCKA) is not altered in mice in which the GluR5 gene has been deleted (A. Contractor, unpublished observations); however, it is completely absent in GluR6 / mice (Mulle et al., 1998 ),
demonstrating that the critical subunit comprising these receptors is GluR6.
Presynaptic kainate receptors on mossy-fiber axons and boutons modulate
glutamate release (Schmitz et al., 2001b ). The application of very low
concentrations of kainate facilitates the release of glutamate (Schmitz
et al., 2001a ), whereas the application of higher concentrations
depresses release (Contractor et al., 2000 ; Kamiya and Ozawa, 2000 ;
Schmitz et al., 2000 ), because of a depolarizing block of axonal
conduction (Kamiya and Ozawa, 2000 ); this depression is absent in the
GluR6 / mice (Contractor et al., 2000 ).
Presynaptic kainate receptors can also be activated by endogenous
glutamate. Homosynaptic glutamate release from mossy-fiber terminals
activates presynaptic kainate receptors, which contribute to the marked
frequency facilitation of transmission observed during increased rates
of stimulation (Contractor et al., 2001 ; Lauri et al., 2001 ). In
addition, mossy-fiber transmission can be modulated by kainate receptor
activation resulting from the heterosynaptic spillover of glutamate
from neighboring mossy-fiber inputs, as well as from the collateral
synapses formed by the axons of other CA3 pyramidal neurons (Schmitz et
al., 2000 , 2001a ). The apparent bidirectional nature of the response to
the activation of presynaptic kainate receptors by exogenous agonists can be reproduced using different intensities of conditioning stimuli
to initiate heterosynaptic glutamate spillover (Schmitz et al., 2001a ).
Because the GluR6 subunit is highly expressed in dentate gyrus granule
cells (Bureau et al., 1999 ), and at least some of these effects are
absent in GluR6 / mice (Contractor et
al., 2000 ), it is thought that, similar to the postsynaptic kainate
receptor, the GluR6 receptor subunit is the predominant and critical
subunit for the function of presynaptic kainate receptors at
mossy-fiber synapses. However, using compounds reported to have
selective activity on GluR5-containing kainate receptors,
several studies suggest that receptors containing the GluR5
subunit are expressed at both postsynaptic (Bortolotto et al., 1999 )
and presynaptic sites of the mossy-fiber synapse (Lauri et al., 2001 ),
in apparent contradiction to the findings in knock-out mice and the
reported distribution of kainate receptors (Bahn et al., 1994 ; Bureau
et al., 1999 ).
The KA2 subunit is also expressed in both granule cells and CA3
pyramidal neurons (Bureau et al., 1999 ) and might assemble with the
GluR6 subunit to form heteromeric kainate receptors. Because
pharmacological agents that specifically target KA2-containing receptors are not available, we have analyzed the contribution of this
subunit to kainate receptor function using gene-targeted mice lacking
the KA2 subunit. In this study, we focus on the physiological characterization of KA2-containing kainate receptors at mossy-fiber synapses. We demonstrate that both presynaptic and postsynaptic receptors are functionally intact in the
KA2 / mice; however, kainate
receptor-mediated heterosynaptic facilitation of mossy-fiber EPSCs was
not observed in these mice, likely reflecting a change in the agonist
affinity of the presynaptic autoreceptor. Consistent with a decrease in
the glutamate affinity of synaptic kainate receptors in these mice, the
postsynaptic EPSCKA had faster current decay
kinetics compared with wild-type mice. These results demonstrate that
the KA2 subunit contributes to functional kainate receptors on both
sides of the mossy-fiber synapse.
 |
Materials and Methods |
Generation of KA2 /
mice. The mouse KA2 gene was disrupted by insertion of a
phosphoglycerate-kinase-neomycin cassette (pgk-neo) by homologous
recombination, replacing 1.3 kb containing two exons and a partial
third exon that encode membrane domains I and II (see Fig.
1A). The final targeting construct contained 3.0 and 2.3 kb of homologous sequence 5' and 3', respectively, to the neomycin
resistance marker. In addition, the targeting vector also contained a
thymidine kinase (TK) gene under the control of the
phosphoglycerate-kinase (pgk-TK) promoter to counterselect for
nonhomologous integration (Mansour et al., 1988 ) (see Fig. 1A). Embryonic stem (ES) cell culture and
electroporation techniques were as described previously (Sailer et al.,
1999 ). Disruption of the KA2 gene was confirmed by Southern blotting
using genomic DNA. We found 8 of 90 clones positive for the predicted
homologous recombination event. Six clones were injected into
blastocysts and implanted into foster mothers that gave birth to
chimeric animals. Two chimeric mice transmitted the mutant allele
through the germline to their offspring as judged by Southern blot
analysis of the KA2 genomic locus using mouse genomic tail DNA (Laird
et al., 1991 ). Subsequent intercrossing of heterozygous mice yielded KA2 / mice at a Mendelian ratio of
22.7% (n = 172). After transmission of the
mutant allele in a mixed background (129SvEv/C57BL/6), we also
generated an isogenic KA2 / strain by
breeding a chimera directly to 129SvEv wild-type animals. Animals from
this KA2 / 129SvEv strain were used for
all subsequent experiments.
Generation of KA2 antibody and immunohistochemistry. A
rabbit polyclonal antibody was raised against the purified
synthetic peptide SPPRPRPGPTGPRELTEHE, corresponding to the
C-terminal 19 aa of the rat KA2 receptor subunit. A cysteine residue
was added at the N terminus to facilitate conjugation to the carrier
protein KLH. Peptide synthesis, rabbit immunization, serum collection from rabbits, and subsequent affinity purification of the crude serum
against the immobilized immunizing peptide were performed by Bethyl
Laboratories Inc. (Montgomery, TX). For immunohistochemistry, adult
mice were transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde; the brains
were removed, cryoprotected in 20% sucrose in PBS, frozen, and cut
into 30-µm-thick sagittal sections. Sections were washed in PBS,
blocked in PBS solution of 5% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100, and
incubated with anti-KA2 antibody in PBS-containing goat serum and 0.1%
Triton X-100. The tissue was washed and incubated with biotinylated
goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame,
CA), followed by incubation with an ABC elite kit (Vector Laboratories)
and subsequent visualization with peroxidase-reduced diaminobenzidine
(Sigma, St. Louis, MO).
Membrane preparation and Western blots. Plasma membranes
were prepared from the brain tissue of wild-type and
KA2 / mice. Dissected hippocampi were
homogenized in 10 vol of ice-cold buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 320 mM
sucrose, and a mix of protease inhibitors containing 1 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin. After
centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min at 4°C, the
supernatant was recovered and additionally centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% Triton
X-100 and protease inhibitors. Lysates were heated at 70°C in SDS
sample buffer for analysis by electrophoresis and immunoblotting. For
immunoprecipitation experiments, hippocampal membranes were incubated
with polyclonal anti-R6/7 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid,
NY) for 2 hr, followed by incubation with protein A Sepharose for 45 min at 4°C. The beads were then washed three times with 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 0.1% Triton X-100.
Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis and immunoblotting after
heating at 70°C in SDS sample buffer.
Slice preparation and electrophysiology. Transverse
hippocampal slices (350 µm) were made from postnatal day 12 (P12) to
P24 knock-out (isogenic 129SvEv) and wild-type (strain 129SvEv) mice. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated. Brains were
removed under ice-cold sucrose slicing artificial CSF (ACSF) containing
(in mM): 85 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 75 sucrose, 0.5 CaCl2, and 4 MgCl2,
equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5%
CO2. Slices were incubated at 28°C for 30 min.
Then the sucrose slicing solution was exchanged for a normal ACSF
containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.4 KCl, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 1 CaCl2, and 2 MgCl2. A 10 µM concentration of
D,L-APV and 100 µM
kynurenate were included in the slicing and incubation solutions. After
the slices were transferred to a recording chamber, they were
continuously perfused with ACSF containing 2 mM
CaCl2 and 1 mM
MgCl2. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were
made from visually identified pyramidal cells in the CA3 region of the
hippocampus at room temperature. Glass electrodes were pulled from
borosilicate glass and had resistances of 3.5-4 M when filled with
internal solution containing (in mM): 95 CsF, 25 CsCl, 10 Cs-HEPES, 10 Cs-EGTA, 2 NaCl, 2 Mg-ATP, 10 lidocaine
N-ethylbromide, 5 TEA-Cl, and 5 4-AP, pH adjusted to
7.3 with CsOH.
Synaptic currents were evoked with monopolar glass electrodes
positioned in the stratum lucidum for mossy-fiber stimulation and in
the stratum radiatum to activate collateral inputs. Data collection and
analysis were done with pClamp 8 software (Axon Instruments, Foster
City, CA). To isolate mixed AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated EPSCs, slices were bathed in ACSF with 10 µM bicuculline,
50 µM picrotoxin and 50 µM
D-AP-5; to isolate the EPSCKA, 100 µM GYKI53655 was added to the ACSF. Mossy-fiber
EPSCs were distinguished by their characteristically large paired-pulse
facilitation (Salin et al., 1996 ), rapid rise time, and short latency
(Yeckel et al., 1999 ), and by the inhibition of transmission by the
group II metabotropic GluR (mGluR) agonist
L-carboxycyclopropylglycine
(L-CCG-1) (10 µM) (Kamiya et al.,
1996 ), which was applied at the end of each experiment. Recordings in
which there was >70% inhibition of the EPSC were included in the
analysis. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Parameters were
compared using Student's unpaired t test (where not
stated), the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and one-way ANOVA; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
 |
Results |
Generation and molecular characterization of
KA2 / mutant mice
To study the role of the KA2 receptor subunit in hippocampal
synaptic transmission, we generated KA2 knock-out mice. We constructed a targeting vector in which a 1.3 kb section of the KA2 gene, which
included the exons coding for the membrane domains I and II, was
replaced by a neomycin-resistant marker cassette (Fig. 1A). Standard
techniques were used to electroporate ES cells, and homologous
recombination of the targeting construct was confirmed by Southern
blot. Six positive clones were injected into blastocysts to generate
chimeric animals. Intercrossing the heterozygous offspring produced
KA2 / mice, which were then backcrossed
to 129SvEv mice to produce the KA2 /
isogenic strain. These mice were used for all experiments described in
this report.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Generation and characterization of KA2 receptor
subunit-deficient mice. A, top, Genomic map of the mouse
KA2 locus around the exons (black boxes) coding for the
transmembrane domains I and II. Middle, The targeting
vector containing a neomycin resistance marker under the control of
pgk-neo. The hatched box (pgk-TK) denotes a thymidine
kinase domain of the targeting vector used for counterselection against
nonhomologous integration. Bottom, An illustration of
the KA2 locus after homologous recombination. E,
EcoRI; EV, EcoRV;
K, KpnI; S,
SacII; X, XbaI.
B, Immunoblot analysis of membrane proteins from
hippocampi of wild-type and KA2 / mutant mice
using an anti-KA-2 antibody and anti-GluR6/7 antibody.
C, Immunohistochemical analysis of
KA2 / mice. Hippocampal sections from wild-type
and KA2 / mice were immunostained with anti-KA2
antibodies. Staining was seen in the stratum lucidum
(SL) and pyramidal cell layers of the CA3 and CA2 but
not in the stratum radiatum (SR) in sections from
wild-type mice (left). No staining was observed in any
region in hippocampal sections from KA2 / mice
(right).
|
|
We confirmed that the mutant mice lacked the KA2 subunit using an
antibody raised against the C terminal of the protein. Immunoblot analysis of the KA2 / mice demonstrated
that KA2 protein was absent, whereas immunoreactivity for the GluR6/7
proteins was not grossly different (Fig. 1B). Similarly, hippocampal sections from
KA2 / mice were not immunoreactive with
the anti-KA2 antibody, whereas in wild-type mice we observed prominent
labeling of the stratum lucidum and pyramidal cell layers of CA3 and
CA2 subfields, confirming previous results with a distinct anti-KA2
antibody (Petralia et al., 1994 ) (Fig. 1C).
KA2 / mice did not differ from their
littermates in breeding or general health status and did not exhibit
any gross abnormalities in behavior.
Presynaptic kainate receptor response to low concentrations of
kainate is impaired in KA2 / mice
Exogenous activation of presynaptic mossy-fiber kainate receptors
with high concentrations of kainate (500 nM) depresses
excitatory transmission by causing a depolarizing block of axons
(Kamiya and Ozawa, 2000 ), whereas a low concentration of kainate (50 nM) facilitates transmission by inactivating potassium
channels and augmenting the presynaptic action potential (Schmitz et
al., 2001a ). To test whether the bidirectional modulation of
transmission is altered in mice lacking the KA2 subunit, we recorded
EPSCs arising from the activation of mossy-fiber AMPA and kainate
receptors (EPSCAMPA/KA) in CA3 neurons while
applying kainate to hippocampal slices from wild-type and
KA2 / mice. The application of 50 nM kainate to slices from wild-type mice caused a
significant facilitation in the amplitude of
EPSCAMPA/KA compared with basal transmission
(130 ± 13%; n = 6; p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
2A,E). In recordings
from KA2 / mice, the application of 50 nM kainate did not significantly alter
EPSCAMPA/KA amplitudes (97 ± 7.3% of
control amplitude; n = 7; p > 0.05;
one-way ANOVA) (Fig. 2C,E).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Facilitation of mossy-fiber EPSCs by low kainate
concentrations is absent in KA2 / mice.
A, Application of 50 nM kainate to
hippocampal slices from wild-type mice potentiates mossy-fiber EPSCs.
B, Application of 500 nM kainate to slices
from wild-type mice depresses mossy-fiber EPSCs. C,
Mossy-fiber EPSC facilitation is not observed when 50 nM
kainate is applied to slices from KA2 / mice.
D, Depression of mossy-fiber synaptic transmission is
still observed in KA2 / mice with 500 nM kainate application. E, Summary of
kainate-mediated effects in wild-type, KA2 / , and
GluR6 / mice.
|
|
Mossy-fiber EPSCs are depressed by the application of higher
concentrations of kainate (Contractor et al., 2000 ; Kamiya and Ozawa,
2000 ; Schmitz et al., 2000 ). Bath application of 500 nM kainate resulted in a significant depression of the
EPSCAMPA/KA in slices from wild-type mice
(50 ± 9.2% of control EPSC; n = 4;
p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
2B,E). In slices from
KA2 / mice, 500 nM kainate also caused a significant depression
of the mossy-fiber evoked EPSC (65 ± 7.3%; n = 5 of the control EPSC; p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
2D,E). We also measured the effect of intermediate
concentrations of kainate (100 and 250 nM) on EPSCAMPA/KA. The application of 100 nM kainate did not significantly affect
EPSCAMPA/KA in wild-type mice (110 ± 4.6%;
n = 3; p > 0.05; one-way ANOVA);
however, this concentration significantly depressed EPSCAMPA/KA amplitudes in
KA2 / mice (88 ± 9.2%;
n = 6; p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
2E). In contrast, the application of 250 nM kainate caused a significant depression of
EPSCAMPA/KA in both wild-type recordings (88 ± 10%; n = 6; p < 0.05; one-way
ANOVA) and KA2 / recordings (78 ± 5.9%; n = 4; p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA)
(Fig. 2E). The application of each of these
concentrations of kainate did not alter
EPSCAMPA/KA in slices from
GluR6 / mice (Fig.
2E).
These results suggested that the agonist affinity of the presynaptic
kainate receptors in the KA2 / mice had
shifted to higher concentrations. Alternatively, it was possible that
the receptors had a higher agonist affinity, and that the transition
from potentiation to inhibition was shifted to very low concentrations
in the KA2 / mice. Therefore, we tested
the effect of a lower concentration of kainate on mossy-fiber
transmission. The application of 10 nM kainate to slices
did not affect mossy-fiber EPSC amplitudes in recordings from either
wild-type or KA2 / mice (wild type,
110 ± 3.0, n = 3, p > 0.05;
KA2 / , 110 ± 14, n = 3, p > 0.05; one-way ANOVA).
Short-term plasticity is not impaired in
KA2 / mice
Our initial results suggested that
KA2 / mice had presynaptic mossy-fiber
kainate receptors with reduced sensitivity to activation by agonist. To
test whether the alteration in presynaptic receptors similarly reduced
their contribution to the facilitation of transmission at mossy-fiber
synapses, we compared two forms of short-term plasticity in wild-type
and knock-out mice (Contractor et al., 2001 ). In recordings from
KA2 / mice, paired-pulse ratios of
EPSCAMPA/KA measured at an interstimulus interval
of 40 msec were normal compared with wild-type mice (wild type,
2.9 ± 0.17, n = 15;
KA2 / , 3.0 ± 0.17, n = 19; p > 0.05) (Fig.
3A). We also tested frequency facilitation of mossy fibers by increasing the stimulation frequency to
four different rates from a base of 0.05 Hz. Frequency facilitation was
not significantly different between wild-type and
KA2 / slices at frequencies of 0.2 Hz
(wild type, n = 7;
KA2 / , n = 10;
p > 0.05), 0.5 Hz (wild type, n = 7;
KA2 / , n = 10;
p > 0.05), 1 Hz (wild type, n = 7;
KA2 / , n = 10;
p > 0.05), or 2 Hz (wild type, n = 7;
KA2 / , n = 4;
p > 0.05) (Fig. 3B). These results suggest
that homosynaptic activation of the facilitatory autoreceptor is normal
in the knock-out mice, despite the absence of the KA2 subunit.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
Mossy-fiber short-term plasticity is normal in
KA2 / mice. A, Sample traces of
mossy-fiber EPSCs paired at 40 msec intervals in wild-type mice
(left) and KA2 / mice
(right). Calibration: 40 msec, 300 pA. B,
Top, Sample mossy-fiber EPSCs showing facilitation at
frequencies of 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 Hz in wild-type and
KA2 / mice. Calibration: 20 msec, 200 pA.
Bottom, Summary of frequency facilitation experiments in
wild-type (black bars) and KA2 /
(gray bars) mice.
|
|
Faster decay kinetics of the EPSCKA in
KA2 / mice
We recorded kainate receptor-mediated EPSCs from CA3 neurons
to test whether deletion of the KA2 subunit alters the properties of
postsynaptic receptors. EPSCKA were isolated from
EPSCAMPA by applying a noncompetitive AMPA
receptor antagonist, GYKI53655 (100 µM), and increasing
the release probability by stimulating mossy-fiber afferents at 1 Hz.
Under these conditions, the proportion of the mossy-fiber EPSC mediated
by kainate receptors was not significantly altered in the
KA2 / mice (wild type, 6.7 ± 0.4%, n = 9; KA2 / ,
6.8 ± 0.9%, n = 7; p > 0.05)
(Fig. 4A). However, the
EPSCKA in KA2 /
mice decayed significantly faster than those in wild-type mice (wild
type, 64 ± 2.5 msec, n = 10;
KA2 / , 41 ± 3.3 msec,
n = 7; p < 0.001) (Fig.
4B). These results demonstrate that postsynaptic
kainate receptors are composed of heteromers of at least the KA2 and
GluR6 subunits, and that the KA2 is not critical for the functional
expression of synaptic kainate receptors.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Decay of the kainate component of the PSC is
faster in KA2 / mice. A, Sample
mossy-fiber EPSCs showing the mixed AMPA/kainate EPSC and the isolated
EPSCKA recorded at 1 Hz stimulation frequency in slices
from wild-type and KA2 / mice. Calibration: 20 msec, 150 pA (for wild type), 200 pA (for KA2 / ).
B, Sample EPSCKA from wild-type and
KA2 / mice. Calibration: 20 msec, 20 pA (for
wild-type), 25 pA (for KA2 / ).
|
|
Spillover-mediated heterosynaptic facilitation is absent in
KA2 / mice
The high-affinity facilitatory presynaptic kainate receptor can be
activated by the spillover of glutamate from neighboring collateral
synapses on CA3 pyramidal neurons (Schmitz et al., 2001a ). To test
whether this heterosynaptic facilitation is altered in
KA2 / mice, we made recordings from CA3
neurons while simultaneously stimulating two synaptic pathways. In the
first set of experiments, mossy-fiber EPSCAMPA/KA
were measured before and 100 msec after brief conditioning stimuli were
delivered to collateral pathways (three stimuli at 200 Hz). This
stimulation protocol has been shown previously to give a robust
facilitation of mossy-fiber EPSCs (Schmitz et al., 2001a ); in agreement
with this, we saw a facilitation of mossy-fiber EPSC in five of seven
recordings from wild-type mice (normalized potentiation for all
wild-type recordings, 120 ± 15%; n = 7;
p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
5A). However, this
spillover-mediated facilitation was absent in recordings from the
KA2 / mice; instead, we observed a
significant depression of the mossy-fiber EPSC (79 ± 5.6% of
control EPSC; n = 10; p < 0.05;
one-way ANOVA) (Fig. 5B). We also made recordings in which
the mossy-fiber test pulse was given after longer trains of
high-frequency stimulation (10 stimuli at 200 Hz), which was designed
to activate axonal kainate receptors maximally and thereby cause a
depression of transmission (Schmitz et al., 2001a ). In both wild-type
and KA2 / mice, this protocol
significantly depressed the mossy-fiber EPSC (wild type, 79 ± 5.9, n = 6, p < 0.05;
KA2 / , 76 ± 7.8%,
n = 7, p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA) (Fig.
6A,B). Therefore, heterosynaptic facilitation of the mossy-fiber pathway is
impaired in KA2 / mice, whereas
glutamate spillover can still activate axonal kainate receptors and
depress mossy-fiber synaptic transmission. These results parallel those
observed with the exogenous application of kainate.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Spillover-mediated heterosynaptic facilitation is
not observed in KA2 / mice. A,
Normalized mossy-fiber EPSC amplitudes in wild-type mice. During the
time denoted by the black bar, mossy-fiber stimulation
is preceded for 100 msec by three high-frequency stimuli to collateral
synapses in the stratum radiatum. B, The effect of the
same collateral conditioning stimulation on mossy-fiber EPSCs in slices
from KA2 / mice.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
High-frequency induced heterosynaptic depression
is observed in KA2 / mice. A,
Normalized mossy-fiber EPSCs in wild-type mice. During the time denoted
by the black bar, mossy-fiber stimulation was preceded
for 100 msec by 10 stimuli at 200 Hz frequency given to collateral
synapses in the stratum radiatum. B, The same collateral
conditioning experiment in slices from KA2 /
mice.
|
|
Mossy-fiber long-term plasticity is normal in
KA2 / mice
Multiple forms of NMDA-independent long-term synaptic plasticity
exist at mossy-fiber synapses (Yeckel et al., 1999 ). One form of
long-term potentiation (LTP) requires the activation of kainate
receptors for induction (Bortolotto et al., 1999 ; Contractor et al.,
2001 ). We tested whether mossy-fiber LTP was impaired in the
KA2 / mice, as it is in the
GluR6 / mice (Contractor et al.,
2001 ). Two induction protocols were used to differentiate between
distinct forms of mossy-fiber LTP (Urban and Barrionuevo, 1996 ; Yeckel
et al., 1999 ). In the first set of experiments, we induced LTP using a
standard tetanus consisting of three 1 sec trains of 100 Hz stimulation
given at 10 sec intervals. There was no difference in the magnitude of
facilitation measured 20-30 min after the induction between wild-type
and knock-out mice [wild type, 230 ± 25%, n = 5; KA2 / , 220 ± 20%,
n = 8; p > 0.05; Kolmogorov-Smirnov
(K-S) test] (Fig. 7A,B). A
less intense induction protocol (15 trains of seven stimuli at 100 Hz
frequency at 5 sec intervals), termed brief high frequency stimulation
(BHFS) (Urban and Barrionuevo, 1996 ), elicited LTP that was similar in
magnitude in wild-type and KA2 / mutant
mice (wild type, 190 ± 32%, n = 7;
KA2 / , 170 ± 9%,
n = 9; p > 0.5; K-S test) (Fig.
7C,D). Therefore, plasticity of the mossy-fiber synapse is
impaired only when the functional synaptic kainate receptors are absent
(in the GluR6 / mice) but is normal in
mice in which the kainate receptors have more subtle alterations in
function, like the KA2 / mice.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
Mossy-fiber LTP is normal in
KA2 / mice. A, Time course of
mossy-fiber LTP in wild-type and KA2 / mice
induced by tetanic stimulation (3 1 sec trains of 100 Hz stimulation).
Inhibition of the EPSC by the group II mGluR agonist
L-CCG-1 at the end of each experiment was used to confirm
that the EPSCs were of mossy-fiber origin (Kamiya et al., 1996 ).
B, Cumulative probability histogram of tetanus induced
LTP in wild-type and KA2 / mice.
C, Time course of mossy-fiber LTP in wild-type and
KA2 / mice induced by BHFS (15 trains of 7 stimuli at 100 Hz frequency at 5 sec intervals). D,
Cumulative probability histogram of BHFS-induced LTP in wild-type and
KA2 / mice.
|
|
 |
Discussion |
The development of kainate receptor knock-out mice has helped
elucidate the roles of these glutamate-gated ion channels in the brain.
Here we report the generation and physiological characterization of a
mouse in which the KA2 receptor subunit is deleted. We found that
presynaptic and postsynaptic kainate receptor function at hippocampal
mossy-fiber-CA3 pyramidal cell synapses is altered but not eliminated
in these mice. These data lead us to conclude that neuronal kainate
receptors at mossy-fiber synapses contain the KA2 subunit, and that
this subunit influences the biophysical properties of mossy-fiber
kainate receptors. In particular, this subunit confers a higher
glutamate affinity on the presynaptic receptor on the mossy-fiber
terminals. KA2-subunit-containing receptors are activated by low
concentrations of glutamate that spill over from adjacent collateral
synapses, which modifies the strength of mossy-fiber transmission if
coincident activation occurs within an appropriate time window.
Presynaptic mossy-fiber kainate receptors
Presynaptic kainate receptors modulate excitatory (Contractor et
al., 2000 ; Kamiya and Ozawa, 2000 ; Schmitz et al., 2000 ; Frerking et
al., 2001 ; Delaney and Jahr, 2002 ; Kidd et al., 2002 ) and inhibitory
(Rodriguez-Moreno et al., 1997 , 2000 ; Min et al., 1999 ; Mulle et al.,
2000 ) transmission at a number of central synapses, including the
hippocampal mossy-fiber synapse. Kainate receptors are expressed at
high levels in this region of the brain, and this synapse has been used
as a model for studying their function. Initial studies of presynaptic
receptors at mossy-fiber synapses reported that the activation of
kainate receptors depressed excitatory transmission at these synapses
because of a depolarizing block of action potential conductance (Kamiya
and Ozawa, 2000 ; Schmitz et al., 2000 ). Studies in knock-out mice
confirmed that this depression of the EPSC was mediated by kainate
receptors composed of the GluR6 subunit (Contractor et al., 2000 ).
Subsequent studies found that the activation of kainate receptors with
low concentrations of kainate facilitated mossy-fiber transmission
(Schmitz et al., 2001a ). Both facilitation and depression of
mossy-fiber transmission by exogenous kainate can be reproduced by
activating presynaptic kainate receptors with synaptically released
glutamate, suggesting that these receptors represent a functional
modulatory system in vivo (Schmitz et al., 2000 , 2001a ). The
biphasic effect of the activation of presynaptic kainate receptors is
thought to result from the differential excitation of mossy fibers.
Moderate kainate receptor activation inactivates repolarizing potassium
channels and thereby increases mossy-fiber excitability. More profound
kainate receptor activation elicits a larger depolarization that
inactivates sodium channels, resulting in a depolarizing block of
action potential conduction (Schmitz et al., 2001b ). The high affinity
of the presynaptic receptor for glutamate is a crucial element in this
form of heterosynaptic modulation of mossy-fiber transmission. In the
present study, we found heterosynaptic depression to be normal in
KA2 / mice, whereas heterosynaptic
facilitation was absent. Therefore, the KA2 receptor subunit is
critical to this physiological function, because it confers high
affinity for glutamate on the presynaptic receptors.
Presynaptic kainate receptors also have an autoreceptor function at
mossy-fiber synapses. Glutamate released from mossy-fiber terminals can
activate presynaptic kainate receptors and facilitate subsequent
release (Contractor et al., 2001 ; Lauri et al., 2001 ). This
autoreceptor function becomes critical in facilitating mossy-fiber transmission during periods of high-frequency transmission.
GluR6 / mice have impairments in
frequency facilitation of mossy-fiber transmission, suggesting that
GluR6 is critical for this autoreceptor function (Contractor et al.,
2001 ). In the present study, we found that this form of synaptic
plasticity was intact in KA2 / mice. It
is likely that the glutamate concentrations involved in homosynaptic
facilitation are higher than those associated with spillover-mediated
activation of presynaptic kainate receptors; therefore, alteration in
the affinity of presynaptic receptors in
KA2 / mice has no effect on this
autoreceptor function.
Postsynaptic mossy-fiber kainate receptors
Kainate receptors are also located on the postsynaptic side of
mossy-fiber synapses. Initial studies that isolated the kainate receptor component of the mossy-fiber EPSC used trains of
high-frequency stimulation to increase the probability of release and
to resolve the EPSCKA clearly (Castillo et al.,
1997 ; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997 ). These observations suggested that
kainate receptors might not participate in ongoing transmission at
mossy fibers but rather might be activated only during periods of
significantly increased mossy-fiber activity. Although
EPSCKA are more readily observed when mossy-fiber
release probability is increased, a recent study has shown that, as at
thalamocortical synapses (Kidd and Isaac, 1999 ), mossy-fiber kainate
receptors are activated by the quantal release of glutamate and thus
are intrinsic to the excitatory synaptic transmission of mossy fibers
(Cossart et al., 2002 ). In addition, although the amplitude of the
EPSCKA is small relative to
EPSCAMPA, the slow decay kinetics of the
EPSCKA causes a significant proportion of the
total charge to be transferred through kainate receptors during the
composite mossy-fiber EPSC. The evidence that kainate receptors are
activated by the quantal release of glutamate at mossy-fiber synapses
(Cossart et al., 2002 ) as well as previous demonstrations that the
manipulation of glutamate clearance from the synaptic cleft did not
affect the kinetics of the EPSCKA (Castillo et
al., 1997 ; Vignes and Collingridge, 1997 ) strongly support the
hypothesis that the slow kinetics of the EPSCKA
results from the intrinsic properties of the receptors rather than
localization to extrasynaptic or perisynaptic sites. Our data also
support this idea, because we find that the time course of the
EPSCKA is markedly more rapid when the KA2
subunit is absent from the postsynaptic receptor complex. In addition, these data are generally consistent with the idea that the KA2 subunit
confers a very high affinity for glutamate on mossy-fiber kainate
receptors and thereby contributes to the relatively slow decay of the
EPSCKA. It remains to be determined what other
mechanisms are responsible for the disparity in the properties between
mossy-fiber EPSCKA and those predicted from the
studies of recombinant receptors.
The EPSCKA was absent when the GluR6 receptor
subunit was deleted (Mulle et al., 1998 ) but normal in
GluR5 / mice (Contractor, unpublished
observations), suggesting that the GluR6 subunit is critical for the
functional expression of postsynaptic kainate receptors. The
application of an antagonist selective for GluR5-containing receptors,
LY382884, reduced mossy-fiber EPSCKA,
initially suggesting that the postsynaptic receptor contained the GluR5
subunit (Bortolotto et al., 1999 ). However, a second report
demonstrated that the antagonist LY382884 did not depress the
EPSCKA directly, but rather acted on presynaptic
kainate receptors to reduce frequency facilitation and thereby
indirectly to reduce the EPSCKA evoked with
high-frequency stimulation trains (Lauri et al., 2001 ); furthermore,
this compound did not act on the postsynaptic receptor. Together with
mRNA expression patterns (Bahn et al., 1994 ; Bureau et al., 1999 ),
these data suggest that the postsynaptic kainate receptor is composed
of heteromers of GluR6 and KA2, although the KA1 receptor subunit might
also be present.
Kainate receptor involvement in mossy-fiber LTP
Mossy-fiber LTP is mechanistically distinct from the more commonly
studied NMDA receptor-dependent forms of plasticity (Henze et al.,
2000 ). Kainate receptors play an integral role in the induction of
mossy-fiber LTP. A selective antagonist of kainate receptors
(Bortolotto et al., 1999 ) and genetic deletion of the GluR6 subunit
(Contractor et al., 2001 ) both impair LTP induction at this synapse.
Because kainate receptors are localized to both presynaptic and
postsynaptic sides of the synapse, it is not clear which of these
receptor populations is involved in the induction of plasticity.
However, recent reports that postsynaptic mechanisms are required for
the induction of this form of synaptic plasticity (Yeckel et al., 1999 ;
Contractor et al., 2002 ) raise the intriguing possibility that the
EPSCKA might mediate the induction of LTP. In
this study, we have found that, although both presynaptic and postsynaptic kainate receptor function are perturbed in
KA2 / mice, mossy-fiber LTP is normal.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Aug. 28, 2002; revised Oct. 31, 2002; accepted Nov. 5, 2002.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental
Health to A.C., the Schweizerische Nationalfond and the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft to A.W.S., the National Alliance for Research on
Schizophrenia and Depression (M.D., G.T.S.), and National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke (G.T.S., S.F.H.). We thank Stephen
O'Gorman for help with embryonic stem cell culture, The Salk
Transgenic Core Facility for performing blastocyst injections,
and Stacie Peters and Lora O'Leary for help with animal husbandry. We
also thank Christophe Mulle for early discussions and for providing
some of the mouse genomic clones.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Anis Contractor, Molecular
Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies,
10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail: contractor{at}salk.edu.
A. W. Sailer's present address: Merck & Company, Inc., 126 East
Lincoln Avenue, Rahway, NJ 07065.
 |
References |
-
Bahn S,
Volk B,
Wisden W
(1994)
Kainate receptor gene expression in the developing rat brain.
J Neurosci
14:5525-5547[Abstract].
-
Bortolotto ZA,
Clarke VRJ,
Delany CM,
Parry MC,
Smolders I,
Vignes M,
Ho KH,
Miu P,
Brinton BT,
Fantaske R,
Ogden A,
Gates M,
Ornstein PL,
Lodge D,
Bleakman D,
Collingridge GL
(1999)
Kainate receptors are involved in synaptic plasticity.
Nature
402:297-301[Medline].
-
Bureau I,
Bischoff S,
Heinemann SF,
Mulle C
(1999)
Kainate receptor-mediated responses in the CA1 field of wild-type and GluR6-deficient mice.
J Neurosci
19:653-663[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Castillo PE,
Malenka RC,
Nicoll RA
(1997)
Kainate receptors mediate a slow postsynaptic current in hippocampal CA3 neurons.
Nature
388:182-186[Medline].
-
Contractor A,
Swanson GT,
Sailer A,
O'Gorman S,
Heinemann SF
(2000)
Identification of the kainate receptor subunits underlying modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission in the CA3 region of the hippocampus.
J Neurosci
20:8269-8278[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Contractor A,
Swanson G,
Heinemann SF
(2001)
Kainate receptors are involved in short- and long-term plasticity at mossy-fiber synapses in the hippocampus.
Neuron
29:209-216[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Contractor A,
Rogers C,
Maron C,
Henkemeyer M,
Swanson GT,
Heinemann SF
(2002)
Trans-synaptic Eph receptor-ephrin signaling in hippocampal mossy-fiber LTP.
Science
296:1864-1869[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Cossart R,
Epstein J,
Tyzio R,
Becq H,
Hirsch J,
Ben-Ari Y,
Crepel V
(2002)
Quantal release of glutamate generates pure kainate and mixed AMPA/kainate EPSCs in hippocampal neurons.
Neuron
35:147-159[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Delaney AJ,
Jahr CE
(2002)
Kainate receptors differentially regulate release at two parallel fiber synapses.
Neuron
36:475-482[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Dingledine R,
Borges K,
Bowie D,
Traynelis SF
(1999)
The glutamate receptor ion channels.
Pharmacol Rev
51:7-61[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Frerking M,
Schmitz D,
Zhou Q,
Johansen J,
Nicoll RA
(2001)
Kainate receptors depress excitatory synaptic transmission at CA3
CA1 synapses in the hippocampus via a direct presynaptic action.
J Neurosci
21:2958-2966[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Henze DA,
Urban NN,
Barrionuevo G
(2000)
The multifarious hippocampal mossy-fiber pathway: a review.
Neuroscience
98:407-427[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Herb A,
Burnashev N,
Werner P,
Sakmann B,
Wisden W,
Seeburg PH
(1992)
The KA-2 subunit of excitatory amino acid receptors shows widespread expression in brain and forms ion channels with distantly related subunits.
Neuron
8:775-785[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kamiya H,
Ozawa S
(2000)
Kainate receptor-mediated presynaptic inhibition at the mouse hippocampal mossy-fiber synapse.
J Physiol (Lond)
523:653-665[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kamiya H,
Shinozaki H,
Yamamoto C
(1996)
Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2/3 suppresses transmission at rat hippocampal mossy-fiber synapses.
J Physiol (Lond)
493:447-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Kidd FL,
Isaac JT
(1999)
Developmental and activity-dependent regulation of kainate receptors at thalamocortical synapses.
Nature
400:569-573[Medline].
-
Kidd FL,
Coumis U,
Collingridge GL,
Crabtree JW,
Isaac JT
(2002)
A presynaptic kainate receptor is involved in regulating the dynamic properties of thalamocortical synapses during development.
Neuron
34:635-646[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Kullmann DM
(2001)
Presynaptic kainate receptors in the hippocampus: slowly emerging from obscurity.
Neuron
32:561-564[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Laird PW,
Zijderveld A,
Linders K,
Rudnicki MA,
Jaenisch R,
Berns A
(1991)
Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure.
Nucleic Acids Res
19:4293[Free Full Text].
-
Lauri SE,
Bortolotto ZA,
Bleakman D,
Ornstein PL,
Lodge D,
Isaac JT,
Collingridge GL
(2001)
A critical role of a facilitatory presynaptic kainate receptor in mossy-fiber LTP.
Neuron
32:697-709[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Lomeli H,
Wisden W,
Kohler M,
Keinanen K,
Sommer B,
Seeburg PH
(1992)
High-affinity kainate and domoate receptors in rat brain.
FEBS Lett
307:139-143[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Mansour SL,
Thomas KR,
Capecchi MR
(1988)
Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes.
Nature
336:348-352[Medline].
-
Min MY,
Melyan Z,
Kullmann DM
(1999)
Synaptically released glutamate reduces
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic inhibition in the hippocampus via kainate receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
96:9932-9937[Abstract/Free Full Text]. -
Mulle C,
Sailer A,
Pérez-Otano I,
Dickinson-Anson H,
Castillo PE,
Bureau I,
Maron C,
Gage FH,
Mann JR,
Bettler B,
Heinemann SF
(1998)
Altered synaptic physiology and reduced susceptibility to kainate-induced seizures in GluR6-deficient mice.
Nature
392:601-605[Medline].
-
Mulle C,
Sailer A,
Swanson GT,
Brana C,
O'Gorman S,
Bettler B,
Heinemann SF
(2000)
Subunit composition of kainate receptors in hippocampal interneurons.
Neuron
28:475-484[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Petralia RS,
Wang YX,
Wenthold RJ
(1994)
Histological and ultrastructural localization of the kainate receptor subunits, KA2 and GluR6/7, in the rat nervous system using selective antipeptide antibodies.
J Comp Neurol
349:85-110[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rodriguez-Moreno A,
Herreras O,
Lerma J
(1997)
Kainate receptors presynaptically downregulate GABAergic inhibition in the rat hippocampus.
Neuron
19:893-901[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Rodriguez-Moreno A,
Lopez-Garcia JC,
Lerma J
(2000)
Two populations of kainate receptors with separate signaling mechanisms in hippocampal interneurons.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
97:1293-1298[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Sailer A,
Swanson GT,
Perez-Otano I,
O'Leary L,
Malkmus SA,
Dyck RH,
Dickinson-Anson H,
Schiffer HH,
Maron C,
Yaksh TL,
Gage FH,
O'Gorman S,
Heinemann SF
(1999)
Generation and analysis of GluR5(Q636R) kainate receptor mutant mice.
J Neurosci
19:8757-8764[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Salin PA,
Scanziani M,
Malenka RC,
Nicoll RA
(1996)
Distinct short-term plasticity at two excitatory synapses in the hippocampus.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
93:13304-13309[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schiffer HH,
Swanson GT,
Heinemann SF
(1997)
Rat GluR7 and a carboxy-terminal splice variant, GluR7b, are functional kainate receptor subunits with a low sensitivity to glutamate.
Neuron
19:1141-1146[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schmitz D,
Frerking M,
Nicoll RA
(2000)
Synaptic activation of presynaptic kainate receptors on hippocampal mossy-fiber synapses.
Neuron
27:327-338[Web of Science][Medline].
-
Schmitz D,
Mellor J,
Nicoll RA
(2001a)
Presynaptic kainate receptor mediation of frequency facilitation at hippocampal mossy-fiber synapses.
Science
291:1972-1976[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Schmitz D,
Mellor J,
Frerking M,
Nicoll RA
(2001b)
Presynaptic kainate receptors at hippocampal mossy-fiber synapses.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
98:11003-11008[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Urban NN,
Barrionuevo G
(1996)
Induction of Hebbian and non-Hebbian mossy-fiber long-term potentiation by distinct patterns of high-frequency stimulation.
J Neurosci
16:4293-4299[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Vignes M,
Collingridge GL
(1997)
The synaptic activation of kainate receptors.
Nature
388:179-182[Medline].
-
Yeckel MF,
Kapur A,
Johnston D
(1999)
Multiple forms of LTP in hippocampal CA3 neurons use a common postsynaptic mechanism.
Nat Neurosci
2:625-633[Web of Science][Medline].
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/03/232422-08$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Dziewczapolski, C. M. Glogowski, E. Masliah, and S. F. Heinemann
Deletion of the {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Gene Improves Cognitive Deficits and Synaptic Pathology in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
J. Neurosci.,
July 8, 2009;
29(27):
8805 - 8815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sachidhanandam, C. Blanchet, Y. Jeantet, Y. H. Cho, and C. Mulle
Kainate Receptors Act as Conditional Amplifiers of Spike Transmission at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses
J. Neurosci.,
April 15, 2009;
29(15):
5000 - 5008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Miyata and K. Imoto
Contrary roles of kainate receptors in transmitter release at corticothalamic synapses onto thalamic relay and reticular neurons
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2009;
587(5):
999 - 1012.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Y. Sun, A. F. Bartley, and L. E. Dobrunz
Calcium-Permeable Presynaptic Kainate Receptors Involved in Excitatory Short-Term Facilitation Onto Somatostatin Interneurons During Natural Stimulus Patterns
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2009;
101(2):
1043 - 1055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wondolowski and M. Frerking
Subunit-Dependent Postsynaptic Expression of Kainate Receptors on Hippocampal Interneurons in Area CA1
J. Neurosci.,
January 14, 2009;
29(2):
563 - 574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-L. Chen, H. Yu, W.-M. Yu, R. Pawlak, and S. Strickland
Proteolytic fragments of laminin promote excitotoxic neurodegeneration by up-regulation of the KA1 subunit of the kainate receptor
J. Cell Biol.,
December 29, 2008;
183(7):
1299 - 1313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Barberis, S. Sachidhanandam, and C. Mulle
GluR6/KA2 Kainate Receptors Mediate Slow-Deactivating Currents
J. Neurosci.,
June 18, 2008;
28(25):
6402 - 6406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mott, M. Benveniste, and R. J. Dingledine
pH-Dependent Inhibition of Kainate Receptors by Zinc
J. Neurosci.,
February 13, 2008;
28(7):
1659 - 1671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Tam, V. Trembovler, V. Di Marzo, S. Petrosino, G. Leo, A. Alexandrovich, E. Regev, N. Casap, A. Shteyer, C. Ledent, et al.
The cannabinoid CB1 receptor regulates bone formation by modulating adrenergic signaling
FASEB J,
January 1, 2008;
22(1):
285 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Pinheiro, D. Perrais, F. Coussen, J. Barhanin, B. Bettler, J. R. Mann, J. O. Malva, S. F. Heinemann, and C. Mulle
GluR7 is an essential subunit of presynaptic kainate autoreceptors at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses
PNAS,
July 17, 2007;
104(29):
12181 - 12186.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Rebola, S. Sachidhanandam, D. Perrais, R. A. Cunha, and C. Mulle
Short-Term Plasticity of Kainate Receptor-Mediated EPSCs Induced by NMDA Receptors at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses
J. Neurosci.,
April 11, 2007;
27(15):
3987 - 3993.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Saganich, B. E. Schroeder, V. Galvan, D. E. Bredesen, E. H. Koo, and S. F. Heinemann
Deficits in Synaptic Transmission and Learning in Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) Transgenic Mice Require C-Terminal Cleavage of APP
J. Neurosci.,
December 27, 2006;
26(52):
13428 - 13436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Fisahn
Kainate receptors and rhythmic activity in neuronal networks: hippocampal gamma oscillations as a tool
J. Physiol.,
January 1, 2005;
562(1):
65 - 72.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Breustedt and D. Schmitz
Assessing the Role of GLUK5 and GLUK6 at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses
J. Neurosci.,
November 10, 2004;
24(45):
10093 - 10098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Fisahn, A. Contractor, R. D. Traub, E. H. Buhl, S. F. Heinemann, and C. J. McBain
Distinct Roles for the Kainate Receptor Subunits GluR5 and GluR6 in Kainate-Induced Hippocampal Gamma Oscillations
J. Neurosci.,
October 27, 2004;
24(43):
9658 - 9668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ito, A. Contractor, and G. T. Swanson
Attenuated Plasticity of Postsynaptic Kainate Receptors in Hippocampal CA3 Pyramidal Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
July 7, 2004;
24(27):
6228 - 6236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rodriguez-Moreno and T. S. Sihra
Presynaptic kainate receptor facilitation of glutamate release involves protein kinase A in the rat hippocampus
J. Physiol.,
June 15, 2004;
557(3):
733 - 745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-h. Youn and M. Randic
Modulation of excitatory synaptic transmission in the spinal substantia gelatinosa of mice deficient in the kainate receptor GluR5 and/or GluR6 subunit
J. Physiol.,
March 15, 2004;
555(3):
683 - 698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Jaskolski, F. Coussen, N. Nagarajan, E. Normand, C. Rosenmund, and C. Mulle
Subunit Composition and Alternative Splicing Regulate Membrane Delivery of Kainate Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
March 10, 2004;
24(10):
2506 - 2515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Darstein, R. S. Petralia, G. T. Swanson, R. J. Wenthold, and S. F. Heinemann
Distribution of Kainate Receptor Subunits at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses
J. Neurosci.,
September 3, 2003;
23(22):
8013 - 8019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|