WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pare, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bouhassira, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pare, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bouhassira, D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Neuroscience, Vol 10, 20-33, Copyright © 1990 by Society for Neuroscience


ARTICLE

Prolonged enhancement of anterior thalamic synaptic responsiveness by stimulation of a brain-stem cholinergic group

D Pare, M Steriade, M Deschenes and D Bouhassira
Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Faculte de Medecine, Universite Laval, Quebec, Canada.

This study describes the effects of brain-stem cholinergic laterodorsal tegmental (LDT) stimulation on the synaptic responsiveness of anterior thalamic (AT) neurons. A sample of AT cells, physiologically identified by their short-latency (less than 6.5 msec) response to mammillary body (MB) stimulation, was recorded in unanesthetized, chronically implanted cats and in urethane-anesthetized cats. In chronic experiments, LDT stimulation evoked a short-latency (10-20 msec) excitation in most AT cells. Moreover, brief LDT trains (3 shocks at 300 Hz, every 3 sec) enhanced the responsiveness of AT cells to both MB (orthodromic) and cortical (ortho- and antidromic) stimuli. This effect did not vary as a function of the interval between LDT conditioning and MB or cortical testing shocks, but as a function of the number of trials. The effects of LDT stimuli resisted reserpine treatment (0.75 mg/kg), suggesting that they were not dependent on the coactivation of monoaminergic fibers. Finally, LDT trains did not suppress inhibitory processes in AT neurons when conditioning-testing intervals were longer than 60 msec. Intracellular recordings performed in urethane-anesthetized cats revealed that LDT stimulation induced a short-latency depolarization which increased with membrane hyperpolarization and was associated with an increase in apparent membrane conductance. Usually, isolated LDT trains did not evoke lasting changes in membrane potential or conductance. However, when LDT trains were applied every 3 sec, they gradually decreased the apparent membrane conductance without altering the membrane potential. This conductance change had a time course similar to the LDT-induced potentiation of responsiveness observed in the chronic experiments. In some neurons, LDT conditioning trains also induced a marked increase in the probability of fast prepotentials being triggered by subthreshold MB or cortical orthodromic volleys. In order to distinguish the cumulative effects of repeated LDT trains from the possibly slow time course of LDT influences, we studied the effects of a unique 1 sec LDT train (at 30 Hz) on the synaptic responsiveness of AT cells recorded extracellularly in reserpine-treated, urethane- anesthetized animals. Such LDT trains induced a 2.9-fold increase in synaptic responsiveness, reaching its peak 40-50 sec after the LDT train and lasting up to 4 min. Iontophoretic application of the muscarinic blocker scopolamine blocked these long-lasting potentiating effects of LDT stimuli. Removal of cortical and basal forebrain inputs to the AT nuclear complex by appropriate transections did not abolish the potentiating effects of LDT trains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. C. Trageser, K. A. Burke, R. Masri, Y. Li, L. Sellers, and A. Keller
State-Dependent Gating of Sensory Inputs by Zona Incerta
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2006; 96(3): 1456 - 1463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. A Castro-Alamancos
Different temporal processing of sensory inputs in the rat thalamus during quiescent and information processing states in vivo
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 567 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Castro-Alamancos
Properties of Primary Sensory (Lemniscal) Synapses in the Ventrobasal Thalamus and the Relay of High-Frequency Sensory Inputs
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 946 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Steriade
Impact of Network Activities on Neuronal Properties in Corticothalamic Systems
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2001; 86(1): 1 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. A. Castro-Alamancos and M. E. Calcagnotto
High-Pass Filtering of Corticothalamic Activity by Neuromodulators Released in the Thalamus During Arousal: In Vitro and In Vivo
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 1489 - 1497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Steriade and I. Timofeev
Short-Term Plasticity during Intrathalamic Augmenting Responses in Decorticated Cats
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1997; 17(10): 3778 - 3795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. A Castro-Alamancos
Different temporal processing of sensory inputs in the rat thalamus during quiescent and information processing states in vivo
J. Physiol., March 1, 2002; 539(2): 567 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-