WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 2, 2003, 23(13):5545-5552

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (73)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shahin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shahin, A.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, L. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Enhancement of Neuroplastic P2 and N1c Auditory Evoked Potentials in Musicians

Antoine Shahin,1 Daniel J. Bosnyak,2 Laurel J. Trainor,2 and Larry E. Roberts2

1Unit of Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences, and 2Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4K1

P2 and N1c components of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) have been shown to be sensitive to remodeling of the auditory cortex by training at pitch discrimination in nonmusician subjects. Here, we investigated whether these neuroplastic components of the AEP are enhanced in musicians in accordance with their musical training histories. Highly skilled violinists and pianists and nonmusician controls listened under conditions of passive attention to violin tones, piano tones, and pure tones matched in fundamental frequency to the musical tones. Compared with nonmusician controls, both musician groups evidenced larger N1c (latency, 138 msec) and P2 (latency, 185 msec) responses to the three types of tonal stimuli. As in training studies with nonmusicians, N1c enhancement was expressed preferentially in the right hemisphere, where auditory neurons may be specialized for processing of spectral pitch. Equivalent current dipoles fitted to the N1c and P2 field patterns localized to spatially differentiable regions of the secondary auditory cortex, in agreement with previous findings. These results suggest that the tuning properties of neurons are modified in distributed regions of the auditory cortex in accordance with the acoustic training history (musical- or laboratory-based) of the subject. Enhanced P2 and N1c responses in musicians need not be considered genetic or prenatal markers for musical skill.

Key words: neural plasticity; musical training; auditory evoked potentials; source analysis; secondary auditory cortex; nature/nurture


Received Dec. 9, 2002; revised Apr. 14, 2003; accepted Apr. 14, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. M. Lee, E. Skoe, N. Kraus, and R. Ashley
Selective Subcortical Enhancement of Musical Intervals in Musicians
J. Neurosci., May 6, 2009; 29(18): 5832 - 5840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Moreno, C. Marques, A. Santos, M. Santos, S. L. Castro, and M. Besson
Musical Training Influences Linguistic Abilities in 8-Year-Old Children: More Evidence for Brain Plasticity
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2009; 19(3): 712 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Lappe, S. C. Herholz, L. J. Trainor, and C. Pantev
Cortical Plasticity Induced by Short-Term Unimodal and Multimodal Musical Training
J. Neurosci., September 24, 2008; 28(39): 9632 - 9639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. F. Altmann, H. Nakata, Y. Noguchi, K. Inui, M. Hoshiyama, Y. Kaneoke, and R. Kakigi
Temporal Dynamics of Adaptation to Natural Sounds in the Human Auditory Cortex
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2008; 18(6): 1350 - 1360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. Alain, J. S. Snyder, Y. He, and K. S. Reinke
Changes in Auditory Cortex Parallel Rapid Perceptual Learning
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2007; 17(5): 1074 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
J. S. Snyder and C. Alain
Sequential Auditory Scene Analysis Is Preserved in Normal Aging Adults
Cereb Cortex, March 1, 2007; 17(3): 501 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Fujioka, B. Ross, R. Kakigi, C. Pantev, and L. J. Trainor
One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children
Brain, October 1, 2006; 129(10): 2593 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Kuriki, S. Kanda, and Y. Hirata
Effects of Musical Experience on Different Components of MEG Responses Elicited by Sequential Piano-Tones and Chords
J. Neurosci., April 12, 2006; 26(15): 4046 - 4053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
D. J. Bosnyak, R. A. Eaton, and L. E. Roberts
Distributed Auditory Cortical Representations Are Modified When Non-musicians Are Trained at Pitch Discrimination with 40 Hz Amplitude Modulated Tones
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2004; 14(10): 1088 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-