Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 1, 2003, 23(5):1847
Peptidases Prevent µ-Opioid Receptor Internalization in Dorsal
Horn Neurons by Endogenously Released Opioids
Bingbing
Song and
Juan
Carlos G.
Marvizón
Center for Neurovisceral Sciences and Women's Health, Division of
Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine
at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
90095
 |
ABSTRACT |
To evaluate the effect of peptidases on µ-opioid receptor (MOR)
activation by endogenous opioids, we measured MOR-1 internalization in
rat spinal cord slices. A mixture of inhibitors of aminopeptidases (amastatin), dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase (captopril), and neutral endopeptidase (phosphoramidon) dramatically increased the potencies of
Leu-enkephalin and dynorphin A to produce MOR-1 internalization, and
also enhanced the effects of Met-enkephalin and
-neoendorphin, but
not endomorphins or
-endorphin. The omission of any one inhibitor abolished Leu-enkephalin-induced internalization, indicating that all
three peptidases degraded enkephalins. Amastatin preserved dynorphin
A-induced internalization, and phosphoramidon, but not captopril,
increased this effect, indicating that the effect of dynorphin A was
prevented by aminopeptidases and neutral endopeptidase. Veratridine (30 µM) or 50 mM KCl produced MOR-1
internalization in the presence of peptidase inhibitors, but little or
no internalization in their absence. These effects were attributed to
opioid release, because they were abolished by the selective MOR
antagonist CTAP (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2)
and were Ca2+ dependent. The effect of veratridine
was protected by phosphoramidon plus amastatin or captopril, but not by
amastatin plus captopril or by phosphoramidon alone, indicating that
released opioids are primarily cleaved by neutral endopeptidase, with a
lesser involvement of aminopeptidases and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase.
Therefore, because the potencies of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 to
elicit internalization were unaffected by peptidase inhibitors, the
opioids released by veratridine were not endomorphins. Confocal
microscopy revealed that MOR-1-expressing neurons were in close
proximity to terminals containing opioids with enkephalin-like
sequences. These findings indicate that peptidases prevent the
activation of extrasynaptic MOR-1 in dorsal horn neurons.
Key words:
amastatin; aminopeptidase; captopril; dipeptidyl
carboxypeptidase; dynorphin; endocytosis; endomorphin; endorphin; enkephalin; internalization; µ-opioid receptor; neutral
endopeptidase; opioid; peptidase; phosphoramidon; rat; release; spinal
cord
 |
Introduction |
Pain neurophysiology was greatly
advanced by the discovery of opioid receptors and endogenous opioids
(for review, see Mansour et al., 1988
; Law et al., 2000
; Przewlocki and
Przewlocka, 2001
). These findings made it possible, in principle, to
trace causal links between stimuli, opioid release, opioid receptor
activation, and analgesic responses. However, measuring opioid release
cannot predict opioid receptor activation, because it may be produced by peptides different from the one being detected, and it is impossible to know the peptide concentration at the receptor. These problems may
be avoided by using opioid receptor internalization to assess their
activation by a given stimulus, independently of the particular opioid
being released. This approach was successfully used to study the
activation of neurokinin 1 receptors by neurokinins released by noxious
stimuli (Mantyh et al., 1995
; Abbadie et al., 1997
; Allen et al., 1997
;
Liu et al., 1997
; Honore et al., 1999
; Trafton et al., 1999
, 2001
) or
after primary afferent stimulation (Marvizon et al., 1997
, 1999a
; Allen
et al., 1999
). Conceivably, the internalization of µ-opioid receptors
(MORs) could be used similarly to detect their activation by
endogenously released opioids.
In the dorsal horn, MOR-1 is present in dorsal horn interneurons (Kemp
et al., 1996
), whereas the splice variants MOR-1C and MOR-1D are found
in primary afferent terminals (Abbadie et al., 2001
), where they
control substance P release (Yaksh et al., 1980
; Aimone and Yaksh,
1989
). MOR-1 in dorsal horn neurons readily internalized when exposed
to etorphine or
[D-Ala2,NMe-Phe4,
Gly-ol5]-enkephalin (DAMGO), and the potency of DAMGO
was similar to its potency to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Marvizon et
al., 1999b
). Furthermore, MOR-1 internalization produced by intrathecal
DAMGO correlated with its ability to elicit analgesia (Trafton et al., 2000
). However, it remains to be established whether endogenous opioids, unlike morphine (Keith et al., 1998
), produce MOR-1
internalization. If this were true, then MOR-1 internalization could be
used as a marker of its activation by endogenous opioids. MOR-1
internalization attributable to opioid release was demonstrated in
hypothalamic neurons after estrogen treatment (Eckersell et al., 1998
)
but has proved elusive in dorsal horn neurons. It was not elicited by
primary afferent stimulation (Trafton et al., 1997
) or,
surprisingly, by noxious stimuli (Trafton et al., 2000
) able to evoke
the spinal release of Met-enkephalin (Le Bars et al., 1987a
; Cesselin
et al., 1989
; Bourgoin et al., 1990
). Furthermore, the ability of Met-enkephalin to elicit MOR-1 internalization (Trafton et al., 2000
)
was much lower than its affinity for MOR-1 (Raynor et al., 1993
; Zadina
et al., 1997
).
We hypothesized that MOR-1 internalization by endogenous opioids is
prevented by their rapid degradation by peptidases. Indeed, enkephalins
(Guyon et al., 1979
; Chou et al., 1984
; Yaksh and Chipkin, 1989
;
Hiranuma et al., 1997
; Hiranuma et al., 1998a
) and dynorphins (Hiranuma
et al., 1998b
) are quickly degraded in the intestine, brain, and spinal
cord by three peptidases: neutral endopeptidase, dipeptidyl
carboxypeptidase, and aminopeptidases (Fig.
1). We tested our hypothesis by
investigating the ability of peptidase inhibitors to protect MOR-1
internalization produced by exogenously added and endogenously released
opioids. These results have been published previously in abstract form
(Song and Marvizon, 2002
).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1.
Opioid peptide bonds cleaved by peptidases. The
N-terminal sequence of opioids encoded by the proenkephalin,
prodynorphin, and pro-opiomelanocortin genes is shown with
arrows pointing to the bonds cleaved by the peptidases.
Dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase I cleaves dipeptides sequentially from the
C terminal. Therefore, depending on whether the peptide has an odd
(Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin, dynorphin A) or even
[Met-enk-Arg-Gly-Leu, dynorphin-(1-8)] number of amino acid
residues, this peptidase would cleave the bonds indicated by the
black or by the gray arrows, respectively
(Guyon et al., 1979 ; Hiranuma et al., 1997 , 1998a ,b ). The peptidase
inhibitors used in this study are shown with arrows
pointing to their corresponding enzymes. Neutral endopeptidase is also
known as enkephalinase, and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase I has also been
called angiotensin 1-converting enzyme and kininase II.
|
|
 |
Materials and Methods |
Chemicals. Ala-pyrrolidine-nitrile (Li et
al., 1995
) was a gift from Dr. Sherwin Wilk (Mount Sinai School of
Medicine, New York, NY).
-Neoendorphin and phosphoramidon
were purchased from Bachem/Peninsula
Laboratories (San Carlos, CA). Other chemicals were obtained
from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Media for slices. Artificial CSF (ACSF) contained (in
mM): 124 NaCl, 1.9 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.2 KH2PO4, 1.3 MgSO4, 2.4 CaCl2, and 10 glucose, and was 305 mOsm. K+-ACSF
contained a higher concentration (5 mM) of KCl.
Sucrose-ACSF was identical to ACSF, except that NaCl was
iso-osmotically replaced by sucrose (215 mM) and
the concentration of KCl was 5 mM. To depolarize
the slices, we used ACSF (50 mM KCl) in which the
concentration of KCl was increased to 50 mM and
the concentration of NaCl was decreased to 74 mM.
All of these media were constantly bubbled with 95%
O2 and 5% CO2 to a pH of
7.4.
Spinal cord slice preparation. All animal procedures were
approved by the Chancellor's Animal Research Committee at the
University of California Los Angeles and conform to National Institutes
of Health guidelines. Slices were prepared as described previously (Randic et al., 1993
; Marvizon et al., 1997
, 1999a
,b
; Sandkuhler et
al., 1997
). Briefly, 3- to 4-week-old Sprague Dawley rats
(Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were anesthetized with
isoflurane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ), and
a laminectomy was performed to extract a lumbar segment of the spinal
cord. The spinal cord was placed in ice-cold sucrose-ACSF in less than
1 min after the spine was pierced and cleaned of dura mater and
roots. Coronal spinal cord slices (400 µm) were cut with a Vibratome
(Technical Products International, St. Louis, MO) in ice-cold
sucrose-ACSF, using minimum forward speed and maximum vibration
amplitude. Up to six slices were obtained from each animal, in the
L1-L4 region. After cutting, slices were kept for 1 hr in
K+-ACSF at 35°C and then transferred to
ACSF at 35°C. It was vital that the slices contained healthy neurons,
which required the use of a Vibratome and spinal cords rapidly
extracted from live rats to make the slices.
Slice treatment. Slices were placed in a nylon net suspended
halfway inside a small beaker and incubated at 35°C with ACSF containing various compounds, constantly bubbled with 95%
O2 and 5% CO2. Peptidase
inhibitors (usually amastatin, phosphoramidon, and captopril) were used
at 10 µM, unless otherwise indicated. Phosphoramidon was always added together with 6 µM dithiothreitol to protect it against
oxidation. The incubation was ended by placing the slices in cold fixative.
MOR-1 immunohistochemistry in spinal cord slices.
Histological sections from spinal cord slices were prepared and labeled as described previously (Marvizon et al., 1999b
). Slices were fixed in
4% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% picric acid, and 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.4; cryoprotected in 20%
sucrose; frozen on dry ice; and sectioned with a cryostat at 25 µm in
the coronal plane. Sections were washed twice with PBS; washed twice
with PBS, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 0.001% thimerosal (PBS/Triton)
containing 5% normal goat serum; and then incubated at room
temperature for 1 hr and at 4°C overnight (12-18 hr) with the
primary antibody diluted 1:7000 in PBS/Triton. The primary antibody was
a rabbit antiserum raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 384-398 of the cloned rat MOR-1 (catalog number 24216; DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN) and was characterized previously
(Arvidsson et al., 1995
). Cells labeled by this antibody are neurons
(Spike et al., 2002
). Although the MOR-1C and MOR-1D splice variants are not recognized by this antibody, they are present in primary afferent terminals and not in dorsal horn neurons (Abbadie et al.,
2001
). After three washes with PBS, sections were incubated for 2 hr at
room temperature with a secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa-488; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) diluted
1:2000 in PBS/Triton. Sections were washed four more times with PBS and mounted in Prolong (Molecular Probes). Preabsorption of
the MOR-1 antibody with its immunizing peptide (10 µg/ml) abolished
the staining, and the labeling of MOR-1 in sections from slices was similar to sections from perfusion-fixed rats (Marvizon et al., 1999b
).
Double-label immunohistochemistry. A similar procedure was
used to double-label spinal cord sections for endomorphins,
enkephalins, and MOR-1. Adult male rats were anesthetized with
isoflurane, killed by bilateral thoracotomy, and fixed by aortal
perfusion. Two spinal cord segments (L3-L2 and L4) were postfixed,
cryoprotected, frozen, and sectioned at 25 µm in the sagittal and
coronal planes, respectively. Sections were incubated simultaneously
with the two primary antibodies diluted in PBS/Triton containing 1%
normal serum for 1 hr at room temperature and overnight at 4°C. After three washes, sections were incubated simultaneously with the two
secondary antibodies for 2 hr at room temperature. The primary antibodies were the rabbit MOR-1 antibody described above, a mouse monoclonal antibody (3-E7) recognizing
-endorphin, enkephalins, and
dynorphins (Gramsch Laboratories, Schwabhausen, Germany), a rabbit IgG (affinity-purified) raised against endomorphin-2 (catalog
number AB5106; Chemicon, Temecula, CA), and a goat
polyclonal antibody (affinity-purified) raised against the C-terminal
of mouse MOR-1 (catalog number sc-7488; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Secondary antibodies were as
follows: goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa-488 (Molecular
Probes), goat anti-mouse IgG-tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate, donkey anti-rabbit IgG-FITC, and donkey
anti-goat IgG-rhodamine red-X (Jackson ImmunoResearch,
West Grove, PA). All secondary antibodies produced negligible staining
in the absence of primary antibody.
Antibody characterization. The 3-E7 mouse monoclonal
antibody recognizes the N-terminal sequence
Tyr-Gly-Gly-Phe-Met of
-endorphin and cross-reacts completely
with Met-enkephalin and Leu-enkephalin and partially with dynorphins
and
-neoendorphin, as reported previously (Gramsch et al., 1983
) and
confirmed by us using preabsorption controls. Staining of the spinal
cord with the 3-E7 antibody was unaffected by preabsorption with
endomorphin-1 or endomorphin-2. The antibody directed against
endomorphins recognized both endomorphin-1 (70%) and endomorphin-2
(100%) but not enkephalins or
-endorphin (<0.03%), as reported by
the manufacturer. Some anti-endomorphin antibodies have been found to
cross-react partially with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)
(Pierce et al., 1998
), probably because CGRP and endomorphins have the
same C-terminal (Phe-NH2). Staining of the
dorsal horn by the endomorphin antibody was abolished by preabsorption
with 1 µM endomorphin-1 or endomorphin-2 but
only slightly decreased by preabsorption with 1 µM CGRP. Moreover, double-labeling of rat
spinal cord sections with the endomorphin antibody and three different
CGRP antibodies produced no colocalization (Marvizon and Song, 2002
),
indicating that this antibody does not cross-react with CGRP in our
conditions. For double-labeling with the rabbit anti-endomorphin
antibody, we used a goat antibody directed against MOR-1. This antibody
gave a somewhat less crisp label than the rabbit anti-MOR-1 antibody,
and it had to be used at a higher concentration (1:200 dilution). When
the two anti-MOR-1 antibodies were used together to double-label spinal
cord sections, we found good colocalization.
Confocal microscopy and image processing. Confocal
images were acquired at the University of California Los Angeles Carol Moss Spivak Cell Imaging Facility with a Leica
(Nussloch, Germany) TCS-SP confocal microscope with argon (476 and 488 nm) and krypton (568 nm) lasers, using a pinhole of 1.0 Airy
units, and objectives of 10× (0.4 numerical aperture) or 100× (1.4 numerical aperture), giving an optical section thickness (full width
half maximum) of 8.13 and 0.62 µm, respectively. A zoom factor of 2 was used with some images taken at 100× to increase the pixel
resolution of the resulting digital files. For each image at 100×,
stacks of 5-10 optical sections were obtained at intervals of 0.49 or 0.57 µm. Each optical section was averaged up to six times to reduce
noise. Images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems,
San Jose, CA). The "curves" feature of the program was used to
adjust the contrast and to balance the colors of double-label images.
Images were acquired at a digital size of 1024 × 1024 pixels and
were later cropped to the relevant part of the field without altering
the original image resolution.
Quantification of MOR-1 internalization. The amount of
internalization was quantified essentially as described previously (Mantyh et al., 1995
; Abbadie et al., 1997
; Marvizon et al., 1997
, 1999a
,b
; Trafton et al., 1999
, 2001
), by calculating the percentage of
MOR-1 immunoreactive (IR) neurons in laminas I and II that show
internalization in relation to the total number of IR neurons sampled.
The person counting the neurons was unaware of the treatment given to
the slice. A Zeiss Axiovert 135 (Carl Zeiss,
Inc., Thornwood, NY) fluorescence microscope fitted with a 100×
objective lens was used to count neurons. Neuronal somata with
five or more endosomes were considered to have internalized receptors.
At least three sections per slice were used, and all MOR-1 somata in
these three sections were counted, representing 100-200 MOR-1 neurons
per slice. An alternative method to quantify internalization consists of counting endosomes in confocal images of sample neurons for each
treatment (Allen et al., 1999
; Trafton et al., 2000
). Although this
method is more effective for examining the inside of individual neurons, it also has some problems: the selection of neurons to be
imaged is a potential source of bias, and the number of endosomes depends on confounding factors such as the size of the neuronal body,
the size and proximity of the nucleus to the membrane, and the number
of dendrites present in the confocal plane. We found that the large
number of neurons sampled with our method provides a better statistical
base to discriminate subtle differences in the amount of
internalization. In any event, similar results were obtained using
these two methods (cf. Marvizon et al., 1999b
; Trafton et al.,
2000
).
Statistical analysis. Treatments were randomized between
slices, and no more than two slices from the same animal received the
same treatment. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism
version 3.03 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego,
CA). Statistical analyses consisted of one-way ANOVA followed by
Tukey's post-test or two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's
post-test. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. In
concentration-response experiments, a sigmoidal dose-response
function, Y = bottom + (top
bottom)/[1 + 10exp ([Log EC50
Log
(X)] × nH)], where
nH denotes the Hill
coefficient, was fitted to the data points by nonlinear
regression. Data were simultaneously fitted to two models, one in which
nH was fixed to 1.0, and the other in
which nH was calculated by the
program. The second, more complex model was chosen based on an
F test if p < 0.005. The "top"
parameter was fixed to 100%, because otherwise the regression often
produced values >100%. The statistical error associated with the
calculated EC50 was expressed as a 95%
confidence interval (95% CI).
 |
Results |
MOR-1 internalization produced by exogenously added opioids
It was initially observed that incubating spinal cord slices with
relatively high concentrations (1 µM) of Leu-enkephalin did not produce MOR-1 internalization. A confocal image of a
representative neuron in a slice exposed to Leu-enkephalin is shown in
Figure 2D: MOR-1
immunoreactivity was located at the surface of the somata, analogous to
neurons in a control slice (Fig. 2A). Similar results have been reported using Met-enkephalin (Trafton et al., 2000
). In
contrast, incubating slices with 1 µM
endomorphin-1 (Fig. 2B) or 0.1 µM endomorphin-2 (Fig. 2C) produced
extensive MOR-1 internalization in lamina II neurons. Although
endomorphins have higher affinities for MOR-1 than enkephalins (Zadina
et al., 1997
), the affinity of Leu-enkephalin is sufficiently high to
produce MOR-1 activation at 1 µM. We
hypothesized that the inability of enkephalins to produce MOR-1
internalization when applied to spinal cord slices was attributable to
their degradation by peptidases. In the guinea pig ileum and striatum,
peptidases actively degrade enkephalins (Hiranuma and Oka, 1986
, 1997
,
1998a
; Oka et al., 1986
), but their degradation can be almost
completely prevented by a mixture of three peptidase inhibitors:
amastatin, captopril, and phosphoramidon (Fig. 1). Inhibitors of these
peptidases also prevented the degradation of enkephalins released in
the spinal cord (Chou et al., 1984
; Yaksh and Chipkin, 1989
). Indeed,
when slices were incubated with this peptidase inhibitor mixture and
Leu-enkephalin (1 µM), we observed profuse
MOR-1 internalization in most MOR-1 neurons (Fig. 2E). Similarly, the degradation of dynorphin 1-8 in
ileum and striatum was prevented by these protease inhibitors (Numata
et al., 1988
; Hiranuma et al., 1998b
). We found that 1 µM dynorphin A did not produce any MOR-1
internalization by itself (Fig. 2H), but it elicited
extensive MOR-1 internalization in the presence of the same peptidase
inhibitor mixture (Fig. 2I).

View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2.
Confocal images of MOR-1 dorsal horn neurons
exposed to opioids and peptidase inhibitors. Spinal cord slices were
incubated for 20 min with opioids and peptidase inhibitors
(PI; 10 µM amastatin, captopril, and
phosphoramidon). Treatments were as follows: Control
(A); 1 µM endomorphin-1
(EM-1, B); 100 nM
endomorphin-2 (EM-2, C); 1 µM Leu-enkephalin (Leu-enk,
D); 1 µM Leu-enkephalin and peptidase
inhibitors (E); 1 µM Leu-enkephalin
and peptidase inhibitors, 10 µM actinonin
(act.) instead of amastatin (F); 1 µM Leu-enkephalin and peptidase inhibitors, 100 µM bestatin (best.) instead of amastatin
(G); a 1 µM concentration of
dynorphin A (dyn A, H); and 1 µM dynorphin A and peptidase inhibitors
(I). Cells in A,
D, and H show no internalization; the
rest show clear internalization. Dorsal is up for all
panels except H, in which dorsal is
right. Confocal images (100×, zoom of 2) are two optical sections
(three in G and H) through the
center of lamina II neurons at intervals of 0.49 or 0.57 µm, of five
to seven optical sections. Scale bar: (in I)
A-I, 5 µm.
|
|
These observations were quantified by counting MOR-1 neurons in laminas
I-II with and without internalization (see Materials and Methods). In
slices incubated with normal ACSF (Fig.
3A, none) only a
very small percentage (6 ± 1%) of MOR-1 neurons presented internalization. This percentage did not significantly increase in
slices incubated with 1 µM Leu-enkephalin or
Met-enkephalin, 3 µM dynorphin A, or 1 µM
-neoendorphin (Fig. 3A). In
contrast, 1 µM
-endorphin (rat sequence), 1 µM endomorphin-1, and 0.1 µM endomorphin-2 elicited MOR-1 internalization
in a majority of MOR-1 neurons. MOR-1 internalization produced by
endomorphin-2 was abolished in the presence of the selective MOR
antagonist CTAP
(D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2,
1 µM), showing that it was attributable to the
binding of endomorphin-2 to MOR-1.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3.
MOR-1 internalization produced by opioids with and
without peptidase inhibitors. Spinal cord slices were
incubated for 10 min without (A) or with
(B) peptidase inhibitors and the opioids
and opioid antagonists indicated. Peptidase inhibitors were 10 µM amastatin, captopril, and phosphoramidon.
Leu-enkephalin (Leu-enk), Met-enkephalin
(Met-enk), -neoendorphin, endomorphin-1
(EM-1), -endorphin, and CTAP were 1 µM;
dynorphin A was 3 µM; endomorphin-2 (EM-2)
was 0.1 µM; and naloxone was 10 µM.
Columns represent the means ± SEM of three to five
slices (except none, which was 10 slices). Separate
ANOVAs for A and B revealed overall
significance (p < 0.0001). Tukey's
post-test revealed the significant differences from none
indicated by the asterisks (***p < 0.001) and significant differences (p < 0.001) between EM-2 and EM-2+CTAP (A), Leu-enk
and Leu-enk+naloxone (B), and dynorphin A and
dynorphin A+CTAP (B).
|
|
The opioid peptides that failed to produce MOR-1 internalization in the
absence of peptidase inhibitors produced MOR-1 internalization in
practically all MOR-1 IR neurons (Fig. 3B) in the presence of 10 µM amastatin, captopril, and
phosphoramidon. The peptidase inhibitor mixture by itself did not
appreciably increase the percentage of MOR-1 neurons with
internalization, as can be seen by comparing the none bars
in Figure 3A,B (also see below). MOR-1 internalization produced by 1 µM Leu-enkephalin was blocked by
the opioid antagonist naloxone (10 µM), and the
MOR-1 internalization produced by 3 µM
dynorphin A was abolished by the selective MOR antagonist CTAP (1 µM), indicating that it was mediated by the
binding of the peptides to MOR. Selective agonists of
and
opioid receptors did not elicit MOR-1 internalization in spinal cord
slices (Marvizon et al., 1999b
); therefore, it is highly unlikely that
enkephalins and dynorphins produced MOR-1 internalization by
interacting with
and
receptors and not by binding directly to
MOR-1.
Peptidase inhibitors increased the potencies of Leu-enkephalin
and dynorphin A to produce MOR-1 internalization
The findings described above are consistent with our hypothesis
that enkephalins and dynorphins are actively degraded by peptidases in
the dorsal horn. The hypothesis also predicts that the inability of
these opioids to produce MOR-1 internalization could be overcome at
higher concentrations because they would saturate the peptidases, and
that peptidase inhibitors would produce a left shift in their concentration-response curves to elicit MOR-1 internalization.
Figure 4A shows that
these predictions are fulfilled for Leu-enkephalin. In the absence of
peptidase inhibitors, high concentrations of Leu-enkephalin were able
to produce MOR-1 internalization, yielding an
EC50 of 22 µM (95% CI,
17-30). Peptidase inhibitors (amastatin, captopril, and
phosphoramidon) dramatically shifted the concentration-response curve
of Leu-enkephalin to the left, increasing its potency by almost two
orders of magnitude (EC50, 0.38 µM; 95% CI, 0.31-0.47). This
EC50 value was very similar to the potency of
Met-enkephalin (0.25 ± 0.6 µM) to produce
outward currents in locus ceruleus neurons in the presence of the
peptidase inhibitor kelatorphan (Williams et al., 1987
). Figure
4B shows that the predictions of the hypothesis are
also satisfied for dynorphin A, although in this case the left shift of
the concentration-response curve produced by peptidase inhibitors is
less dramatic: the EC50 for dynorphin A decreased
by one order of magnitude, from 5.2 µM (95%
CI, 4.3-6.3) to 0.60 µM (95% CI, 0.34-1.04).
Hill coefficients calculated for the concentration-response curves
were significantly higher than 1 (based on an F test with
p < 0.005, see Statistical analysis, above) for
Leu-enkephalin with peptidase inhibitors (nH, 2.8 ± 0.7) and for
dynorphin A without peptidase inhibitors (nH, 3.0 ± 0.6). Using a less
stringent criterion in the F test (p < 0.05), nH was also >1
(nH, 1.8 ± 0.5) for dynorphin A
with peptidase inhibitors. These high Hill coefficients suggest the presence of positive cooperativity in processes that regulate the
access of the opioids to the receptor or its internalization. The
calculated EC50 values were fairly independent of
nH values. In the two cases in which
nH was >1, we obtained similar
EC50 values if
nH was assumed to be 1: Leu-enkephalin
with peptidase inhibitors: EC50, 0.36 µM (95% CI, 0.20-0.64); dynorphin A without peptidase inhibitors: EC50, 4.6 µM (95% CI, 2.5-8.2).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4.
Effect of peptidase inhibitors on the potencies of
Leu-enkephalin, dynorphin-A, endomorphin-1, and endomorphin-2 to
produce MOR-1 internalization. Spinal cord slices were incubated for 10 min without (control) or with peptidase
inhibitors, and the indicated concentrations of Leu-enkephalin
(A), dynorphin-A (B),
endomorphin-1 (C), or endomorphin-2
(D). Peptidase inhibitors were 10 µM amastatin, captopril, and phosphoramidon
(A, B), or these three inhibitors plus 10 µM Ala-pyrrolidine-nitrile (C,
D). Points are the means ± SEM of three to five
slices. Curves were generated by fitting a sigmoidal dose-response
curve to the data. Numbers next to the
curves indicate EC50 values:
A, Leu-enkephalin: EC50, 22 µM (95% CI, 17-30;
R2, 0.96); Leu-enkephalin (peptidase
inhibitors): EC50, 0.38 µM (95% CI,
0.31-0.47; nH, 2.8 ± 0.7;
R2, 0.82). B,
Dynorphin A: EC50, 5.2 µM (95% CI,
4.3-6.3; nH, 3.0 ± 0.6;
R2, 0.90); dynorphin A (peptidase
inhibitors): EC50, 0.60 µM (95% CI,
0.34-1.04; R2, 0.83).
C, Endomorphin-1: EC50, 32 nM (95% CI, 16-65; R2,
0.73); endomorphin-1 (peptidase inhibitors): EC50,
40 nM (95% CI, 22-73;
R2, 0.77). D,
Endomorphin-2: EC50, 5 nM (95% CI,
3-8; R2, 0.92); endomorphin-2
(peptidase inhibitors): EC50, 10 nM
(95% CI, 6-15; R2, 0.94). Unless
otherwise indicated, nH values were fixed to
1.0 according to an F test. Values of the top parameter
were fixed to 100%.
|
|
Peptidase inhibitors did not affect the potency of endomorphins to
elicit MOR-1 internalization
In contrast to the MOR-1 internalization produced by
Leu-enkephalin and dynorphin A, peptidase inhibitors had no effect on the potencies of endomorphin-1 (Fig. 4C) or endomorphin-2
(Fig. 4D) to elicit MOR-1 internalization. Because
dipeptidyl peptidase IV (EC 3.4.14.15) has been reported to play an
important role in degrading endomorphins (Shane et al., 1999
), we
included in the assay the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor
Ala-pyrrolidine-nitrile (Li et al., 1995
) (10 µM) in addition to amastatin, captopril, and
phosphoramidon. However, even with this addition the potency of
endomorphin-1 was the same in the presence (EC50,
40 nM; 95% CI, 22-73) and in the absence
(EC50, 32 nM; 95% CI,
16-65) of peptidase inhibitors. Likewise, the potency of endomorphin-2
was the same with (EC50, 10 nM; 95% CI, 6-15) and without
(EC50, 5 nM; 95% CI, 3-8)
peptidase inhibitors. Diprotin A (Ile-Pro-Ile; 1 mM), another dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor,
did not increase the MOR-1 internalization produced by 1 nM endomorphin-2 (control, 18 ± 4%,
n = 3; diprotin A, 8 ± 3%, n = 3).
Contribution of different peptidases to the degradation
of Leu-enkephalin
Next, we determined the relative contribution of peptidases to
preventing MOR-1 internalization by Leu-enkephalin by using different
combinations of peptidase inhibitors. We took advantage of the fact
that Leu-enkephalin at 1 µM elicited maximal MOR-1 internalization in the presence of peptidase inhibitors and minimal internalization in their absence (Fig. 4A). Hence,
the ability of peptidase inhibitors to protect Leu-enkephalin against
degradation would be reflected in the amount of MOR-1 internalization
produced by 1 µM Leu-enkephalin. Figure
5A shows that in the presence
of 10 µM amastatin, phosphoramidon, or
captopril alone, or even combined two by two, 1 µM Leu-enkephalin remained unable to
significantly stimulate MOR-1 internalization. These results indicate
that each of the three peptidases targeted by these inhibitors
(aminopeptidases, neutral endopeptidase, and dipeptidyl
carboxypeptidase) (Fig. 1) is sufficient to degrade Leu-enkephalin
substantially. Interpolating the data in Figure 5A in the
left curve of Figure 4A suggests that each of these
peptidases is able to reduce the concentration of Leu-enkephalin from 1 to <0.3 µM. Thiorphan, like phosphoramidon, inhibits neutral endopeptidase (Yaksh and Chipkin, 1989
). In the presence of 10 µM thiorphan, amastatin, and
captopril, 1 µM Leu-enkephalin did produce
significant MOR-1 internalization (Fig. 5A), although the
effect was not as consistent as in the presence of phosphoramidon.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 5.
Effect of different combinations of peptidase
inhibitors on the internalization of MOR-1 produced by Leu-enkephalin
(Leu-enk) and dynorphin A. Spinal cord slices were
incubated at 35°C with peptidase inhibitors (10 µM
unless indicated otherwise); after 10 min, 1 µM
Leu-enkephalin (A, B) or dynorphin A
(C) was added for an additional 10 min.
Columns represent the means ± SEM of three to five
slices. ama, Amastatin; PhA,
phosphoramidon; capt, captopril; thio,
thiorphan; act, actinonin. A, Effects on
the MOR-1 internalization produced by Leu-enkephalin of different
combinations of an aminopeptidase inhibitor (amastatin), a dipeptidyl
carboxypeptidase inhibitor (captopril), and inhibitors of neutral
endopeptidase (phosphoramidon or thiorphan). B, Effects
on the MOR-1 internalization produced by Leu-enkephalin of different
aminopeptidase inhibitors in combination with phosphoramidon and
captopril. ANOVA of data in A and B
together revealed overall significance (p < 0.0001). C, Effects on the MOR-1 internalization
produced by dynorphin A of different combinations of amastatin,
captopril, and phosphoramidon. ANOVA yielded overall
p < 0.0001. Statistical differences from
none: *p < 0.05;
**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001;
Tukey's post-test.
|
|
To further characterize the aminopeptidase(s) responsible for the
degradation of enkephalins in the spinal cord, we substituted different
aminopeptidase inhibitors for amastatin in our inhibitor mixture (Fig.
5B). Antipain, arphamenine, bacitracin, proctolin, and
puromycin were ineffective. Other studies found that bacitracin (Tseng
et al., 1986
; Ozaki et al., 1994
) and puromycin (Aoki et al., 1984
) did
not protect enkephalins against degradation. Only actinonin (Fig.
1F) and amastatin (Fig. 1E)
protected the effect of Leu-enkephalin at 10 µM. The effectiveness of amastatin was reduced
at 1 µM but remained significant. Amastatin
inhibits aminopeptidases N (EC 3.4.11.7), A (EC 3.4.11.2), and W (EC
3.4.11.16), with IC50 values of 1-20
µM, whereas actinonin inhibits aminopeptidase N
(IC50, 2 µM) but not
aminopeptidases A and W (Tieku and Hooper, 1992
). Bestatin was
ineffective at 10 µM but protected the effect of Leu-enkephalin at 100 µM (Fig.
1G). Bestatin potently inhibits aminopeptidase W
(IC50, 8 µM), inhibits
aminopeptidase N at higher concentrations (IC50,
89 µM), and does not inhibit aminopeptidase A
(Tieku and Hooper, 1992
; Suzuki et al., 1997
). Together, these results
show that the pharmacological profile of the aminopeptidase that
degrades Leu-enkephalin matches that of aminopeptidase N.
Contribution of different peptidases to the degradation of
dynorphin A
The effect of combinations of peptidase inhibitors on dynorphin A
(Fig. 5C) was different from their effect on Leu-enkephalin (Fig. 5A). Amastatin plus phosphoramidon was as effective as
all three peptidase inhibitors in protecting the effect of
dynorphin A, indicating that dynorphin A is degraded by aminopeptidases and neutral endopeptidase. Moreover, significant
(p < 0.05) protection could be achieved with
amastatin alone. Actinonin could substitute for amastatin, which is
consistent with the idea that aminopeptidase N is involved
in the degradation of dynorphins as well as enkephalins. No protection
of dynorphin A was obtained with phosphoramidon plus captopril, and the
addition of captopril did not increase the effect of amastatin, which
shows that the MOR-1 internalization produced by dynorphin A is not
appreciably decreased by dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase. This is probably
attributable to the fact that dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase starts
cleaving dynorphin A at its extended C terminal (Fig. 1), producing
peptides containing the Leu-enkephalin sequence that are still able to
activate MOR-1.
Relative localization of opioid peptides and MOR-1 in the
dorsal horn
The localization of opioid-containing terminals
relative to MOR-1 IR neurons was explored using double-label
immunofluorescence. To detect opioid peptides, we used a monoclonal
antibody (3-E7) that recognized
-endorphin, enkephalins, dynorphins,
and
-neoendorphin (Gramsch et al., 1983
) but not endomorphins (data
not shown). Costaining with the 3-E7 and the MOR-1 antibodies (Fig.
6A) showed that 3-E7 IR
is very dense in laminas I and II, where MOR-1 IR cells were located,
and also slightly deeper in the dorsal horn and in the dorsolateral
funiculus, where MOR-1 staining was absent. High-magnification confocal
images in sagittal sections (Fig. 6B) showed that
3-E7 IR terminals are dispersed around MOR-1 IR neurons and dendrites.
Some 3-E7 IR terminals were in close apposition with MOR-1 IR neurons
or colocalized with it (Fig. 6B, arrows), indicating the presence of synapses and presynaptic MOR-1.

View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 6.
Relative localization of opioids and MOR-1 in the
dorsal horn. Sections (25 µm) from the lumbar spinal cord of an adult
rat were double-labeled with a monoclonal antibody (3-E7)
recognizing enkephalins, -endorphin, dynorphins, and
-neoendorphin (opioids, red),
and the MOR-1 antibody (MOR, green).
A, Single optical section at 10× magnification from a
coronal section. B, Two optical sections at
100× magnification from a sagittal section. Arrows
indicate sites of possible colocalization (in yellow).
I and II, Approximate location of laminas
I and II, respectively. Scale bar: (in B)
A, 100 µm; B, 10 µm.
|
|
Using an antibody that recognizes endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2, we
found that endomorphin-like immunoreactivity did not colocalize with
3-E7 immunoreactivity (data not shown), suggesting that endomorphins
are contained in terminals different from other opioids.
Endomorphin-like immunoreactivity was found primarily in lamina I and
the dorsolateral funiculus, whereas most MOR-1 IR neurons were found in
lamina II (Fig. 6), separated from endomorphin IR fibers and
varicosities (data not shown). However, Spike et al. (2002)
recently
reported that endomorphin-2 was present in substance-P-containing axons
contacting MOR-1 neurons in the dorsal horn.
MOR-1 internalization produced by endogenously
released opioids
To elicit opioid release, spinal cord slices were incubated with
30 µM veratridine or 50 mM KCl in the
presence or absence of peptidase inhibitors (amastatin, captopril, and
phosphoramidon). Veratridine increases Na+
fluxes through voltage-dependent Na+
channels (Satoh and Nakazato, 1991
). These stimuli have been shown
previously to elicit Met-enkephalin (Uzumaki et al., 1984
; Yaksh and
Chipkin, 1989
) and dynorphin (Przewlocka et al., 1990
) release from the
spinal cord.
A short (2 min) incubation with 30 µM veratridine in the
presence of peptidase inhibitors produced MOR-1 internalization in approximately two-thirds of MOR-1 IR cells (Fig.
7A). However, veratridine did not produce MOR-1 internalization in the absence of
peptidase inhibitors. These data were analyzed with a two-way ANOVA
with veratridine and peptidase inhibitors as the two variables, which
showed significant (p < 0.0001) effects of the
variables and their interaction. Bonferroni's post-test revealed a
significant effect (p < 0.001) of veratridine
combined with peptidase inhibitors but no significant effects of
peptidase inhibitors alone or veratridine without peptidase
inhibitors.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7.
MOR-1 internalization produced by opioids released
by veratridine. All compounds were applied to the slices during a 2 min
incubation with 30 µM veratridine and for 10 min
afterward. Peptidase inhibitors (10 µM) were actinonin
(act), amastatin (ama), captopril
(capt), and phosphoramidon (PhA).
Numbers above the columns indicate the
number of replicates (slices). A, Slices were incubated
in ACSF (control) or 30 µM
veratridine, without or with peptidase inhibitors. Two-way ANOVA
indicated significant (p < 0.0001) effects
of both variables (veratridine and peptidase
inhibitors) and their interaction. Bonferroni's post-test
indicated significant differences from control only for veratridine
with peptidase inhibitors (***p < 0.001).
B, Slices were treated with veratridine, peptidase
inhibitors, and no addition (none), 10 µM
CTAP, or 0.2 mM CaCl2 (low
Ca2+). ANOVA, p = 0.0001 overall; Tukey's post-test, ***p < 0.001;
**p < 0.01 compared with none. C,
Slices were incubated with veratridine and the indicated combinations
of peptidase inhibitors. ANOVA, p = 0.0006 overall; Tukey's post-test, *p < 0.05;
**p < 0.01 compared with none.
|
|
Depolarization with high K+ in the
presence of peptidase inhibitors elicited MOR-1 internalization in
one-third of the MOR-1 IR neurons (Fig.
8A). In this
experiment, slices were incubated for 20 min in ACSF containing 50 mM KCl, decreasing the concentration of NaCl by
the same amount to avoid increasing the osmotic pressure. In the
absence of peptidase inhibitors, 50 mM KCl
produced MOR-1 internalization in a small percentage of MOR-1 IR
neurons (Fig. 8A). Two-way ANOVA revealed significant
effects of the variables high K+
and peptidase inhibitors (p < 0.0001) and their
interaction (p < 0.01). Bonferroni's post-test
yielded a significant effect for 50 mM KCl
without (p < 0.05) and with (p < 0.001) peptidase inhibitors.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 8.
MOR-1 internalization produced by opioids released
by 50 mM KCl. Spinal cord slices were incubated for 20 min
with 50 mM KCl, peptidase inhibitors, and other additions.
Peptidase inhibitors (10 µM) were amastatin
(ama), phosphoramidon (PhA), and
captopril (capt). Numbers above the
columns indicate the number of replicates (slices).
A, Slices were incubated in normal ACSF
(control) or in ACSF containing 50 mM
KCl, without or with peptidase inhibitors. Control values are the same
as in Figure 7A, and are shown here for comparison.
Two-way ANOVA with 50 mM KCl and peptidase
inhibitors as the variables indicated significant
(p < 0.0001) effects of both variables and
their interaction (p < 0.01). Bonferroni's
post-test indicated significant differences from controls for 50 mM KCl both without (*p < 0.05) and
with (***p < 0.001) peptidase inhibitors.
B, Slices were incubated in ACSF containing 50 mM KCl, peptidase inhibitors, and no other addition
(none), 1 µM CTAP, or 0.2 mM
CaCl2 (low Ca2+). ANOVA,
p < 0.0001 overall; Tukey's post-test,
**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with none. C, Slices were incubated in ACSF
containing 50 mM KCl and the indicated combinations of
peptidase inhibitors. ANOVA, p = 0.0017 overall;
Tukey's post-test, **p < 0.01;
*p < 0.05 compared with ama+capt+PhA.
|
|
Confocal images of neurons representative of these observations are
shown in Figure 9. Neurons exposed to
peptidase inhibitors (A) or veratridine
(B) alone showed crisp surface staining and no
endosomes. Figure 9F shows a neuron exposed to 50 mM KCl in the absence of peptidase inhibitors; it
presents a somewhat discontinuous labeling of the membrane, possibly
indicating some MOR-1 clustering. In the presence of peptidase
inhibitors, veratridine produced clear internalization in most neurons,
as shown by the group of three neurons in Figure 9C. The
neuron in the bottom left corner does not have the nucleus
in the confocal plane, and part of a fourth neuron is visible in the
bottom right corner. Note the presence of intensely labeled
endosomes and the decrease in surface staining. Figure 9G
shows a neuron presenting internalization after treatment with high
K+ and peptidase inhibitors. This neuron
has a nucleus occupying most of the soma, which is common in MOR-1 IR
neurons in the dorsal horn (see also Figs. 2, 6B).
However, there is almost no surface staining, and several endosomes are
visible in the cytoplasm and along one dendrite.

View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9.
Confocal images of MOR-1 dorsal horn neurons
treated with 50 mM KCl or veratridine. Slice treatments
were as follows: peptidase inhibitors (PI) alone
(A); 30 µM veratridine
(veratr., B); 30 µM
veratridine and peptidase inhibitors (C); 30 µM veratridine, peptidase inhibitors, and CTAP
(D); 30 µM veratridine, peptidase
inhibitors, and 0.2 mM Ca2+
( Ca, E); 50 mM KCl
(KCl, F); 50 mM KCl
and peptidase inhibitors (G); 50 mM
KCl, peptidase inhibitors, and 1 µM CTAP
(H); and 50 mM KCl, peptidase
inhibitors, and 0.2 mM Ca2+
(I). Peptidase inhibitors were 10 µM amastatin, captopril, and phosphoramidon. Only cells
in C and G show internalization. Confocal
images (100×, zoom of 2 for A,
F-I) are from neurons in central
(A-E, H, I) or
medial (F, G) lamina II. Dorsal
is up for all panels. For each image, stacks of 5-10
optical sections were obtained at intervals of 0.49 or 0.57 µm, but
only two optical sections (3 for A and C,
4 for G) through the center of the cell are shown. Scale
bar: (in I) A,
F-I, 5 µm; B-E, 10 µm.
|
|
The selective MOR-1 antagonist CTAP (1 µM) abolished
MOR-1 internalization produced by veratridine (Fig. 7B) or
50 mM KCl (Fig. 8A) in the
presence of peptidase inhibitors. Representative neurons are shown in
Figure 9D (veratridine) and Figure 9H (high K+). This observation indicates that the
internalization was attributable to the interaction of agonists with
MOR-1. Moreover, if the internalization produced by veratridine and
high K+ was attributable to the release of
endogenous opioids, we predicted that it would be inhibited in the
absence Ca2+ as well. However, it is
possible that the mechanism of MOR-1 internalization itself requires
Ca2+. Indeed, in the nominal absence of
Ca2+ (no CaCl2 was
added), the MOR-1 internalization produced by 1 µM endomorphin-2 was decreased from 100% of
MOR-1 neurons with internalization (Fig. 4D) to
55 ± 18% (n = 5). However, a 10-fold reduction
in Ca2+ concentration (from 2.4 to 0.2 mM) did not affect the MOR-1 internalization produced by 0.1 µM endomorphin-2, which was
present in 97 ± 2% of the MOR-1 IR neurons (n = 3). Therefore, the MOR-1 internalization process can take place if a
small amount of Ca2+ is present in the
extracellular medium. Yet when the Ca2+
concentration was decreased to 0.2 mM, the MOR-1
internalization produced by 50 mM KCl (Figs.
7A, 8I) or veratridine (Figs.
6B, 8E) was abolished or greatly
reduced, respectively. These results confirm that veratridine and high
K+ produced MOR-1 internalization by
eliciting the Ca2+-dependent release of
endogenous opioids.
Contribution of different peptidases to the degradation of
endogenously released opioids
To determine which peptidases contributed to the degradation of
the opioids released by veratridine or high
K+, we studied the effect of different
combinations of peptidase inhibitors. In the case of high
K+ (Fig. 8B), only the
mixture of the three inhibitors significantly increased
(p < 0.05) MOR-1 internalization above that
produced by 50 mM KCl alone. However,
phosphoramidon plus captopril produced an effect that was not
significantly different from the combination of the three inhibitors,
and showed a trend toward increased internalization. In the case
of veratridine (Fig. 7C), phosphoramidon plus captopril or
phosphoramidon plus amastatin produced MOR-1 internalization significantly above control levels (p < 0.05).
However, phosphoramidon by itself or amastatin plus captopril did not
significantly increase internalization above the effect of veratridine
alone. Mixtures of three inhibitors, including either amastatin or
actinonin as aminopeptidase inhibitors, produced robust MOR-1
internalization (p < 0.01). These results
indicate that neutral endopeptidase is the main enzyme degrading
opioids released in the spinal cord, with a substantial contribution of
aminopeptidases and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase.
 |
Discussion |
In summary, in the dorsal horn: (1) peptidases restrict MOR-1
internalization by exogenously applied enkephalins and dynorphins, (2)
endomorphins are not substantially degraded by peptidases, and (3)
peptidases prevent MOR-1 internalization by endogenously released opioids.
Peptidases restrict MOR-1 internalization by exogenous enkephalins
and dynorphins
Peptidase inhibitors substantially increased the potencies of
Leu-enkephalin and dynorphin A to elicit MOR-1 internalization, as well
as the effect of single concentrations of Met-enkephalin and
-neoendorphin, indicating that three peptidases (Fig. 1) cleave
enkephalins and dynorphins before they bind to MOR. Opioids encoded by
the proenkephalin, prodynorphin, and pro-opiomelanocortin genes have N
terminals homologous to Leu-enkephalin or Met-enkephalin and are in
principle susceptible to be cleaved by these peptidases. However,
-endorphin produced MOR-1 internalization in the absence of
peptidase inhibitors, probably because its tertiary structure protects
against cleavage by aminopeptidases (Bewley and Li, 1985
), its long
sequence provides protection against carboxypeptidases, and neutral
endopeptidase preferentially cleaves the Leu17-Phe18 bond (Graf et al.,
1985
), producing
-endorphin. Indeed, many degradation products of
-endorphin are biologically active (Burbach and De Kloet, 1982
).
All three peptidases degraded Leu-enkephalin, because omission of any
one inhibitor resulted in the loss of its effect. The Leu-enkephalin-degrading aminopeptidase was probably aminopeptidase N
(Tieku and Hooper, 1992
; Suzuki et al., 1997
) present in the dorsal
horn (Noble et al., 2001
), because it was inhibited by amastatin,
actinonin, and high concentrations of bestatin, but not by puromycin or
other aminopeptidase inhibitors. Aminopeptidase M degrades enkephalins
(Hersh, 1985
) but is located primarily in blood vessels (Hersh et al.,
1987
), and other enkephalin-degrading aminopeptidases are sensitive to
puromycin (Shimamura et al., 1983
; Dyer et al., 1990
; Hui et al.,
1998
). However, we cannot rule out the involvement of aminopeptidases
with a pharmacological profile similar to aminopeptidase N, like one
associated with opioid receptors (Hui et al., 1985
).
The ability of dynorphin A to produce MOR-1 internalization was
decreased by aminopeptidases and neutral endopeptidase, but not
appreciably by dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase, probably because their
cleavage of dynorphin A produces active peptides containing the
Leu-enkephalin sequence. Likewise, although dynorphin A does have a
fairly high affinity for MOR-1 (Raynor et al., 1993
; Zadina et al.,
1997
), we cannot rule out that MOR-1 internalization produced by
dynorphin A was mediated through its conversion to Leu-enkephalin by
peptidase EC 3.4.24.15 (Bell and Traynor, 1998
). Importantly, in the
absence of peptidase inhibitors, dynorphin A was more potent than
Leu-enkephalin in producing MOR-1 internalization.
Endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 are not degraded by peptidases
Shane et al. (1999)
showed that ventricular administration of an
inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV enhanced the analgesic effect of
endomorphin-2. In contrast, we found that inhibitors of this and other
peptidases did not affect the abilities of endomorphins to produce
MOR-1 internalization. It is possible that dipeptidyl peptidase IV
activity in the dorsal horn is lower than in the brain. However,
Tomboly et al. (2002)
showed that endomorphins are degraded at slow
rates in the brain. Unlike endomorphins, the opioids released by
veratridine or high K+ were degraded by
peptidases. It is possible that the marginal internalization elicited
in the absence of peptidase inhibitors by high
K+ (but not veratridine) was attributable
to endomorphin release, but it could also be mediated by
-endorphin.
Therefore, endomorphins, despite their high affinity, seem to
contribute little to the activation of extrasynaptic MOR-1 in dorsal
horn neurons.
Endogenously released opioids
The MOR-1 internalization produced by veratridine or high
K+ was abolished by the MOR-1 antagonist
CTAP and was Ca2+ dependent, indicating
that it was attributable to the release of MOR-1 agonists.
Veratridine-evoked MOR-1 internalization required peptidase inhibitors,
and internalization produced by high K+
was greatly reduced in their absence, showing that most of the released
opioids are degraded by peptidases. This is consistent with studies
showing that peptidase inhibitors decreased ventral root potentials
(Suzuki et al., 1997
) and responses of dorsal horn neurons to C fiber
activity (Dickenson et al., 1987
).
Neutral endopeptidase appears to be the main enzyme degrading released
opioids, because phosphoramidon plus amastatin or captopril, but not
amastatin plus captopril, protected the effect of veratridine. However,
phosphoramidon alone did not produce significant protection, indicating
that the contribution of aminopeptidases and dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase is also important. In contrast, the internalization produced by Leu-enkephalin was similarly decreased by all three peptidases, whereas the effect of dynorphin A was not decreased by
dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase. This discrepancy suggests that the
opioids released are not the enkephalin pentapeptides or dynorphin A
alone, but a mixture of opioid peptides of various lengths (Lucas and
Yaksh, 1990
), resulting in a mixed susceptibility to peptidases.
Our results show that MOR-1 internalization can be used to investigate
mechanisms of opioid release. Opioids are not appreciably released from
primary afferents, because prolonged dorsal root stimulation while
superfusing the slices with peptidase inhibitors did not produce MOR-1
internalization (Marvizon and Song, 2002
). Therefore, the opioid
release detected here is probably from interneurons (Todd and Spike,
1993
) and/or bulbospinal fibers (Basbaum and Fields, 1984
; Le Bars et
al., 1987b
; Fields et al., 1991
; Budai and Fields, 1998
).
Physiological relevance
Our results likely reflect the situation in vivo.
Amastatin, captopril, and phosphoramidon increased the analgesic
effects of intrathecal or intracerebral opioids (Kishioka et al., 1994
; Kitamura et al., 2000
), but deletion of any one of the inhibitors substantially decreased this effect. The peptidase inhibitor RB-101 [N-([R,S]-2-benzyl-3([S][2-amino-4-methythio]butyl
dithio)-1-oxopropyl)-L- phenylalanine benzyl ester]
injected systemically also produced analgesia (Noble et al.,
1992a
).
The relationship between MOR activation and its internalization is
complex. Although internalization requires activation, the converse is
not always true, because morphine activates MOR-1 without producing its
internalization (Keith et al., 1998
). Nevertheless, it has been
suggested that endogenous opioids are able to produce MOR-1
internalization (Whistler et al., 1999
). Our results support this idea,
because all of the opioids tested produced MOR-1 internalization. Moreover, in the presence of peptidase inhibitors, the potency of
Leu-enkephalin to produce MOR-1 internalization was remarkably similar
to the potency of Met-enkephalin to evoke outward currents in locus
ceruleus neurons (Williams et al., 1987
). Therefore, MOR-1
internalization provides a good indicator of its activation by
endogenous opioids.
In view of this, it is puzzling that noxious stimuli that elicited
spinal enkephalin release (Yaksh and Elde, 1981
; Cesselin et al., 1985
;
Le Bars et al., 1987a
,b
; Cesselin et al., 1989
; Bourgoin et al., 1990
)
did not produce MOR-1 internalization in dorsal horn neurons (Trafton
et al., 2000
). We show here that this was probably because of opioid
degradation, but the question remains as to why peptidases did not
degrade opioids detected in release studies that did not use peptidase
inhibitors. However, in other studies (Yaksh and Chipkin, 1989
)
peptidase inhibitors did produce a 10-fold increase in Met-enkephalin
release. Peptidases are bound to the extracellular surface of neurons
(Aoki et al., 1984
; Roques, 2000
) and may be associated with MOR (Hui
et al., 1985
), degrading opioids in their microenvironment. Thus,
opioids diffusing away from the tissue would not be degraded as readily as those near the receptors. Conversely, exogenous opioids will be
degraded as they approach MOR-1.
Our findings indicate that opioids, unlike neurokinins (Mantyh et al.,
1995
; Abbadie et al., 1997
; Allen et al., 1997
; Marvizon et al., 1997
,
1999a
; Trafton et al., 2001
), do not normally operate by "volume
transmission," (i.e., by activating extrasynaptic receptors over a
large region) (Fuxe and Agnati, 1991
). Although released opioids
inhibited dorsal horn neurons by activating MOR (Budai and Fields,
1998
), this may be because of the activation of synaptic MOR. Indeed,
we found opioid-containing terminals in close proximity to
MOR-expressing dorsal horn neurons. Whether synaptic and extrasynaptic MORs are differently associated with peptidases needs to be investigated.
Yet, it is unlikely that the abundant extrasynaptic MOR-1 in dorsal
horn neurons serves no function; hence, there may be some conditions in
which opioids act by volume transmission. First, during inflammation
and hyperalgesia, dynorphin and enkephalins are upregulated (Draisci et
al., 1991
; MacArthur et al., 1999
; Wang et al., 2000
). However,
although the spinal release of dynorphin was increased during
inflammation, Met-enkephalin release was reduced (Pohl et al., 1997
),
and noxious stimulation during inflammation failed to produce MOR-1
internalization (Trafton et al., 2000
). Second, peptidase activity
could be downregulated in some conditions. For example, the activity of
a substance P endopeptidase in the spinal cord was altered during
morphine tolerance and withdrawal (Zhou et al., 2001
). Moreover, an
enkephalin-degrading aminopeptidase can be switched between cytosolic
and membrane-bound forms (Dyer et al., 1990
). Third, these peptidases
also degrade other neuropeptides, notably neurokinins (Duggan et al.,
1992
), and could become saturated when neuropeptides are released in
large amounts or inhibited otherwise. For example, enkephalin-degrading
aminopeptidases are inhibited by substance P (Hersh, 1985
; Shimamura et
al., 1991
).
Therapeutic implications
It has been suggested that peptidase inhibitors could be used to
treat pain, because they have analgesic effects (Noble et al., 1992a
)
and do not produce tolerance and addiction (Noble et al., 1992b
,c
;
Whistler et al., 1999
; Roques, 2000
). This may be because pain causes
the release of opioids in the dorsal horn but not in brain areas
involved in addiction. Although these peptidases also degrade
neurokinins (Duggan et al., 1992
), peptidase inhibitors had a
comparatively small effect on their ability to produce neurokinin 1 receptor internalization in dorsal horn neurons (X. Wang and J. C. G. Marvizón, unpublished observations). Our findings
underscore the importance of inhibiting dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase, in
addition to aminopeptidase N and neutral endopeptidase (Noble et al.,
1992a
,b
; Roques, 2000
), to fully protect the analgesic effect of
endogenously released opioids.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
Received Sept. 25, 2002; revised Dec. 10, 2002; accepted Dec. 12, 2002.
This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant
RO1-DA12609 to J.C.M. We thank Drs. Chris Evans, Marzia Malcangio, and
Emeran Mayer for critically reading this manuscript; Drs. Enrico
Stefani, Catia Sternini, and Ligia Toro for their advice and support;
Dr. Sherwin Wilk for providing alanine-pyrrolidonyl-2-nitrile; and
Kendrick Che and Anish R. Dube for their help. We are also grateful for
the assistance of Dr. Matthew J. Schibler at the University of
California Los Angeles Carol Moss Spivak Cell Imaging Facility.
Correspondence should be addressed to Juan Carlos G. Marvizón,
1541 MacDonald Research Laboratories, 675 Charles E. Young Drive,
University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail:
marvizon{at}ucla.edu.
 |
References |
-
Abbadie C,
Trafton J,
Liu H,
Mantyh PW,
Basbaum AI
(1997)
Inflammation increases the distribution of dorsal horn neurons that internalize the neurokinin-1 receptor in response to noxious and non-noxious stimulation.
J Neurosci
17:8049-8060[Abstract/Free Full&n