The Journal of Neuroscience, June 1, 2003, 23(11):4677-4688
Previous Article | Next Article 
Frequency-Specific Interaural Level Difference Tuning Predicts Spatial Response Patterns of Space-Specific Neurons in the Barn Owl Inferior Colliculus
Michael L. Spezio and
Terry T. Takahashi
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
97403
Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus have spatial
receptive fields (RFs) because of sensitivity to interaural time difference
and frequency-specific interaural level difference (ILD). These neurons are
assumed to be tuned to the frequency-specific ILDs occurring at their spatial
RFs, but attempts to assess this tuning with traditional narrowband stimuli
have had limited success. Indeed, tuning assessed in this manner, when
processed via a linear model of spectral integration, typically explains only
approximately half the variance in spatial response patterns. Here we report
our findings that frequency-specific ILD tuning of space-specific neurons,
when assessed from responses to broadband stimuli, predicted nearly 75% of the
variance in spatial responses, using a linear model of spectral integration
(p < 0.0001; n = 97 neurons). Furthermore, when we tested
neurons using only those frequencies we found to be spatially relevant, we saw
that their responses were similar to those elicited by broadband stimuli. When
we used frequencies not identified as spatially relevant, such similarity was
lacking. Furthermore, spectral components that elicited high firing rates when
presented as narrowband stimuli were found in several cases to be irrelevant
for or detrimental to the definition of spatial RFs. Thus, neurons achieved
sharp spatial tuning by selecting for ILDs of a subset of spectral components
in noise, some of which were not identified using narrowband stimuli.
Key words: sound localization; auditory space; reverse correlation; spatial hearing; receptive field; virtual auditory space; binaural
Received Oct. 10, 2002;
revised Feb. 25, 2003;
accepted Mar. 18, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Fischer, G. B. Christianson, and J. L. Pena
Cross-Correlation in the Auditory Coincidence Detectors of Owls
J. Neurosci.,
August 6, 2008;
28(32):
8107 - 8115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Keller and T. T. Takahashi
Localization and Identification of Concurrent Sounds in the Owl's Auditory Space Map
J. Neurosci.,
November 9, 2005;
25(45):
10446 - 10461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Spitzer, A. D. S. Bala, and T. T. Takahashi
A Neuronal Correlate of the Precedence Effect Is Associated With Spatial Selectivity in the Barn Owl's Auditory Midbrain
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2004;
92(4):
2051 - 2070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|