QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 2, 2003, 23(13):5732-5739

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hofer, S. B. Articles by Klump, G. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hofer, S. B. Articles by Klump, G. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Within- and Across-Channel Processing in Auditory Masking: A Physiological Study in the Songbird Forebrain

Sonja B. Hofer¹ and Georg M. Klump²

¹Technische Universität München, Lehrstuhl für Zoologie, 85748 Garching, Germany, and ²Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, FK 5, Arbeitsgruppe Zoophysiologie und Verhalten, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany

Synchronous envelope fluctuations in different frequency ranges of an acoustic background enhance the detection of signals in background noise. This effect, termed comodulation masking release (CMR), is attributed to both processing within one frequency channel of the auditory system and comparisons across separate frequency channels. Here we present data on CMR from a study in field L2 of the auditory forebrain of the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) using two 25-Hz-wide bands of masking noise that provide the opportunity to distinguish between within-channel and across-channel effects. Acoustically evoked responses were recorded from unrestrained birds via radio telemetry. The signal was a 800 msec pure tone presented at the most sensitive frequency of the units in a previously determined frequency-tuning curve (FTC). One band of masking noise was centered on the signal frequency while the flanking band of noise was presented either within the limits of the excitatory FTC (i.e., within the same frequency channel as the on-frequency masker) or in the suppression area of the FTC (i.e., in a separate channel). For flanking bands inside the excitatory FTC, signal detection thresholds based on the rate code were lower in noise maskers with identical envelope fluctuations (comodulated) than in maskers with uncorrelated envelopes resulting in a neural CMR of 4–7 dB. For flanking bands inside the suppression areas, the neural CMR was reduced. Although the average neural CMR was below the behaviorally determined CMR, a subsample of between 11 and 26% of the recording sites resembled the behavioral performance.

Key words: auditory forebrain; bird; masking release; auditory scene analysis; envelope correlation; narrow-band noise

---

Received Oct. 30, 2002; revised Mar. 24, 2003; accepted Apr. 18, 2003.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Asher and M. Bateson Use and husbandry of captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in scientific research: a review of current practice Lab Anim, April 1, 2008; 42(2): 111 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Neuert, J. L. Verhey, and I. M. Winter Responses of Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus Neurons to Signals in the Presence of Modulated Maskers J. Neurosci., June 23, 2004; 24(25): 5789 - 5797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help