 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, November 19, 2003, 23(33):10577-10584
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Inhibiting the Expression of a Classically Conditioned Behavior Prevents Its Extinction
David J. Krupa and
Richard F. Thompson
Neuroscience Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-2520
The underlying neuronal substrates and behavioral properties that might mediate extinction of the classically conditioned eye-blink response (CR) were examined. Four groups of rabbits were trained to perform the CR. Two of the groups then received either three or six sessions of tone-alone extinction training while the motor nuclei that mediate expression of the CR (facial nucleus and accessory abducens) were reversibly inactivated with microinjections of the GABA agonist muscimol. After these inactivation extinction sessions, rabbits received four more extinction sessions without inactivation. Two groups of controls received either three or six extinction sessions while saline vehicle was infused into the motor nuclei, followed by four sessions with no infusions. Saline infusions had no effect on extinction, and controls extinguished the CR normally over the first three to four sessions. In contrast, muscimol inactivation of the motor nuclei completely prevented any performance of CRs during the three or six inactivation extinction sessions. At the start of the four extinction sessions without inactivation, rabbits performed CRs at the same rate and amplitude as controls on their first extinction sessions. The muscimol rabbits then extinguished the CR normally over the four sessions without inactivation. In short, inactivation of the motor nuclei completely prevented any extinction of the eye-blink CR with no effect on subsequent extinction without inactivation. These results are discussed in terms of possible neuroanatomical loci that might mediate the extinction process as well as how effects of manipulating CR performance during extinction may affect the extinction process.
Key words: learning; memory; eye-blink; extinction; motor nuclei; classical conditioning
Received June 13, 2003;
revised September 26, 2003;
accepted September 29, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Laurent, A. R. Marchand, and R. F. Westbrook
The basolateral amygdala is necessary for learning but not relearning extinction of context conditioned fear
Learn. Mem.,
May 5, 2008;
15(5):
304 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Robleto and R. F. Thompson
Extinction of a Classically Conditioned Response: Red Nucleus and Interpositus
J. Neurosci.,
March 5, 2008;
28(10):
2651 - 2658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Kehoe
Repeated acquisitions and extinctions in classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response
Learn. Mem.,
May 1, 2006;
13(3):
366 - 375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ouyang and S. A. Thomas
From The Cover: A requirement for memory retrieval during and after long-term extinction learning
PNAS,
June 28, 2005;
102(26):
9347 - 9352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Bouton
Context and Behavioral Processes in Extinction
Learn. Mem.,
September 1, 2004;
11(5):
485 - 494.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Robleto, A. M. Poulos, and R. F. Thompson
Brain Mechanisms of Extinction of the Classically Conditioned Eyeblink Response
Learn. Mem.,
September 1, 2004;
11(5):
517 - 524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cammarota, L. R.M. Bevilaqua, J. H. Medina, and I. Izquierdo
Retrieval Does Not Induce Reconsolidation of Inhibitory Avoidance Memory
Learn. Mem.,
September 1, 2004;
11(5):
572 - 578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Kehoe and N. E. White
Overexpectation: Response Loss During Sustained Stimulus Compounding in the Rabbit Nictitating Membrane Preparation
Learn. Mem.,
July 1, 2004;
11(4):
476 - 483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|