 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 4, 2004, 24(5):1173-1181; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4011-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination of Two Modular Architectures for Switching Multiple Internal Models
Hiroshi Imamizu,1
Tomoe Kuroda,2
Toshinori Yoshioka,1 and
Mitsuo Kawato1
1Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, and 2Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology Kawato Dynamic Brain Project, Keihanna Science City, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
An internal model is a neural mechanism that can mimic the inputoutput properties of a controlled object such as a tool. Recent research interests have moved on to how multiple internal models are learned and switched under a given context of behavior. Two representative computational models for task switching propose distinct neural mechanisms, thus predicting different brain activity patterns in the switching of internal models. In one model, called the mixture-of-experts architecture, switching is commanded by a single executive called a "gating network," which is different from the internal models. In the other model, called the MOSAIC (MOdular Selection And Identification for Control), the internal models themselves play crucial roles in switching. Consequently, the mixture-of-experts model predicts that neural activities related to switching and internal models can be temporally and spatially segregated, whereas the MOSAIC model predicts that they are closely intermingled. Here, we directly examined the two predictions by analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging activities during the switching of one common tool (an ordinary computer mouse) and two novel tools: a rotated mouse, the cursor of which appears in a rotated position, and a velocity mouse, the cursor velocity of which is proportional to the mouse position. The switching and internal model activities temporally and spatially overlapped each other in the cerebellum and in the parietal cortex, whereas the overlap was very small in the frontal cortex. These results suggest that switching mechanisms in the frontal cortex can be explained by the mixture-of-experts architecture, whereas those in the cerebellum and the parietal cortex are explained by the MOSAIC model.
Key words: task switching; internal model; computational models; functional magnetic resonance imaging; tool use; cerebro-cerebellar communication loop
Received Aug 31, 2003;
revised October 26, 2003;
accepted November 21, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. Lee and N. Schweighofer
Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory
J. Neurosci.,
August 19, 2009;
29(33):
10396 - 10404.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Munuera, P. Morel, J.-R. Duhamel, and S. Deneve
Optimal Sensorimotor Control in Eye Movement Sequences
J. Neurosci.,
March 11, 2009;
29(10):
3026 - 3035.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Cerminara, R. Apps, and D. E. Marple-Horvat
An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum
J. Physiol.,
January 15, 2009;
587(2):
429 - 442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hagura, Y. Oouchida, Y. Aramaki, T. Okada, M. Matsumura, N. Sadato, and E. Naito
Visuokinesthetic Perception of Hand Movement is Mediated by Cerebro-Cerebellar Interaction between the Left Cerebellum and Right Parietal Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
January 1, 2009;
19(1):
176 - 186.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Imamizu and M. Kawato
Neural Correlates of Predictive and Postdictive Switching Mechanisms for Internal Models
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2008;
28(42):
10751 - 10765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kluzik, J. Diedrichsen, R. Shadmehr, and A. J. Bastian
Reach Adaptation: What Determines Whether We Learn an Internal Model of the Tool or Adapt the Model of Our Arm?
J Neurophysiol,
September 1, 2008;
100(3):
1455 - 1464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. F. de C. Hamilton and S. T. Grafton
Action Outcomes Are Represented in Human Inferior Frontoparietal Cortex
Cereb Cortex,
May 1, 2008;
18(5):
1160 - 1168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Christensen, J. Lundbye-Jensen, N. Petersen, S. S. Geertsen, O. B. Paulson, and J. B. Nielsen
Watching Your Foot Move--An fMRI Study of Visuomotor Interactions during Foot Movement
Cereb Cortex,
August 1, 2007;
17(8):
1906 - 1917.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Davare, M. Andres, E. Clerget, J.-L. Thonnard, and E. Olivier
Temporal Dissociation between Hand Shaping and Grip Force Scaling in the Anterior Intraparietal Area
J. Neurosci.,
April 11, 2007;
27(15):
3974 - 3980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yamamoto, M. Kawato, S. Kotosaka, and S. Kitazawa
Encoding of Movement Dynamics by Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Activity During Fast Arm Movements Under Resistive and Assistive Force Fields
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2007;
97(2):
1588 - 1599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Diedrichsen, Y. Hashambhoy, T. Rane, and R. Shadmehr
Neural Correlates of Reach Errors
J. Neurosci.,
October 26, 2005;
25(43):
9919 - 9931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Seitz, N. Yamagishi, B. Werner, N. Goda, M. Kawato, and T. Watanabe
Task-specific disruption of perceptual learning
PNAS,
October 11, 2005;
102(41):
14895 - 14900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|