WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, May 17, 2006, ():

This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions

Role of Dopamine in the Primate Caudate Nucleus in Reward Modulation of Saccades
J. Neurosci. Nakamura and Hikosaka 26: 5360

Supplemental data

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • supplemental material - Supplemental Table
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 1. The effects of D1 antagonist injections into mid-caudate for ipsilateral saccades (n=12). The thick line (A) and arrows (B, C) indicate the data obtained from the same experiment shown in Fig. 2A, B. (A) The same format as Fig. 2D. (B-C) The same format as Fig. 3B-C. (D) The same format as Fig. 4B.
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 2. The effects of D2 antagonist injections into mid-caudate for ipsilateral saccades (n=13). The thick line (A) and arrows (B, C) indicate the data obtained from the same experiment shown in Fig. 5A, B. The same format as Supplementary Fig. 1.
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 3. The effects of D1 antagonist injections into post-caudate (n=9).
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 4. The effects of D2 antagonist injections into post-caudate (n=10).
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 5. The effects of saline injections into mid-caudate (n=9).
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 6. The effects of saline injections into post-caudate (n=4).
  • supplemental material - Supplementary Fig. 7. Population analyses for all D1 antagonist injections (A) and all D2 antagonist injections (B) in the mid-caudate for contralateral saccades. The same format as in Fig. 3B and 6B, but the median, instead of mean, reaction times are plotted. Filled circles indicate significant differences between the pre- and post-injection sessions (Mann-Whitney U test, p<0.05); open circles indicate non-significant differences.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow reprints & permissions

-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-