WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience ScienceCareers.org
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

Correction for Stackman and Taube, J. Neurosci. 18 (21) 9020-9037.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

 Previous Article

The Journal of Neuroscience, February 15, 2003, 23(4):1555

CORRECTION

In the article "Firing Properties of Rat Lateral Mammillary Single Units: Head Direction, Head Pitch, and Angular Head Velocity," by Robert W. Stackman and Jeffrey S. Taube, which appeared on pages 9020-9037 of the November 1, 1998 issue, the authors reported the presence of head direction (HD) cells in the lateral mammillary nuclei (LMN). In the course of conducting data analyses for another project, the authors realized that the timing clocks for two pieces of equipment (a timestamper and video tracker) were not synchronized in time with one another in one of the recording rooms. Each piece of equipment had its own clock, and the two clocks ran at slightly different speeds. Consequently, the disparity between the two clocks increased linearly the longer a recording session was conducted. It was determined that the difference in clock speed between the two clocks was 3.0055 µsec per video field (1/60th sec). Thus, over the 8 min recording sessions conducted, an error was introduced between when the cell fired (determined by the timestamper) and the rat's current directional heading (determined by the video tracker, which tracked the locations of the two light-emitting diodes attached along the midline of the rat's body axis). This error was negligible at the beginning of the recording session, but grew to ~86 msec during the last minute of recording, which is a little more than five video samples. This error effected 15 of the 20 LMN HD cells reported; five HD cells were not affected, because they were recorded in a different room that used different recording equipment that was not susceptible to this timing error.

The authors have now corrected for this error in their data analysis programs. The error caused little change in the mean values for the HD cell firing properties reported in Table 1, including observed peak firing rate, directional firing range, information content, asymmetry ratio, background firing rate, signal-to-noise ratio, and correlations to linear and angular velocities. However, this error significantly changed the values for the time shift analyses and altered the anticipatory time interval (ATI) for LMN cells. The table below shows the corrected values and replaces Table 2 from the November 1, 1998 article. This table indicates that the estimated ATI for LMN HD cells is ~66.7 msec, compared with the incorrect value of 95.8 msec reported previously. This corrected value, although still somewhat larger than the value of 38.5 msec reported by Blair et al. [Blair HT, Cho J, Sharp PE (1998) Role of the lateral mammillary nucleus in the rat head direction circuit: a combined single unit recording and lesion study. Neuron 21:1387-1397] in their study on LMN HD cells, is less than the originally reported value and closer to the value reported by Blair et al. (1998). By calculating the ATI using the procedures of Blair et al. (1998), a mean ATI of 78.3 msec was obtained for the LMN HD cells, again, a value that is lower than the value reported previously but higher than the value reported by Blair et al. (1998). In examining the table below, it is noteworthy that although all of the optimal time shift values for LMN HD cells are more anticipatory than the values for anterodorsal thalamic nucleus (ADN) HD cells, there were no significant differences for any of the parameters (Scheffe's F test; all p values >0.05), which is different from the original results reported on page 9030. Also shown below are the corrected graphs for Figures 5D-F and 6D-F of this article. The plots from the original Figure 5A-C do not change significantly and are not shown as revised. The plots from the original Figure 6A-C (optimal time shift curves for LMN HD cells) are altered and can be viewed in the revised graphs for Figure 6D-F shown below. These revised plots show that LMN HD cells are a little more anticipatory than ADN HD cells, because each of the LMN curves is shifted to the right of the ADN curves around the peaks (see inset of each plot for an expanded view around the curve peaks for the ADN and LMN functions; the dashed vertical line in all plots is time shift = 0).


                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table. Regional comparison of optimal time shift data



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 


Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience  0270-6474/03/2341555-02$05.00/0



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-