 |
 Previous Article | Next Article 
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 1, 2002, 22(7):2748-2752
Imaging Attentional Modulation of Pain in the Periaqueductal Gray
in Humans
Irene
Tracey1,
Alexander
Ploghaus1,
Joseph
S.
Gati2,
Stuart
Clare1,
Steve
Smith1,
Ravi S.
Menon2, and
Paul M.
Matthews1
1 Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of
the Brain, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford,
Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom, and 2 Laboratory for
Functional Magnetic Resonance Research, John P. Robarts Research
Institute, London, Ontario N6A 5K8, Canada
Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience usually
triggered by stimulation of peripheral nerves and often associated with
actual or potential tissue damage. It is well known that pain
perception for patients and normal subjects can be modulated by
psychological factors, such as attention, stress, and arousal. Our
understanding of how this modulation occurs at a neuroanatomical level
is poor. Here we neuroanatomically defined a key area in the network of
brain regions active in response to pain that is modulated by attention
to the painful stimulus. High-resolution functional magnetic resonance
imaging was used to define brain activation to painful heat stimulation
applied to the hand of nine normal subjects within the periaqueductal
gray region. Subjects were asked to either focus on or distract
themselves from the painful stimuli, which were cued using colored
lights. During the distraction condition, subjects rated the pain
intensity as significantly lower compared with when they attended to
the stimulus. Activation in the periaqueductal gray was significantly
increased during the distraction condition, and the total increase in
activation was predictive of changes in perceived intensity. This
provides direct evidence supporting the notion that the periaqueductal gray is a site for higher cortical control of pain modulation in humans.
Key words:
pain; fMRI; PAG; attention; modulation; brainstem
Copyright © 2002 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/02/2272748-05$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Piche, M. Arsenault, and P. Rainville
Cerebral and Cerebrospinal Processes Underlying Counterirritation Analgesia
J. Neurosci.,
November 11, 2009;
29(45):
14236 - 14246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Yelle, Y. Oshiro, R. A. Kraft, and R. C. Coghill
Temporal Filtering of Nociceptive Information by Dynamic Activation of Endogenous Pain Modulatory Systems
J. Neurosci.,
August 19, 2009;
29(33):
10264 - 10271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Villemure and M. C. Bushnell
Mood Influences Supraspinal Pain Processing Separately from Attention
J. Neurosci.,
January 21, 2009;
29(3):
705 - 715.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. A. Strigo, A. N. Simmons, S. C. Matthews, A. D. Craig, and M. P. Paulus
Association of Major Depressive Disorder With Altered Functional Brain Response During Anticipation and Processing of Heat Pain
Arch Gen Psychiatry,
November 1, 2008;
65(11):
1275 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Quevedo and R. C. Coghill
Attentional Modulation of Spatial Integration of Pain: Evidence for Dynamic Spatial Tuning
J. Neurosci.,
October 24, 2007;
27(43):
11635 - 11640.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. J. Coen, L. J. Gregory, L. Yaguez, E. Amaro Jr., M. Brammer, S. C. R. Williams, and Q. Aziz
Reproducibility of human brain activity evoked by esophageal stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
July 1, 2007;
293(1):
G188 - G197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Seminowicz and K. D. Davis
Interactions of Pain Intensity and Cognitive Load: The Brain Stays on Task
Cereb Cortex,
June 1, 2007;
17(6):
1412 - 1422.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Seminowicz and K. D. Davis
Pain Enhances Functional Connectivity of a Brain Network Evoked by Performance of a Cognitive Task
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2007;
97(5):
3651 - 3659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Wiech, R. Kalisch, N. Weiskopf, B. Pleger, K. E. Stephan, and R. J. Dolan
Anterolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates the Analgesic Effect of Expected and Perceived Control over Pain.
J. Neurosci.,
November 1, 2006;
26(44):
11501 - 11509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Keltner, A. Furst, C. Fan, R. Redfern, B. Inglis, and H. L. Fields
Isolating the modulatory effect of expectation on pain transmission: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
J. Neurosci.,
April 19, 2006;
26(16):
4437 - 4443.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Nicotra, H. D. Critchley, C. J. Mathias, and R. J. Dolan
Emotional and autonomic consequences of spinal cord injury explored using functional brain imaging
Brain,
March 1, 2006;
129(3):
718 - 728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Matre, K. L. Casey, and S. Knardahl
Placebo-Induced Changes in Spinal Cord Pain Processing
J. Neurosci.,
January 11, 2006;
26(2):
559 - 563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. C. deCharms, F. Maeda, G. H. Glover, D. Ludlow, J. M. Pauly, D. Soneji, J. D. E. Gabrieli, and S. C. Mackey
Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI
PNAS,
December 20, 2005;
102(51):
18626 - 18631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. T. Lewith, P. J. White, and J. Pariente
Investigating Acupuncture Using Brain Imaging Techniques: The Current State of Play
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med.,
September 1, 2005;
2(3):
315 - 319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Dunckley, R. G. Wise, M. Fairhurst, P. Hobden, Q. Aziz, L. Chang, and I. Tracey
A Comparison of Visceral and Somatic Pain Processing in the Human Brainstem Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Neurosci.,
August 10, 2005;
25(32):
7333 - 7341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Tracey and P Dunckley
Importance of anti- and pro-nociceptive mechanisms in human disease
Gut,
November 1, 2004;
53(11):
1553 - 1555.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A R Hobson and Q Aziz
Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding?
Gut,
August 1, 2004;
53(8):
1198 - 1206.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Wager, J. K. Rilling, E. E. Smith, A. Sokolik, K. L. Casey, R. J. Davidson, S. M. Kosslyn, R. M. Rose, and J. D. Cohen
Placebo-Induced Changes in fMRI in the Anticipation and Experience of Pain
Science,
February 20, 2004;
303(5661):
1162 - 1167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P M Matthews and P Jezzard
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry,
January 1, 2004;
75(1):
6 - 12.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Porro
Functional Imaging and Pain: Behavior, Perception, and Modulation
Neuroscientist,
October 1, 2003;
9(5):
354 - 369.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hao, K. Mamiya, O. Takahata, H. Iwasaki, M. Mata, and D. J. Fink
Nifedipine Potentiates the Antinociceptive Effect of Endomorphin-1 Microinjected into the Periaqueductal Gray in Rats
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2003;
96(4):
1065 - 1071.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
