 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 1, 2003, 23(3):1087
Activity of Different Classes of Neurons of the Motor Cortex during Locomotion
Irina N. Beloozerova1, Mikhail G. Sirota1, and Harvey A. Swadlow2 1 Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, and 2 Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
Introduction
This study examines the activity of different classes of neurons of the motor cortex in the rabbit during two locomotion tasks: a simple (on a flat surface) and a complex (overstepping a series of barriers) locomotion. Four classes of efferent neurons were studied: corticocortical (CC) neurons with ipsilateral projection (CCIs), those with contralateral projection (CCCs), descending corticofugal neurons of layer V (CF5s), and those of layer VI (CF6s). In addition, one class of inhibitory interneurons (SINs) was investigated. CF5 neurons and SINs were the only groups that were strongly active during locomotion. In most of these neurons a clear-cut modulation of discharge in the locomotion rhythm was observed. During simple locomotion, CF5s and SINs were preferentially active in opposite phases of the step cycle, suggesting that SINs contribute to formation of the step-related pattern of CF5s. Transition from simple to complex locomotion was associated with changes of the discharge pattern of the majority of CF5 neurons and SINs. In contrast to CF5 neurons, other classes of efferent neurons (CCI, CCC, CF6) were much less active during both simple and complex locomotion. That suggests that CC interactions, both within a hemisphere (mediated by CCIs) and between hemispheres (mediated by CCCs), as well as corticothalamic interactions via CF6 neurons are not essential for motor coordination during either simple or complex locomotion tasks.
Key words: motor cortex; corticocortical neurons; corticothalamic neurons; interneurons; locomotion; rabbit
Introduction
Pyramidal tract neurons have been the focus of many studies of the activity of motor cortex during motor tasks (Porter and Lewis, 1975
; Evarts and Tanji, 1976
The experiments were performed on fully awake rabbits, where several groups of neurons in sensory and motor cortical areas have been identified previously and their response properties extensively studied in the resting state (Swadlow, 1988
View larger version (20K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Types of neurons that were recorded in the forelimb representation of the left motor cortex (MC): CCIs [corticocortical neurons projecting to the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1)], CCCs (corticocortical neurons projecting to the contralateral motor cortex or primary somatosensory cortex), CF6s [corticofugal neurons of layer VI projecting to ventrolateral thalamus (VL)], and CF5s (corticofugal neurons of layer V). These neuron types were identified by their antidromic responses to electrical stimulation of the corresponding structures (Stim 1 to Stim 4). SINs were identified by their high-frequency orthodromic responses to stimulation of ventrolateral thalamus or a cortical site (Stim 1 to Stim 4). Solid lines indicate the directly tested projections; dotted lines show supposed projections.
The animals performed two locomotor tasks: (1) locomotion on a flat surface (a "simple" locomotion) and (2) locomotion with overstepping a series of barriers (a "complex" locomotion). During complex locomotion, visual recognition of the barriers and visuomotor coordination were necessary for successful negotiation of the barriers. It has been demonstrated previously that complex locomotion does require participation of the motor cortex, whereas simple locomotion does not (Trendelenberg, 1911
We here report dramatic differences in the activity of different efferent subpopulations during locomotion and discuss their roles in transmitting cortical signals to other centers as well as a potential role of inhibitory interneurons in shaping the locomotion-related activity of efferent neurons. Some of the results have been published previously in abstract form (Beloozerova et al., 1998
Materials and Methods
Recordings were obtained from the forelimb representation of the motor cortex of five awake adult Dutch-Belted rabbits. Some of the methods have been described previously (Swadlow, 1991
Experimental design. Positive reinforcement (food) was used to adapt rabbits to the experimental situation and to engage them in locomotion behavior (Pryor, 1975
General surgical procedures. After rabbits were trained, surgery was performed under pentobarbital sodium anesthesia (initial dose, 25-35 mg/kg) using aseptic procedures. The skin and fascia were removed from much of the dorsal surface of the rabbit's skull. Bones of the dorsal surface of the skull were fused together with stainless-steel screws and acrylic cement. An aluminum circular base was cemented to the screws. Later, awake rabbits were rigidly held by this base during mapping procedures and during identification of neurons before testing their activity in locomotion tasks. A portion of the skull over the approximate locations of the motor and the primary somatosensory limb representations was mechanically thinned to ~0.3 mm. This allowed an easy removal of the remaining thinned bone over an area of 100-200 µm in diameter before inserting a recording or a stimulation electrode into the cortex in awake animals.
Identifying the region of motor cortex. Motor cortex was identified in awake animals (after several days of a postoperative recovery period) by first localizing the forepaw representation of the primary somatosensory cortex using multiple-unit receptive field mapping procedures (Gould, l986; Swadlow, 1990
View larger version (13K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Location of the motor limb representation in the rabbit (a typical example). A, Schematic drawing of the hemispheres (dorsal view) and the limb representations. The dashed horizontal line indicates the zero anteroposterior coordinate. The square area shown in A is represented in B with a higher magnification to show the relative positions of motor representation of the forelimb (1), the primary somatosensory representations of the forelimb (2a) and the hindlimb (2b), as well as that of the whiskers (3).
Implantation of stimulating electrodes. Stimulating electrodes were constructed of platinum-iridium wire (140 µm OD) insulated with Teflon to within 0.4 mm of the tip. For the identification of CCIs, two stimulating electrodes were implanted into the ipsilateral primary somatosensory area 1 mm apart (Fig. 1, Stim 1). For the identification of CCCs, two stimulating electrodes were implanted into the contralateral motor cortex, also 1 mm apart, and two similarly spaced electrodes were implanted into the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, both into the forelimb representations (Fig. 1, Stim 2, Stim 3). In the ipsilateral as well as in the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex, stimulating electrodes were implanted into the arm and forearm but not in the digits representations. For the identification of CF5s and CF6s, two or three stimulating electrodes were implanted in the ventrolateral thalamus (Fig. 1, Stim 4). In all cases, the electrodes were implanted after mapping the area by multiple-unit recording procedures.
Single-unit recording and neurons sampled. At the beginning of an experiment, a rabbit was positioned on a table, and the base that was attached to the skull during surgery was fixed in a frame, so the head of the rabbit was immobilized while the body was put in a comfortable position. Methods ensuring the humane treatment of subjects during immobilization of the head have been described previously (Swadlow, 1988
Monitoring stepping movements. The duration of the stance and swing phases of the forelimb, contralateral to the investigated cortical zone, was monitored during locomotion. To accomplish this, a thin rubber sack was placed on the rabbit's forelimb, a thin metal electrode was attached to the external surface of the sack under the foot, and a voltage of 2-5 mV was applied to the electrode. The floor of the experimental box was covered by a cloth moistened with 0.1% sodium chloride to make the surface electrically conductive. A wire, sewn into the cloth along the length of the box, was connected to a common ground. The fall of voltage resulting from contact of the foot with the floor was recorded. The start and finish of electrical contact was taken as the start and finish of the stance phase of a step.
Identification of neurons. All neurons were tested for antidromic activation using 0.2 msec rectangular pulses of graded intensity in the range of 0.1-2 mA. The principal criterion for the identification of antidromic activation was the test for collision of spikes (Bishop et al., 1962
Differentiation of CF5 and CF6 neurons. In both sensory and motor cortex, layer VI is characterized by the presence of efferent neurons (CF6s) with slowly conducting axons that exhibit a marked "supernormal" period of reduced antidromic latency at 8-12 msec intervals after a previous action potential (Swadlow, 1989
2 mm away from the site of stimulation. Nevertheless, CF5 neurons of this study probably represent a heterogeneous population of corticofugal neurons, because, in addition to activating axons that terminate within the thalamus, we could be activating (1) axons in passage through or near to the thalamus or (2) collaterals of axons terminating in the thalamus but projecting a main axon more distally. Neurons that were found <50 µm above the first CF6 neuron were not classified as being in an uncertain cortical layer.
Processing of locomotion-related neuronal activity. The onset of the swing phase was taken as the beginning of the step cycle. The duration of each step cycle was divided into 10 equal bins. The discharge frequency in a bin was derived according to the method of Udo et al. (1982)
Fmin/Fmax) × 100%, where Fmin and Fmax are the minimal and the maximal frequencies of discharge in the histogram. (3) The preferred step phase of the discharge of the neuron was assessed using circular statistics. The occurrence of each spike was presented as a vector of a unit length. The angle (the phase) of it was calculated by multiplying the relative position of the spike in the step cycle (in portions of the cycle) by 2
. The phase of the mean vector (the preferred phase) was calculated. (4) The change of the mean frequency, the coefficient of frequency modulation, and the preferred phase on transition from simple to complex locomotion were also calculated.
Gait analysis. In experiments without unit recording, an analysis of the kinematics of locomotion was performed using a video-recording technique. The movements of rabbits were videotaped from the side by a two-dimensional Peak Performance System at 60 frames/sec. Light-reflecting paper stickers were attached to the skin projections of the joints. The video camera was positioned 3 m from the side of the chamber.
Statistical procedures. Parametric tests were used when possible for comparisons between groups. For all mean values, the SEM is given. The discharge frequency and modulation of neurons during simple and complex locomotion was compared using the paired-samples t test. The phase relationship between a locomotion task and the activity of neurons was determined and compared across the tasks using circular statistics (Batschelet, 1981
Histological procedures. At the termination of the experiment, rabbits were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium and perfused with isotonic saline followed by a 10% formalin solution. Frozen brain sections of 50 µm thickness were cut in the regions of recording and stimulating electrodes so that their locations could be verified by observation of electrode track gliosis. The tissue was stained for Nissl substance with cresyl violet.
Results
Characteristics of simple and complex locomotion
The gait that rabbits used both on the flat surface (simple locomotion) and during overstepping a series of barriers (complex locomotion) was a slow gallop (velocity of 1.2-1.4 m/sec; step duration of 350 ± 20 msec; mean ± SEM). Figure 3A and B illustrate the step phases during the two locomotion tasks. Each step included the following phases: (1) two hindlimbs support, (2) three limbs support, (3) two forelimb support, and (4) one forelimb support. To clear the barriers, rabbits lifted the limbs much higher compared with simple locomotion. This was achieved by an additional flexion in all of the joints during the swing phase (Fig. 3C,D). However, during both locomotion tasks, the durations of the swing and the stance phases were similar.
View larger version (34K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Characteristics of simple and complex locomotion. A, B, Body configuration in four sequential phases of the locomotor cycle (1-4) are shown for simple (A) and complex (B) locomotion. C, D, Sequential positions of the "leading" forelimb presented as stick figures for one representative step for simple (C) and complex (D) locomotion. E, F, Footprints in 20 sequential passages during simple (E) and complex (F) locomotion. Three steps in each passage are shown. Black circles indicate footprints of the leading forelimb, gray circles indicate footprints of the trailing forelimb, and bars indicate footprints of the hindlimbs. The positions of barriers 1-3 in F are shown by vertical bars. The direction of progression in C-F was from left to right.
The variability of the step lengths during simple locomotion was considerable. Figure 3E shows 20 simple locomotion passages that were aligned on the position of the toes in the first step. Because of the variability of the step lengths, the positions of the footprints generated by the two successive steps were progressively more variable. Figure 3F presents 20 complex locomotion passages that were aligned on the position of the barriers (vertical bars) that restricted the permissible positions for the paws on the floor. In these tracks, the footprints before barriers 2 and 3 were made at very similar positions, despite the starting positions being considerably different. Thus, complex locomotion was characterized by a more precise positioning of feet on the surface compared with simple locomotion.
Activity of CF5 neurons
Figure 4A presents an example of activity of a CF5 neuron at rest, during simple locomotion, and during complex locomotion. At rest the neuron discharged with a frequency of ~6 Hz. During simple locomotion, the discharge of the neuron was modulated, discharging more during the swing phase than during the stance phase. During complex locomotion, the discharge of the neuron during the swing phase was even greater, but the activity during the stance phase was still low. The pattern of activity of the neuron was rather consistent, as illustrated in the rasters that show discharges of the neuron in 50 steps during simple (Fig. 4B) and complex (Fig. 4C) locomotion. Figure 4D and E presents discharge frequency of the neuron as a function of the step phase. During simple locomotion (Fig. 4D), the neuron had a sharper peak in the swing phase, whereas during complex locomotion (Fig. 4E), the peak was wider.
View larger version (48K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Activity of CF5 neurons during locomotion. A, A representative record of a CF5 neuron discharge at rest and during simple and complex locomotion. The bottom trace shows the swing (Sw) and stance (St) phases of the step cycle of the forelimb contralateral to the recording site in the cortex. B, D, Activity of the same CF5 neuron during simple locomotion is presented as a raster of 50 step cycles (B) and as a histogram (D). In the raster, the duration of step cycles is normalized to 100%, and the raster is rank-ordered according to the duration of the swing phase. The beginning of the stance phase in each step is indicated by an open triangle. In the histogram, the dashed line shows the level of activity at rest. C, E, Activity of the same neuron during complex locomotion presented as a raster (C) and as a histogram (E). F, G, Distribution of preferred phases (positions of mean vectors) of activity of all CF5 neurons in the normalized step cycle during simple (F) and complex (G) locomotion. H, I, Proportion of neurons in which the mean discharge frequency increased (black), decreased (gray), and did not change (white) on transition from rest to locomotion (H) and from simple to complex locomotion (I). J, Proportion of neurons in which the coefficient of frequency modulation increased, decreased, and did not change on transition from simple to complex locomotion; color codes are same as in H and I.
All 24 CF5 neurons studied were active at rest [5.7 ± 1.0 impulses (imp)/sec] and during simple locomotion (7.3 ± 1.3 imp/sec). During simple locomotion, the discharge of 88% of these neurons was modulated in the step cycle. The coefficient of frequency modulation (M) was 71 ± 4%. The activity of different CF5s had different preferred phases in the step cycle; however, the preferred phase of 45% of CF5s was in the first half of the swing (Fig. 4F).
During complex locomotion, all CF5 neurons were also active (8.8 ± 1.3 imp/sec). The discharge of 96% of these neurons was modulated in relation to the step cycle. The M was 79 ± 2%. The mean activity and modulation values as well as the percentage of neurons involved in the locomotion task were not significantly different during complex locomotion compared with simple locomotion. As during simple locomotion, the activity of different CF5s had different preferred step phases during complex locomotion. However, in contrast to simple locomotion, distribution of the preferred phases of different neurons was rather equal across the step cycle (Fig. 4G). This change in the preferred phase of the CF5 population activity was attributable to shifts of preferred phases in 25% of individual neurons by 1/10 and to shifts in 17% of them by one-fifth to one-half of the duration of the cycle, while the preferred phases of 58% of the neurons stayed unchanged on transition from simple to complex locomotion.
Although the mean activity and modulation values for the CF5 population were close during simple and complex locomotion, individual CF5 neurons expressed significant changes in both of these parameters on transition from simple to complex locomotion, as demonstrated by the paired-samples t test (p < 0.03 or better). This transition was associated with an increase in the mean frequency in 46% of CF5s and with a decrease in 8% of them (Fig. 4I). The M increased in 58% and decreased in 17% of the neurons (Fig. 4J). There was also a change in the mean frequency of most CF5s on transition from rest to simple locomotion (p < 0.005; paired t test): it increased in one-half of the neurons and decreased in 33% of them (Fig. 4H).
Activity of CF6 neurons
The CF6 neurons were very distinct from CF5 neurons. At rest, 66% (16 of 24) of these neurons were virtually silent, emitting <1 imp/min during a 10 min test period. The mean rate for all CF6s was 0.4 ± 0.1 imp/sec, and that for the active cells only was 1.1 ± 0.3 imp/sec, which was significantly lower than that of CF5 neurons, all of which were active at rest (p < 0.001; U test) (see Fig. 8A).
During simple locomotion, only 25% (6 of 24) of CF6s showed some level of activity. However the discharge rates of these CF6 neurons were significantly lower than those of CF5s that were tested under the same conditions (2.3 ± 1.1 imp/sec vs 7.3 ± 1.3 imp/sec; p < 0.02; U test) (see Fig. 8B). Five CF6 neurons that were active at rest were silent for the period of locomotion (Fig. 5A). Of six cells active during locomotion, the step-related modulation was pronounced in the activity of four of these cells (17% of the total population) (see Fig. 8D). The M was in the range of 65-100%. The activity of different CF6 neurons had different preferred step phases.
View larger version (16K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Examples of activity of CF6 neurons during locomotion. A, Inhibition of the discharge of a neuron during locomotion. B-E, A raster and a histogram for simple (B, D) and complex (C, E) locomotion for a typical CF6 neuron are shown. Designations are as in Figure 4.
There was little change in the activity of CF6 neurons on transition from simple to complex locomotion. The six neurons that were active during simple locomotion were also active during complex locomotion, with discharge rates lower than those in the corresponding CF5 group (4.4 ± 2.4 imp/sec vs 8.8 ± 1.3 imp/sec for the CF5s; p < 0.03; U test) (see Fig. 8C). Of the four CF6 neurons whose activity was modulated during simple locomotion, only one showed a change in this modulation during complex locomotion. Figure 5B-E illustrates the activity of that one neuron in 50 steps during each simple and complex locomotion. The discharge frequency of the neuron during simple locomotion was extremely low, but the activity did show a step-related modulation (six of seven action potentials occurred during stance phase). The discharge frequency of the neuron during complex locomotion was still low, and the step-related modulation was weaker.
The CF6 neurons that were active during locomotion did not have any other properties that would distinguish them from the silent CF6s. These cells had a wide variety of conduction velocities and supernormal conductivity. They had no obvious receptive fields and did not respond synaptically to electrical stimulation of any of the sites tested.
Activity of CCC and CCI neurons
The two types of CC neurons, CCIs and CCCs, behaved similarly and will be considered together. CC neurons, like the CF6 population described above, were very different from the CF5 group, in that many CC neurons were weakly if at all active at rest and during locomotion.
At rest, 49% (19 of 39) of CC neurons were virtually silent, emitting <1 imp/min during a 10 min test period. The mean rate for all CCs was 0.6 ± 0.1 imp/sec, and that for the active cells only was 1.2 ± 0.2 imp/sec, which was significantly lower that that of CF5s (p < 0.001; U test) (see Fig. 8A). During simple locomotion, 56% of CC neurons were active. However the rates of activity of these neurons were still very low when compared with CF5 neurons under the same testing conditions (2.4 ± 0.9 imp/sec vs 7.3 ± 1.3 imp/sec; p < 0.001; U test) (see Fig. 8B). The activity of 28% of CC neurons was modulated in relation to locomotion cycle (see Fig. 8D), with the M in the range of 85-100%. The preferred step phases of activity of different CC neurons were distributed over step cycle.
During complex locomotion, 54% of the CC neurons were active. Those were the same neurons that were also active during simple locomotion. During complex locomotion, the discharge rates of CCs were still lower than those of CF5s (4.0 ± 1.4 imp/sec vs 8.8 ± 1.3 imp/sec; p < 0.002; U test) (see Fig. 8B). The activity was modulated in 33% of the CCs (see Fig. 8E), with the M in the range of 67-100%. These values were derived from the same neurons that were modulated during simple locomotion plus two neurons that were only modulated during complex locomotion. They were similar to the values obtained during simple locomotion. The activity of different CCs had different preferred step phases. Figure 6A-D illustrates the activity of one of the active and modulated CC neurons in 50 steps during simple and complex locomotion. The low discharge of this neuron peaked at the end of swing during both simple and complex locomotion, but the peak was wider during complex locomotion.
View larger version (22K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 6. Activity of CC neurons during locomotion. A-D, Examples of activity of one of the most active and modulated CC neurons during locomotion. A raster and a histogram are shown for simple (A, C) and complex (B, D) locomotion. E, F, Proportion of neurons in which the discharge rate increased (black), decreased (gray), and did not change (white) on transition from rest to locomotion (E) and from simple to complex locomotion (F). G, Proportion of neurons in which the coefficient of frequency modulation increased, decreased, and did not change on transition from simple to complex locomotion. Designations are as in Figure 4.
Although the mean activity values for the CC population were close during simple and complex locomotion, the frequency of many individual CC neurons changed on transition from simple to complex locomotion, as demonstrated by the paired-samples t test (p < 0.02 or better). This transition was associated with an increase in the mean frequency in 38% of CCs and with a decrease in 6% of them (Fig. 6F). However, the M increased in 11% and decreased in 11% of the neurons only (Fig. 6G). The mean frequency of 56% of the neurons increased (p < 0.001; paired t test), and that of 38% of the neurons decreased (p < 0.02; paired t test) also on transition from rest to simple locomotion (Fig. 6E).
The CC neurons that were active during locomotion had significantly higher conduction velocities than did the silent CCs (1.2 m/sec compared with 0.6 m/sec; p < 0.015; U test), and among them there were more cells with somatosensory receptive fields. However, the active CCs did not have any distinct laminar distribution.
Activity of SINs
Figure 7 presents an example of activity of a SIN at rest and during locomotion. At rest the neuron discharged with a frequency of ~14 Hz. During simple locomotion the frequency of the discharge was considerably higher. In addition, the discharge of the neuron was modulated in locomotion cycle with a peak in the late swing-early stance phase. The pattern of activity of the neuron was rather consistent, as illustrated in the raster that shows discharge of the neuron in 50 steps during simple (Fig. 7B) and complex (Fig. 7C) locomotion. During complex locomotion, the discharge frequency in the late stance-early swing was much lower compared with that during simple locomotion (was below the rest level), while it was still high in the late swing-early stance phase (Fig. 7D,E).
View larger version (54K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Activity of SINs during locomotion. A, A representative record of a SIN discharge at rest and during simple locomotion. B, D, Activity of the same SIN during simple locomotion is presented as a raster of 50 normalized step cycles (B) and as a histogram (D). C, E, Activity of the same neuron during complex locomotion is presented as a raster (C) and as a histogram (E). F, G, Distribution of preferred phases (positions of mean vectors) of activity of all SINs in the normalized step cycle during simple (F), and complex (G) locomotion. H, I, Proportion of neurons in which the discharge frequency increased (black), decreased (gray), and did not change (white) on transition from rest to locomotion (H) and from simple to complex locomotion (I). J, Proportion of neurons in which the coefficient of frequency modulation increased, decreased, and did not change on transition from simple to complex locomotion. Designations are as in Figure 4.
All 46 SINs studied were active at rest (16.8 ± 1.7 imp/sec) (Fig. 8A). During simple locomotion, all SINs were also active; however, the mean frequency was twice as high compared to rest (33.9 ± 3.2 imp/sec) (Fig. 8B). The discharge of 65% of SINs was modulated in the step cycle (Fig. 8D). The M of SINs was 65 ± 2% (Fig. 8F). Different SINs had different preferred step phases; however, the preferred phase of 50% of them was in the first half of the stance (Fig. 7F) [i.e., in the anti-phase with the preferred phase of CF5 neurons (Fig. 4F)].
View larger version (25K):[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure 8. Characteristics of different neuronal groups. A-C, Mean discharge frequency of neurons of different groups at rest (A), during simple locomotion (B), and during complex locomotion (C). For the CF6 and CC populations, the mean rates are presented across the active cells only. D, E, Percentage of neurons in which the activity was modulated in relation to the step cycle during simple (D) and complex (E) locomotion. F, G, Mean coefficient of modulation of neurons during simple (F) and complex (G) locomotion. Note that the differences in all of the parameters between different neuronal subpopulations were similar during simple and complex locomotion.
During complex locomotion, all SINs were active as well (34.1 ± 3.2 imp/sec) (Fig. 8C). The discharge of 77% of SINs was modulated in relation to step cycle (Fig. 8E). Those were the same neurons the activity of which was modulated during simple locomotion plus the neurons the activity of which was only modulated during complex locomotion. The M was 64 ± 3% (Fig. 8G). The mean activity and modulation values as well as the percentage of neurons involved in locomotion task were not significantly different during complex locomotion compared with simple locomotion. As during simple locomotion, different SINs had different preferred step phases. In contrast to simple locomotion however, the distribution of the preferred phases of the neurons was rather equal across the step cycle (Fig. 7G). This change in the preferred phase of SIN population activity was attributable to shifts of preferred phases in 25% of the neurons by 1/10 and in 19% of them by one-fifth to one-half of the duration of the cycle. The preferred phases of 55% of the neurons stayed unchanged on transition from simple to complex locomotion.
Although the mean activity and modulation values for the SIN population were close during simple and complex locomotion, individual neurons did demonstrate significant changes in both of these parameters on transition from simple to complex locomotion (by paired-samples t test; p < 0.04 or better). This transition was associated with an increase in the mean frequency in 22% of SINs and with a decrease in 17% of them (Fig. 7I). The M increased in 35% and decreased in 20% of the neurons (Fig. 7J). There was also a change in the mean discharge frequency on transition from rest to simple locomotion (p < 0.001; paired t test) in the overwhelming majority of SINs: it increased in 83% and decreased in 9% of the neurons (Fig. 7H).
During both simple and complex locomotion, the M values of SINs that responded with latencies of <2.5 msec to stimulation of the ventrolateral thalamus were higher than those of the cells that responded with longer latencies (p < 0.04; U test). There was no correlation between the strength of locomotion-related modulation and the latency with which SINs responded to stimulation of any cortical sites. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend for the activity of SINs found in cortical layers II and III to be more often linked to stepping movements than was the activity of SINs found in layers V and VI.
Activity of NI neurons
All 62 NI neurons studied were active at rest (6.3 ± 0.7 imp/sec). During simple locomotion, all NI neurons were also active (8.5 ± 1.0 imp/sec) (Fig. 8A,B). The discharge of 80% of the neurons was modulated in the locomotion rhythm (Fig. 8D). The mean M was 65 ± 3% (Fig. 8F). Different NI neurons had different preferred step phases, with slightly more cells having them in the swing phase.
During complex locomotion, all NI neurons were active as well (8.8 ± 1.2 imp/sec) (Fig. 8C). The discharge of 90% of the neurons was modulated (Fig. 8E). The M was 67 ± 2% (Fig. 8G). The mean activity and modulation values as well as the percentage of neurons involved in locomotion task and their preferred phase distribution were not significantly different during complex versus simple locomotion. However, individual NI neurons demonstrated significant changes in their discharge frequency and modulation on transition from simple to complex locomotion, as demonstrated by the paired-samples t test (p < 0.02 or better). The mean frequency increased in 33% of NIs and decreased in 34% of them. The M increased in 48% and decreased in 21% of the neurons.
Discussion
Activity of different types of efferent cortical neurons
Locomotion is one of the most complex motor behaviors. The entire skeletal musculature is involved in a highly coordinated activity. All motor centers (spinal cord, brain stem, cerebellum, motor cortex) participate in the generation of the locomotor pattern (Orlovsky at al., 1999
Communication between motor centers is believed to be essential for normal motor behavior, especially for a complex motor behavior such as locomotion. However, only recently has the activity of the "communication lines" leading from the motor cortex, other than the corticospinal tract, been assessed during motor behaviors. In the walking cat, the activity of corticoreticular neurons in steps over an obstacle was considerably different from that during ordinary steps (Kably and Drew, 1998
Based on the available data, we expected all efferent populations of the motor cortex to be active during locomotion and to have pronounced step-related discharges. This hypothesis was not confirmed, however. We found that the activity of several classes of motor cortical efferent neurons was only weakly related to the locomotion rhythm, (i.e., CCIs, CCCs, and CF6s). Most of these neurons were either silent or exhibited a weak step-related activity. The only cortical output that had a strong step-related activity was the CF5s.
Studies of motor and sensory cortices usually report very few cells that cannot be driven by movements of the animal or by peripheral stimulation. This is probably because the identification of a neuron is usually achieved by detecting its spontaneous activity or peripherally driven response. However, if a special effort is given to elicit a discharge of a neuron by an application of a neurotransmitter (Dykes and Lamour, 1988
The inactivity of many CCCs during locomotion suggests that coordination between the two symmetrical limbs during simple as well as the complex locomotion does not require interaction of the two hemispheres and is achieved at the brainstem-spinal level.
To explain a low activity of CCI neurons projecting to the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex, one should take into account that the main afferent input to the motor cortex during locomotion is from the ventrolateral thalamus (Beloozerova and Sirota, 1988
The absence of activity in CF6 neurons during locomotion is most surprising. These neurons are usually considered to be an essential part of the thalamocortical loop (Sherman and Guillery, 2001
Thus, on the base of our observations as well as data that is available in literature (From, 1983
Formation of corticofugal signals
The motor cortex receives input signals related to locomotion primarily from the ventrolateral thalamus, and in the absence of this input, the locomotion-related modulation of cortical activity nearly vanishes (Beloozerova and Sirota, 1988
Inhibitory interneurons are thought to be involved in regulating both spatial and temporal response properties of sensory cortical neurons (Sillito, 1975
Two locomotion tasks in this study, the simple and the complex, were associated with pronounced differences in the activity of individual CF5 and SIN neurons. Many CF5s and SINs increased both their mean frequency and the coefficient of modulation, but in some of these neurons these values decreased or did not change (Figs. 4I,J, 7I,J). Because of the opposite changes in the activity of individual neurons, a transition from simple to complex locomotion caused only minor changes in the mean population characteristics (Fig. 8). A similar result was obtained in cats when comparing activities of cortical neurons during simple and complex locomotion (Beloozerova and Sirota, 1993
FOOTNOTES Received May 14, 2002; revised Nov. 19, 2002; accepted Nov. 20, 2002.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants F32 NS-10314 and R01 NS-39340 (I.N.B.) and MH-64024 (H.A.S.).
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Irina Beloozerova, Neurobiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, 350 West Thomas Road, Phoenix, AZ 85013. E-mail: ibelooz{at}chw.edu.
References
- Armstrong DM, Drew T (1984a) Discharge of pyramidal tract and other motor cortical neurons during locomotion in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 346:471-496
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Armstrong DM, Drew T (1984b) Locomotor-related neuronal discharges in cat motor cortex compared with peripheral receptive fields and evoked movements. J Physiol (Lond) 346:497-517
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Baker SN, Kilner JM, Pinches EM, Lemon RN (1999) The role of synchrony and oscillations in the motor output. Exp Brain Res 128:109-117[ISI][Medline].
- Batschelet E (1981) In: Circular statistic in biology. New York: Academic.
- Bauswein E, Fromm C, Preuss A (1989) Corticostriatal cells in comparison with pyramidal tract neurons: contrasting properties in the behaving monkey. Brain Res 493:198-203[ISI][Medline].
- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG (1988) Role of motor cortex in control of locomotion. In: Stance and motion. Facts and concepts (Gurfinkel VS, Ioffe ME, Massion J, Roll JP, eds), pp 163-176. New York: Plenum.
- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG (1993) The role of the motor cortex in the control of accuracy of locomotor movements in the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 461:1-25
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG (1998) Cortically controlled gait modifications in the cat. Ann NY Acad Sci 860:550-554
[Free Full Text] .- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG (2002) Activity of ventrolateral thalamus (VL) during locomotion. Soc Neurosci Abstr 28:62.13.
- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG, Swadlow HA (1998) Putative inhibitory interneurons in the motor cortex: activity during locomotion. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:158.18.
- Beloozerova IN, Sirota MG, Swadlow HA (1999) Efferent neurons in the motor cortex: activity and silence during locomotion. Soc Neurosci Abstr 25:665.20.
- Bishop PO, Burke W, Davis R (1962) The identification of single units in central visual pathways. J Physiol (Lond) 162:409-431
[Free Full Text] .- Drew T (1991) Visuomotor coordination in locomotion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1:652-657[Medline].
- Drew T (1993) Motor cortical activity during voluntary gait modifications in the cat. I. Cells related to the forelimbs. J Neurophysiol 70:179-199
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Dykes RW, Lamour Y (1988) Neurons without demonstrable receptive fields outnumber neurons having receptive fields in samples from the somatosensory cortex of anesthetized or paralyzed cats and rats. Brain Res 440:133-143[ISI][Medline].
- Dykes RW, Landry P, Metherate R, Hicks TP (1984) Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 52:1066-1093
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Evarts EV, Tanji J (1976) Reflex and intended responses in motor cortex pyramidal tract neurons of monkey. J Neurophysiol 39:1069-1080
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Evarts EV, Fromm C, Kroller J, Jennings A (1983) Motor cortex control of finely graded forces. J Neurophysiol 49:1199-1215
[Free Full Text] .- Fisher NI (1993) In: Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
- Fromm C (1983) Contrasting properties of pyramidal tract neurons located in the precentral and postcentral areas and of corticorubral neurons in the behaving monkey. Adv Neurol 39:329-345[Medline].
- Fuller JH, Schlag J (1976) Determination of antidromic excitation by the collision test: problems of interpretation. Brain Res 122:283-298.
- Gould HJ (1986) Body surface maps in the somatosensory cortex of rabbit. J Comp Neurol 243:207-233[ISI][Medline].
- Hicks TP, Dykes RW (1983) Receptive field size for certain neurons in primary somatosensory cortex is determined by GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition. Brain Res 274:160-164[ISI][Medline].
- Hollands MA, Marple-Horvat DE (1996) Visually guided stepping under conditions of step cycle-related denial of visual information. Exp Brain Res 109:343-356[ISI][Medline].
- Jones EG (1984) Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells. In: Cerebral cortex. Cellular components of the cerebral cortex, Vol 1 (Peters A, Jones EG, eds), pp 521-546. New York: Plenum.
- Kably B, Drew T (1998) Corticoreticular pathways in the cat. II. Discharge activity of neurons in area 4 during voluntary gait modifications. J Neurophysiol 80:406-424
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Li BM, Matsumura M, Kubota K (1993) GABAB modulation of neuronal activity related to visually guided movement in the monkey premotor cortex. Neurosci Res 18:83-87[Medline].
- Liddell EGT, Phillips CG (1944) Pyramidal section in the cat. Brain 67:1-9
[Free Full Text] .- Matsumura M, Sawaguchi T, Kubota K (1992) GABAergic inhibition of neuronal activity in the primate motor and premotor cortex during voluntary movement. J Neurophysiol 68:692-702
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Matsunami K, Hamada I (1981) Characteristics of the ipsilateral movement-related neuron in the motor cortex of the monkey. Brain Res 204:29-42[ISI][Medline].
- Metherate R, Tremblay N, Dykes RW (1988) The effect of acetylcholine on response properties of cat somatosensory cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 59:1231-1252
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Nowak LG, Bullier J (1996) Spread of stimulating current in the cortical gray matter of rat visual cortex studied on a new in vitro slice preparation. J Neurosci Methods 67:237-248[ISI][Medline].
- Orlovsky GN, Deliagina TG, Grillner S (1999) In: Neuronal control of locomotion. From mollusc to man. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Patla AE, Prentice SD, Robinson C, Neufeld J (1991) Visual control of locomotion: strategies for changing direction and for going over obstacles. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:603-634[ISI][Medline].
- Porter R, Lewis M (1975) Relationship of neuronal discharges in the precentral gyrus of monkeys to the performance of arm movements. Brain Res 98:21-36[ISI][Medline].
- Pryor K (1975) In: Lads before the wind. New York: Harper and Row.
- Rank JB (1975) Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res 98:417-440[ISI][Medline].
- Rao SG, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (1999) Isodirectional tuning of adjacent interneurons and pyramidal cells during working memory: evidence for microcolumnar organization in PFC. J Neurophysiol 81:1903-1916
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Rao SG, Williams GV, Goldman-Rakic PS (2000) Destruction and creation of spatial tuning by disinhibition: GABAA blockade of prefrontal cortical neurons engaged by working memory. J Neurosci 20:485-494
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Reitboeck HJ (1983) Fiber microelectrodes for electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosci Methods 8:249-262[ISI][Medline].
- Ruffo M, Postupna N, Anderson M (2001) Corticothalamic neurons to motor thalamus have low spontaneous or task related activity. Soc Neurosci Abstr 27:824.4.
- Schmied A, Fetz EE (1987) Activity-related changes in electrical thresholds of pyramidal tract axons in the behaving monkey. Exp Brain Res 65:352-360[Medline].
- Sherman SM, Guillery RW (2001) In: Exploring the thalamus. New York: Academic.
- Sillito AM (1975) The contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to the receptive field properties of neurons in the striate cortex of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 250:305-329
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Strick PL, Sterling P (1974) Synaptic termination of afferents from the ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus in the cat motor cortex. A light and electron microscopy study. J Comp Neurol 153:77-106[ISI][Medline].
- Swadlow HA (1988) Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in binocular visual cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and binocular properties. J Neurophysiol 59:1162-1187
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1989) Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 vibrissa cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. J Neurophysiol 62:288-308
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1990) Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 forelimb representation of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. J Neurophysiol 63:1477-1498
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1991) Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in second somatosensory cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties. J Neurophysiol 66:1392-1409
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1994) Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in motor cortex of the awake rabbit: axonal properties, sensory receptive fields, and subthreshold synaptic inputs. J Neurophysiol 71:437-453
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1995) Influence of VPM afferents on putative inhibitory interneurons in S1 of the awake rabbit: evidence from cross-correlation, microstimulation, and latencies to peripheral sensory stimulation. J Neurophysiol 73:1584-1599
[Abstract/Free Full Text] .- Swadlow HA (1998) Neocortical efferent neurons with very slowly conducting axons: strategies for reliable antidromic identification. J Neurosci Methods 79:131-141
