QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, January 12, 2005, 25(2):473-478; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4218-04.2005

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (44) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Krakauer, J. W. Articles by Ghilardi, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krakauer, J. W. Articles by Ghilardi, M. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Adaptation to Visuomotor Transformations: Consolidation, Interference, and Forgetting

John W. Krakauer,¹ Claude Ghez,^1,2 and M. Felice Ghilardi²

¹Department of Neurology and ²Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032-2603

The paradigm task Atask Btask A, which varies the time interval between task A and task B, has been used extensively to investigate the consolidation of motor memory. Consolidation is defined as resistance to retrograde interference (interference by task B on initial learning of task A). Consolidation has been demonstrated for simple skills, motor sequencing, and learning of force fields. In contrast, evidence to date suggests that visuomotor learning does not consolidate. We have shown previously that adaptation to a 30° screen-cursor rotation is faster and more complete on relearning 24 hr later. This improvement is prevented if a 30° counter-rotation is learned 5 min after the original rotation. Here, we sought to identify conditions under which rotation learning becomes resistant to interference by a counter-rotation. In experiment 1, we found that interference persists even when the counter-rotation is learned 24 hr after the initial rotation. In experiment 2, we removed potential anterograde interference (interference by task B on relearning of task A) by introducing washout blocks before all of the learning blocks. In contrast to experiment 1, we found resistance to interference (i.e., consolidation) when the counter-rotation was learned after 24 hr but not after 5 min. In experiment 3, we doubled the amount of initial rotation learning and found resistance to interference even after 5 min. Our results suggest that persistent interference is attributable to anterograde effects on memory retrieval. When anterograde effects are removed, rotation learning consolidates both over time and with increased initial training.

Key words: motor learning; consolidation; retrograde interference; anterograde interference; visuomotor rotation; arm movements

---

Received Oct 11, 2004; revised November 12, 2004; accepted November 15, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Cothros, J. Wong, and P. L. Gribble Visual Cues Signaling Object Grasp Reduce Interference in Motor Learning J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2112 - 2120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-Y. Lee and N. Schweighofer Dual Adaptation Supports a Parallel Architecture of Motor Memory J. Neurosci., August 19, 2009; 29(33): 10396 - 10404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Ghilardi, C. Moisello, G. Silvestri, C. Ghez, and J. W. Krakauer Learning of a Sequential Motor Skill Comprises Explicit and Implicit Components That Consolidate Differently J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2009; 101(5): 2218 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Wong and D. Y. P. Henriques Visuomotor Adaptation Does Not Recalibrate Kinesthetic Sense of Felt Hand Path J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 614 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Zarahn, G. D. Weston, J. Liang, P. Mazzoni, and J. W. Krakauer Explaining Savings for Visuomotor Adaptation: Linear Time-Invariant State-Space Models Are Not Sufficient J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2008; 100(5): 2537 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Criscimagna-Hemminger and R. Shadmehr Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory J. Neurosci., September 24, 2008; 28(39): 9610 - 9618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Seidler and D. C. Noll Neuroanatomical Correlates of Motor Acquisition and Motor Transfer J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2008; 99(4): 1836 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Gupta and J. Ashe Lack of Adaptation to Random Conflicting Force Fields of Variable Magnitude J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 738 - 745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Overduin, A. G. Richardson, C. E. Lane, E. Bizzi, and D. Z. Press Intermittent Practice Facilitates Stable Motor Memories. J. Neurosci., November 15, 2006; 26(46): 11888 - 11892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Chhabra and R. A. Jacobs Near-Optimal Human Adaptive Control across Different Noise Environments. J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10883 - 10887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Thoroughman and J. A. Taylor Rapid Reshaping of Human Motor Generalization J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 8948 - 8953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help