QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tischkau, S. A. Articles by Gillette, M. U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tischkau, S. A. Articles by Gillette, M. U.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, 1999, 0:RC15:1-6

RAPID COMMUNICATION
Oscillation and Light Induction of timeless mRNA in the Mammalian Circadian Clock

Shelley A. Tischkau¹, Jeffrey A. Barnes¹, Fang-Ju Lin², Edith M. Myers², Jessica W. Barnes¹, Elizabeth L. Meyer-Bernstein², William J. Hurst¹, Penny W. Burgoon¹, Dechun Chen², Amita Sehgal², and Martha U. Gillette¹

¹ Department of Cell and Structural Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, and ² Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster depend on a molecular feedback loop generated by oscillating products of the period (per) and timeless (tim) genes. In mammals, three per homologs are cyclically expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), site of the circadian clock, and two of these, mPer1 and mPer2, are induced in response to light. Although this light response distinguishes the mammalian clock from its Drosophila counterpart, overall regulation, including homologous transcriptional activators, appears to be similar. Thus, the basic mechanisms used to generate circadian timing have been conserved. However, contrary to expectations, the recently isolated mammalian tim homolog was reported not to cycle. In this study, we examined mRNA levels of the same tim homolog using a different probe. We observed a significant (approximately threefold) diurnal variation in mTim expression within mouse SCN using two independent methods. Peak levels were evident at the day-to-night transition in light-entrained animals, and the oscillation persisted on the second day in constant conditions. Furthermore, light pulses known to induce phase delays caused significant elevation in mTim mRNA. In contrast, phase-advancing light pulses did not affect mTim levels. The mTim expression profile and the response to nocturnal light are similar to mPer2 and are delayed compared with mPer1. We conclude that temporal ordering of mTim and mPer2 parallels that of their fly homologs. We predict that mTIM may be the preferred functional partner for mPER2 and that expression of mTim and mPer2 may, in fact, be driven by mPER1.

Key words: mtimeless (mTim); suprachiasmatic nucleus; light induction; circadian oscillation; mPer; mouse

---

Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Chen-Goodspeed and Cheng Chi Lee Tumor Suppression and Circadian Function J Biol Rhythms, August 1, 2007; 22(4): 291 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Hendricks Genetic Models in Applied Physiology: Invited Review: Sleeping flies don't lie: the use of Drosophila melanogaster to study sleep and circadian rhythms J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1660 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help