 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 27, 2003, 23(21):7820-7829
Previous Article | Next Article 
Subunit Composition of Functional Nicotinic Receptors in Dopaminergic Neurons Investigated with Knock-Out Mice
Nicolas Champtiaux,1
Cecilia Gotti,2
Matilde Cordero-Erausquin,1
Denis J. David,3
Cédric Przybylski,3
Clément Léna,1
Francesco Clementi,2
Milena Moretti,2
Francesco M. Rossi,1
Nicolas Le Novère,1
J. Michael McIntosh,4
Alain M. Gardier,3 and
Jean-Pierre Changeux1
1Laboratoire de Neurobiologie Moléculaire,
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche
Associée 2182 "Récepteurs et Cognition," Institut
Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France, 2Consiglio
Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Neuroscience, Section of Cellular and
Molecular Pharmacology, Department of Medical Pharmacology and Center of
Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Milan, 20129 Milan,
Italy, 3Laboratoire de Neuropharmacologie Equipe
Associée-Ministere de l'Education Nationale de la Recherche et de la
Technologie, Faculté de Pharmacie Institut Fédératif de
Recherche-Institut de Signalisation at Innovation Thérapeutique,
Institut de Signalisation et d'Innovation Thérapeutique,
Université Paris-Sud, F92296 Châtenay-Malabry cedex, France, and
4Departments of Psychiatry and Biology, University of
Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) expressed by dopaminergic (DA)
neurons have long been considered as potential therapeutic targets for the
treatment of several neuropsychiatric diseases, including nicotine and cocaine
addiction or Parkinson's disease. However, DA neurons express mRNAs coding for
most, if not all, neuronal nAChR subunits, and the subunit composition of
functional nAChRs has been difficult to establish. Immunoprecipitation
experiments performed on mouse striatal extracts allowed us to identify three
main types of heteromeric nAChRs ( 4 2*,
6 2*, and 4 6 2*) in DA
terminal fields. The functional relevance of these subtypes was then examined
by studying nicotine-induced DA release in striatal synaptosomes and recording
ACh-elicited currents in DA neurons from 4, 6, 4 6,
and 2 knock-out mice. Our results establish that
6 2* nAChRs are functional and sensitive to
-conotoxin MII inhibition. These receptors are mainly located on DA
terminals and consistently do not contribute to DA release induced by systemic
nicotine administration, as evidenced by in vivo microdialysis. In
contrast, (non 6) 4 2* nAChRs represent the
majority of functional heteromeric nAChRs on DA neuronal soma. Thus, whereas a
combination of 6 2* and 4 2*
nAChRs may mediate the endogenous cholinergic modulation of DA release at the
terminal level, somato-dendritic (non 6) 4 2*
nAChRs most likely contribute to nicotine reinforcement.
Key words: dopamine; knock-out mice; mesencephalon; nicotinic acetylcholine receptors; striatum; -conotoxine MII
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The dopaminergic (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and
substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) play a key role in natural and artificial
reinforcement (Berridge and Robinson,
1998 ), motor coordination, motor associative learning, and habit
formation (Gerdeman et al.,
2003 ). In DA neurons, nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) are
abundantly expressed both at the somatic (SNc, VTA) and terminal [dorsal
striatum, nucleus accumbens (Nac)] levels, in which they might play different
physiological roles.
nAChRs located in the VTA are critically involved in nicotine addiction.
Indeed, in rats, intra-VTA infusions of nicotine increase DA concentration in
the Nac (Nisell et al., 1994 ),
an effect thought to mediate the reinforcing properties of most addictive
drugs (Di Chiara and Imperato,
1988 ). Also, intra-VTA infusion of nicotinic antagonists blocks
the effect of systemic nicotine injections on accumbal DA release
(Nisell et al., 1994 ) and
disrupt nicotine self-administration
(Corrigall et al., 1994 ).
Electrophysiological experiments demonstrate that nicotine is able to increase
the firing rate of DA neurons both in vitro and in vivo
(Grenhoff et al., 1986 ;
Pidoplichko et al., 1997 ;
Picciotto et al., 1998 ).
Although actions on nAChRs located on GABAergic interneurons or glutamatergic
terminals in the VTA, or on pedunculopontine neurons, have been proposed to
contribute to these effects (Nomikos et
al., 2000 ; Corrigall et al.,
2001 ; Mansvelder et al.,
2002 ), somato-dendritic nAChRs expressed by VTA DA neurons remain
good candidates for the primary reinforcing action of nicotine.
The functional importance of nAChRs present on DA terminals should not be
underestimated, however. In the striatum, endogenous ACh exerts a strong tonic
control on action potential-dependent DA release through the activation of
2-containing ( 2*) presynaptic nAChRs
(Zhou et al., 2001 ).
Furthermore, intra-Nac nicotine injections produce sensitization to the
locomotor stimulant effects of systemic nicotine
(Kita et al., 1992 ), whereas
intra-striatal infusion of nicotinic antagonists blocks the induction of
behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-induced stereotypies
(Karler et al., 1996 ). These
findings suggest that nAChRs on DA terminals might play a role in the control
of locomotor behavior and in the development of some long-lasting adaptations
associated with drug abuse.
To date, 11 neuronal nAChR subunits have been cloned in mammals, 8 of which
( 3-7, 2-4) are expressed in rat DA neurons
(Le Novère et al.,
1996 ; Charpantier et al.,
1998 ; Klink et al.,
2001 ). In vitro, 7 is known to form homopentameric
nAChRs, whereas other subunits ( 2, 3, 4, 6,
2, and 4) associate to form heteropentamers with a 2 ,
3 stoichiometry (for review, see
Role and Berg, 1996 ). The
structural subunits 5 and 3, so called because they lack critical
residues necessary to form a ligand binding site, are incorporated into
heteromeric nAChRs with at least one other subunit and one other
subunit (Ramirez-Latorre et al.,
1996 ; Wang et al.,
1996 ; Groot-Kormelink et al.,
1998 ). In vivo, studies on 2 knock-out (Ko) mice
have demonstrated that functional heteromeric nAChRs expressed by DA neurons
in the cell body or terminal regions contain the 2 subunit
(Picciotto et al., 1998 ; Grady
et al., 2001 ,
2002 ). Recent
immunoprecipitation (IPP) experiments have examined the nature of the
subunits associating with 2 to form nAChRs on DA terminals in the rat
striatum (Zoli et al.,
2002 ).
We confirmed these results in mice and extended them using Ko mice for
various nAChR subunits. Furthermore, we combined several experimental
approaches ranging from electrophysiological recordings of DA neurons to
in vivo microdialysis to establish the functionality and the relative
abundance of the nAChR subtypes identified at the somatic and terminal level.
Evidence is presented that the populations of nAChRs differ in these two
compartments.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Mice. All animals were used in accordance with the Centre National
de la Recherche Scientifique guidelines for care and use of laboratory
animals. The generation of 2-/-, 4-/-, and 6-/- mice has
been described previously (Picciotto et
al., 1995 ; Marubio et al.,
1999 ; Champtiaux et al.,
2002 ). For microdialysis experiments, we used 6-/- and
6+/+ littermates obtained by heterozygous matings (N4 backcross
generation with C57Bl/6J mice; Charles River, Wilmington, MA). For other
experiments, Ko and matching wild-type (Wt) control colonies were bred
separately. For each colony, at least five couples of homozygous breeders were
produced by mating heterozygous mice, obtained after 1 ( 6), 7
( 4), or 12 ( 2) backcrosses with C57Bl/6J mice.
Reagents. Unless specified, all chemical reagents were purchased
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). -Conotoxin MII ( CtxMII) was
synthesized as described previously
(Cartier et al., 1996 ).
Antibody production. Polyclonal antibodies (Abs) directed against
nAChR subunits were produced in rabbit and affinity purified as described
previously (Vailati et al.,
1999 ). Peptides sequence was derived from the C-terminal (COOH) or
intracytoplasmic loop (Cyt) regions of the rat (R) or human (H) subunit
sequence: 2(H-Cyt),
CHPLRLKLSPSYHWLESNVDAEEREV;
3(H-Cyt),
TRPTSNEGNAQKPRPLYGAELSNLNC;
4(H-Cyt),
SPSDQLPPQQPLEAEKASPHPSPGP;
4(R-COOH), cgPPWLAGMI; 5(R-Cyt),
DRYFTQREEAESGAGPKSRNTLEAALDC; 6(R-Cyt),
GVKDPKTHTKRPAKVKFTHRKEPKLLKEC;
2(H-Cyt),
RQREREGAGALFFREAPGADSC;
3(R-COOH), cgPALKMWIHRFH; 4(R-Cyt),
VSSHTAGLPRDARLRSSGRFREDLQEALEGc. Lowercase letters are amino acids
introduced to enable coupling to carrier protein. Underlined letters are
mismatches with the mouse sequence.
Ab specificity and IPP efficiency was checked on tissue extracts from Wt
and Ko mice as well as on affinity-purified nAChR subtypes (all the values
reported below are the mean ± SEM of three independent determinations).
Anti- 4, - 5, - 6, and - 2 Abs immunoprecipitated,
respectively, 82 ± 7%, 10 ± 1%, 30 ± 2%, and 92 ±
5% of 3H-Epibatidine (Epi)-labeled nAChRs in whole brain ( 4,
5, 2) or striatal ( 6) extracts from Wt mice compared with
0, 0, 1.9 ± 0.4%, and 1.6 ± 0.8% in the corresponding extracts
from 4, 5, 6 and 2 Ko controls. Anti- 5 and
- 6 Abs immunoprecipitated, respectively, 75 ± 7% of
5* nAChRs (purified from cortex) and 75 ± 3% of
6* nAChRs (purified from retina). Anti- 3 and - 4
Abs immunoprecipitated, respectively, 2.3 ± 0.1% and 2.5 ± 1% of
3H-Epi binding sites in striatal extracts compared with 74 ±
3% and 68 ± 2% in superior cervical ganglion (known to express 3
and 4 mRNA) extracts. Anti- 3 Abs immunoprecipitated 13 ± 3%
and 8 ± 3% of 3H-Epi binding sites in superior colliculus
and striatal extracts, respectively (projecting regions from retina and
SN/VTA, where 3 mRNA is expressed), but 0% of 3H-Epi
binding sites in superior cervical ganglion extracts, where 3 mRNA is
not detected.
IPPs. Extract preparation and subsequent IPP were performed as
described (Vailati et al.,
1999 ). Briefly, the dissected tissue was homogenized in 50
mM Na phosphate, pH 7.4, 1 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA,
2 mM EGTA, and 2 mM PMSF using a potter homogenizer and
centrifuged (1 hr; 60,000 x g). The pellet was collected;
homogenized in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7, 150 mM NaCl, 5
mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM
CaCl2, and 2 mM PMSF; centrifuged (1 hr; 40,000 x
g); and then resuspended in the same buffer containing a mixture of
20 µg/ml of the leupeptin, bestatin, pepstatin A, and aprotinin protease
inhibitors. Membranes were solubilized by adding 2% Triton X-100 (2 hr,
4°C). After centrifugation (1.5 hr; 60,000 x g) to remove
nonsolubilized material, extracts were preincubated with 2 µM
-bungarotoxin ( Bgtx), labeled with 2 nM
3H-Epi (50-66Ci/mmole; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), and
incubated (overnight, 0°C) with a saturating concentration (20-30 µg)
of each subunit-specific Ab or preimmune IgG (to measure nonspecific IPP). IPP
was induced by adding beads bound with goat anti-rabbit IgG.
To determine the subunit composition of 6* nAChRs,
affinity columns were prepared with anti- 6 Abs (1 mg/ml) bound to
CNBr-activated Sepharose4B (Amersham). Striatal extracts from 6+/+
animals (20-40 mice) were passed three times on the affinity column. The
number of 6* nAChRs in the flow-through dropped to 2.5
± 0.8% of total nAChRs. Bound receptors were eluted by competition with
the peptide (100 µM) used for 6 Ab production. IPP was
then performed as on crude striatal membrane extracts. The same procedure was
used to determine the subunit content of (non 6)* nAChRs. In
this case, the flow-through of the anti- 6 affinity column or crude
striatal extracts from 6-/- mice were loaded on an anti- 4
affinity column.
6-Hydroxydopamine lesions. Mice were anesthetized with chloral
hydrate (400 mg/kg, i.p.) and received a bilateral stereotaxic injection (4
µl/side; 4 min) of a solution containing 1x PBS, 0.02% ascorbic acid,
and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) hydrochloride (4 µg/µl) in the dorsal
striatum [Bregma coordinates (in mm): anterior, 0.4; lateral, +2.0; ventral,
3.0] using a 10 µl Hamilton syringe (26 gauge). Control animals received an
injection of 1x PBS and 0.02% ascorbic acid. Extracts from dorsal
striatum were prepared 7 d after lesion. The extent of DA denervation was
assessed by 3H-WIN35,428 (NEN, Boston, MA) binding, a ligand for DA
transporter (Zoli et al.,
2002 ).
Ligand binding on immunoimmobilized nAChRs. Subunit-specific Abs
(10 µg/ml) were bound to microwells (Maxi-Sorp; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) by
overnight incubation at 4°C. After washing to remove unbound Abs, striatal
extracts prepared from 6+/+ and 4-/- mice, or from 6-/-
mice, were added to the wells prepared with anti- 6 or anti- 2 Abs,
respectively. After overnight incubation at 4°C, the wells were washed,
and binding experiments were performed as described
(Vailati et al., 1999 ). For
saturation experiments, 125I-Epi (2200Ci/mmole; NEN) was used at
concentrations ranging from 0.005 to 2 nM. For inhibition
experiments, the immunoimmobilized receptors were incubated (30 min, room
temperature) with various concentrations of unlabeled ligands before adding
125I-Epi at the Kd concentration. Incubation
was prolonged overnight at 4°C. Nonspecific binding was measured in the
presence of 100 nM unlabeled Epi. For each ligand, data from three
to six experiments were analyzed using the LIGAND program
(Vailati et al., 1999 ).
Synaptosomes. For each experiment, the striatum from one mouse was
dissected on ice. Protocols for synaptosomes preparation, 3H-DA
loading, and superfusion buffer (SB) composition were described previously
(el-Bizri and Clarke, 1994 ).
The superfusion apparatus comprised 20 identical channels consisting of a
length of Tygon (1.14 mm inner diameter) and Teflon tubing (0.9 mm; Polylabo,
Strasbourg, France) leading to and from a polypropylene superfusion chamber.
Synaptosome samples immobilized on GFA/E glass fiber filters (Gelman Science,
Ann Arbor, MI) were perfused with SB (37°C; 0.5 ml/min). After a 15 min
washout period, samples were collected for 7 min before and 8 min after
agonist application, at 1 min intervals. Antagonists, when tested, were
present in SB throughout the experiment. Basal 3H-DA release was
calculated as a single exponential decay from the seven fractions collected
before agonist application. Peak 3H-DA release was calculated as
the maximum of (3H-DA released-baseline)/baseline from the first
three fractions collected after agonist application. For a particular
condition (mouse genotype, agonist concentration, antagonist), peak release
value was determined as the average of at least three independent triplicate
experiments. For EC50 and Hill coefficient determination, peak
release values were determined for different nicotine concentrations and
normalized to the peak release value obtained with 3 µM nicotine
(measured in parallel). Normalized dose-response curves were fitted to the
Hill equation [Release = Rmax/(1+(EC50/[Nic])
n), where Rmax is maximum release, [Nic] is
nicotine concentration, and n is the Hill coefficient] using SigmaPlot 4.16
(Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).
Electrophysiological recordings of DA neurons. Eleven to 14-d-old
mice were sacrificed by decapitation. The brain was removed rapidly and placed
in ice-cold oxygenated Krebs solution containing (in mM) 126 NaCl,
2.5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and
25 D-glucose. Coronal slices (250 µm) were obtained using a
DSK-1000 slicer (Dosaka, Kyoto, Japan) and were left at least 1 hr to recover
at room temperature. A single slice was transferred to the recording chamber
superfused with oxygenated Krebs at 35 ± 0.5°C, at a rate of 1.8
ml/min. Atropine (1 µM) was added to the Krebs solution to
inhibit muscarinic receptors. Whole-cell recordings were obtained from SNc/VTA
neurons identified using infrared videomicroscopy with Nomarksy optics. Only
presumptive projection neurons of large and medium size were targeted;
presumptive interneurons of small size were avoided. Patch pipettes were
filled with the following (in mM): 144 K-gluconate, 3 MgCl2, 0.2
EGTA, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.2, yielding a 2-4 M resistance. Recordings
were performed with an Axopatch-1C (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA)
amplifier operating under current-clamp or voltage-clamp mode, filtered at 1
kHz, acquired at 3.33 kHz, and analyzed using PClamp 8 (Axon Instruments). DA
neurons where selected according to the long duration of their action
potentials (>2.4 msec) and long after hyperpolarization
(Grace and Onn, 1989 ;
Klink et al., 2001 ). Fast
application of ACh (1 mM) was achieved by pressure-pulse delivery
(30 psi during 30 msec) to a pipette positioned at 30 µm from the
targeted cell. One pulse was delivered every 2 min. For each neuron, a control
response was determined as the average of three consecutive responses to ACh
application. Only neurons exhibiting a stable response were then bath perfused
with the nicotinic antagonists CtxMII (100 nM) and/or
methyllycaconitine (MLA; 1 nM). ACh pulses were administered 6, 8,
and 10 min after the onset of antagonist perfusion. The antagonized response
is the mean of these three responses. As observed previously in rat DA neurons
(Klink et al., 2001 ), the
effect of these nicotinic antagonists on Ach-induced currents recorded from
SNc or VTA neurons were similar. Data collected from both cell types were
pooled in the analysis.
In vivo microdialysis in freely moving mice. Microdialysis and DA
measurements were adapted from
(Malagié et al., 2001 ).
Mice (9-12 weeks of age; 25-30 gm) were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400
mg/kg, i.p.), and a concentric microdialysis probe (cuprophan fibers; outer
diameter, 0.30 mm; active length, 2.0 mm) was implanted into the ventral
striatum [Bregma coordinates (in mm): anterior, 0; lateral, +2.0; ventral,
4.5). This site was chosen after testing several rostrocaudal levels of the
ventral striatum because it gave the highest and most consistent DA responses
to a systemic nicotine injection in C57Bl/6J mice. After a 20 hr surgery
recovery period, the probe was perfused continuously (1.3 µl/min) with
artificial CSF (Malagié et al.,
2001 ). DA content of dialysate samples collected every 15 min was
measured using a HPLC analytical method
(Malagié et al., 2001 ).
The limit of sensitivity for DA was 0.5 fmol per sample (signal-to-noise
ratio = 2). Basal DA values were measured on the five to eight fractions
collected before intraperitoneal nicotine injection (0, 0.5, or 1.0 mg/kg in
0.9% NaCl; 10 µl/g). Responses to drug administration were determined over
a 120 min period. At the end of the experiment, the placement of the
microdialysis probes was verified histologically.
 |
Results
|
|---|
4, 6, and 2 are the most abundant nAChR subunits
in mice striatum
To determine the subunit composition of heteromeric nAChRs in DA terminal
fields, we performed IPP on mouse striatal membrane extracts. For each
subunit, we raised a polyclonal Ab against a peptide chosen to minimize
intersubunit cross-reactivity. Ab specificity and IPP efficiency were tested
on tissue extracts from Wt and 4, 5, 6, and 2 Ko
mice (see Materials and Methods). Before IPP, incubation of the solubilized
extracts with 2 nM 3H-Epi, a highly specific nicotinic ligand,
ensured that only nAChRs were quantified by radioactive counting of the
immunoprecipitated material. A preincubation step with 2 µM
unlabeled Bgtx prevented the binding of 3H-Epi to homomeric
7 nAChRs.
In 6+/+ mice (Fig.
1A), the vast majority (97%) of striatal Epi binding
sites could be immunoprecipitated using the anti- 2 Ab. High levels of
4* (67%) and 6* (30%) nAChRs were also
detected. In contrast, the contribution of 2 (3%), 3 (2%), and
4 (2%) subunits to striatal Epi binding sites was minimal. Finally, a
small fraction of heteromeric nAChRs contained the structural subunits
5 (12%) and 3 (8%). Similar results have been obtained using
striatal extracts from 4+/+ mice
(Fig. 1B) and from rat
(Zoli et al., 2002 ).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Subunit composition of striatal nAChRs. A, B, Solubilized striatal
membrane extracts from 6-/-, 4-/-, 6+/+, and 4+/+
mice, preincubated with 2 nM 3H-Epi, were
immunoprecipitated with subunit-specific Abs. Results are expressed in
femtomoles of immunoprecipitated 3H-Epi/mg of protein (n =
3-5; *p < 0.05 compared with matching Wt control;
Student's t test). Total 3H-Epi and
125I- BgtX binding to striatal extracts is indicated.
C, IPP experiments were conducted on extracts from the dorsal
striatum of 6+/+ mice after 6-OHDA lesions. Each value is the mean of
two to three independent determinations on different groups of animals
(*p < 0.05 compared with saline-lesioned groups;
Student's t test). The extent of DA denervation was assessed by
3H-WIN35,428 binding, a ligand for DA transporter (204 ± 26
and 41 ± 3 fmol/mg protein in the saline- and 6-OHDA-lesioned groups,
respectively). D, 6* and 4*
nAChRs were purified from 6+/+ striatal extracts using an anti- 6
and an anti- 4 affinity column. (non 6) 4* nAChRs
were purified on an anti- 4 affinity column using striatal extracts from
6-/- mice or from 6+/+ mice after 6 depletion. The
subunit content of purified nAChRs was determined by IPP. The amount of
3H-Epi immunoprecipitated is expressed as percentage of total
3H-Epi bound to the purified material before IPP (n =
3).
|
|
Because only a portion of striatal nAChRs are located on DA terminals
(Clarke and Pert, 1985 ), we
performed a selective denervation of DA terminals using 6-OHDA. In DA
denervated dorsal striatum of 6+/+ mice
(Fig. 1C), we observed
a 90% reduction of 6* and 3* nAChRs. The
number of 4* and 2* nAChRs was only reduced
by 50%, whereas the number of 125I- Bgtx binding
sites was not affected by the lesion. These results indicate that striatal
6* and 3* nAChRs are located on DA
terminals (exclusively), whereas 7* nAChRs are not. Striatal
4* and 2* nAChRs are both expressed on DA
terminals and non-DA cells or terminals.
IPP experiments were also conducted in 4-/- and 6-/- animals
to check for the consequences of single subunit gene inactivation on the
composition of striatal nAChRs. As reported previously
(Champtiaux et al., 2002 ), we
could not detect any significant decrease in total Epi binding in striatal
extracts from 6-/- compared with 6+/+ mice (83.3 ± 5.1
and 89.4 ± 4.6 fmol/mg of protein, respectively). This finding can be
explained by the upregulation of 4* nAChRs seen in
6-/- animals (Fig.
1A). In contrast, in 4-/- animals, the total
number of Epi binding sites was decreased by 86%. Among the remaining Epi
binding sites, 68% contained the 6 subunit and 81% the 2 subunit
(Fig. 1B).
Interestingly, in 4-/- animals, the number of 6*
nAChRs was reduced by 57% compared with 4+/+ mice, suggesting the
existence of 4 6* nAChRs in Wt mice.
Subunit composition of purified nAChRs. Existence of
4 6 2* oligomers.
To test this hypothesis, we looked at the subunit composition of
6* nAChRs purified from 6+/+ striatal extracts on an
affinity column bearing anti- 6 antibody. The proportion of
6* nAChRs in the flow-through of the affinity column dropped
to 2.5 ± 0.8% of total nAChRs, demonstrating the efficiency of the
depletion. Purified nAChRs were then eluted from the column by an excess of
the 6 peptide, and their subunit content was determined by IPP. Using
this procedure, we found that a significant fraction of 6*
nAChRs also contain the 4 (35%) and/or the 3 (13%) subunits
(Fig. 1D). The
specificity of the purification was confirmed on 6-/- striatal extracts
(yielding only 2% of the number of Epi binding sites obtained using a similar
amount of 6+/+ striatal tissue).
A similar procedure, using an anti- 4 affinity column, allowed us to
purify 4* nAChRs from 6+/+ striatal extracts and
confirmed the presence of the 6 subunit in 14% of 4*
purified nAChRs. The structural subunits 5 and 3 were also found
in 9% and 11% of 4-purified receptors, respectively.
At last, purification of 4* nAChRs from 6+/+
striatal extracts after 6 depletion or from 6-/- striatal
extracts revealed that (non 6) 4* nAChRs were
essentially composed of the 4 and 2 subunits [most likely
( 4)2( 2)3].
Pharmacological characterization of immunoimmobilized receptors.
Having determined the composition of the major nAChR subtypes expressed in
the mouse striatum, we studied their pharmacology after immunoimmobilization
using anti- 6 and anti- 2 Abs. 2-Immunoimmobilized nAChRs
from 6-/- animals (mainly 4 2, according to our IPP
experiments and, thus, referred to as " 4 2" nAChRs for
clarity), 6-immunoimmobilized nAChRs from 4-/- animals (mainly
6 2, referred to as " 6 2"), and
6-immunoimmobilized nAChRs from 6+/+ animals (containing a mix
of 6 2 and 4 6 2 nAChRs) were studied. Affinity
for 125I-Epi was determined by saturation experiments, whereas
displacement of 125I-Epi binding to immunoimmobilized receptors was
used to determine Ki values for nicotinic
agonists(cytisine, Ach, and nicotine) or antagonists (dtubocurarine,
dihydro- -erythroidine, CtxMII, MLA)
(Fig. 2,
Table 1).
For the agonists, cytisine exhibited a higher affinity for 4 2
nAChRs than for 6 2 nAChRs. For the antagonists, CtxMII and
MLA both showed a high affinity for 6 2 nAChRs (1.07 nM and 231
nM, respectively) and a low affinity for 4 2 nAChRs (>10
µM and 14.3 µM, respectively). In
6-immunoimmobilized nAChRs from 6+/+ mice, 125I-Epi
displacement by CtxMII and MLA was biphasic (p < 0.01
compared with a monophasic model), suggesting the existence of a heterogenous
population of sites. The estimated proportion of low-affinity sites was 28
± 4% for CtxMII and 40 ± 11% for MLA. For both ligands,
the estimated Ki value for the low- and high-affinity
binding sites were in good agreement with those obtained on 4 2
and 6 2 receptors, respectively
(Table 1)
(Mogg et al., 2002 ). Our
interpretation of these results is that, in a fraction of 6*
nAChRs, one of the two Epi binding sites (located at the interface between the
and subunits) is made up of an 4 2 interface with
low affinity for CtxMII and MLA. Control experiments on 6-/-
animals rule out the possibility of a nonselective immunoimmobilization of
(non 6)* nAChRs by our anti- 6 Ab (data not shown).
These findings correlate well with IPP results showing that
4 6 2* nAChRs are present in the striatum of Wt
mice.
In striatal synaptosomes, 6 2* and
4(non 6) 2* nAChRs each contribute 50% of the
effect of nicotine on DA release
The three main heteromeric nAChR subtypes found in striatum are
4 2, 6 2, and 4 6 2. However,
whereas 6* nAChRs are mainly located on DA terminals, a
significant proportion of striatal 4 2* nAChRs is not
present on DA terminals (Fig.
1C). To more directly evaluate the relative contributions
of 4* and 6* nAChRs to DA function at the
terminal level, we studied nicotine-stimulated DA release in striatal
synaptosomes.
Synaptosomes loaded with 3H-DA and immobilized on glass fiber
filters were perfused with a saline buffer (unless specified, synaptosomes
were obtained from adult mice whole striatum). When applied on synaptosomal
preparations from 4+/+ or 6+/+ mice, nicotine (3
µM for maximal effect) stimulated DA release by 100% above
baseline level (peak value) (Fig.
3A). This effect was entirely blocked by mecamylamine
(mean inhibition, 94 ± 3%; n = 6) or by removing
Ca2+ from perfusion buffer (mean inhibition, 92 ± 4%;
n = 3). In addition, a mix of NMDA (AP-5, 100 µM) and
non-NMDA (CNQX, 10 µM) ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists
did not alter DA response to nicotine (104 ± 5% of control response
determined in parallel using an antagonist-free buffer; n = 4),
ruling out the possibility of an indirect action of nicotine via stimulation
of glutamate release. The effect of 3 µM nicotine on DA release
was reduced by half in both 4-/- and 6-/- animals (compared with
4+/+ and 6+/+ animals, respectively) and completely abolished in
4-/- 6-/- or 2-/- animals
(Fig. 3A). The effect
of KCl (23 mM) application on DA release was not altered by inactivation of
any nAChR subunit (data not shown). These results demonstrate that all nAChRs
mediating the effects of nicotine on synaptosomal DA release contain the
2 subunit in association with either 4or 6 or both
subunits. As will be detailed in Discussion, a specific contribution of
4 6 2* nAChRs to the effect of nicotine in Wt
mice is suggested by the fact that nicotine potency is decreased by eightfold
as a consequence of 4 inactivation
(Fig. 3C) but is
unaffected by gene targeting of the 6 subunit
(Fig. 3B).
Because CtxMII appears highly selective for
6 2* nAChRs in binding experiments
(Table 1), we examined the
effect of this toxin on nicotine-elicited DA release to determine the relative
contribution of 6 2* and
(non 6) 4 2* nAChRs. As described previously
(Kulak et al., 1997 ;
Kaiser et al., 1998 ;
Sharples et al., 2000 ),
CtxMII (100 nM) reduced the effect of 3 µM nicotine on DA
release by 50% in 4+/+ or 6+/+ mice whole striatum
(Fig. 3A). The
inhibitory effect of CtxMII was identical on synaptosomal preparations
from the dorsal or ventral part of the striatum (mean inhibition: 49 ±
5% and 47 ± 7%, respectively; n = 3). Finally, CtxMII
completely blocked the effect of nicotine in 4-/- animals but had no
inhibitory effect in 6-/- mice. Taken together, these data demonstrate
that the CtxMII-sensitive fraction of nicotine-induced DA release is
mediated by 6* nAChRs and, thus, that 6*
nAChRs and 4(non 6)* nAChRs each contribute to 50% of
the effect of nicotine in Wt mice striatum, regardless of the anatomical
region examined (dorsal or ventral part).
To more easily compare results obtained in synaptosomal experiments and
those derived from the study of ACh-induced currents in DA neurons (see
below), we also studied ACh-elicited DA release in striatal synaptosomes from
young (postnatal days 11-14) 6+/+ animals. In these conditions, in the
presence of atropine (1 µM), CtxMII blocked 53 ±
4% of peak DA release elicited by ACh (10 µM for maximal effect)
application (n = 4).
Slow ACh-elicited currents in SNc/VTA DA neurons are mediated by
4 2* and 6 2* nAChRs
To expand the results on DA terminals to somato-dendritic nAChRs, we
studied the electrophysiological response of DA neurons to ACh application. DA
neurons in the SNc and VTA were identified according to their characteristic
electrophysiological signature (see Materials and Methods). In Wt mice, in the
presence of atropine to block muscarinic currents, fast ACh (1 mM) application
elicited inward currents (Fig.
4) entirely blocked by mecamylamine (10 µM;
n = 2; data not shown). Previous experiments on 7-/- and
2-/- animals have demonstrated that both 7 homomeric and 2
heteromeric nAChRs differentially contribute to this response
(Klink et al., 2001 ). Whereas
7-mediated currents display fast activation and decay kinetics,
2* nAChRs-mediated currents exhibit a slow activation and a
long duration. The partners of the 2 subunit were investigated
using 4-/-, 6-/-, and 4-/- 6-/- mice
(Table 2,
Fig. 4).
The amplitude of ACh-elicited response is markedly decreased in 4-/-
animals. Residual currents in 4-/- animals display faster activation
kinetics than in Wt mice, but still exhibit a slow decay. This current
waveform was never seen in 2-/- mice, suggesting that
4 2* nAChRs are not the only 2* nAChRs
subtype contributing to the slow ACh-elicited current in Wt mice. To
investigate whether 6 2* nAChRs could be involved, we
studied the effect of CtxMII (100 nM). In Wt mice, this toxin inhibited
only a small fraction of ACh-gated currents (mean inhibition, 19 ± 3%;
n = 15; p < 0.001; paired Student's t test), in
agreement with the observation of a small (20%), non-statistically significant
decrease of mean current amplitude in 6-/- animals compared to their Wt
controls. The specificity of CtxMII for 6* nAChRs was
checked in 6-/- mice where it had no significant effect on ACh-elicited
currents (mean inhibition, 6 ± 5%; n = 7). Two lines of
evidence indicate that the modest inhibitory effect of CtxMII seen in
Wt mice is not because of partial efficacy or inadequate concentration of the
antagonist. First, in 4-/- animals, CtxMII inhibited 64% of the
ACh-elicited response. Second, the residual CtxMII-resistant current
exhibited all the kinetic (Table
2) and pharmacological characteristics (complete inhibition by 1
nM MLA; n = 4) of 7* homomeric nAChRs. In
4-/- 6-/- animals in the absence of CtxMII, the
7* homomeric current was the only residual response observed
(n = 14) and was entirely blocked by MLA (n = 3).
Altogether, these results demonstrate that both 4 and 6
subunits, in association with the 2 subunit, form functional nAChRs that
mediate the slow current component of ACh-elicited response in DA neurons from
Wt animals.
In vivo, 6* nAChRs do not contribute to
the effect of systemic nicotine injections on DA release
As mentioned previously, the reinforcing properties of nicotine have been
attributed to its ability to increase accumbal DA levels (for review, see
Di Chiara, 2000 ). To examine
the involvement of 6* nAChRs in this effect, we studied the
consequences of systemic nicotine injection on DA levels in the ventral
striatum of 6-/- and 6+/+ mice. DA levels were monitored by
in vivo microdialysis in freely moving mice. Basal extracellular DA
levels in the ventral striatum did not differ between the two genotypes [12.6
± 0.6 and 13.4 ± 0.5 fmol/20 µl of dialysate in 6+/+
(n = 11) and 6-/- animals (n = 10), respectively].
After nicotine (0.5 or 1 mg/kg; free base), but not after saline injection, an
increase in striatal DA levels was observed in 6+/+ and 6-/-
animals (Fig. 5A-C).
When plotting DA outflow (in percentage of basal levels) as a function of
time, one can measure the area under the curve (AUC), which is an estimate of
DA release over the 120 min post-treatment period
(Fig. 5D). A two-way
ANOVA on AUC values was performed, with drug treatment (saline, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg
nicotine) and mouse genotype ( 6+/+ or 6-/-)as main factors. This
statistical analysis revealed a significant treatment factor
(F(2,30) = 8.35; p < 0.001), no significant
genotype factor (F(1,30) = 0.016; p = 0.872), and
no significant genotype-treatment interaction (F(2,30) =
0.311; p = 0.73).
These results demonstrate that in the range of doses tested, the effect of
systemic nicotine injections on DA release in the ventral striatum is not
mediated by 6* nAChRs. However, in view of the upregulation
of 4* Epi binding sites in the striatum of 6-/- mice,
one could argue that the lack of influence of the 6 mutation on
nicotine-induced DA release is because of functional compensation. Although we
cannot rule out this hypothesis, such compensation was not seen in efflux
experiments. Indeed, in striatal synaptosomes from 6-/- mice, the
effect of nicotine on DA release was reduced by 50% compared with 6+/+
mice, a decrease closely corresponding to the CtxMII-sensitive fraction
of nicotine effect in Wt mice (Fig.
3A).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
In this article, we have established that the main heteromeric nAChR
subtypes expressed by DA neurons contain the 4 and/or the 6
subunits in association with the 2 subunit. IPP experiments on striatal
extracts demonstrate that the most abundant subunits accounting for the
majority of high-affinity 3H-Epi binding sites in DA terminal
fields are the 4, 6, and 2 subunits. Studying
nicotine-elicited DA release in striatal synaptosomes or recording
ACh-elicited currents on DA neurons further establishes the existence of two
types of functional heteromeric nAChRs in DA neurons. In both types of
experiments, the response to nicotinic agonists includes an
CtxMII-sensitive fraction, mediated by 6 2*
nAChRs and an CtxMII-resistant fraction attributed to
4(non 6) 2* nAChRs. The partial inhibitory effect
of CtxMII on nicotine-induced DA release had already been observed but
was initially attributed to the presence of 3 2* nAChRs
on DA terminals (Kulak et al.,
1997 ; Kaiser et al.,
1998 ; Sharples et al.,
2000 ). Indeed, in Xenopus oocytes, CtxMII was
reported as selective for 3 2* nAChRs
(Cartier et al., 1996 ). We
found little evidence for the presence of 3* nAChRs in the
striatum, confirming previous in situ hybridization results showing a
very low concentration of 3 mRNA in DA neurons
(Le Novère et al.,
1996 ). IPP experiments showed that at the terminal level only 2%
of 3H-Epi binding sites contain the 3 subunit. Moreover, in
6-/- animals, the inhibitory effect of CtxMII on
nicotine-induced DA release or on ACh-elicited currents is entirely abolished.
These results are in good agreement with the recent observations that
high-affinity 125I- CtxMII binding sites are preserved in the
striatum of 3-/- animals (Whiteaker
et al., 2002 ) but completely disappear in 6-/- animals
(Champtiaux et al., 2002 ).
Ultimately, experiments on 4-/- 6-/- double mutant mice establish
that the 4 and 6 subunits are necessary constituents of all
functional heteromeric nAChRs in DA neurons.
In addition to the simple 6 2 and 4 2 combinations,
our experiments reveal the existence of an 4 6 2 subtype in
DA neurons. This was initially suggested by the decrease of
6* Epi binding sites in the striatum of 4-/- animals
(Fig. 1B) and was
further confirmed by IPP performed on purified 6* nAChRs.
With this approach, we found that 35% of 6* nAChRs also
contain the 4 subunit. We also found that 28% of 125I-Epi
binding sites on 6 immunoimmobilized receptors (from Wt animals) were
resistant to CtxMII displacement, most likely reflecting the existence
of an 4 2 interface in 6* nAChRs. Functionally,
4 6 2* nAChRs were difficult to distinguish from
6 2* nAChRs, because CtxMII is likely to block
both subtypes. Nonetheless, a clue as to the role of
4 6 2* nAChRs is given by the study of DA release
in synaptosomes. In this experiment, we found that the potency of nicotine is
lower on 6 2* nAChRs, the only remaining nAChR subtype
in the striatum of 4-/- mice, than on 4 2*
nAChRs (Fig. 3, compare
EC50 values in 4-/- and 6-/- animals). Accordingly,
we found an eightfold increase in the EC50 value in 4-/-
animals compared with 4+/+ mice, revealing low potency
6 2* nAChRs. However, we did not observe the expected
corresponding decrease in the EC50 value in 6-/- mice. Such
a decrease would have been expected if 6 2* and
4 2* nAChRs each contributed to 50% of nicotine effect
in Wt mice. These findings, in contrast, are compatible with a preponderant
role of 4 6 2* nAChRs in nicotine-mediated DA
release in Wt mice because 4 6 2* and
4 2* nAChRs were shown to have a similar affinity for
nicotine when expressed in Xenopus oocytes
(Kuryatov et al., 2000 ).
According to this hypothesis, the contribution of 6 2 nAChRs to
nicotine-induced DA release, minimal in Wt mice, is only revealed in
4-/- mice. Altogether, these results demonstrate the existence of
4 6 2* nAChRs in DA neurons and suggest a
preponderant role of this subtype in mediating the CtxMII-sensitive
fraction of nicotine-elicited DA release.
Whereas the main heteromeric nAChRs subtypes identified in mouse DA neurons
are constituted of the 4 2, 6 2, and
4 6 2 combinations, a contribution of the structural
subunits 3 and 5 was also revealed. Interestingly, the 5
subunit was found preferentially associated with 4* nAChRs
( 5 was present in 9% of purified 4* nAChRs compared
with only 1% of 6* nAChRs;
Fig. 1D), whereas the
3 subunit was detected at similar levels in both 6*
and 4* nAChRs (11% of purified 4* and 13%
of purified 6* nAChRs also contained 3). These results
are in partial agreement with previous observations made in the rat striatum
showing a preferential association of the 5 and 3 subunits with
4* and 6* nAChRs, respectively
(Zoli et al., 2002 ).
A main issue arising from the evidence of the diversity of nAChRs in DA
neurons is whether they are differentially expressed in different parts of DA
pathways. So far, most studies have only revealed subtle differences in the
subunit composition or pharmacology of nAChRs expressed in the mesolimbic or
nigrostriatal DA pathways (Klink et al.,
2001 ; Grady et al.,
2002 ; Wooltorton et al.,
2003 ). In the present study, CtxMII was shown to inhibit
nicotine-induced DA release to the same extent in synaptosomal preparations
from the dorsal and ventral parts of the striatum, suggesting a similar
proportion of 6* versus 4(non 6)*
nAChRs in both regions. Our data, however, reveal a heterogeneity in the
nature of nAChRs mediating nicotinic agonists effects on DA neuron soma or
terminals. Whereas CtxMII can block 50% of the effect of nicotine on DA
release in striatal synaptosomes, it has only a modest effect (<20%
inhibition) on ACh-elicited currents in SN/VTA DA cell bodies. Moreover,
ligand binding autoradiography experiments on mouse brain sections demonstrate
that the ratio of 125I- CtxMII binding sites versus total
3H-Epi binding sites, taken as an estimate of the proportion of
6* nAChRs within the total nAChR population, is more than
three times higher in the Nac than in the VTA (M. Zoli, L. Marubio, N.
Champtiaux, and J. P. Changeux, unpublished observations). Finally, IPP
experiments show that 6* nAChRs account for 30% of
3H-Epi binding sites in the striatum
(Fig. 1A,B) but only
5% in SN/VTA (data not shown). Thus, 6* nAChRs appear to be
preferentially addressed to DA nerve terminal compartment. In contrast,
7* nAChRs appear to be exclusively present on DA neuronal
cell bodies. Indeed, although 7-mediated nicotinic currents could be
detected at the somatic level, the lack of residual effect of nicotine on DA
release in striatal synaptosomes from 4-/- 6-/- or 2-/-
mice, as well as the lack of effect of 6-OHDA lesions on
125I- Bgtx binding to striatal extracts, demonstrate the
absence of 7* nAChRs on DA terminals
(Kaiser and Wonnacott,
2000 ).
The mechanisms responsible for the differential targeting of the
6* and 7* nAChRs are unknown, but the
paucity of 6* nAChRs on DA neuron soma has important
physiological implications. Indeed, it is known that activation of nAChRs
located in the VTA, but not in the Nac, is critical for mediating DA release
in the ventral striatum induced by systemic nicotine injections and
maintaining nicotine self-administration
(Corrigall et al., 1994 ;
Nisell et al., 1994 ). In
agreement with these observations, whereas the 6 subunit gene
inactivation did not modify the effect of systemic nicotine on DA release in
the ventral striatum, in 4-/- animals, systemic nicotine injections
(0.5 and 1 mg/kg) failed to stimulate striatal DA outflow
(Marubio et al., 2003 ). Thus,
4* rather than 6* nAChRs, presumably
located in the VTA, are critical for nicotine reinforcement. In contrast, both
4* and 6* nAChRs are likely to contribute
to the endogenous cholinergic modulation of DA release at the terminal level.
In vitro, it was recently demonstrated that action
potential-dependent DA release is under control of 2* nAChRs
located on DA terminals and tonically activated by endogenous ACh
(Zhou et al., 2001 ). The
disruption of this control in 2-/- animals, leading to 80% decrease in
electrically-evoked DA release, might explain the reduced sensitivity to the
reinforcing effects of cocaine seen in 2-/- mice
(Zachariou et al., 2001 ). In
addition, the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-induced
stereotypes can be blocked by intrastriatal infusions of nicotinic antagonists
(Karler et al., 1996 ). By
tonically controlling DA release in DA terminal fields, endogenous activation
of terminal 4 2* and 6 2* nAChRs
is, thus, likely to modulate important aspects of natural and artificial
reinforcement.
In summary (Fig. 6), in
mouse DA neurons, heteromeric nAChRs contain the 2 subunit associated
with the 4 and/or the 6 subunits. On DA terminals,
6 2* and (non 6) 4 2*
nAChRs each contribute to 50% of nicotine effect on synaptosomal DA release.
In contrast, (non 6) 4 2* nAChRs mediate most of
the slow ACh-elicited currents in the somato-dendritic compartment. Other
evidence suggests that although 6* nAChRs are mainly located
on DA nerve terminals, 7* nAChRs are only present on DA
neuronal soma. Whereas a critical contribution of somato-dendritic
4 2* nAChRs to nicotine reinforcement is likely, the
physiological role of 4 2* and
6 2* nAChRs expressed on striatal DA terminals remains
to be investigated further.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received March 31, 2003;
revised June 24, 2003;
accepted July 7, 2003.
This work was supported by the Collège de France, the Association
pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, the Association Française contre les
Myopathies, European Economic Community contracts 097038 and 097038, and
European Community (EC) project HPRNCT2002OO258. F.C. is supported by grants
from the Italian Ministero dell'Istruziona, l'Universita e la Ricerca
(2002052378), the Progetto Strategico Neuroscienze, the Italian Ministry of
Health (ICS 030.3/RA 0048), and EC contract HPRN-CT-2002-00258. J.M.M. is
supported by National Institutes of Health Grants MH53631 and GM48677. We
thank Drs. M. Zoli, L. M. Marubio, and N. Mechawar for critical reading of
this manuscript and Drs. M. De Biasi, A. L. Beaudet, and A. Orr-Urtreger for
providing 5-/- mice.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Jean-Pierre Changeux, Laboratoire
de Neurobiologie Moléculaire, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux,
75015 Paris, France. E-mail:
changeux{at}pasteur.fr.
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience
0270-6474/03/237820-10$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Berridge KC, Robinson TE (1998) What is the role of
dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Brain Res Rev 28:
309-369.[Medline]
Cartier GE, Yoshikami D, Gray WR, Luo S, Olivera BM, McIntosh JM
(1996) A new -conotoxin which targets 3 2
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Biol Chem
271: 7522-7528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Champtiaux N, Han ZY, Bessis A, Rossi FM, Zoli M, Marubio L,
McIntosh JM, Changeux JP (2002) Distribution and pharmacology of
6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors analyzed with mutant
mice. J Neurosci 22:
1208-1217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Charpantier E, Barneoud P, Moser P, Besnard F, Sgard F
(1998) Nicotinic acetylcholine subunit mRNA expression in
dopaminergic neurons of the rat substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area.
NeuroReport 9:
3097-3101.[Web of Science][Medline]
Clarke PB, Pert A (1985) Autoradiographic evidence for
nicotine receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons.
Brain Res 348:
355-358.[Web of Science][Medline]
Corrigall WA, Coen KM, Adamson KL (1994)
Self-administered nicotine activates the mesolimbic dopamine system through
the ventral tegmental area. Brain Res
653: 278-284.[Web of Science][Medline]
Corrigall WA, Coen KM, Zhang J, Adamson KL (2001) GABA
mechanisms in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus influence particular
aspects of nicotine self-administration selectively in the rat.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158:
190-197.[Medline]
Di Chiara G (2000) Role of dopamine in the behavioural
actions of nicotine related to addiction. Eur J Pharmacol
393: 295-314.[Web of Science][Medline]
Di Chiara G, Imperato A (1988) Drugs abused by humans
preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic
system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
85: 5274-5278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
el-Bizri H, Clarke PB (1994) Blockade of nicotinic
receptor-mediated release of dopamine from striatal synaptosomes by
chlorisondamine and other nicotinic antagonists administered in vitro.
Br J Pharmacol 111:
406-413.[Web of Science][Medline]
Gerdeman GL, Partridge JG, Lupica CR, Lovinger DM
(2003) It could be habit forming: drugs of abuse and striatal
synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci 26:
184-192.[Web of Science][Medline]
Grace AA, Onn SP (1989) Morphology and
electrophysiological properties of immunocytochemically identified rat
dopamine neurons recorded in vitro. J Neurosci
9: 3463-3481.[Abstract]
Grady SR, Meinerz NM, Cao J, Reynolds AM, Picciotto MR, Changeux
JP, McIntosh JM, Marks MJ, Collins AC (2001) Nicotinic agonists
stimulate acetylcholine release from mouse interpeduncular nucleus: a function
mediated by a different nAChR than dopamine release from striatum. J
Neurochem 76:
258-268.[Web of Science][Medline]
Grady SR, Murphy KL, Cao J, Marks MJ, McIntosh JM, Collins AC
(2002) Characterization of nicotinic agonist-induced
[(3)H]dopamine release from synaptosomes prepared from four mouse brain
regions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301:
651-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Grenhoff J, Aston-Jones G, Svensson TH (1986)
Nicotinic effects on the firing pattern of midbrain dopamine neurons.
Acta Physiol Scand 128:
351-358.[Web of Science][Medline]
Groot-Kormelink PJ, Luyten WH, Colquhoun D, Sivilotti LG
(1998) A reporter mutation approach shows incorporation of the
"orphan" subunit beta3 into a functional nicotinic receptor.
J Biol Chem 273:
15317-15320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kaiser S, Wonnacott S (2000)
-Bungarotoxin-sensitive nicotinic receptors indirectly modulate
[(3)H]dopamine release in rat striatal slices via glutamate release.
Mol Pharmacol 58:
312-318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kaiser SA, Soliakov L, Harvey SC, Luetje CW, Wonnacott S
(1998) Differential inhibition by -conotoxin-MII of the
nicotinic stimulation of [3H]dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes
and slices. J Neurochem 70:
1069-1076.[Web of Science][Medline]
Karler R, Calder LD, Bedingfield JB (1996) A novel
nicotinic-cholinergic role in behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-induced
stereotypy in mice. Brain Res 725:
192-198.[Medline]
Kita T, Okamoto M, Nakashima T (1992) Nicotine-induced
sensitization to ambulatory stimulant effect produced by daily administration
into the ventral tegmental area and the nucleus accumbens in rats. Life
Sci 50:
583-590.[Web of Science][Medline]
Klink R, de Kerchove d'Exaerde A, Zoli M, Changeux JP
(2001) Molecular and physiological diversity of nicotinic
acetylcholine receptors in the midbrain dopaminergic nuclei. J
Neurosci 21:
1452-1463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kulak JM, Nguyen TA, Olivera BM, McIntosh JM (1997)
Alpha-conotoxin MII blocks nicotine-stimulated dopamine release in rat
striatal synaptosomes. J Neurosci 17:
5263-5270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kuryatov A, Olale F, Cooper J, Choi C, Lindstrom J
(2000) Human 6 AChR subtypes: subunit composition,
assembly, and pharmacological responses. Neuropharmacology
39: 2570-2590.[Web of Science][Medline]
Le Novère N, Zoli M, Changeux JP (1996)
Neuronal nicotinic receptor 6 subunit mRNA is selectively concentrated
in catecholaminergic nuclei of the rat brain. Eur J Neurosci
8: 2428-2439.[Web of Science][Medline]
Malagié I, Trillat AC, Bourin M, Jacquot C, Hen R, Gardier
AM (2001) 5-HT1B autoreceptors limit the effects of selective
serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in mouse hippocampus and frontal cortex.
J Neurochem 76:
865-871.[Medline]
Mansvelder HD, Keath JR, McGehee DS (2002) Synaptic
mechanisms underlie nicotine-induced excitability of brain reward areas.
Neuron 33:
905-919.[Web of Science][Medline]
Marubio LM, del Mar Arroyo-Jimenez M, Cordero-Erausquin M, Lena C,
Le Novere N, de Kerchove d'Exaerde A, Huchet M, Damaj MI, Changeux JP
(1999) Reduced antinociception in mice lacking neuronal nicotinic
receptor subunits. Nature 398:
805-810.[Medline]
Marubio LM, Gardier AM, Durier S, David D, Klink R, del Mar
Arroyo-Jimenez M, McIntosh JM, Rossi FM, Champtiaux N, Zoli M, Changeux JP
(2003) Effects of nicotine in the dopaminergic system of mice
lacking the 4 subunit of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Eur J Neurosci 17:
1329-1337.[Web of Science][Medline]
Mogg AJ, Whiteaker P, McIntosh JM, Marks M, Collins AC, Wonnacott S
(2002) Methyllycaconitine is a potent antagonist of
-conotoxin-MII-sensitive presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
in rat striatum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther
302: 197-204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nisell M, Nomikos GG, Svensson TH (1994) Systemic
nicotine-induced dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens is regulated by
nicotinic receptors in the ventral tegmental area. Synapse
16: 36-44.[Web of Science][Medline]
Nomikos GG, Schilstrom B, Hildebrand BE, Panagis G, Grenhoff J,
Svensson TH (2000) Role of 7 nicotinic receptors in
nicotine dependence and implications for psychiatric illness. Behav
Brain Res 113:
97-103.[Web of Science][Medline]
Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Lena C, Bessis A, Lallemand Y, LeNovere N,
Vincent P, Pich EM, Brulet P, Changeux JP (1995) Abnormal
avoidance learning in mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor
in the brain. Nature 374:
65-67.[Medline]
Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Rimondini R, Lena C, Marubio LM, Pich EM,
Fuxe K, Changeux JP (1998) Acetylcholine receptors containing the
2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine.
Nature 391:
173-177.[Medline]
Pidoplichko VI, DeBiasi M, Williams JT, Dani JA (1997)
Nicotine activates and desensitizes midbrain dopamine neurons.
Nature 390:
401-404.[Medline]
Ramirez-Latorre J, Yu CR, Qu X, Perin F, Karlin A, Role L
(1996) Functional contributions of 5 subunit to neuronal
acetylcholine receptor channels. Nature
380: 347-351.[Medline]
Role LW, Berg DK (1996) Nicotinic receptors in the
development and modulation of CNS synapses. Neuron
16: 1077-1085.[Web of Science][Medline]
Sharples CG, Kaiser S, Soliakov L, Marks MJ, Collins AC, Washburn
M, Wright E, Spencer JA, Gallagher T, Whiteaker P, Wonnacott S
(2000) UB-165: a novel nicotinic agonist with subtype selectivity
implicates the 4 2* subtype in the modulation of
dopamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes. J Neurosci
20: 2783-2791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vailati S, Hanke W, Bejan A, Barabino B, Longhi R, Balestra B,
Moretti M, Clementi F, Gotti C (1999) Functional
alpha6-containing nicotinic receptors are present in chick retina. Mol
Pharmacol 56:
11-19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wang F, Gerzanich V, Wells GB, Anand R, Peng X, Keyser K, Lindstrom
J (1996) Assembly of human neuronal nicotinic receptor 5
subunits with 3, 2, and 4 subunits. J Biol
Chem 271:
17656-17665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Whiteaker P, Peterson CG, Xu W, McIntosh JM, Paylor R, Beaudet AL,
Collins AC, Marks MJ (2002) Involvement of the alpha3 subunit in
central nicotinic binding populations. J Neurosci
22: 2522-2529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wooltorton JR, Pidoplichko VI, Broide RS, Dani JA
(2003) Differential desensitization and distribution of nicotinic
acetylcholine receptor subtypes in midbrain dopamine areas. J
Neurosci 23:
3176-3185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Zachariou V, Caldarone BJ, Weathers-Lowin A, George TP, Elsworth
JD, Roth RH, Changeux JP, Picciotto MR (2001) Nicotine receptor
inactivation decreases sensitivity to cocaine.
Neuropsychopharmacology 24:
576-589.[Medline]
Zhou FM, Liang Y, Dani JA (2001) Endogenous nicotinic
cholinergic activity regulates dopamine release in the striatum. Nat
Neurosci 4:
1224-1229.[Web of Science][Medline]
Zoli M, Moretti M, Zanardi A, McIntosh JM, Clementi F, Gotti C
(2002) Identification of the nicotinic receptor subtypes
expressed on dopaminergic terminals in the rat striatum. J
Neurosci 22:
8785-8789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. J. Jackson, J. M. McIntosh, D. H. Brunzell, S. S. Sanjakdar, and M. I. Damaj
The Role of {alpha}6-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Nicotine Reward and Withdrawal
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
November 1, 2009;
331(2):
547 - 554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Xiao, R. Nashmi, S. McKinney, H. Cai, J. M. McIntosh, and H. A. Lester
Chronic Nicotine Selectively Enhances {alpha}4{beta}2* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Nigrostriatal Dopamine Pathway
J. Neurosci.,
October 7, 2009;
29(40):
12428 - 12439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. McClure-Begley, N. M. King, A. C. Collins, J. A. Stitzel, J. M. Wehner, and C. M. Butt
Acetylcholine-Stimulated [3H]GABA Release from Mouse Brain Synaptosomes is Modulated by {alpha}4{beta}2 and {alpha}4{alpha}5{beta}2 Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes
Mol. Pharmacol.,
April 1, 2009;
75(4):
918 - 926.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Grady, M. Moretti, M. Zoli, M. J. Marks, A. Zanardi, L. Pucci, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Rodent Habenulo-Interpeduncular Pathway Expresses a Large Variety of Uncommon nAChR Subtypes, But Only the {alpha}3{beta}4 and {alpha}3{beta}3{beta}4 Subtypes Mediate Acetylcholine Release
J. Neurosci.,
February 18, 2009;
29(7):
2272 - 2282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yang, J. Hu, L. Lucero, Q. Liu, C. Zheng, X. Zhen, G. Jin, R. J. Lukas, and J. Wu
Distinctive nicotinic acetylcholine receptor functional phenotypes of rat ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons
J. Physiol.,
January 15, 2009;
587(2):
345 - 361.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. X. Albuquerque, E. F. R. Pereira, M. Alkondon, and S. W. Rogers
Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: From Structure to Function
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2009;
89(1):
73 - 120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pons, L. Fattore, G. Cossu, S. Tolu, E. Porcu, J. M. McIntosh, J. P. Changeux, U. Maskos, and W. Fratta
Crucial Role of {alpha}4 and {alpha}6 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunits from Ventral Tegmental Area in Systemic Nicotine Self-Administration
J. Neurosci.,
November 19, 2008;
28(47):
12318 - 12327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Avale, P. Faure, S. Pons, P. Robledo, T. Deltheil, D. J. David, A. M. Gardier, R. Maldonado, S. Granon, J.-P. Changeux, et al.
Interplay of {beta}2* nicotinic receptors and dopamine pathways in the control of spontaneous locomotion
PNAS,
October 14, 2008;
105(41):
15991 - 15996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuryatov, J. Onksen, and J. Lindstrom
Roles of Accessory Subunits in {alpha}4{beta}2* Nicotinic Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2008;
74(1):
132 - 143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gotti, M. Moretti, N. M. Meinerz, F. Clementi, A. Gaimarri, A. C. Collins, and M. J. Marks
Partial Deletion of the Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor {alpha}4 or {beta}2 Subunit Genes Changes the Acetylcholine Sensitivity of Receptor-Mediated 86Rb+ Efflux in Cortex and Thalamus and Alters Relative Expression of {alpha}4 and {beta}2 Subunits
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2008;
73(6):
1796 - 1807.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Parikh, K. Man, M. W. Decker, and M. Sarter
Glutamatergic Contributions to Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist-Evoked Cholinergic Transients in the Prefrontal Cortex
J. Neurosci.,
April 2, 2008;
28(14):
3769 - 3780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Walsh, A. P. Govind, R. Mastro, J. C. Hoda, D. Bertrand, Y. Vallejo, and W. N. Green
Up-regulation of Nicotinic Receptors by Nicotine Varies with Receptor Subtype
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6022 - 6032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. V. Poisik, J.-x. Shen, S. Jones, and J. L. Yakel
Functional {alpha}7-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors localize to cell bodies and proximal dendrites in the rat substantia nigra pars reticulata
J. Physiol.,
March 1, 2008;
586(5):
1365 - 1378.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. A. Campanucci, A. Krishnaswamy, and E. Cooper
Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Inactivate Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Induce Long-Term Depression of Fast Nicotinic Synaptic Transmission
J. Neurosci.,
February 13, 2008;
28(7):
1733 - 1744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Drenan, R. Nashmi, P. Imoukhuede, H. Just, S. McKinney, and H. A. Lester
Subcellular Trafficking, Pentameric Assembly, and Subunit Stoichiometry of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Containing Fluorescently Labeled {alpha}6 and 3 Subunits
Mol. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2008;
73(1):
27 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kabbani, M. P. Woll, R. Levenson, J. M. Lindstrom, and J.-P. Changeux
Intracellular complexes of the 2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in brain identified by proteomics
PNAS,
December 18, 2007;
104(51):
20570 - 20575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zanardi, R. Ferrari, G. Leo, U. Maskos, J.-P. Changeux, and M. Zoli
Loss of high-affinity nicotinic receptors increases the vulnerability to excitotoxic lesion and decreases the positive effects of an enriched environment
FASEB J,
December 1, 2007;
21(14):
4028 - 4037.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Liu, Y. Otsu, C. Vasuta, H. Nawa, and T. H. Murphy
Action-Potential-Independent GABAergic Tone Mediated by Nicotinic Stimulation of Immature Striatal Miniature Synaptic Transmission
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2007;
98(2):
581 - 593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Nashmi, C. Xiao, P. Deshpande, S. McKinney, S. R. Grady, P. Whiteaker, Q. Huang, T. McClure-Begley, J. M. Lindstrom, C. Labarca, et al.
Chronic Nicotine Cell Specifically Upregulates Functional {alpha}4* Nicotinic Receptors: Basis for Both Tolerance in Midbrain and Enhanced Long-Term Potentiation in Perforant Path
J. Neurosci.,
August 1, 2007;
27(31):
8202 - 8218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Lopes, E. F. R. Pereira, H.-Q. Wu, P. Purushottamachar, V. Njar, R. Schwarcz, and E. X. Albuquerque
Competitive Antagonism between the Nicotinic Allosteric Potentiating Ligand Galantamine and Kynurenic Acid at {alpha}7* Nicotinic Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2007;
322(1):
48 - 58.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Perry, D. Mao, A. B. Gold, J. M. McIntosh, J. C. Pezzullo, and K. J. Kellar
Chronic Nicotine Differentially Regulates {alpha}6- and beta3-Containing Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in Rat Brain
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2007;
322(1):
306 - 315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Bordia, S. R. Grady, J. M. McIntosh, and M. Quik
Nigrostriatal Damage Preferentially Decreases a Subpopulation of {alpha}6beta2* nAChRs in Mouse, Monkey, and Parkinson's Disease Striatum
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2007;
72(1):
52 - 61.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Salminen, J. A. Drapeau, J. M. McIntosh, A. C. Collins, M. J. Marks, and S. R. Grady
Pharmacology of {alpha}-Conotoxin MII-Sensitive Subtypes of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Isolated by Breeding of Null Mutant Mice
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2007;
71(6):
1563 - 1571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. McGehee
Nicotinic and Opioid Receptor Interactions in Nicotine Addiction
Mol. Interv.,
December 1, 2006;
6(6):
311 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Tumkosit, A. Kuryatov, J. Luo, and J. Lindstrom
beta3 Subunits Promote Expression and Nicotine-Induced Up-Regulation of Human Nicotinic {alpha}6* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Expressed in Transfected Cell Lines
Mol. Pharmacol.,
October 1, 2006;
70(4):
1358 - 1368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xu, Y. Zhu, and S. F. Heinemann
Identification of sequence motifs that target neuronal nicotinic receptors to dendrites and axons.
J. Neurosci.,
September 20, 2006;
26(38):
9780 - 9793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Azam and J. M. McIntosh
Characterization of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors That Modulate Nicotine-Evoked [3H]Norepinephrine Release from Mouse Hippocampal Synaptosomes
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2006;
70(3):
967 - 976.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. McCallum, N. Parameswaran, T. Bordia, H. Fan, J. M. McIntosh, and M. Quik
Differential Regulation of Mesolimbic {alpha}3/{alpha}6beta2 and {alpha}4beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Sites and Function after Long-Term Oral Nicotine to Monkeys
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2006;
318(1):
381 - 388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Briggs, E. J. Gubbins, M. J. Marks, C. B. Putman, R. Thimmapaya, M. D. Meyer, and C. S. Surowy
Untranslated Region-Dependent Exclusive Expression of High-Sensitivity Subforms of {alpha}4beta2 and {alpha}3beta2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2006;
70(1):
227 - 240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Quik and J. M. McIntosh
Striatal {alpha}6* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Potential Targets for Parkinson's Disease Therapy
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
February 1, 2006;
316(2):
481 - 489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Barik and S. Wonnacott
Indirect Modulation by {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors of Noradrenaline Release in Rat Hippocampal Slices: Interaction with Glutamate and GABA Systems and Effect of Nicotine Withdrawal
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2006;
69(2):
618 - 628.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Gutkin, S. Dehaene, and J.-P. Changeux
A neurocomputational hypothesis for nicotine addiction
PNAS,
January 24, 2006;
103(4):
1106 - 1111.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Zhu, R. R. Stewart, J. M. McIntosh, and F. F. Weight
Activation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Increases the Frequency of Spontaneous GABAergic IPSCs in Rat Basolateral Amygdala Neurons
J Neurophysiol,
November 1, 2005;
94(5):
3081 - 3091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Parish, J. Nunan, D. I. Finkelstein, F. N. McNamara, J. Y. Wong, J. L. Waddington, R. M. Brown, A. J. Lawrence, M. K. Horne, and J. Drago
Mice Lacking the {alpha}4 Nicotinic Receptor Subunit Fail to Modulate Dopaminergic Neuronal Arbors and Possess Impaired Dopamine Transporter Function
Mol. Pharmacol.,
November 1, 2005;
68(5):
1376 - 1386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gotti, M. Moretti, A. Zanardi, A. Gaimarri, N. Champtiaux, J.-P. Changeux, P. Whiteaker, M. J. Marks, F. Clementi, and M. Zoli
Heterogeneity and Selective Targeting of Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR) Subtypes Expressed on Retinal Afferents of the Superior Colliculus and Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Identification of a New Native nAChR Subtype {alpha}3{beta}2({alpha}5 or {beta}3) Enriched in Retinocollicular Afferents
Mol. Pharmacol.,
October 1, 2005;
68(4):
1162 - 1171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. E. McCallum, N. Parameswaran, T. Bordia, J. M. McIntosh, S. R. Grady, and M. Quik
Decrease in {alpha}3*/{alpha}6* Nicotinic Receptors but Not Nicotine-Evoked Dopamine Release in Monkey Brain after Nigrostriatal Damage
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2005;
68(3):
737 - 746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. McIntosh, P. V. Plazas, M. Watkins, M. E. Gomez-Casati, B. M. Olivera, and A. B. Elgoyhen
A Novel {alpha}-Conotoxin, PeIA, Cloned from Conus pergrandis, Discriminates between Rat {alpha}9{alpha}10 and {alpha}7 Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 26, 2005;
280(34):
30107 - 30112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. H. Berrettini and C. E. Lerman
Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacogenetics of Nicotine Dependence
Am J Psychiatry,
August 1, 2005;
162(8):
1441 - 1451.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-Q. Ren, S.-B. Cheng, M. W. Treuil, J. Mukherjee, J. Rao, K. H. Braunewell, J. M. Lindstrom, and R. Anand
Structural Determinants of {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Trafficking
J. Neurosci.,
July 13, 2005;
25(28):
6676 - 6686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. F. Vallejo, B. Buisson, D. Bertrand, and W. N. Green
Chronic Nicotine Exposure Upregulates Nicotinic Receptors by a Novel Mechanism
J. Neurosci.,
June 8, 2005;
25(23):
5563 - 5572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gotti, M. Moretti, F. Clementi, L. Riganti, J. M. McIntosh, A. C. Collins, M. J. Marks, and P. Whiteaker
Expression of Nigrostriatal {alpha}6-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Is Selectively Reduced, but Not Eliminated, by {beta}3 Subunit Gene Deletion
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2005;
67(6):
2007 - 2015.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Papke, J. D. Buhr, M. M. Francis, K. I. Choi, J. S. Thinschmidt, and N. A. Horenstein
The Effects of Subunit Composition on the Inhibition of Nicotinic Receptors by the Amphipathic Blocker 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl Heptanoate
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2005;
67(6):
1977 - 1990.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lai, N. Parameswaran, M. Khwaja, P. Whiteaker, J. M. Lindstrom, H. Fan, J. M. McIntosh, S. R. Grady, and M. Quik
Long-Term Nicotine Treatment Decreases Striatal {alpha}6* Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Sites and Function in Mice
Mol. Pharmacol.,
May 1, 2005;
67(5):
1639 - 1647.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. P. Grinevich, S. R. Letchworth, K. A. Lindenberger, J. Menager, V. Mary, K. A. Sadieva, L. M. Buhlman, G. A. Bohme, L. Pradier, J. Benavides, et al.
Heterologous Expression of Human {alpha}6{beta}4{beta}3{alpha}5 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: Binding Properties Consistent with Their Natural Expression Require Quaternary Subunit Assembly Including the {alpha}5 Subunit
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
February 1, 2005;
312(2):
619 - 626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Azam and J. M. McIntosh
Effect of Novel {alpha}-Conotoxins on Nicotine-Stimulated [3H]Dopamine Release from Rat Striatal Synaptosomes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2005;
312(1):
231 - 237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Quik, S. Vailati, T. Bordia, J. M. Kulak, H. Fan, J. M. McIntosh, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Subunit Composition of Nicotinic Receptors in Monkey Striatum: Effect of Treatments with 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine or L-DOPA
Mol. Pharmacol.,
January 1, 2005;
67(1):
32 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Buccafusco
Neuronal Nicotinic Receptor Subtypes: DEFINING THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
Mol. Interv.,
October 1, 2004;
4(5):
285 - 295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wu, A. A. George, K. M. Schroeder, L. Xu, S. Marxer-Miller, L. Lucero, and R. J. Lukas
Electrophysiological, Pharmacological, and Molecular Evidence for {alpha}7-Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Rat Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
October 1, 2004;
311(1):
80 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Hernandez, S. Vicini, Y. Xiao, M. I. Davila-Garcia, R. P. Yasuda, B. B. Wolfe, and K. J. Kellar
The Nicotinic Receptor in the Rat Pineal Gland Is an {alpha}3{beta}4 Subtype
Mol. Pharmacol.,
October 1, 2004;
66(4):
978 - 987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Moretti, S. Vailati, M. Zoli, G. Lippi, L. Riganti, R. Longhi, A. Viegi, F. Clementi, and C. Gotti
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes Expression during Rat Retina Development and Their Regulation by Visual Experience
Mol. Pharmacol.,
July 1, 2004;
66(1):
85 - 96.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Luetje
Getting Past the Asterisk: the Subunit Composition of Presynaptic Nicotinic Receptors That Modulate Striatal Dopamine Release
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2004;
65(6):
1333 - 1335.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Salminen, K. L. Murphy, J. M. McIntosh, J. Drago, M. J. Marks, A. C. Collins, and S. R. Grady
Subunit Composition and Pharmacology of Two Classes of Striatal Presynaptic Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mediating Dopamine Release in Mice
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2004;
65(6):
1526 - 1535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Parker, Y. Fu, K. McAllen, J. Luo, J. M. McIntosh, J. M. Lindstrom, and B. M. Sharp
Up-Regulation of Brain Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in the Rat during Long-Term Self-Administration of Nicotine: Disproportionate Increase of the {alpha}6 Subunit
Mol. Pharmacol.,
March 1, 2004;
65(3):
611 - 622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|