WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 16, 2008, 28(29)

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in J. Neurosci.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Next Article 

This Week in The Journal
This Week in The Journal

Formula Cellular/Molecular

Hodgkin–Huxley Model of Backpropagating Spikes

Yuguo Yu, Yousheng Shu, and David A. McCormick

(see pages 7260–7272)

Axon potentials recorded in somata of pyramidal neurons in vivo have a fast rising phase and variable threshold, contrary to predictions of the Hodgkin–Huxley model. Some have suggested that this difference is due to cooperativity among sodium channels, resulting in many channels opening simultaneously. Yu et al. now show that the shape and threshold variability of somatic action potentials can be explained by the fact that spikes backpropagate to the soma from their initiation point, ~40 µm along the axon. Simultaneous intracellular recordings from somata and axons in cortical slices revealed that the shape and threshold variability of spikes at the spike-initiating zone were consistent with predictions of the Hodgkin–Huxley model. Computer simulations confirmed that the rise times of spikes in the soma were influenced by backpropagation, and that threshold variability resulted from differences in membrane potential in the soma and axon initial segment at the time of spike initiation.

Formula Development/Plasticity/Repair

SCLIP Role in Purkinje Cell Dendritogenesis

Fabienne E. Poulain, Stéphanie Chauvin, Rosine Wehrlé, Mathieu Desclaux, Jacques Mallet, Guilan Vodjdani, Isabelle Dusart, and André Sobel

(see pages 7387–7398)

Purkinje cells develop highly branched dendritic arbors that receive tens of thousands of synaptic inputs. Poulain et al. report this week that SCLIP, a member of the stathmin family of microtubule-destabilizing proteins, is important in Purkinje cell dendritogenesis. In the developing cerebellum, SCLIP was expressed primarily in Purkinje cells, became concentrated in dendrites as they formed, and decreased when the dendritic arbor was fully formed. The expression was concentrated in the Golgi apparatus and other vesicular structures. Overexpression of SCLIP in postnatal organotypic cerebellar cultures accelerated dendritic development and increased the number and branching of primary dendrites. Conversely, early knockdown of SCLIP via RNA inhibition inhibited the initial formation of dendrites, and later knockdown inhibited growth and branching of nascent dendrites. Importantly, neighboring Purkinje cells that were not transfected with interfering RNAs developed normally, indicating that SCLIP affects dendritogenesis only in the cell in which it is expressed.


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
After 14 d in vivo, control Purkinje cells (left) have a highly branched dendritic arbor. Knockdown of SCLIP (right) inhibits dendritogenesis but does not affect axonal growth. See the article by Poulain et al. for details.

 
Formula Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive

Stress and Cannabinoids

Silvia Rossi, Valentina De Chiara, Alessandra Musella, Hajime Kusayanagi, Giorgia Mataluni, Giorgio Bernardi, Alessandro Usiello, and Diego Centonze

(see pages 7284–7292)

The relationship between stress and the endocannabinoid system are complex, and activation of cannabinoid receptors can have diverse and apparently contradictory effects on the stress response. This complexity is further demonstrated this week by Rossi et al., who show that stress has different effects on GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the striatum, a brain area that has high levels of cannabinoid receptors and is important in stress responses. Mice were subjected daily to an aggressive male to induce social stress, and the effects of exogenous and endogenous cannabinoids were measured in corticostriatal slice cultures. Stress exposure eliminated the reductions in GABAergic IPSC frequency and amplitude that are normally produced by cannabinoids. In contrast, stress did not alter cannabinoid-mediated reduction in glutamatergic EPSC frequency and amplitude. Providing mice with rewards (exercise, sugar, or cocaine) after social stress eliminated the effects of stress on cannabinoid modulation of GABAergic transmission.

Formula Neurobiology of Disease

Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Mutations in Migraine

Sandrine Cestèle, Paolo Scalmani, Raffaella Rusconi, Benedetta Terragni, Silvana Franceschetti, and Massimo Mantegazza

(see pages 7273–7283)

Different mutations in the neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav1.1) cause familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) or epilepsy. To help differentiate the physiological bases of these diseases, Cestèle et al. expressed human Nav1.1 channels bearing the FHM type 3 mutation (which results in an amino acid substitution in the inactivation gate) in a non-neural cell line and in cultured neocortical neurons. The electrophysiological properties of the mutant channel were consistent with it conferring a limited hyperexcitability on neurons. Compared to wild type, mutated channels had a positive shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation, reduced maximum current density, and faster inactivation. Some of these properties are expected to produce hyperexcitability, and others should favor hypoexcitability. Mutant channels appeared able to sustain high-frequency firing better than wild-type channels, but this ability was limited and disappeared after sustained depolarization. This limited hyperexcitability may distinguish migraine and epilepsy mutations.


Related articles in J. Neurosci.:

Cortical Action Potential Backpropagation Explains Spike Threshold Variability and Rapid-Onset Kinetics
Yuguo Yu, Yousheng Shu, and David A. McCormick
J. Neurosci. 2008 28: 7260-7272. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Self-Limited Hyperexcitability: Functional Effect of a Familial Hemiplegic Migraine Mutation of the Nav1.1 (SCN1A) Na+ Channel
Sandrine Cestèle, Paolo Scalmani, Raffaella Rusconi, Benedetta Terragni, Silvana Franceschetti, and Massimo Mantegazza
J. Neurosci. 2008 28: 7273-7283. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

Chronic Psychoemotional Stress Impairs Cannabinoid-Receptor-Mediated Control of GABA Transmission in the Striatum
Silvia Rossi, Valentina De Chiara, Alessandra Musella, Hajime Kusayanagi, Giorgia Mataluni, Giorgio Bernardi, Alessandro Usiello, and Diego Centonze
J. Neurosci. 2008 28: 7284-7292. [Abstract] [Full Text]  

SCLIP Is Crucial for the Formation and Development of the Purkinje Cell Dendritic Arbor
Fabienne E. Poulain, Stéphanie Chauvin, Rosine Wehrlé, Mathieu Desclaux, Jacques Mallet, Guilan Vodjdani, Isabelle Dusart, and André Sobel
J. Neurosci. 2008 28: 7387-7398. [Abstract] [Full Text]  




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in J. Neurosci.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-