QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kimmerle, B. Articles by Egelhaaf, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kimmerle, B. Articles by Egelhaaf, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2000, 20(16):6256-6266

Performance of Fly Visual Interneurons during Object Fixation

Bernd Kimmerle and Martin Egelhaaf

Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany

Neurons involved in the processing of optic flow are usually analyzed using stimuli designed by the experimenter. However, in real life optic flow depends on locomotive behavior. We characterized the performance of motion-sensitive neurons in the visual system of the fly using optic flow as occurring in behavioral situations during object fixation. Optic flow generated by tethered flying flies in a flight simulator was subsequently replayed while recording the responses of two cell types in the fly's motion pathway presumably involved in the detection of objects and of deviations from a straight flight course, respectively. FD1b cells, which are representatives of the so-called figure-detection cells, responded very specifically to object motion. Although object selectivity of these cells is attributable to inhibition during large-field motion, the influence of background motion during object fixation was almost negligible. In contrast, the cells of the so-called horizontal system (HS cells) are most sensitive to background motion, as elicited during deviations of the animal from its course. During object fixation, the responses of HS cells depended on both object and background motion. The simulated distance of the background to the fly did not have a strong influence on the responses of either cell type. The specificity for detecting deviations from a straight course is enhanced by subtraction of the signals of HS cells in both halves of the brain. In contrast, the FD1b cells in the two halves of the brain need to interact in a nonlinear way to ensure efficient detection of objects.

Key words: behaviorally relevant stimuli; figure-ground discrimination; insect; object fixation; optic flow; visual system

---

Copyright © 2000 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/00/20166256-11$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. van Hateren, R. Kern, G. Schwerdtfeger, and M. Egelhaaf Function and Coding in the Blowfly H1 Neuron during Naturalistic Optic Flow J. Neurosci., April 27, 2005; 25(17): 4343 - 4352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Farrow, J. Haag, and A. Borst Input Organization of Multifunctional Motion-Sensitive Neurons in the Blowfly J. Neurosci., October 29, 2003; 23(30): 9805 - 9811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Haag and A. Borst Dendro-Dendritic Interactions between Motion-Sensitive Large-Field Neurons in the Fly J. Neurosci., April 15, 2002; 22(8): 3227 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kern, C. Petereit, and M. Egelhaaf Neural Processing of Naturalistic Optic Flow J. Neurosci., April 15, 2001; 21(8): RC139 - RC139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help