The Journal of Neuroscience, July 13, 2005, 25(28):6676-6686; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1079-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
Cellular/Molecular
Structural Determinants of
4
2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Trafficking
Xiao-Qin Ren,1
Shi-Bin Cheng,1
Magdalen W. Treuil,2
Jayanta Mukherjee,1
Jayaraman Rao,2
K. H. Braunewell,3
Jon M. Lindstrom,4 and
Rene Anand1,2
1Neuroscience Center of Excellence and 2Department of Neurology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, 3Signal Transduction Research Group, Neuroscience Research Center, Charité, University Medicine, 10117 Berlin, Germany, and 4Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
The structural determinants of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) trafficking have yet to be fully elucidated. Hydrophobic residues occur within short motifs important for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export or endocytotic trafficking. Hence, we tested whether highly conserved hydrophobic residues, primarily leucines, in the cytoplasmic domain of the
4
2 AChR subunits were required for cell surface expression of
4
2 AChRs. Mutation of F350, L351, L357, and L358 to alanine in the
4 AChR subunit attenuates cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs. Mutation of F342, L343, L349, and L350 to alanine at homologous positions in the
2 AChR subunit abolishes cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs. The hydrophobic nature of the leucine residue is a primary determinant of its function because mutation of L343 to another hydrophobic amino acid, phenylalanine, in the
2 AChR subunit only poorly inhibits trafficking of mutant
4
2 AChR to the cell surface. All mutant
4
2 AChRs exhibit high-affinity binding for [3H]epibatidine. In both tsA201 cells and differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells, wild-type
4
2 AChRs colocalize with the Golgi marker giantin, whereas mutant
4
2 AChRs fail to do so. The striking difference between mutant
4 versus mutant
2 AChR subunits on cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs points to a cooperative or regulatory role for the
4 AChR subunit and an obligatory role for the
2 AChR subunit in ER export. Collectively, our results identify, for the first time, residues within AChR subunits that are essential structural determinants of
4
2 AChR ER export.
Key words: cargo; export; endoplasmic reticulum; Golgi; nicotine; trafficking
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Neuronal acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) are a family of ACh-gated ion channels assembled from different combinations of
2-
10 and
2-
4 subunits (Millar, 2003
). The
4
2 AChRs represent >80% of the [3H]nicotine and [3H]epibatidine binding sites in mammalian brain (Whiting and Lindstrom, 1988
).
2 AChR subunit gene knock-out mice show little [3H]nicotine binding in their brains, lose their sensitivity to nicotine in passive avoidance tasks (Picciotto et al., 1995
), and show attenuated self-administration of nicotine (Picciotto et al., 1998
).
4 AChR subunit gene knock-out mice also lack [3H]nicotine binding sites and exhibit reduced antinociceptive effects of nicotine (Marubio et al., 1999
) and loss of tonic control of striatal basal dopamine release (Marubio et al., 2003
). Using a knock-in mouse expressing
4
2 AChRs hypersensitive to nicotine,
4
2 AChRs were shown to mediate the essential features of nicotine-addiction, including reward, tolerance, and sensitization (Tapper et al., 2004
).
4
2 AChRs have important roles in other neurological diseases because some human epilepsies are caused by mutations within the
4 subunit or the
2 subunit (Raggenbass and Bertrand, 2002
) and because significant loss of
4
2 AChRs may contribute to the cognitive deficits in Alzheimer's disease (Nordberg et al., 1992
; Court and Clementi, 1995
).
The ontogeny of AChRs remains to be fully elucidated. The archetypical muscle-type AChR subunits are translated by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane-associated ribosomal complexes and cotranslationally inserted into the ER membrane via the translocon (Johnson and van Waes, 1999
; Alder and Johnson, 2004
). The nascent subunit polypeptide subsequently undergoes cleavage of its signal sequence, oxidation of its disulfide bonds (Mishina et al., 1985
; Blount and Merlie, 1990
), and N-glycosylation of specific residues (Merlie et al., 1982
; Smith et al., 1987
; Blount and Merlie 1988
). Chaperones such as binding protein BiP (Blount and Merlie, 1991
; Paulson et al., 1991
; Forsayeth et al., 1992
) and calnexin (Gelman et al., 1995
; Keller et al., 1996
, 1998
) promote proper folding and maturation of AChR subunits. Unassembled or misfolded AChR subunits are then targeted for degradation by the ER-associated proteasomal degradation machinery (Wanamaker et al., 2003
). AChRs are exported in coat protein complex II (COPII) vesicles from the ER to the Golgi presumably after masking of specific ER retention signals (Keller et al., 2001
; Wang et al., 2002
) and recognition of ER export motifs in properly folded and oligomerized AChR subunits.
Several different trafficking motifs have been identified to date (Nishimura and Balch, 1997
; Barlowe, 2003
; Robinson, 2004
), but little is known about the location or nature of such motifs in AChR subunits. Alignment of AChR subunit sequences shows hydrophobic residues in their large cytoplasmic domain that are highly conserved. Such hydrophobic residues occur within short motifs important for either cargo selection into COPII-coated vesicles for ER export (Duncan and Payne, 2003
) or cargo selection into clathrin-coated vesicles for endocytotic trafficking (Aridor and Traub, 2002
). We investigated the role of these residues in the
4 and
2 AChR subunits and provide evidence that they are structural determinants of AChR ER export.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Generation of constructs and mutants. All constructs were made by PCR using appropriate pairs of forward and reverse synthetic oligonucleotide primers (Life Technologies, Bethesda, MD) and Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Rat
3,
4,
2, and
4 AChR subunit cDNAs were cloned into the EcoRI-XbaI sites of the mammalian cell expression vector PEF6/myc-His A. Mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). For mutagenesis of the
4 AChR subunit, the following primer pairs used were: 5'-GCC TGG GTG CGT AGA GTC GCC CTG GAC ATC GTG CC-3' and 5'-GG CAC GAT GTC CAG GGC GAC TCT ACG CAC CCA GGC-3' for F350A; 5'-GTG CGT AGA GTC TTC GCG GAC ATC GTG CCT CGC-3' and 5'-GCG AGG CAC GAT GTC CGC GAA GAC TCT ACG CAC-3' for L351A; 5'-GAC ATC GTG CCT CGC GCA GCC TTC ATG AAG CGC CCC-3' and 5'-GGG GCG CTT CAT GAA GGC TGC GCG AGG CAC GAT GTC-3' for L357A,L358A. The triple mutant L351A,L357A,L358A in the
4 AChR subunit was generated using primers for the L351A mutation and the plasmid DNA template containing the L357A,L358A mutations. For mutagenesis of the
2 AChR subunit, the following primers pairs were used: 5'-TGG GTC AAG GTG GTC GCC CTG GAG AAG CTG CCC-3' and 5'-GGG CAG CTT CTC CAG GGC GAC CAC CTT GAC CCA-3' for F342A; 5'-GTC AAG GTG GTC TTC GCG GAG AAG CTG CCC ACC-3' and 5'-GGT GGG CAG CTT CTC CGC GAA GAC CAC CTT GAC-3' for L343A; 5'-GTC AAG GTG GTC TTC TTC GAG AAG CTG CCC ACC-3' and 5'-GGT GGG CAG CTT CTC GAA GAA GAC CAC CTT GAC-3' for L343F; 5'-GAG AAG CTG CCC ACC GCG GCC TTC CTG CAG CAG CCA-3' and 5'-TGG CTG CTG CAG GAA GGC CGC GGT GGG CAG CTT CTC-3' for L349, 350A; 5'-GAG AAG CTG CCC ACC GCG CTC TTC CTG CAG CAG-3' and 5'-CTG CTG CAG GAA GAG CGC GGT GGG CAG CTT CTC-3' for L349A; 5'-G AAG CTG CCC ACC CTG GCC TTC CTG CAG CAG CCA C-3'and 5'-G TGG CTG CTG CAG GAA GGC CAG GGT GGG CAG CTT C-3' for L350A. The underlined bases indicate mismatches used to generate the appropriate codons for the mutants. The N-terminal FLAG-tagged
4 construct was generated by subcloning the cDNA sequence corresponding to the mature
4 subunit (amino acids 35-630) into an expression vector containing influenza hemagglutinin signal sequence and the FLAG epitope (DYKDDDDA) (Guan et al., 1992
).
Antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the
4 AChR subunit (mAb 299), the
2 AChR subunit (mAb 295), and the antiserum against the
2 AChR subunit (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) that binds to denatured
2 subunits on immunoblots were used. The goat anti-rat and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs were obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). The Alexa Fluor 488- and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rat and anti-rabbit secondary Abs were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR).
Expression of recombinant
4
2 AChRs in human embryonic kidney tsA201 and human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Human tsA201 cells, a derivative of the human embryonic kidney cell line 293, were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in either 12- or 24-well plates in DMEM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells at 90% confluency were transfected with various combinations of cDNAs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) per the instructions of the manufacturer and typically used after incubation at 30°C for 48 h or additional incubation at 37°C for another 1-2 h. The levels of wild-type
4
2 AChRs in tsA201 cells were reduced by replating after trypsinization transfected cells with nontransfected cells at ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:5, respectively, or by transfecting lower amounts of total DNA at much reduced levels of cDNA mixes of 1/64 and 1/128 the normal amount. Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were differentiated in serum-free EMEM media with N2 supplement (Invitrogen) and then transfected with various combinations of cDNAs using Lipofectamine 2000.
Enzyme-linked immunoassay for quantitating cell surface
4
2 AChRs. Cell surface
4
2 AChRs were measured using the methodology described previously (Jeanclos et al., 2001
). Transfected tsA201 cells plated in 12-well dishes were washed once in PBS and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature. After four washes with PBS, the cells were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an mAb against the
2 AChR subunit (mAb 295) whose epitope is located in the extracellular domains of the subunit. After six washes with PBS, the cells were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary Ab for 1 h, washed eight times with PBS, and finally incubated with the HRP substrate 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min. The absorbance of the supernatant was then measured at 655 nm in a Beckman Instruments (Fullerton, CA) spectrophotometer. The nonspecific background binding of Abs to cells was determined using nontransfected cells and was typically <0.5% of the total binding observed for wild-type
4
2 AChRs.
Detergent solubilization of cellular proteins. Transfected tsA201 cells were homogenized by sonication (using five 5 s bursts) in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide, and 2% NP-40), and the proteins were solubilized by gently agitating the cells for 2 h at 4°C. Typically, 1 x 106 cells were lysed in 400 µl of lysis buffer. The clear supernatant of solubilized proteins used in the analysis was obtained after centrifugation at 18,000 x g for 15 min. Proteins were quantitated using the Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) Dc assay, and protein samples were boiled with sample buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE.
Immunoblot analysis. Proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (IMMUN-BLOT; Bio-Rad) and incubated with diluted rat Ab against the
4 AChR subunit (mAb 299) or the goat polyclonal Ab against the
2 AChR subunit (C-20) in PBS containing 5% nonfat milk powder. Binding of the primary Abs to proteins was detected using Alexa Fluor 680-conjugated secondary Abs (Molecular Probes). Fluorescent signals were detected using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). Typically, the scan times were adjusted to prevent saturation of fluorescent signals on the detector. The intensities of the fluorescent bands were then quantitated using the Odyssey image analysis software.
Immunostaining of
4
2 AChRs. For immunostaining of cell surface
4
2 AChRs, transfected cells were diluted (1:5), replated on 12 mm circular glass coverslips (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA), and cultured for an additional 32 h in 24-well dishes. For immunostaining of cell surface
4
2 AChRs in SH-SY5Y cells, cells were cultured in EMEM media containing 10% fetal bovine serum, changed to serum-free EMEM with N2 supplements next day, and then incubated for 24 h. The cells were then transfected with various combinations of plasmids and incubated at 30°C for 48 h or then shifted to 37°C for another 1-2 h. Transfected cells were then fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. After four washes with PBS, cells were blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min. Cells were then incubated with the Ab against the
2 AChR subunit (mAb 295; 1:1000 dilution) and then, after three washes with PBS, incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary Ab (1:1000 dilution). For immunostaining of intracellular
4
2 AChRs, transfected tsA201 as well as SH-SY5Y cells were fixed and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS containing 3% BSA for 30 min at room temperature. The subcellular distribution of
4
2 mutants with respect to the ER network was determined by costaining with a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to calnexin (1:1000 dilution; Stressgen, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada), and its binding was then detected with an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary Ab (1:1000 dilution). After a temperature shift to 37°C for 1-2 h, the subcellular distribution of
4
2 AChRs in the Golgi complex was detected by costaining with a polyclonal rabbit antiserum to giantin (1:1000 dilution; Covance, Princeton, NJ), and its binding was then visualized with an Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary Ab (1:1000 dilution). As controls, nontransfected cells were subject to the same immunohistochemical process. Additionally, transfected cells were also incubated with secondary antibodies in the absence of the primary antibody. No positive staining was found in these controls (data not shown).
Fluorescence microscopy. Cells were visualized using a deconvolution microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with ultraviolet illumination from a 50 W xenon arc through a 40x Zeiss fluorescence oil immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.3), and images were captured using the SlideBook software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, CO) using 5 µm steps in the z-axis, alternating between FITC and cyanine 5 (Cy5) filters. For image analysis, the captured images were pseudo-colored and processed using Adobe Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
Ligand-binding assays. [3H]Epibatidine binding to
4
2 AChRs was done directly in wells containing cells that were gently fixed with paraformaldehyde. Under these conditions of fixation, the binding affinity of
4
2 AChRs for [3H]epibatidine was not significantly different from that of
4
2 AChRs in normal cells (our unpublished data). Transfected tsA201 cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde diluted with DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 1 h at room temperature. After four washes with PBS, cells were permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. For saturation binding experiments, permeabilized cells were incubated with 3 nM [3H]epibatidine overnight at 4°C. For inhibition experiments, cells were incubated with 400 pM [3H]epibatidine in the presence or absence of 10, 30, 100, 300, or 1000 nM nicotine. After four washes with PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100, the bound epibatidine was eluted with a buffer containing 0.5% SDS and 0.5 M NaOH for 1 h. The eluates were then mixed with liquid scintillation fluid, and the amount of radioactivity present was measured with a Winspectral liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland).
Data analysis. The Hill-type equation was fitted to the nicotine concentration inhibition of [3H]epibatidine binding with a nonlinear least-squares error curve fit method (KaleidaGraph; Abelbeck Software, Reading, PA): I(x) = Imax[xnH/(xnH + IC50nH)], where I(x) is the amount of [3H]epibatidine bound at concentration x of nicotine, Imax is the maximal number of [3H]epibatidine binding sites in the absence of nicotine (set at 100%), IC50 is the nicotine concentration required for half-maximal inhibition, and nH is the Hill coefficient.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Alignment of the first 30 amino acid residues of the long cytosolic loop of AChR subunits reveals highly conserved leucine residues among all AChR subunits (Fig. 1). Such leucine residues occur within short motifs important for cargo selection into COPII-coated vesicles that transport proteins from the ER to the Golgi (for review, see Duncan and Payne, 2003
). They also occur in sequences of integral membrane proteins that interact with adaptor proteins (such as AP-1) that select their cargo for endocytosis within clathrin-coated vesicles (for review, see Aridor and Traub, 2002
). However, exocytotic or endocytotic motifs that had been described previously were not readily identifiable within this region. Hence, to determine whether these conserved hydrophobic residues in the
4 and
2 AChR subunits were part of a trafficking motif, we mutated them to alanine or other residues and studied the effect of the mutations on the cell surface expression levels of the mutant
4
2 AChRs. Table 1 lists all of the
4 AChR and
2 AChR subunit mutants used in this study and a summary of the experimental results obtained.
Mutations of conserved hydrophobic residues within the
4 AChR subunit attenuate cell surface expression of AChRs
The wild-type
4 AChR subunit, or each of the mutant
4 AChR subunits
4F350A,
4L351A,
4L357,358A, and
4L351,L357,358A, was coexpressed with the wild-type
2 AChR subunit in tsA201 cells. Pairs of samples generated from independently transfected wells were analyzed to account for small variations generated by differences in transfection efficiency. The expression level of the
4 AChR subunits was monitored by immunoblot analysis of NP-40-solubilized protein extracts, separated by SDS-PAGE using an Ab against the
4 AChR subunit. The result of a representative experiment is shown in Figure 2A. Small changes in the overall steady-state level of the mutant
4 AChR subunits were observed (Fig. 2A). The steady-state level of the
4 AChR subunit expressed alone (lanes 11, 12) was comparable with that of the
4 AChR subunit coexpressed with the
2 AChR subunit (lanes 1, 2), suggesting that the stability of
4 AChR subunits was not significantly influenced by subunit assembly. No cross-reactive band was obtained in extracts of tsA201 cells expressing the
2 AChR subunit alone, showing that the binding of the
4Abwas specific (lane 13).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Subunit expression and assembly of high-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites by wild-type and mutant 4 AChR subunits. A, The 4, 4F350A, 4L351A, 4L357, 358A, or 4L351, 357, 358A AChR subunit was coexpressed with the wild-type 2 AChR subunit in tsA201 cells, and 2% NP-40-solubilized membrane proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis using an mAb against the 4 AChR subunit (mAb 299). Paired lanes represent the expression levels of the AChR subunit from two independently transfected wells from a representative experiment. B, Detergent-permeabilized transfected fixed cells expressing wild-type and mutant 4 2 AChRs were incubated with 3 nM [3H]epibatidine overnight at 4°C. The amount of bound [3H]epibatidine was quantitated by scintillation counting. Data for the mutants were expressed as a percentage of the [3H]epibatidine binding observed for the wild-type 4 2. The data represent the mean ± SE from four experiments.
|
|
The ability of the mutated
4 AChR subunit to assemble and form high-affinity ligand-binding sites was monitored using [3H]epibatidine binding assays. Ligand binding was performed as described in Materials and Methods using a saturating concentration of 3 nM [3H]epibatidine. Somewhat lower levels of total number of [3H]epibatidine sites were formed by all of the mutant
4
2 AChRs compared with the wild-type
4
2 AChRs (Fig. 2B; Table 1). The
4 AChR subunit expressed by itself failed to bind [3H]epibatidine.
The relative amount of AChRs expressed in cytosol versus the cell surface membrane was determined qualitatively by detecting the binding of the
2 AChR subunit Ab to AChRs in detergent-permeabilized versus nonpermeabilized cells using immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3A). The relative level of
4
2 AChRs expressed on the cell surface membrane was also quantitated using an enzyme-linked immunoassay. Thus, although all four mutant
4
2 AChRs showed a significant decrease in their cell surface expression levels relative to that of the wild-type
4
2 AChR (Fig. 3B), the simultaneous mutations of all three conserved leucine residues in
4L351,L357,358A AChR was not sufficient to completely abolish cell surface expression. However, the magnitude of the decrease in the cell surface expression levels was significantly greater than the magnitude of the decrease in the total number of [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed by the mutant
4
2 AChRs (Table 1). These results suggest that the mutations primarily affect the transport of
4
2 AChRs to the cell surface membrane.
Mutation of conserved hydrophobic residues within the
2 AChR subunit abolishes cell surface expression of AChRs
We next determined the effects of mutating the conserved hydrophobic residues in the
2 AChR subunit, at positions that are homologous to the mutated positions in the
4 AChR subunit, on cell surface expression of
4
2 AChRs. The wild-type
2 AChR subunit, or each of the mutant
2 AChR subunits
2F342A,
2L343A,
2L349,350A,
2L349A, and
2L350A, was coexpressed with the wild-type
4 AChR subunit in tsA201 cells. As before, the expression levels of the
2 AChR subunits were monitored by immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal antiserum to the
2 AChR subunit. The result of a representative experiment is shown (Fig. 4A). Quantitation of the band intensities using the Odyssey imaging software suggests that the mutations also decreased the overall steady-state levels of the mutant
2 AChR subunits, particularly for those with multiple mutations (Table 1). The steady-state level of the
2 AChR subunit expressed alone (lanes 15, 16) was comparable with that of the
2 AChR subunit coexpressed with the
4 AChR subunit (lanes 1, 2), and, like the
4 AChR subunit, subunit assembly did not significantly influence its stability. No cross-reactive band was obtained in extracts of tsA201 cells expressing the
4 AChR subunit alone, indicating the relatively high binding specificity of the
2 Ab (lane 17).
The ability of mutated
2 AChR subunits to form AChRs that bound cholinergic ligands with high affinity was monitored using [3H]epibatidine binding assays containing a saturating concentration of 3 nM [3H]epibatidine. Substantially lower levels of total numbers of [3H]epibatidine binding sites were formed by all of the mutant
4
2 AChRs compared with the wild-type
4
2 AChRs (Fig. 4B), and the decrease qualitatively matched the lower expression levels detected by immunoblot analysis (Table 1). In addition, we found that coexpression of the mutant
4L351,L357,358A AChR subunit with the mutant
2L349,350A AChR subunit did not further reduce the number of [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed (
35%; data not shown) by the
4
2L349,350A AChR mutant. Overall, the [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed by
2 AChR subunit mutants were lower than those formed by the
4 AChR subunit mutants (Table 1).
The relative amount of AChRs expressed on the cell surface membrane was determined qualitatively using immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5A). Importantly, very little binding of mAb 295 to cells expressing the
2 AChR subunit alone was observed, despite the fact that the immunoblot showed that its expression level is comparable with that of the assembled
2 AChR subunit. This result shows that high-affinity mAb 295 binding depends on conformational maturation promoted by subunit assembly. Quantitative results from the enzyme-linked immunoassay showed that, in contrast to the
4 AChR mutants, the
2 AChR subunit mutants virtually abolished cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs (Fig. 5B; Table 1). A very small, but detectable, level of mutant
4
2 AChRs surface expression was observed for the
2L349A AChR. This is consistent with a less conserved role for this leucine, relative to the other leucines, as deduced by the lack of sequence conservation at this position among the other AChR subunits (Fig. 1).
Several lines of evidence (Zwart and Vijverberg, 1998
; Marks et al., 1999
; Nelson et al., 2003
; Zhou et al., 2003
; Lopez-Hernandez et al., 2004
) support the possibility that
4
2 AChRs, which represent most of the high-affinity nicotine binding sites in the brain, exist in at least two different stoichiometries, (
4)2(
2)3 and (
4)3(
2)2. To determine whether the differences in surface expression of mutant
4 versus the mutant
2 AChR subunits were attributable to differences in the number of subunits present in assembled
4
2 AChRs, we transfected cells with a subunit cDNA ratio of wild-type
4/mutant
2L343A of 3:1 rather than the usual 1:1 ratio and measured surface expression of AChRs. This ratio, which would be predicted to bias the stoichiometry in favor of assembly of (
4)3(
2)2 AChRs, still failed to rescue surface expression of the mutant
4
2 AChR (data not shown). Collectively, these results strongly support the notion that the highly conserved hydrophobic residues in the
2 AChR subunit play an obligatory role in the transport of
4
2 AChRs to the cell surface membrane.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Subunit expression and assembly of high-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites by wild-type and mutant 2 AChR subunits. A, The 2, 2F342A, 2L343A, 2L349,350A, 2L349A, 2L350A, 2F342A, or 2L343F AChR subunit was coexpressed with the wild-type 4 AChR subunit in tsA201 cells, and 2% NP-40-solubilized membrane proteins were subjected to immunoblot analysis using a polyclonal antiserum against the 2 AChR subunit. Paired lanes represent the expression levels of the AChR subunit from two independently transfected wells from a representative experiment. B, Detergent-permeabilized transfected fixed cells expressing wild-type and mutant 4 2 AChRs, or the 2 AChR subunit alone, were incubated with 3 nM [3H]epibatidine overnight at 4°C. The amount of bound [3H]epibatidine was quantitated by scintillation counting. Data for the mutants were expressed as a percentage of the [3H]epibatidine binding observed for the wild-type 4 2. The data represent the mean ± SE from four experiments.
|
|
The cell surface expression of the
4
2 AChR measured using the
2 Ab or other Abs correlate well with different expression levels of AChR
The overall levels of [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed by coassembly of mutant
2 AChR subunits with the
4 AChR subunit were significantly (
35%) below that of the wild-type
4
2 AChR. To rule out the possibility that the failure to detect the mutant
4
2 AChRs formed by the mutant
2 AChR subunits was not a result of a detection threshold for the
2 Ab (mAb 295) used in all of the assays, we tested whether the
2 Ab could detect wild-type
4
2 AChRs at all levels of AChR expression observed in the experiments. Reduction of the
4
2 AChRs per well of cells was achieved by dilution of the total amount of cDNA mixture used to transfect cells. Extreme dilutions of 1/64 and 1/128 of the normal amount of total DNA used (0.8 µg/0.25 x 106 cells/well) were found to be necessary to achieve a significant reduction of
33 and
12%, respectively (data not shown). To stably and predictably achieve specific levels of reduction in the levels of
4
2 AChR per well, we also replated different fixed ratios (1:1, 1:2, and 1:5) of mixtures of tsA201 cells expressing
4
2 AChRs with those not expressing AChRs in each well and then assayed the surface levels of
4
2 AChRs per well under identical conditions. The Ab binding correlated quite well with the number of [3H]epibatidine binding sites measured in parallel assays under the same conditions. These values included those that were below the
35% expression levels of [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed by the
4
2L349,350A AChRs (Fig. 6A).
The
2 Ab used to measure
4
2 AChR surface expression is a conformation-dependent Ab that preferably binds mature
2 AChR subunits in assembled
4
2 AChRs. Hence, to rule out the possibility that the mutations in the large cytoplasmic loop of the
2 AChR subunit did not affect the conformation of mutant
4
2 AChR such that the binding affinity of the
2 Ab for them was significantly reduced or abolished, we repeated the cell surface measurements with two other conformation-insensitive Abs. First, we used mAb 299, which binds to the
4 AChR subunit on immunoblots and is not expected to be conformation sensitive. Second, we used the M2 anti-FLAG Ab to measure the cell surface levels of an N-terminal FLAG-tagged
4 AChR subunit (FLAG
4) coassembled with the mutant
2L349,350A AChR subunit. We failed to detect either mutant
4
2L349,350A AChRs (Fig. 6B) or mutant FLAG
4b2 AChRs on the cell surface (Fig. 6C), despite robust expression of the respective wild-type
4
2 AChRs and FLAG
4
2 AChRs on the cell surface.
Mutant a4
2 AChRs do not exhibit significant differences in their ligand affinity
To assess whether the decrease in [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed by the mutant
4
2 AChRs was attributable to a change in their ligand affinity, we compared the relative affinity of mutant versus wild-type
4
2 AChR for nicotine in a competitive inhibition experiment. We used
4L351,L357,358A and
2L349,350A as representative
4 and
2 mutants, respectively, to determine the degree to which these mutations affected ligand affinity. Direct measurement of the Kd for [3H]epibatidine was found to be impractical because of experimental problems with ligand depletion at the extremely low concentrations of epibatidine needed to establish the lower binding values in saturation binding experiments. The data best fit a single-site Hill equation with KI values of 0.65 nM for the
4, 0.77 nM for the
4L351,L357,358A, and 0.74 nM for the
2L349,350A. The results show that the representative
4L351,L357,358A AChR and the
2L349,350A AChR mutants, which formed the lowest levels of total [3H]epibatidine binding sites, show similar affinities for nicotine (Fig. 7), and thus the reduced numbers of binding sites most likely reflect higher degradation rates and/or lower assembly efficiency for the mutant
4
2 AChR.
Mutations in the
2 AChR subunit affect ER export
To determine the subcellular location of the mutant
4
2 AChRs that completely fail to traffic to the cell surface membrane, we stained detergent-permeabilized cells simultaneously with Abs against the ER marker calnexin and against the
2 AChR subunit. Staining for both antigens showed complete colocalization (Fig. 8A), as shown for the representative mutant
4L351,L357,358A
2 AChRs and
4
2L349,350A AChRs. For muscle AChR, a brief temperature shift from 20°C to 37°C promotes rapid and synchronous exit of preassembled muscle AChR from the ER to the Golgi (Ross et al., 1991
). Hence, to unambiguously resolve whether mutant
4
2 AChRs colocalize with the Golgi, we first cultured cells at 30°C and then briefly at 37°C for an additional 1-2 h. When tsA201 cells were temperature shifted, the staining pattern with the
2 Ab colocalized almost completely with the Golgi marker giantin for the wild-type
4
2 AChR but not for the mutant
4
2L349,350A AChR (Fig. 8B). We also investigated whether the Golgi-disruptive agent brefeldin A (BFA) that causes ER-Golgi fusion changed this staining pattern. After BFA treatment (1 µg/ml, 37°C, 1 h), the staining for both giantin and the
2 Ab showed only an ER-like distribution for both the wild-type and the mutant
4
2 AChR expressing cells (Fig. 8C). These results confirm that, under temperature-shift conditions, the difference in staining of the Ab observed between the wild-type
4
2 AChR, which nearly completely overlaps with the giantin stain, and the mutant
4
2L349,350A AChR, which does not do so, corresponds to
4
2 AChRs transiently accumulated in the Golgi and not some other intracellular compartment that fortuitously overlaps with the Golgi. Collectively, these results provide additional evidence that the mutations in the
2 AChR subunit that abolish cell surface expression do so by preventing
4
2 AChR export from the ER.
Hydrophobicity of conserved leucine residue in the
2 AChR subunit is essential for interaction with the ER export machinery
The residues within the other AChR subunits, which are at homologous positions to the leucines mutated in the
4 and
2 AChR subunits, are hydrophobic in nature (I, F, M, V, and Y). Hence, to test whether retention of the hydrophobic character of leucine alone would be sufficient to retain its function within an ER export motif, we mutated L343 in the
2 AChR subunit (
2L343F) to phenylalanine, a hydrophobic but aromatic residue. As expected, the subunit expression level and number of high-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites formed were significantly higher than those of the other
2 AChR mutants. However, in contrast to the effect of mutating this leucine residue to alanine, mutation to phenylalanine does not abolish the cell surface expression of the mutant
4
2 AChR but instead reduces it to
57% of that observed for the wild-type
2 AChR subunit (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that the hydrophobic physiochemical property of this leucine residue is a key feature of its function in ER export.
Conservation of mutant AChR trafficking defects in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells
To further examine whether the trafficking deficits observed for mutant
4
2 AChRs in tsA201 cells were conserved in polarized cells of neural origin, we examined whether the mutant
4
2L349,350A AChR behaved similarly in differentiated human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. These cells were chosen because they do not express detectable levels of wild-type
4
2 AChRs that could interfere with our analysis and because they exhibit reasonable transfection efficiencies. SH-SY5Y cells were first differentiated in serum-free media and then transfected with appropriate cDNAs to express wild-type
4
2 AChRs or mutant
4
2L349,350A AChRs in them. At 30°C, wild-type
4
2 AChRs were strongly expressed on the surface of the soma and processes, but mutant
4
2L349,350A AChRs failed to show surface expression despite high levels of expression in the cytoplasm (Fig. 9A). When SH-SY5Y cells expressing
4
2 AChRs were shifted from 30°C to 37°C for
2 h, internal pools of wild-type
4
2 AChRs showed the ability to synchronously move from the ER to almost completely colocalize with the Golgi marker giantin (red), whereas the mutant
4
2L349,350A AChRs failed to do so (Fig. 9B). These results provide additional evidence that the conserved hydrophobic residues are essential determinants of an ER export motif.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 7. Leucine mutations in the 4 and 2 AChR subunits do not affect 4 2 AChR ligand affinity. Transfected cells expressing mutant 4L351,357,358A 2 AChR, 4 2L349,350A AChR, or wild-type 4 2 AChR were fixed, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100, and incubated with 400 pM [3H]epibatidine in the presence or absence of 10, 30, 100, 300, and 1000 nM nicotine for 24 h. The amount of bound [3H]epibatidine was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Background binding was determined in nontransfected cells and was subtracted. The data shown was normalized to the amount bound in the absence of nicotine and represent the mean ± SE from four experiments. The data were fitted to the Hill equation, and the KI values obtained are 0.65 ± 0.03 nM (nH = 0.91) for the 4, 0.77 ± 0.04 nM (nH = 0.92) for the 4L351,L357,358A, and 0.74 ± 0.02 nM (nH = 0.92) for the 2L349,350A.
|
|
Other heteromeric AChR combinations assembled from mutant
4 and
2 AChR subunits also show trafficking deficits
To determine whether the cell surface trafficking of other heteromeric AChR combinations containing the mutant
4L351,357,358A or the mutant
2L349,350A AChR subunit would be affected, we expressed wild-type
3
2 AChRs and mutant
3
2L349,350A AChRs in tsA201 cells and measured their surface expression using the
2 Ab (mAb 295). Similarly, we expressed wild-type
4
4 AChRs and mutant
4L351,357,358A
4 AChRs in tsA201 cells and measured their surface expression levels using the
4 Ab (mAb 299). The results (Fig. 10) show that the mutant
4L351,357,358A AChR subunit attenuated and the mutant
2L349,350A AChR subunit abolished cell surface expression of the corresponding heteromeric AChRs containing these mutant AChR subunits.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
The goal of this study was to elucidate the structural determinants for trafficking of AChRs. The principal finding of this study demonstrates that highly conserved hydrophobic residues within the long cytoplasmic loop of AChR subunits are critical structural determinants for ER export of fully assembled AChRs. We show that cell surface expression of
4
2 AChRs is attenuated when F350, L351, L357, and L358 in the
4 AChR subunit are mutated to alanine and abolished when F342, L343, L349, and L350 in the
2 AChR subunit are mutated to alanine. The mutant AChR subunits assemble to form mutant
4
2 AChRs that colocalize with the endoplasmic marker calnexin and exhibit high-affinity for [3H]epibatidine. Furthermore, in temperature-shift experiments designed to promote rapid ER exit of assembled
4
2 AChRs, internal pools of wild-type
4
2 AChRs colocalize almost completely with the Golgi marker giantin, whereas mutant
4
2 AChRs fail to do so. Collectively, these results suggest that the hydrophobic conserved residues are essential structural determinants of
4
2 AChR ER export.
Mutations of the conserved hydrophobic residues to alanine in both the
4 AChR and the
2 AChR subunits, with the exception of the
4F350A mutant, also decreased the subunit expression levels and the total number of high-affinity ligand-binding sites formed. Thus, it is likely that the decreased subunit stability also contributed to the decrease observed in cellular levels of
4
2 AChRs. Nonetheless, because all of the mutant AChR subunits studied assemble to form >35% of the high-affinity [3H]epibatidine binding sites observed with the wild-type AChR subunits, it is likely that the mutation of these conserved residues have their most significant functional effect on the trafficking of
4
2 AChRs. In this regard, the
4F350A mutant notably showed virtually no decrease in its subunit stability or in the number of high-affinity ligand-binding sites formed but yet exhibited a significant (
30%) decrease in cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs. This result, and those obtained for the mutant
2 AChR subunits that abolish
4
2 AChR cell surface expression, in aggregate, strongly support the conclusion that the mutations primarily affect
4
2 AChR trafficking.
High-resolution fluorescence imaging experiments show that the wild-type but not the mutant
4
2 AChRs can traffic from the ER to the Golgi. The temperature-shift experiment, as described previously (Ross et al., 1991
), was crucial in helping unambiguously resolve whether the mutant
4
2 AChRs traffic to the Golgi for two reasons. First, standard fluorescence image deconvolution protocols showed significant overlap between staining for the Golgi marker giantin and the ER marker calnexin, which was not attributable to "bleed through" between the filters used to visualize the fluorophores Alexa 488 (FITC) and Alexa 647 (Cy5). Second, under steady-state conditions, it is likely that only a small fraction of the
4
2 AChRs is localized in the Golgi, making its visualization rather difficult over the signals from the larger pool of
4
2 AChRs localized in the ER. The brief temperature shift helped mobilize this larger pool of assembled
4
2 AChRs to synchronously exit the ER and traffic to the Golgi, effectively eliminating ER staining while transiently enriching the Golgi pool, which then enhanced our ability to visualize
4
2 AChRs in the Golgi. We obtained similar results using both tsA201 cells and differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells. Indeed, in SH-SY5Y cells, wild-type
4
2 AChRs are not only expressed on the cell surface of the soma but are also transported down the surface membrane of the processes, whereas the mutant
4
2 AChRs, in contrast, fail to express on the cell surface and remain localized within the soma. These results further support our hypothesis that these conserved hydrophobic residues are determinants of an ER export motif for
4
2 AChRs.
The residues at positions that are homologous to those of the conserved leucines in the
4 AChR and the
2 AChR subunit are not fully conserved, but their hydrophobic nature is highly conserved in all AChR subunits (Fig. 1). For example, the first residue of the first pair of hydrophobic residues is a phenylalanine, isoleucine, or leucine, and the second residue is a leucine or an isoleucine. Similarly, the first residue of the second pair of hydrophobic residues shown is a isoleucine, tryptophan, valine, phenylalanine, or a tyrosine at this position, and a leucine or a methionine at the second position. Such hydrophobic residues, particularly phenylalanine or leucine, occur within short motifs important for cargo selection into COPII-coated vesicles that transport proteins from the ER to the Golgi. To test the possibility that conservation of the hydrophobic character of these leucine residues is a key feature of their function within the ER export motif, we mutated L343 to phenylalanine in the
2 AChR subunit. Because a very significant level (
60%) of cell surface expression for the mutant
4
2 AChR was observed, we speculate that the hydrophobic residues found at homologous positions in the other AChR subunits may also have conserved functions.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 9. Subcellular distribution of wild-type 4 2 AChRs and mutant 4 2L349,350A AChRs in differentiated SH-SY5Y neural cells. A, Wild-type 4 2 AChRs are expressed on the surface membrane of the soma and processes, but mutant 4 2L349, 350A AChRs fail to do so even in cells that have high expression levels of the proteins in the cytoplasm. Transfected SH-SY5Y cells expressing wild-type 4 2 and mutant 4 2L349, 350A AChRs were incubated at 30°C for 2 d and then fixed for immunohistochemical processing. The cells were probed with Ab against the 2 AChR subunit (mAb 295) before permeabilization, and the Ab binding was detected with the Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rat Abs. These same cells were then permeabilized and probed with the 2 AChR subunit Ab (mAb 295) again, and the Ab binding was detected using the Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rat Abs. B, Wild-type 4 2 AChRs (green) colocalize with giantin (red), whereas mutant 4 2L349, 350A AChRs (green) do not. Transfected SH-SY5Y cells expressing wild-type 4 2or mutant 4 2L349,350A AChRs were incubated at 30°C and then shifted to 37°C for 2 h. The cells were fixed, permeabilized, and probed with the 2 AChR subunit Ab (mAb 295) and the giantin Ab. Ab binding to the 2 AChR subunit was visualized using Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rat Abs and to giantin using Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated goat anti-rabbit Abs. Colocalization of the proteins is shown in yellow in the merged image.
|
|
The leucine mutations in the two AChR subunits affected the cell surface expression of mutant
4
2 AChRs to strikingly different degrees. The three leucine mutations in the
4 AChR subunit, even when present together (as in
4L351,357,358A) only attenuated AChR cell surface expression, whereas the individual mutations in the
2 AChR subunits were sufficient to virtually abolish AChR cell surface expression. These results suggest that the
4 AChR subunit has a cooperative or regulatory role and the
2 AChR subunit an obligatory role in their functional interaction with the ER export machinery. Hence, it is possible that other regulatory proteins, yet to be identified, could interact with these residues in the
4 AChR subunit and influence the export rate of
4
2 AChRs from the ER. Coassembly of the mutant
4L351,357,358A or the mutant
2L349,350A AChR subunit with other complementary subunits in the AChR family to form the
3
2 AChR and
4
4 AChR revealed that the functional effects of these mutations with respect to trafficking are conserved even in other heteromeric combinations of AChRs.
Hydrophobic residues occur in trafficking motifs of a number of integral membrane proteins. For example, mutations of leucine residues in the intracellular domains of the kainate receptor KA2 (Ren et al., 2003
), the
2 subunit of the GABAA receptor (Herring et al., 2003
), and the
-opioid receptor (Wang et al., 2003
) inhibit their endocytotic trafficking. Interestingly, the motif F(X)6(I/L)(I/L), which has significant similarities to the ER export motif FL(X)5LL identified in this study in the
4 and
2 AChR subunits, was found to be present in the C-terminal tail of a very large number, but not all, G-protein-coupled receptors (Duvernay et al., 2004
). Mutation of the hydrophobic residues F or L was shown to inhibit ER export of the
2B-adrenergic receptor and thus to represent structural determinants of G-protein-coupled receptor ER export. This motif is spaced approximately three residues away from the seventh transmembrane domain of G-protein-coupled receptors, but its functional homolog in AChR subunits is spaced
17 residues away from its third transmembrane domain. Thus, these motifs may function in an autonomous manner because their interaction with the ER export machinery does not appear to be critically dependent on their distance from the ER cytosolic membrane surface.
Other signals that participate in the quality control of AChR biogenesis have been described. The ER retention dibasic signal R313K314 in the
1 AChR subunit, when masked by subunit assembly with the
,
, and
AChR subunits, permits trafficking of muscle AChRs from the ER to the Golgi (Keller et al., 2001
). Interestingly, ubiquitination of K313 was found to function as a post-Golgi modulator of trafficking. A second ER retention signal, PLYXXN, in the first transmembrane domain of the
1 AChR subunit serves as an additional signal in the quality control of AChR subunit oligomerization (Wang et al., 2002
).
The amino acid sequence of the long cytosolic loop is highly divergent among the AChR subunits, and recent work indicates that native AChRs assemble with a dizzying array of subunit complexity (Champtiaux et al., 2003
; Moretti et al., 2004
). The differential effect of mutating the conserved leucines in the
4 AChR subunit versus the
2 AChR subunit on ER export reveals another level of complexity in the functional roles of well conserved cytoplasmic motifs. Motifs within different AChR subunits, when present in AChRs of different subunit compositions, may show heterogeneity in their functional contributions. Complementary progress has been made in identifying at least two proteins, 14-3-3
(Jeanclos et al., 2001
) and ric-3 (Halevi et al., 2002
, 2003
), which influence the earliest steps in the biogenesis of AChRs. Furthermore, it is of interest to note that VILIP-1, a myristoylated calcium sensor protein whose interaction with the
4 AChR subunit upregulates
4
2 AChR surface expression (Lin et al., 2002
), binds in protein-protein interaction screens to the
30 amino acid region in the loop encompassing the ER export motif identified in this study. Future experiments need to be done to determine the extent to which this ER export site overlaps, if at all, with that of VILIP-1.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Received Oct 8, 2004;
revised June 7, 2005;
accepted June 8, 2005.
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (R.A.), the National Institutes of Health (R.A., J.M.L.), the Millennium Trust Health Excellence Fund (R.A., J.R.), and Philip Morris USA and Philip Morris International (R.A., J.M.L.). M.W.T. is supported in part with funds from the Grace Benson Fund for Parkinson's Research. A Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence Grant from the National Institutes of Health (National Center for Research Resources) supports the Imaging and Molecular Core Facilities of the Neuroscience Center used in this study. We thank Dr. Gregg Wells for critical comments on this manuscript.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Rene Anand, Neuroscience Center of Excellence and Department of Neurology, 2020 Gravier Street, Suite D, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail: ranand{at}lsuhsc.edu.
Copyright © 2005 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/05/256676-11$15.00/0
 |
References
|
|---|
Alder NN, Johnson AE (2004) Cotranslational membrane protein biogenesis at the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 279: 22787-22790.[Free Full Text]
Aridor M, Traub LM (2002) Cargo selection in vesicular transport: the making and breaking of a coat. Traffic 3: 537-546.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Barlowe C (2003) Signals for COPII-dependent export from the ER: what's the ticket out? Trends Cell Biol 13: 295-300.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Blount P, Merlie JP (1988) Native folding of an acetylcholine receptor alpha subunit expressed in the absence of other receptor subunits. J Biol Chem 263: 1072-1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Blount P, Merlie JP (1990) Mutational analysis of muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit assembly. J Cell Biol 111: 2613-2622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Blount P, Merlie JP (1991) BIP associates with newly synthesized subunits of the mouse muscle nicotinic receptor. J Cell Biol 113: 1125-1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Champtiaux N, Gotti C, Cordero-Erausquin M, David DJ, Przybylski C, Lena C, Clementi F, Moretti M, Rossi FM, Le Novere N, McIntosh JM, Gardier AM, Changeux JP (2003) Subunit composition of functional nicotinic receptors in dopaminergic neurons investigated with knock-out mice. J Neurosci 23: 7820-7829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Court J, Clementi F (1995) Distribution of nicotinic subtypes in human brain. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 9: 6-14.
Duncan MC, Payne GS (2003) ENTH/ANTH domains expand to the Golgi. Trends Cell Biol 13: 211-225.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Duvernay MT, Zhou F, Wu G (2004) A conserved motif for the transport of G protein-coupled receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cell surface. J Biol Chem 279: 30741-30750.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Forsayeth JR, Gu Y, Hall ZW (1992) BiP forms stable complexes with unassembled subunits of the acetylcholine receptor in transfected COS cells and in C2 muscle cells. J Cell Biol 117: 841-847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Gelman MS, Chang W, Thomas DY, Bergeron JJ, Prives JM (1995) Role of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone calnexin in subunit folding and assembly of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J Biol Chem 270: 15085-15092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Guan XM, Kobilka TS, Kobilka BK (1992) Enhancement of membrane insertion and function in a type IIIb membrane protein following introduction of a cleavable signal peptide. J Biol Chem 267: 21995-21998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Halevi S, McKay J, Palfreyman M, Yassin L, Eshel M, Jorgensen E, Treinin M (2002) The C. elegans ric-3 gene is required for maturation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. EMBO J 21: 1012-1020.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Halevi S, Yassin L, Eshel M, Sala F, Sala S, Criado M, Treinin M (2003) Conservation within the RIC-3 gene family. Effectors of mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression. J Biol Chem 278: 34411-34417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Herring D, Huang R, Singh M, Robinson LC, Dillon GH, Leidenheimer NJ (2003) Constitutive GABAA receptor endocytosis is dynamin-mediated and dependent on a dileucine AP2 adaptin-binding motif within the beta 2 subunit of the receptor. J Biol Chem 278: 24046-24052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Jeanclos EM, Lin L, Treuil MW, Rao J, DeCoster MA, Anand R (2001) The chaperone protein 14-3-3eta interacts with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha 4 subunit. Evidence for a dynamic role in subunit stabilization. J Biol Chem 276: 28281-28290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Johnson AE, van Waes MA (1999) The translocon: a dynamic gateway at the ER membrane. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 799-842.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Taylor P (1996) Involvement of the chaperone protein calnexin and the acetylcholine receptor beta-subunit in the assembly and cell surface expression of the receptor. J Biol Chem 271: 22871-22877.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Taylor P (1998) Inhibition of glucose trimming with castanospermine reduces calnexin association and promotes proteasome degradation of the alpha-subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 273: 17064-17072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Keller SH, Lindstrom J, Ellisman M, Taylor P (2001) Adjacent basic amino acid residues recognized by the COP I complex and ubiquitination govern endoplasmic reticulum to cell surface trafficking of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-Subunit. J Biol Chem 276: 18384-18391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lin L, Jeanclos EM, Treuil M, Braunewell KH, Gundelfinger ED, Anand R (2002) The calcium sensor protein visinin-like protein-1 modulates the surface expression and agonist sensitivity of the alpha 4beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem 277: 41872-41878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Lopez-Hernandez GY, Sanchez-Padilla J, Ortiz-Acevedo A, Lizardi-Ortiz J, Salas-Vincenty J, Rojas LV, Lasalde-Dominicci JA (2004) Nicotine-induced up-regulation and desensitization of alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptors depend on subunit ratio. J Biol Chem 279: 38007-38015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Marks MJ, Whiteaker P, Calcaterra J, Stitzel JA, Bullock AE, Grady SR, Picciotto MR, Changeux JP, Collins AC (1999) Two pharmacologically distinct components of nicotinic receptor-mediated rubidium efflux in mouse brain require the beta2 subunit. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 289: 1090-1103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Marubio LM, Arroyo-Jimenez MM, Cordero-Erausquin M, Lena C, Le Novere N, de Kerchove d'Exaerde, A, Huchet M, Damaj MI, Changeux JP (1999) Reduced antinociception in mice lacking neuronal nicotinic receptor subunits. Nature 398: 805-810.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marubio LM, Gardier AM, Durier S, David D, Klink R, Arroyo-Jimenez MM, McIntosh JM, Rossi F, Champtiaux N, Zoli M, Changeux JP (2003) Effects of nicotine in the dopaminergic system of mice lacking the alpha4 subunit of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Eur J Neurosci 17: 1329-1337.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Merlie JP, Sebbane R, Tzartos S, Lindstrom J (1982) Inhibition of glycosylation with tunicamycin blocks assembly of newly synthesized acetylcholine receptor subunits in muscle cells. J Biol Chem 257: 2694-2701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Millar NS (2003) Assembly and subunit diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Soc Trans 31: 869-874.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Mishina M, Tobimatsu T, Imoto K, Tanaka K, Fujita Y, Fukuda K, Kurasaki M, Takahashi H, Morimoto Y, Hirose T (1985) Location of functional regions of acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunit by site-directed mutagenesis. Nature 313: 364-369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moretti M, Vailati S, Zoli M, Lippi G, Riganti L, Longhi R, Viegi A, Clementi F, Gotti C (2004) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes expression during rat retina development and their regulation by visual experience. Mol Pharmacol 66: 85-96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nelson ME, Kuryatov A, Choi CH, Zhou Y, Lindstrom J (2003) Alternate stoichiometries of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Mol Pharmacol 63: 332-341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nishimura N, Balch WE (1997) A di-acidic signal required for selective export from the endoplasmic reticulum. Science 277: 556-558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nordberg A, Alafuzoff I, Winblad B (1992) Nicotinic and muscarinic subtypes in the human brain: changes with aging and dementia. J Neurosci Res 31: 103-111.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Paulson HL, Ross AF, Green WN, Claudio T (1991) Analysis of early events in acetylcholine receptor assembly. J Cell Biol 113: 1371-1384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Lena C, Bessis A, Lallemand Y, LeNovere N, Vincent P, Pich EM, Brulet P, Changeux JP (1995) Abnormal avoidance learning in mice lacking functional high-affinity nicotine receptor in the brain. Nature 374: 65-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
Picciotto MR, Zoli M, Rimondini R, Lena C, Marubio LM, Pich EM, Fuxe K, Changeux JP (1998) Acetylcholine receptors containing the beta2 subunit are involved in the reinforcing properties of nicotine. Nature 391: 173-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raggenbass M, Bertrand D (2002) Links Nicotinic receptors in circuit excitability and epilepsy. J Neurobiol 53: 580-589.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ren Z, Riley NJ, Garcia EP, Sanders JM, Swanson GT, Marshall J (2003) Multiple trafficking signals regulate kainate receptor KA2 subunit surface expression. J Neurosci 23: 6608-6616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Robinson MS (2004) Adaptable adaptors for coated vesicles. Trends Cell Biol 14: 167-174.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Ross AF, Green WN, Hartman DS, Claudio T (1991) Efficiency of acetylcholine receptor subunit assembly and its regulation by cAMP. J Cell Biol 113: 623-636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Smith MM, Lindstrom J, Merlie JP (1987) Formation of the alpha-bungarotoxin binding site and assembly of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits occur in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 262: 4367-4376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Tapper AR, McKinney SL, Nashmi R, Schwarz J, Deshpande P, Labarca C, Whiteaker P, Marks MJ, Collins AC, Lester HA (2004) Nicotine activation of alpha4* receptors: sufficient for reward, tolerance, and sensitization. Science 306: 1029-1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wanamaker CP, Christianson JC, Green WN (2003) Regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor assembly. Ann NY Acad Sci 998: 66-80.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wang JM, Zhang L, Yao Y, Viroonchatapan N, Rothe E, Wang ZZ (2002) A transmembrane motif governs the surface trafficking of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nat Neurosci 5: 963-970.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
Wang W, Loh HH, Law PY (2003) The intracellular trafficking of opioid receptors directed by carboxyl tail and a di-leucine motif in Neuro2A cells. J Biol Chem 278: 36848-36858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Whiting PJ, Lindstrom JM (1988) Characterization of bovine and human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors using monoclonal antibodies. J Neurosci 8: 3395-3404.[Abstract]
Zhou Y, Nelson ME, Kuryatov A, Choi C, Cooper J, Lindstrom J (2003) Human
4
2 acetylcholine receptors formed from linked subunits. J Neurosci 23: 9004-9015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Zwart R, Vijverberg HP (1998) Four pharmacologically distinct subtypes of alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Pharmacol 54: 1124-1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sabatelli, F. Eusebi, A. Al-Chalabi, A. Conte, F. Madia, M. Luigetti, I. Mancuso, C. Limatola, F. Trettel, F. Sobrero, et al.
Rare missense variants of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor altering receptor function are associated with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
October 15, 2009;
18(20):
3997 - 4006.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-B. Cheng, S. A. Amici, X.-Q. Ren, S. B. McKay, M. W. Treuil, J. M. Lindstrom, J. Rao, and R. Anand
Presynaptic Targeting of {alpha}4{beta}2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Is Regulated by Neurexin-1{beta}
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 28, 2009;
284(35):
23251 - 23259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Zaarour, S. Demaretz, N. Defontaine, D. Mordasini, and K. Laghmani
A Highly Conserved Motif at the COOH Terminus Dictates Endoplasmic Reticulum Exit and Cell Surface Expression of NKCC2
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 7, 2009;
284(32):
21752 - 21764.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rivas, B. Mellstrom, B. Torres, G. Cali, A. M. Ferrara, D. Terracciano, M. Zannini, G. Morreale de Escobar, and J. R. Naranjo
The DREAM Protein Is Associated with Thyroid Enlargement and Nodular Development
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2009;
23(6):
862 - 870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Rezvani, Y. Teng, Y. Pan, J. A. Dani, J. Lindstrom, E. A. Garcia Gras, J. M. McIntosh, and M. De Biasi
UBXD4, a UBX-Containing Protein, Regulates the Cell Surface Number and Stability of {alpha}3-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
J. Neurosci.,
May 27, 2009;
29(21):
6883 - 6896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. X. Albuquerque, E. F. R. Pereira, M. Alkondon, and S. W. Rogers
Mammalian Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: From Structure to Function
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2009;
89(1):
73 - 120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kabbani, M. P. Woll, R. Levenson, J. M. Lindstrom, and J.-P. Changeux
Intracellular complexes of the 2 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in brain identified by proteomics
PNAS,
December 18, 2007;
104(51):
20570 - 20575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xu, Y. Zhu, and S. F. Heinemann
Identification of sequence motifs that target neuronal nicotinic receptors to dendrites and axons.
J. Neurosci.,
September 20, 2006;
26(38):
9780 - 9793.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuryatov, J. Luo, J. Cooper, and J. Lindstrom
Nicotine Acts as a Pharmacological Chaperone to Up-Regulate Human {alpha}4{beta}2 Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2005;
68(6):
1839 - 1851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|