 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, February 25, 2004, 24(8):2037-2044; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3796-03.2004
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Impaired Recency Judgments and Intact Novelty Judgments after Fornix Transection in Monkeys
David P. Charles,
David Gaffan, and
Mark J. Buckley
Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom
Over four experiments based on the delayed matching-to-sample task, fornix-transected and normal control monkeys were presented with a sequence of five sample stimuli and then received intermixed within-session recency (WSR) and between-session recency (BSR) tests in experiment 1, only BSR tests in experiment 2, only absolute novelty (AN) tests in experiment 3, or only WSR tests in experiment 4. In WSR tests, monkeys chose which of two samples had occurred more recently in the immediately preceding sequence. In BSR and AN tests, monkeys were required to choose one sample from the immediately preceding sequence in preference to a foil unseen in the present session (BSR) or an AN foil that had never been presented before. When tests of WSR and BSR were intermixed (experiment 1), fornix monkeys performed below the level of the control monkeys in both types of test, although this difference was not statistically significant. In experiment 2, fornix monkeys were significantly impaired on tests of BSR alone, in which memory for a stimulus presented in an immediately preceding sequence could compete with memory for a foil presented in an earlier training session. In tests of AN (experiment 3), fornix monkeys performed at the same level as control animals in distinguishing a previously experienced stimulus from a previously unseen foil. In experiment 4, fornix transection significantly impaired tests of WSR alone. Taken together, these results suggest that one specialized role of the fornix is to process temporal information.
Key words: memory; hippocampus; fornix; monkey; recency; recognition
Received Aug 14, 2003;
revised December 22, 2003;
accepted December 23, 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. F. Browning, D. Gaffan, P. L. Croxson, and M. G. Baxter
Severe Scene Learning Impairment, but Intact Recognition Memory, after Cholinergic Depletion of Inferotemporal Cortex Followed by Fornix Transection
Cereb Cortex,
May 15, 2009;
(2009)
bhp097v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Yakovlev, D. J. Amit, S. Romani, and S. Hochstein
Universal Memory Mechanism for Familiarity Recognition and Identification
J. Neurosci.,
January 2, 2008;
28(1):
239 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. E. Wilson, D. P. Charles, M. J. Buckley, and D. Gaffan
Fornix Transection Impairs Learning of Randomly Changing Object Discriminations
J. Neurosci.,
November 21, 2007;
27(47):
12868 - 12873.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Cowell, T. J. Bussey, and L. M. Saksida
Why Does Brain Damage Impair Memory? A Connectionist Model of Object Recognition Memory in Perirhinal Cortex.
J. Neurosci.,
November 22, 2006;
26(47):
12186 - 12197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Croxson, H. Johansen-Berg, T. E. J. Behrens, M. D. Robson, M. A. Pinsk, C. G. Gross, W. Richter, M. C. Richter, S. Kastner, and M. F. S. Rushworth
Quantitative Investigation of Connections of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Human and Macaque using Probabilistic Diffusion Tractography
J. Neurosci.,
September 28, 2005;
25(39):
8854 - 8866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|