 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 15, 2003, 23(28):9265-9275
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Resolution of Sensory Ambiguities for Gaze Stabilization Requires a Second Neural Integrator
Andrea M. Green and
Dora E. Angelaki
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
The ability to simultaneously move in the world and maintain stable visual perception depends critically on the contribution of vestibulo-ocular reflexes (VORs) to gaze stabilization. It is traditionally believed that semicircular canal signals drive compensatory responses to rotational head disturbances (rotational VOR), whereas otolith signals compensate for translational movements [translational VOR (TVOR)]. However, a sensory ambiguity exists because otolith afferents are activated similarly during head translations and reorientations relative to gravity (i.e., tilts). Extra-otolith cues are, therefore, necessary to ensure that dynamic head tilts do not elicit a TVOR. To investigate how extra-otolith signals contribute, we characterized the temporal and viewing distance-dependent properties of a TVOR elicited in the absence of a lateral acceleration stimulus to the otoliths during combined translational/rotational motion. We show that, in addition to otolith signals, angular head position signals derived by integrating sensory canal information drive the TVOR. A physiological basis for these results is proposed in a model with two distinct integration steps. Upstream of the well known oculomotor velocity-to-position neural integrator, the model incorporates a separate integration element that could represent the "velocity storage integrator," whose functional role in the oculomotor system has so far remained controversial. We propose that a key functional purpose of the velocity storage network is to temporally integrate semicircular canal signals, so that they may be used to extract translation information from ambiguous otolith afferent signals in the natural and functionally relevant bandwidth of head movements.
Key words: eye movement; vestibular; oculomotor; sensorimotor; model; otolith; VOR; velocity storage
Received June 16, 2003;
revised August 14, 2003;
accepted August 15, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. Lewis, C. Haburcakova, and D. M. Merfeld
Roll Tilt Psychophysics in Rhesus Monkeys During Vestibular and Visual Stimulation
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2008;
100(1):
140 - 153.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.A.A. Vingerhoets, J.A.M. Van Gisbergen, and W. P. Medendorp
Verticality Perception During Off-Vertical Axis Rotation
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2007;
97(5):
3256 - 3268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Green, H. Meng, and D. E. Angelaki
A Reevaluation of the Inverse Dynamic Model for Eye Movements
J. Neurosci.,
February 7, 2007;
27(6):
1346 - 1355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Zhou, B. F. Tang, S. D. Newlands, and W. M. King
Responses of Monkey Vestibular-Only Neurons to Translation and Angular Rotation
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2006;
96(6):
2915 - 2930.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M.F. Wong and J. A. Sharpe
Cerebellar skew deviation and the torsional vestibuloocular reflex
Neurology,
August 9, 2005;
65(3):
412 - 419.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. I. Frequency Response of VOR and Perceptual Responses During Translation and Tilt
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2005;
94(1):
186 - 198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Merfeld, S. Park, C. Gianna-Poulin, F. O. Black, and S. Wood
Vestibular Perception and Action Employ Qualitatively Different Mechanisms. II. VOR and Perceptual Responses During Combined Tilt&Translation
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2005;
94(1):
199 - 205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. M. Hess, K. Jaggi-Schwarz, and H. Misslisch
Canal-Otolith Interactions After Off-Vertical Axis Rotations. II. Spatiotemporal Properties of Roll and Pitch Postrotatory Vestibuloocular Reflexes
J Neurophysiol,
March 1, 2005;
93(3):
1633 - 1646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. G. Shaikh, F. F. Ghasia, J. D. Dickman, and D. E. Angelaki
Properties of Cerebellar Fastigial Neurons During Translation, Rotation, and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2005;
93(2):
853 - 863.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Peterka, C. C. Gianna-Poulin, L. H. Zupan, and D. M. Merfeld
Origin of Orientation-Dependent Asymmetries in Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes Evoked by Caloric Stimulation
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2004;
92(4):
2333 - 2345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Green and D. E. Angelaki
An Integrative Neural Network for Detecting Inertial Motion and Head Orientation
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2004;
92(2):
905 - 925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Angelaki
Eyes on Target: What Neurons Must do for the Vestibuloocular Reflex During Linear Motion
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2004;
92(1):
20 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|