WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience MBF Bioscience Neurolucida
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, June 8, 2005, 25(23):5651-5656; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1084-05.2005

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Material
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conway, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Conway, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Livingstone, M. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Neural Basis for a Powerful Static Motion Illusion

Bevil R. Conway,1,5 Akiyoshi Kitaoka,2 Arash Yazdanbakhsh,1,3 Christopher C. Pack,4 and Margaret S. Livingstone1

1Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, 2Department of Psychology, Ritsumeikan University, Kita-ku, Kyoto 603-8577, Japan, 3Cognitive and Neural Systems Department, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, 4Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4, and 5Harvard Society of Fellows, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138

Most people see movement in Figure 1, although the image is static. Motion is seen from black -> blue -> white -> yellow -> black. Many hypotheses for the illusory motion have been proposed, although none have been tested physiologically. We found that the illusion works well even if it is achromatic: yellow is replaced with light gray, and blue is replaced with dark gray. We show that the critical feature for inducing illusory motion is the luminance relationship of the static elements. Illusory motion is seen from black -> dark gray -> white -> light gray -> black. In psychophysical experiments, we found that all four pairs of adjacent elements when presented alone each produced illusory motion consistent with the original illusion, a result not expected from any current models. We also show that direction-selective neurons in macaque visual cortex gave directional responses to the same static element pairs, also in a direction consistent with the illusory motion. This is the first demonstration of directional responses by single neurons to static displays and supports a model in which low-level, first-order motion detectors interpret contrast-dependent differences in response timing as motion. We demonstrate that this illusion is a static version of four-stroke apparent motion.

Key words: directional; prestriate; receptive field; striate cortex; primate; visual motion


Received March 19, 2005; revised May 3, 2005; accepted May 7, 2005.






-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-