 |
Previous Article | Next Article 
Volume 16, Number 23,
Issue of December 1, 1996
pp. 7670-7677
Copyright ©1996 Society for Neuroscience
Effects of Binge Pattern Cocaine Administration on Dopamine
D1 and D2 Receptors in the Rat Brain: An
In Vivo Study Using Positron Emission Tomography
Received April 17, 1996; revised Aug. 9, 1996; accepted Sept. 5, 1996.
Hideo Tsukada1,
Jason Kreuter2,
Christopher E. Maggos2,
Ellen M. Unterwald2, 3,
Takeharu Kakiuchi1,
Shingo Nishiyama1,
Masami Futatsubashi1, and
Mary Jeanne Kreek2
1 Central Research Laboratory, Hamamatsu Photonics K. K., Shizuoka 434, Japan, 2 Laboratory of the Biology of
Addictive Diseases, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
10021, and 3 Department of Psychiatry, New York University
Medical Center, New York, New York 10003
The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of
"binge" pattern cocaine administration on dopamine D1
and D2 receptors in the rat brain. Male Sprague Dawley rats
were injected three times at 1 hr intervals with saline or cocaine (15 mg/kg) each day for 2, 7, or 14 d. The in vivo
binding of [11C]SCH23390 (dopamine D1
receptor antagonist) and
[11C]N-methylspiperone (NMSP; dopamine
D2 receptor antagonist) in the striatal region was measured
by a high-resolution positron emission tomography at 1 and 3.5 hr,
respectively, after the last cocaine or saline injection. Acute (2 d)
binge cocaine administration did not change the in vivo
binding potential of [11C]SCH23390 or the binding of
[11C]NMSP in the striatum. After 7 d of binge
cocaine administration, a significant decrease in the binding potential
of [11C]SCH23390 was observed, whereas no change in the
binding of [11C]NMSP was found. After 14 d of binge
cocaine administration, the in vivo binding was
significantly reduced for both [11C]SCH23390 and
[11C]NMSP. Separate saturation experiments indicated that
the observed alterations of in vivo binding were
attributable mainly to apparent alterations in the affinity and not the
number of binding sites. These results suggest that both dopamine
D1 and D2 receptors may have altered
physiologically available binding sites after binge pattern cocaine
administration.
Key words:
cocaine;
dopamine receptors;
[11C]SCH23390;
[11C]N-methylspiperone;
positron emission
tomography;
rat brain
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Leriche, T. Bjorklund, N. Breysse, L. Besret, M.-C. Gregoire, T. Carlsson, F. Dolle, R. J. Mandel, N. Deglon, P. Hantraye, et al.
Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Demonstrates Correlation between Behavioral Recovery and Correction of Dopamine Neurotransmission after Gene Therapy
J. Neurosci.,
February 4, 2009;
29(5):
1544 - 1553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Alexoff, P. Vaska, D. Marsteller, T. Gerasimov, J. Li, J. Logan, J. S. Fowler, N. B. Taintor, P. K. Thanos, and N. D. Volkow
Reproducibility of 11C-Raclopride Binding in the Rat Brain Measured with the MicroPET R4: Effects of Scatter Correction and Tracer Specific Activity
J. Nucl. Med.,
May 1, 2003;
44(5):
815 - 822.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nikolaus, R. Larisch, M. Beu, K. Hamacher, F. Forutan, H. Vosberg, and H.-W. Muller
In Vivo Measurement of D2 Receptor Density and Affinity for 18F-(3-N-Methyl)Benperidol in the Rat Striatum with a PET System for Small Laboratory Animals
J. Nucl. Med.,
April 1, 2003;
44(4):
618 - 624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Tsukada, N. Harada, S. Nishiyama, H. Ohba, and T. Kakiuchi
Cholinergic Neuronal Modulation Alters Dopamine D2 Receptor Availability In Vivo by Regulating Receptor Affinity Induced by Facilitated Synaptic Dopamine Turnover: Positron Emission Tomography Studies with Microdialysis in the Conscious Monkey Brain
J. Neurosci.,
September 15, 2000;
20(18):
7067 - 7073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. van Gorp, J. N. Wilkins, C. H. Hinkin, L. H. Moore, J. Hull, M. D. Horner, and D. Plotkin
Declarative and Procedural Memory Functioning in Abstinent Cocaine Abusers
Arch Gen Psychiatry,
January 1, 1999;
56(1):
85 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|