WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Fine Science Tools - Extraordinary Craftsmanship
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

Correction for Olson et al., J. Neurosci. 25 (5) 1050-1062.
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 2, 2005, 25(9):2445-2446

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

 Previous Article

Corrections

In the article "G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Modulation of Striatal CaV1.3 L-Type Ca2+ Channels Is Dependent on a Shank-Binding Domain," by Patricia A. Olson, Tatiana Tkatch, Salvador Hernandez-Lopez, Sasha Ulrich, Ema Ilijic, Enrico Mugnaini, Hua Zhang, Ilya Bezprozvanny, and D. James Surmeier, which appeared on pages 1050-1062 of the February 2, 2005 issue, the right panels of Figures 1C and 4C are not correct and have been replaced. The errors in the printed images were introduced when the figures were composed and do not affect any of the summaries or figure legends. However, revised versions of Figures 1 and 4 are printed here.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. D2 dopaminergic and M1 muscarinic receptors inhibit L-type calcium channels in medium spiny neurons. A, Control current traces from a dorsal striatal medium spiny neuron from a wild-type mouse: current elicited by S(-)-BayK 8644 (BAYK; 1 µM) alone or with NPA (10 µM). B, Measuring the tail current 5 ms after the step isolated L-type current, providing the time course shown. NPA inhibited L-type tail current by 18%. C, Control current traces from a dorsal striatal medium spiny neuron from a wild-type mouse: current elicited by BayK 8644 (1 µM) alone or with (+)-muscarine chloride (muscarine; 2 µM). D, Measuring the tail current 5 ms after the step isolated L-current, providing the time course shown. Muscarine application inhibited L-type tail currents by 25%.

 



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. D2 dopaminergic and M1 muscarinic receptor modulations of L-type calcium channels are lost in neurons from a CaV1.3 knock-out. A, Current traces from a medium spiny neuron from a CaV1.3 knock-out mouse. Experimental conditions were the same as in Figure 1. NPA had no effect on the L-type tail current. The inset shows scRT-PCR confirmation that the neuron expressed enkephalin, a marker for D2 receptor expression. B, Box plot illustrates the difference in percentage inhibition of L-type tail currents by D2 receptor activation in medium spiny neurons from wild-type (n = 3; median, 18%) and CaV1.3 knock-out (n = 6; median, 0%) mice (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney). Also shown is the box plot summary of experiments examining the reduction in peak ramp current by NPA (10 µM) after the addition of low (low nim; 1 µM; n = 4) and high (high nim; 10 µM; n = 4) nimodipine. The amplitude of the modulation in low and high nimodipine divided by the control modulation is plotted; values close to 100 indicate no effect on the modulation, whereas values close to 0 indicate occlusion. C, Current traces from a dorsal striatal medium spiny neuron from a CaV1.3 knock-out mouse. Experimental conditions were the same as Figure 1. Muscarine had no effect on the L-type tail current. D, Box plot illustrates the difference in percentage inhibition of L-type tail currents by M1 receptor activation in medium spiny neurons from wild-type (n = 5; median, 20%) and CaV1.3 knock-out (n = 5; median, 0%) mice (p < 0.05; Mann-Whitney). Also shown is the box plot summary of experiments examining the reduction in peak ramp current by muscarine (10 µM) after the addition of low (low nim; 1 µM; n = 5) and high (high nim; 10 µM; n = 5) nimodipine. The amplitude of the modulation in low and high nimodipine divided by the control modulation is plotted; values close to 100 indicate no effect on the modulation, whereas values close to 0 indicate occlusion.

 




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-