QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barber, M. J. Articles by Lichtman, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barber, M. J. Articles by Lichtman, J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, November 15, 1999, 19(22):9975-9985

Activity-Driven Synapse Elimination Leads Paradoxically to Domination by Inactive Neurons

Michael J. Barber¹ and Jeff W. Lichtman²

Departments of ¹ Physics and ² Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130

In early postnatal life, multiple motor axons converge at individual neuromuscular junctions. However, during the first few weeks after birth, a competitive mechanism eliminates all the inputs but one. This phenomenon, known as synapse elimination, is thought to result from competition based on interaxonal differences in patterns or levels of activity (for review, see Lichtman, 1995). Surprisingly, experimental data support two opposite views of the role of activity: that active axons have a competitive advantage (Ribchester and Taxt, 1983; Ridge and Betz, 1984; Balice-Gordon and Lichtman, 1994) and that inactive axons have a competitive advantage (Callaway et al., 1987, 1989). To understand this paradox, we have formulated a mathematical model of activity-mediated synapse elimination. We assume that the total amount of transmitter released, rather than the frequency of release, mediates synaptic competition. We further assume that the total synaptic area that a neuron can support is metabolically constrained by its activity level and size. This model resolves the paradox by showing that a competitive advantage of higher frequency axons early in development is overcome at later stages by greater synaptic efficacy of axons firing at a lower rate. This model both provides results consistent with experiments in which activity has been manipulated and an explanation for the origin of the size principle (Henneman, 1985).

Key words: synapse elimination; neuromuscular junction; synaptic competition; Hebb's postulate; synaptic plasticity; model

---

Copyright © 1999 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/99/19229975-11$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. B. Mantilla and G. C. Sieck Key aspects of phrenic motoneuron and diaphragm muscle development during the perinatal period J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2008; 104(6): 1818 - 1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Harms, K. R. Tovar, and A. M. Craig Synapse-Specific Regulation of AMPA Receptor Subunit Composition by Activity J. Neurosci., July 6, 2005; 25(27): 6379 - 6388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Lee, S. J. Eglen, and R. O. L. Wong Segregation of ON and OFF Retinogeniculate Connectivity Directed by Patterned Spontaneous Activity J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2311 - 2321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Personius and R. J. Balice-Gordon Book Review: Activity-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Insights from Neuromuscular Junctions Neuroscientist, October 1, 2002; 8(5): 414 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help