QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

HOME  |   SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, July 6, 2005, 25(27):6394-6400; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0862-05.2005

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an eLetter Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sengpiel, F. Articles by Vorobyov, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sengpiel, F. Articles by Vorobyov, V.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Intracortical Origins of Interocular Suppression in the Visual Cortex

Frank Sengpiel and Vasily Vorobyov

Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3US, United Kingdom

The response of neurons in the primary visual cortex to an optimally oriented grating is usually suppressed quite dramatically when a second grating of, for example, orthogonal orientation is superimposed. Such "cross-orientation suppression" has been implicated in the generation of cortical orientation selectivity and local response normalization. Until recently, little experimental evidence was available concerning the neurophysiological substrate of this phenomenon, although an involvement of intracortical inhibition was commonly assumed. However, Freeman et al. (2002) proposed that cortical cross-orientation suppression is caused by suppression in the thalamus and depression at geniculocortical synapses. Here, we examine a dichoptic form of cross-orientation suppression, termed interocular suppression and thought to be involved in binocular rivalry (Sengpiel et al., 1995a). We show that its dependency on the drift rate of the suppressing stimulus is consistent with a cortical origin; unlike monocular cross-orientation suppression, it cannot be evoked by very fast-moving stimuli. Moreover, we find that previous adaptation to the orthogonal stimulus essentially eliminates interocular suppression. Because adaptation is a cortical phenomenon, this result also argues in favor of a cortical locus of suppression, again unlike monocular cross-orientation suppression, which is not affected by adaptation to the suppressor (Freeman et al., 2002). Finally, interocular suppression is greatly reduced in the presence of the GABA antagonist bicuculline. Together, our study demonstrates that interocular suppression is substantially different from monocular cross-orientation suppression and is mediated by inhibitory circuitry within the visual cortex.

Key words: orientation; primary visual cortex; binocular; adaptation; inhibition; GABA

---

Received March 4, 2005; revised May 25, 2005; accepted May 26, 2005.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. P. Issa, A. Rosenberg, and T. R. Husson Models and Measurements of Functional Maps in V1 J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2008; 99(6): 2745 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Sengpiel, K.-U. Jirmann, V. Vorobyov, and U. T. Eysel Strabismic Suppression Is Mediated by Inhibitory Interactions in the Primary Visual Cortex Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1750 - 1758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Li, J. K. Thompson, T. Duong, M. R. Peterson, and R. D. Freeman Origins of Cross-Orientation Suppression in the Visual Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 1755 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Carandini, J. B. Demb, V. Mante, D. J. Tolhurst, Y. Dan, B. A. Olshausen, J. L. Gallant, and N. C. Rust Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? J. Neurosci., November 16, 2005; 25(46): 10577 - 10597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help