 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, March 24, 2004, 24(12):2914-2922; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5346-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Spike Generator Limits Efficiency of Information Transfer in a Retinal Ganglion Cell
Narender K. Dhingra and
Robert G. Smith
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6058
The quality of the signal a retinal ganglion cell transmits to the brain is important for preception because it sets the minimum detectable stimulus. The ganglion cell converts graded potentials into a spike train with a selective filter but in the process adds noise. To explore how efficiently information is transferred to spikes, we measured contrast detection threshold and increment threshold from graded potential and spike responses of brisk-transient ganglion cells. Intracellular responses to a spot flashed over the receptive field center of the cell were recorded in an intact mammalian retina maintained in vitro at 37°C. Thresholds were measured in a single-interval forced-choice procedure with an ideal observer. The graded potential gave a detection threshold of 1.5% contrast, whereas spikes gave 3.8%. The graded potential also gave increment thresholds approximately twofold lower and carried 60% more gray levels. Increment threshold "dipped" below the detection threshold at a low contrast (<5%) but increased rapidly at higher contrasts. The magnitude of the "dipper" for both graded potential and spikes could be predicted from a threshold nonlinearity in the responses. Depolarization of the cell by current injection reduced the detection threshold for spikes but also reduced the range of contrasts they can transmit. This suggests that contrast sensitivity and dynamic range are related in an essential trade-off.
Key words: retina; discrimination; contrast; threshold; spike; information
Received Dec 3, 2003;
revised February 6, 2004;
accepted February 9, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Balasubramanian and P. Sterling
Receptive fields and functional architecture in the retina
J. Physiol.,
June 15, 2009;
587(12):
2753 - 2767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Borghuis, P. Sterling, and R. G. Smith
Loss of Sensitivity in an Analog Neural Circuit
J. Neurosci.,
March 11, 2009;
29(10):
3045 - 3058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Borghuis, C. P. Ratliff, R. G. Smith, P. Sterling, and V. Balasubramanian
Design of a Neuronal Array
J. Neurosci.,
March 19, 2008;
28(12):
3178 - 3189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Greschner, A. Thiel, J. Kretzberg, and J. Ammermuller
Complex Spike-Event Pattern of Transient ON-OFF Retinal Ganglion Cells
J Neurophysiol,
December 1, 2006;
96(6):
2845 - 2856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. K. Dhingra, M. A. Freed, and R. G. Smith
Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Improve Contrast Sensitivity of a Retinal Ganglion Cell
J. Neurosci.,
August 31, 2005;
25(35):
8097 - 8103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Frechette, A. Sher, M. I. Grivich, D. Petrusca, A. M. Litke, and E. J. Chichilnisky
Fidelity of the Ensemble Code for Visual Motion in Primate Retina
J Neurophysiol,
July 1, 2005;
94(1):
119 - 135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, N. K. Dhingra, R. G. Smith, and P. Sterling
Sluggish and Brisk Ganglion Cells Detect Contrast With Similar Sensitivity
J Neurophysiol,
May 1, 2005;
93(5):
2388 - 2395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Chichilnisky and F. Rieke
Detection Sensitivity and Temporal Resolution of Visual Signals near Absolute Threshold in the Salamander Retina
J. Neurosci.,
January 12, 2005;
25(2):
318 - 330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|