 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Previous Article | Next Article
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 15, 2003, 23(8):3506
Evidence of a Spatial Encoding Deficit in Rats with Lesions of the Mammillary Bodies or Mammillothalamic Tract
Seralynne D. Vann and John P. Aggleton School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3YG, United Kingdom
The present study sought to identify the role of the mammillary bodies and their projections to the anterior thalamic nuclei for spatial memory. Rats with either selective, neurotoxic mammillary body lesions or discrete mammillothalamic tract lesions were tested on various spatial working memory tasks. Tests using the T-maze, radial-arm maze, and water maze were manipulated to compare three possible theories of mammillary body function by increasing proactive interference, increasing retention interval, and taxing the rapid processing of novel spatial stimuli. On T-maze alternation and radial-arm maze tasks, both lesion groups were initially impaired but seemed to recover. Transfer tests revealed, however, a more permanent change in performance, suggesting a failure to use distal (allocentric) cues. Consistent with this, both groups were also impaired at matching-to-place in the water maze and showed little improvement with practice. Nevertheless, once the lesion groups had been trained on a task, they were not affected differentially either by an increase of proactive interference or by retention intervals of up to 30 min. Although both mammillary body and mammillothalamic tract lesions resulted in similar impairments, the mammillothalamic tract group was the more affected when acquiring new spatial information. Together, these results suggest that mammillary body damage causes an encoding deficit when learning new spatial tasks, resulting in a suboptimal mode of performance, which may reflect a loss of directional heading information.
Key words: amnesia; anterior thalamic nuclei; Delay and Brion circuit; mammillary bodies; mammillothalamic tract; rat; spatial memory
Copyright © 2003 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/03/2383506-09$05.00/0
This article has been cited by other articles:
S. D. Vann
Gudden's ventral tegmental nucleus is vital for memory: re-evaluating diencephalic inputs for amnesia
Brain, September 1, 2009; 132(9): 2372 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
S. D. Vann, D. Tsivilis, C. E. Denby, J. R. Quamme, A. P. Yonelinas, J. P. Aggleton, D. Montaldi, and A. R. Mayes
Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5442 - 5447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
J.-F. Marion, C. Yang, A. Caqueret, F. Boucher, and J. L. Michaud
Sim1 and Sim2 are required for the correct targeting of mammillary body axons
Development, December 15, 2005; 132(24): 5527 - 5537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
T. P. Duprez, B. A. Serieh, C. Raftopoulos, Y. Yoneoka, N. Takeda, A. Inoue, Y. Ibuchi, T. Kumagai, T. Sugai, K. Takeda, et al.
Absence of Memory Dysfunction after Bilateral Mammillary Body and Mammillothalamic Tract Electrode Implantation: Preliminary Experience in Three Patients
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 195 - 198.
[Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|