The Journal of Neuroscience, September 15, 2002, 22(18):8259-8265
Motoneurons Have Different Membrane Resistance during Fictive
Scratching and Weight Support
Marie-Claude
Perreault1, 2
1 Department of Physiology, Panum Institute,
2200 Copenhagen, Denmark, and 2 Department of
Physiology, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway
The passive membrane properties of motoneurons may be affected in a
behavior-specific manner because of differences in synaptic drive
during different motor behaviors. To explore this possibility, the
changes in input resistance (Rin) and
membrane time constant (
m) of single
extensor motoneurons were compared during two different types of motor
activities: fictive scratching and fictive weight support. These two
activities were selected because the membrane potential of extensor
motoneurons follows a very different trajectory during fictive
scratching (multiphasic, mostly rhythmic trajectory) and fictive weight
support (monophasic, tonic trajectory). The intracellular recordings
were performed in vivo in the immobilized, decerebrate
cat using QX-314-containing microelectrodes to block action potentials.
The Rin and
m at rest (control) were reduced
substantially during all phases of fictive scratching. In contrast,
Rin and
m changed only little during fictive
weight support. Such a differential effect on the membrane resistance
was observed even in motoneurons in which the peak voltage of the
rhythmic depolarization during scratching was similar to the peak
voltage of the tonic depolarization during weight support. The
differential effect was attributed mainly to a difference in synaptic
drive and, in particular, to a larger amount of inhibitory synaptic
activity during fictive scratching.
The present study demonstrates how the same motoneuron can have a
different membrane resistance while participating in two different
behaviors. Such tuning of the membrane resistance may provide
motoneurons with behavior-specific integrative capabilities that, in
turn, could be used advantageously to increase motor performance.
Key words:
locomotion; central pattern generator; spinal cord; synaptic integration; membrane conductance; glycine; postsynaptic
inhibition; chloride
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/22188259-07$05.00/0