 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 12, 2003, 23(32):10321-10330
Previous Article | Next Article 
Development/Plasticity/Repair
Patterned Activity via Spinal Dorsal Quadrant Inputs Is Necessary for the Formation of Organized Somatosensory Maps
Neeraj Jain,1
Pamela S. Diener,2,3
Jacques-Olivier Coq,1 and
Jon H. Kaas1
1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, 2Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, and 3Department of Physical Therapy, Marymount University, School of Health Professions, Arlington, Virginia 22207
The normal development of the somatosensory system requires intact sensory inputs from the periphery during a critical window of time early in development. Here we determined how the removal of only part of the ascending spinal inputs early in development affects the anatomical and neurophysiological development of the somatosensory system. We performed spinal overhemisections in rat pups at C3/C4 levels on the third day after birth. This procedure hemisects the spinal cord on one side and transects the dorsal funiculus on the other side. When the rats were 6-8 months old, the responsiveness and somatotopy of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) contralateral to the hemisection were determined using standard multiunit mapping techniques. Sections of the flattened cortex were processed for cytochrome oxidase activity, Nissl substance, or myelin. We found that histologically apparent modules that are normally present in the regions of the forepaw and the hindpaw representations were absent, whereas the lateral barrel field representing the face was completely normal. The neurons in the forepaw regions of S1 either did not respond to the stimulation of the skin of any region of the body or responded to the stimulation of the upper arm afferents that enter the spinal cord rostral to the site of the lesion. The results show that a lack of normal sensory inputs via ascending pathways in the dorsal spinal cord during early development results in massive anatomical and neurophysiological abnormalities in the cortex. Intact crossed spinothalamic pathways are unable to support the normal development of the forepaw barrels.
Key words: somatosensory cortex; development; cuneate nucleus; rat; spinal cord injury; plasticity
Received Feb 27, 2003;
revised September 4, 2003;
accepted September 10, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kao, J. S. Shumsky, M. Murray, and K. A. Moxon
Exercise Induces Cortical Plasticity after Neonatal Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat
J. Neurosci.,
June 10, 2009;
29(23):
7549 - 7557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Giszter, M. R. Davies, A. Ramakrishnan, U. I. Udoekwere, and W. J. Kargo
Trunk Sensorimotor Cortex Is Essential for Autonomous Weight-Supported Locomotion in Adult Rats Spinalized as P1/P2 Neonates
J Neurophysiol,
August 1, 2008;
100(2):
839 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Endo, C. Spenger, T. Tominaga, S. Brene, and L. Olson
Cortical sensory map rearrangement after spinal cord injury: fMRI responses linked to Nogo signalling
Brain,
November 1, 2007;
130(11):
2951 - 2961.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Fagg, N. G. Hatsopoulos, V. de Lafuente, K. A. Moxon, S. Nemati, J. M. Rebesco, R. Romo, S. A. Solla, J. Reimer, D. Tkach, et al.
Biomimetic Brain Machine Interfaces for the Control of Movement
J. Neurosci.,
October 31, 2007;
27(44):
11842 - 11846.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Tutunculer, G. Foffani, B. T. Himes, and K. A. Moxon
Structure of the Excitatory Receptive Fields of Infragranular Forelimb Neurons in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex Responding To Touch
Cereb Cortex,
June 1, 2006;
16(6):
791 - 810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|