WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Stereo Investigator
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiCarlo, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, K. O.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 1999, 19(1):401-419

Velocity Invariance of Receptive Field Structure in Somatosensory Cortical Area 3b of the Alert Monkey

James J. DiCarlo and Kenneth O. Johnson

Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Departments of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

This is the second in a series of studies of the neural representation of tactile spatial form in cortical area 3b of the alert monkey. We previously studied the spatial structure of 330 area 3b neuronal receptive fields (RFs) on the fingerpad with random dot patterns scanned at one velocity (40 mm/sec; ). Here, we analyze the temporal structure of 84 neuronal RFs by studying their spatial structure at three scanning velocities (20, 40, and 80 mm/sec). As in the previous study, most RFs contained a single, central, excitatory region and one or more surrounding or flanking inhibitory regions. The mean time delay between skin stimulation and its excitatory effect was 15.5 msec. Except for differences in mean rate, each neuron's response and the spatial structure of its RF were essentially unaffected by scanning velocity. This is the expected outcome when excitatory and inhibitory effects are brief and synchronous. However, that interpretation is consistent neither with the reported timing of excitation and inhibition in somatosensory cortex nor with the third study in this series, which investigates the effect of scanning direction and shows that one component of inhibition lags behind excitation. We reconcile these observations by showing that overlapping (in-field) inhibition delayed relative to excitation can produce RF spatial structure that is unaffected by changes in scanning velocity. Regardless of the mechanisms, the velocity invariance of area 3b RF structure is consistent with the velocity invariance of tactile spatial perception (e.g., roughness estimation and form recognition).

Key words: receptive field; somatosensory; cortex; area 3b; SI; tactile; velocity; monkey; reverse correlation


Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/191401-19$05.00/0


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Depeault, E.-M. Meftah, and C. E. Chapman
Tactile Speed Scaling: Contributions of Time and Space
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1422 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Z. Simon, D. A. Depireux, D. J. Klein, J. B. Fritz, and S. A. Shamma
Temporal symmetry in primary auditory cortex: implications for cortical connectivity.
Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 583 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. P. Sripati, T. Yoshioka, P. Denchev, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System
J. Neurosci., February 15, 2006; 26(7): 2101 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. T. Blake and M. M. Merzenich
Changes of AI Receptive Fields With Sound Density
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 3409 - 3420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. N. S. Sachdev and K. C. Catania
Receptive Fields and Response Properties of Neurons in the Star-Nosed Mole's Somatosensory Fovea
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2602 - 2611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
T. Yoshioka, B. Gibb, A. K. Dorsch, S. S. Hsiao, and K. O. Johnson
Neural Coding Mechanisms Underlying Perceived Roughness of Finely Textured Surfaces
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 6905 - 6916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. J. DiCarlo and K. O. Johnson
Spatial and Temporal Structure of Receptive Fields in Primate Somatosensory Area 3b: Effects of Stimulus Scanning Direction and Orientation
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2000; 20(1): 495 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-