WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, March 30, 2005, 25(13):3323-3332; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4493-04.2005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwabe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Obermayer, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwabe, L.
Right arrow Articles by Obermayer, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Adaptivity of Tuning Functions in a Generic Recurrent Network Model of a Cortical Hypercolumn

Lars Schwabe and Klaus Obermayer

Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, Berlin University of Technology, 10587 Berlin, Germany

The representation of orientation information in the adult visual cortex is plastic as exemplified by phenomena such as perceptual learning or attention. Although these phenomena operate on different time scales and give rise to different changes in the response properties of neurons, both lead to an improvement in visual discrimination or detection tasks. If, however, optimal performance is indeed the goal, the question arises as to why the changes in neuronal response properties are so different. Here, we hypothesize that these differences arise naturally if optimal performance is achieved by means of different mechanisms. To evaluate this hypothesis, we set up a recurrent network model of a visual cortical hypercolumn and asked how each of four different parameter sets (strength of afferent and recurrent synapses, neuronal gains, and additive background inputs) must be changed to optimally improve the encoding accuracy of a particular set of visual stimuli. We find that the predicted changes in the population responses and the tuning functions were different for each set of parameters, hence were strongly dependent on the plasticity mechanism that was operative. An optimal change in the strength of the recurrent connections, for example, led to changes in the response properties that are similar to the changes observed in perceptual learning experiments. An optimal change in the neuronal gains led to changes mimicking neural effects of attention. Assuming the validity of the optimal encoding hypothesis, these model predictions can be used to disentangle the mechanisms of perceptual learning, attention, and other adaptation phenomena.

Key words: visual cortex; orientation tuning; model; plasticity; perceptual learning; attention


Received Nov 2, 2004; revised February 16, 2005; accepted February 16, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. I. Chelaru and V. Dragoi
Asymmetric Synaptic Depression in Cortical Networks
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2008; 18(4): 771 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. Schwabe, K. Obermayer, A. Angelucci, and P. C. Bressloff
The Role of Feedback in Shaping the Extra-Classical Receptive Field of Cortical Neurons: A Recurrent Network Model
J. Neurosci., September 6, 2006; 26(36): 9117 - 9129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Raiguel, R. Vogels, S. G. Mysore, and G. A. Orban
Learning to see the difference specifically alters the most informative V4 neurons.
J. Neurosci., June 14, 2006; 26(24): 6589 - 6602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-
-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2009 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-