 |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 15, 1998, 18(10):3929-3942
Sensitive Periods for Visual Calibration of the Auditory Space Map in the Barn Owl Optic Tectum
Michael S. Brainard1 and Eric I. Knudsen2 1 Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Departments of Physiology and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, and 2 Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5125
Previous studies have identified sensitive periods for the developing barn owl during which visual experience has a powerful influence on the calibration of sound localization behavior. Here we investigated neural correlates of these sensitive periods by assessing developmental changes in the capacity of visual experience to alter the map of auditory space in the optic tectum of the barn owl. We used two manipulations. (1) We equipped owls with prismatic spectacles that optically displaced the visual field by 23° to the left or right, and (2) we restored normal vision to prism-reared owls that had been raised wearing prisms. In agreement with previous behavioral experiments, we found that the capacity of abnormal visual experience to shift the tectal auditory space map was restricted to an early sensitive period. However, this period extended until later in life (~200 d) than described previously in behavioral studies (~70 d). Furthermore, unlike the previous behavioral studies that found that the capacity to recover normal sound localization after restoration of normal vision was lost at ~200 d of age, we found that the capacity to recover a normal auditory space map was never lost. Finally, we were able to reconcile the behaviorally and neurophysiologically defined sensitive periods by taking into account differences in the richness of the environment in the two sets of experiments. We repeated the behavioral experiments and found that when owls were housed in a rich environment, the capacity to adjust sound localization away from normal extended to later in life, whereas the capacity to recover to normal was never lost. Conversely, when owls were housed in an impoverished environment, the capacity to recover a normal auditory space map was restricted to a period ending at ~200 d of age. The results demonstrate that the timing and even the existence of sensitive periods for plasticity of a neural circuit and associated behavior can depend on multiple factors, including (1) the nature of the adjustment demanded of the system and (2) the richness of the sensory and social environment in which the plasticity is studied.
Key words: sensitive period; critical period; auditory plasticity; sound localization; auditory map; space map; optic tectum; superior colliculus; barn owl; Tyto alba
Copyright © 1998 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/98/18103929-14$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
I. B. Witten, E. I. Knudsen, and H. Sompolinsky
A Hebbian Learning Rule Mediates Asymmetric Plasticity in Aligning Sensory Representations
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2008; 100(2): 1067 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. I. Knudsen, J. J. Heckman, J. L. Cameron, and J. P. Shonkoff
Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America's future workforce
PNAS, July 5, 2006; 103(27): 10155 - 10162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J. J. Knierim
Neural representations of location outside the hippocampus
Learn. Mem., July 1, 2006; 13(4): 405 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. I. Knudsen
Sensitive Periods in the Development of the Brain and Behavior
J. Cogn. Neurosci., September 1, 2004; 16(8): 1412 - 1425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. M. DeBello and E. I. Knudsen
Multiple Sites of Adaptive Plasticity in the Owl's Auditory Localization Pathway
J. Neurosci., August 4, 2004; 24(31): 6853 - 6861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. K. Kuhl
Human speech and birdsong: Communication and the social brain
PNAS, August 19, 2003; 100(17): 9645 - 9646.
[Full Text] [PDF]
M. Kardar and A. Zee
Information optimization in coupled audio-visual cortical maps
PNAS, December 10, 2002; 99(25): 15894 - 15897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
D. R. Euston and T. T. Takahashi
From Spectrum to Space: The Contribution of Level Difference Cues to Spatial Receptive Fields in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2002; 22(1): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
P. S. Hyde and E. I. Knudsen
A Topographic Instructive Signal Guides the Adjustment of the Auditory Space Map in the Optic Tectum
J. Neurosci., November 1, 2001; 21(21): 8586 - 8593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. Zheng and E. I. Knudsen
GABAergic Inhibition Antagonizes Adaptive Adjustment of the Owl's Auditory Space Map during the Initial Phase of Plasticity
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2001; 21(12): 4356 - 4365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. S. Brainard and A. J. Doupe
Postlearning Consolidation of Birdsong: Stabilizing Effects of Age and Anterior Forebrain Lesions
J. Neurosci., April 1, 2001; 21(7): 2501 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
E. I. Knudsen, W. Zheng, and W. M. DeBello
Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway
PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11815 - 11820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
W. Zheng and E. I. Knudsen
Functional Selection of Adaptive Auditory Space Map by GABAA-Mediated Inhibition
Science, May 7, 1999; 284(5416): 962 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text]
G. L. Miller and E. I. Knudsen
Early Visual Experience Shapes the Representation of Auditory Space in the Forebrain Gaze Fields of the Barn Owl
J. Neurosci., March 15, 1999; 19(6): 2326 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
A. J. King, J. W. H. Schnupp, and I. D. Thompson
Signals from the Superficial Layers of the Superior Colliculus Enable the Development of the Auditory Space Map in the Deeper Layers
J. Neurosci., November 15, 1998; 18(22): 9394 - 9408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|