QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (51) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barlow, H. Articles by Tripathy, S. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barlow, H. Articles by Tripathy, S. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Volume 17, Number 20, Issue of October 15, 1997 pp. 7954-7966
Copyright ©1997 Society for Neuroscience

Correspondence Noise and Signal Pooling in the Detection of Coherent Visual Motion

Received March 4, 1997; revised July 25, 1997; accepted July 25, 1997.

Horace Barlow and Srimant P. Tripathy

Physiological Laboratory, Downing Site, Cambridge CB2 3EG, United Kingdom

In the random dot kinematograms used to analyze the detection of coherent motion in the middle temporal visual area (MT) and in psychophysical experiments the exact way that dots are paired between successive presentations is not known by the observer. We show how to calculate the limit to coherence threshold caused by this uncertainty, which we call "correspondence noise." We compare ideal thresholds limited only by this noise with those of human observers when dot density, ratio of dot numbers in two fields, area of stimulus, number of fields, and method of generation of the coherent dots are varied. The observed thresholds vary in the same way as the ideal thresholds over wide ranges, but they are much higher. We think this difference is because the ideal detector takes advantage of the high precision with which dots are placed in the kinematograms, whereas the neural motion system can only operate with low precision. When kinematograms are generated with decreased precision of dot placement, the ideal detector no longer has this advantage, and the gap between ideal and actual performance is greatly reduced. Because the signals that result from objects moving in the real world are scattered over broad ranges of direction and velocity, high precision is not needed, and it is advantageous for the motion system to pool information over broad ranges. Other mismatches between kinematograms and the neural motion system, and internal noise, may also elevate human thresholds relative to the ideal detector. The importance of external noise suggests that the neurons of MT form a vast array of optimal filters, each matched to a different combination of parameters in the multidimensional space required to define motion in patches of the visual field.

Key words: correspondence noise; coherent motion; statistical efficiency; integration; matched filters; MT or V5; global motion

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Y. Masse and E. P. Cook The Effect of Middle Temporal Spike Phase on Sensory Encoding and Correlates with Behavior during a Motion-Detection Task J. Neurosci., February 6, 2008; 28(6): 1343 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Klam, R. S. Zemel, and A. Pouget Population Coding with Motion Energy Filters: The Impact of Correlations Neural Comput., January 1, 2007; 20(1): 146 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sapir, G. d'Avossa, M. McAvoy, G. L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta Brain signals for spatial attention predict performance in a motion discrimination task PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17810 - 17815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Cook and J. H. R. Maunsell Attentional Modulation of Motion Integration of Individual Neurons in the Middle Temporal Visual Area J. Neurosci., September 8, 2004; 24(36): 7964 - 7977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.A.J. Reddi, K. N. Asrress, and R.H.S. Carpenter Accuracy, Information, and Response Time in a Saccadic Decision Task J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2003; 90(5): 3538 - 3546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Uka and G. C. DeAngelis Contribution of Middle Temporal Area to Coarse Depth Discrimination: Comparison of Neuronal and Psychophysical Sensitivity J. Neurosci., April 15, 2003; 23(8): 3515 - 3530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Baddeley, H. A. Ingram, and R. C. Miall System Identification Applied to a Visuomotor Task: Near-Optimal Human Performance in a Noisy Changing Task J. Neurosci., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 3066 - 3075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. A. Van Wezel and K. H. Britten Motion Adaptation in Area MT J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3469 - 3476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Gardner-Medwin and H. B. Barlow The Limits of Counting Accuracy in Distributed Neural Representations Neural Comput., March 1, 2001; 13(3): 477 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				E. Grossman, M. Donnelly, R. Price, D. Pickens, V. Morgan, G. Neighbor, and R. Blake Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 12(5): 711 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. H. Britten and W. T. Newsome Tuning Bandwidths for Near-Threshold Stimuli in Area MT J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 762 - 770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help