 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, December 10, 2003, 23(36):11461-11468
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Expectation Enhances the Regional Brain Metabolic and the Reinforcing Effects of Stimulants in Cocaine Abusers
Nora D. Volkow,1,3
Gene-Jack Wang,1
Yemin Ma,1
Joanna S. Fowler,2
Wei Zhu,4
Laurence Maynard,1
Frank Telang,1
Paul Vaska,1
Yu-Shin Ding,2
Christopher Wong,1 and
James M. Swanson5
1Medical and 2Chemistry Departments, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, Departments of 3Psychiatry and 4Applied Mathematics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York 11794, and 5University of California at Irvine, Child Development Center, Irvine, California 92612
The reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse result from the complex interaction between pharmacological effects and conditioned responses. Here we evaluate how expectation affects the response to the stimulant drug methylphenidate in 25 cocaine abusers. The effects of methylphenidate (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) on brain glucose metabolism (measured by [18F]deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography) and on its reinforcing effects (self-reports of drug effects) were evaluated in four conditions: (1) expecting placebo and receiving placebo; (2) expecting placebo and receiving methylphenidate; (3) expecting methylphenidate and receiving methylphenidate; (4) expecting methylphenidate and receiving placebo. Methylphenidate increased brain glucose metabolism, and the largest changes were in cerebellum, occipital cortex, and thalamus. The increases in metabolism were 50% larger when methylphenidate was expected than when it was not, and these differences were significant in cerebellum (vermis) and thalamus. In contrast, unexpected methylphenidate induced greater increases in left lateral orbitofrontal cortex than when it was expected. Methylphenidate-induced increases in self-reports of "high" were also 50% greater when subjects expected to receive it than when they did not and were significantly correlated with the metabolic increases in thalamus but not in cerebellum. These findings provide evidence that expectation amplifies the effects of methylphenidate in brain and its reinforcing effects. They also suggest that the thalamus, a region involved with conditioned responses, may mediate the enhancement of the reinforcing effects of methylphenidate by expectation and that the orbitofrontal cortex mediates the response to unexpected reinforcement. The enhanced cerebellar activation with expectation may reflect conditioned responses that are not linked to conscious responses.
Key words: imaging; cerebellum; FDG; addiction; context; dopamine; reinforcement; conditioned responses
Received July 21, 2003;
revised October 14, 2003;
accepted October 14, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. S. Oken
Placebo effects: clinical aspects and neurobiology
Brain,
November 1, 2008;
131(11):
2812 - 2823.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Volkow, G.-J. Wang, F. Telang, J. S. Fowler, J. Logan, C. Wong, J. Ma, K. Pradhan, D. Tomasi, P. K. Thanos, et al.
Sleep Deprivation Decreases Binding of [11C]Raclopride to Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors in the Human Brain
J. Neurosci.,
August 20, 2008;
28(34):
8454 - 8461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Ohlmeier, K. Peters, B. T. T. Wildt, M. Zedler, M. Ziegenbein, B. Wiese, H. M. Emrich, and U. Schneider
Comorbidity of Alcohol and Substance Dependence with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Alcohol Alcohol.,
March 7, 2008;
(2008)
agn014v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Scott, C. S. Stohler, C. M. Egnatuk, H. Wang, R. A. Koeppe, and J.-K. Zubieta
Placebo and Nocebo Effects Are Defined by Opposite Opioid and Dopaminergic Responses
Arch Gen Psychiatry,
February 1, 2008;
65(2):
220 - 231.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Boileau, A. Dagher, M. Leyton, K. Welfeld, L. Booij, M. Diksic, and C. Benkelfat
Conditioned Dopamine Release in Humans: A Positron Emission Tomography [11C]Raclopride Study with Amphetamine
J. Neurosci.,
April 11, 2007;
27(15):
3998 - 4003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Kalivas and N. D. Volkow
The Neural Basis of Addiction: A Pathology of Motivation and Choice
Focus,
January 1, 2007;
5(2):
208 - 219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Malizia
The role of emission tomography in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in clinical psychopharmacology
J Psychopharmacol,
July 1, 2006;
20(4_suppl):
100 - 107.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Benedetti, H. S. Mayberg, T. D. Wager, C. S. Stohler, and J.-K. Zubieta
Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect
J. Neurosci.,
November 9, 2005;
25(45):
10390 - 10402.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Dom, B. Sabbe, W. Hulstijn, and W. van den Brink
Substance use disorders and the orbitofrontal cortex: Systematic review of behavioural decision-making and neuroimaging studies
The British Journal of Psychiatry,
September 1, 2005;
187(3):
209 - 220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Kalivas and N. D. Volkow
The Neural Basis of Addiction: A Pathology of Motivation and Choice
Am J Psychiatry,
August 1, 2005;
162(8):
1403 - 1413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. D. Volkow, G.-J. Wang, Y. Ma, J. S. Fowler, C. Wong, Y.-S. Ding, R. Hitzemann, J. M. Swanson, and P. Kalivas
Activation of Orbital and Medial Prefrontal Cortex by Methylphenidate in Cocaine-Addicted Subjects But Not in Controls: Relevance to Addiction
J. Neurosci.,
April 13, 2005;
25(15):
3932 - 3939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hester and H. Garavan
Executive Dysfunction in Cocaine Addiction: Evidence for Discordant Frontal, Cingulate, and Cerebellar Activity
J. Neurosci.,
December 8, 2004;
24(49):
11017 - 11022.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|