QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cascio, C. J. Articles by Sathian, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cascio, C. J. Articles by Sathian, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 15, 2001, 21(14):5289-5296

Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness

Carissa J. Cascio and K. Sathian

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322

Optimal perception of surface roughness requires lateral movement between skin and surface, suggesting the importance of temporal cues. The roughness of periodic gratings is affected by changing either inter-element spacing (groove width, G) or element width (ridge width, R). Peripheral neural responses to gratings depend quantitatively on a spatial variable, G, and a temporal variable, grating temporal frequency (F_t), with changes in R acting indirectly through concomitant changes in F_t. We investigated, psychophysically, the contribution of temporal cues to human tactile perception of roughness, using gratings varying in either R or G. Gratings were scanned across the immobile fingerpad with controlled movement speed (S) and contact force. In one experiment, we found that roughness magnitude estimates depended on both G and F_t. In a second experiment, discrimination of the roughness of gratings varying in either R or G was affected by manipulating F_t. Overall, the effect of G on roughness judgments was much stronger than that of F_t, probably explaining why many previous studies using surfaces that varied only in inter-element spacing led to the conclusion that temporal factors play no role in roughness perception. However, the perceived roughness of R-varying gratings was determined by F_t and not spatial variables. Roughness judgments were influenced by G and F_t in a manner entirely consistent with predicted afferent response rates. Thus perceived roughness, like peripheral afferent responses, depends in part on temporal variables.

Key words: human; perception; somatosensory; touch; finger; texture; gratings; roughness; temporal frequency; psychophysics; discrimination; magnitude estimation

---

Copyright © 2001 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/01/21145289-08$05.00/0

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. E. LEGGE, C. MADISON, B. N. VAUGHN, A. M. Y. CHEONG, and J. C. MILLER Retention of high tactile acuity throughout the life span in blindness Percept Psychophys, November 1, 2008; 70(8): 1471 - 1488. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Depeault, E.-M. Meftah, and C. E. Chapman Tactile Speed Scaling: Contributions of Time and Space J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2008; 99(3): 1422 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hollins, F. Lorenz, and D. Harper Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch. J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5582 - 5588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Gamzu and E. Ahissar Importance of Temporal Cues for Tactile Spatial- Frequency Discrimination J. Neurosci., September 15, 2001; 21(18): 7416 - 7427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help