 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 5, 2005, 25(40):9294-9303; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2678-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
Development/Plasticity/Repair
Visual Prey Capture in Larval Zebrafish Is Controlled by Identified Reticulospinal Neurons Downstream of the Tectum
Ethan Gahtan,1,2,3
Paul Tanger,1 and
Herwig Baier3
1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, 2Department of Psychology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521, and 3Department of Physiology, Program in Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158-2722
Many vertebrates are efficient hunters and recognize their prey by innate neural mechanisms. During prey capture, the internal representation of the prey's location must be constantly updated and made available to premotor neurons that convey the information to spinal motor circuits. We studied the neural substrate of this specialized visuomotor system using high-speed video recordings of larval zebrafish and laser ablations of candidate brain structures. Seven-day-old zebrafish oriented toward, chased, and consumed paramecia with high accuracy. Lesions of the retinotectal neuropil primarily abolished orienting movements toward the prey. Wild-type fish tested in darkness, as well as blind mutants, were impaired similarly to tectum-ablated animals, suggesting that prey capture is mainly visually mediated. To trace the pathway further, we examined the role of two pairs of identified reticulospinal neurons, MeLc and MeLr, located in the nucleus of the medial longitudinal fasciculus of the tegmentum. These two neurons extend dendrites into the ipsilateral tectum and project axons into the spinal cord. Ablating MeLc and MeLr bilaterally impaired prey capture but spared several other behaviors. Ablating different sets of reticulospinal neurons did not impair prey capture, suggesting a selective function of MeLr and MeLc in this behavior. Ablating MeLc and MeLr neurons unilaterally in conjunction with the contralateral tectum also mostly abolished prey capture, but ablating them together with the ipsilateral tectum had a much smaller effect. These results suggest that MeLc and MeLr function in series with the tectum, as part of a circuit that coordinates prey capture movements.
Key words: prey capture; tectum; reticulospinal; laser ablation; zebrafish; visuomotor
Received Aug 24, 2004;
revised August 18, 2005;
accepted August 22, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Arrenberg, F. Del Bene, and H. Baier
Optical control of zebrafish behavior with halorhodopsin
PNAS,
October 20, 2009;
106(42):
17968 - 17973.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Dong, R. H. Lee, H. Xu, S. Yang, K. G. Pratt, V. Cao, Y.-K. Song, A. Nurmikko, and C. D. Aizenman
Visual Avoidance in Xenopus Tadpoles Is Correlated With the Maturation of Visual Responses in the Optic Tectum
J Neurophysiol,
February 1, 2009;
101(2):
803 - 815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Kokel and R. T. Peterson
Chemobehavioural phenomics and behaviour-based psychiatric drug discovery in the zebrafish
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic,
November 1, 2008;
7(6):
483 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kohashi and Y. Oda
Initiation of Mauthner- or Non-Mauthner-Mediated Fast Escape Evoked by Different Modes of Sensory Input
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 2008;
28(42):
10641 - 10653.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. A. Burgess and M. Granato
Modulation of locomotor activity in larval zebrafish during light adaptation
J. Exp. Biol.,
July 15, 2007;
210(14):
2526 - 2539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Saitoh, A. Menard, and S. Grillner
Tectal Control of Locomotion, Steering, and Eye Movements in Lamprey
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2007;
97(4):
3093 - 3108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Tomchik
Appetite for Destruction: Neuron Ablations, Prey Capture, and Sensorimotor Integration in Larval Zebrafish
J. Neurosci.,
February 1, 2006;
26(5):
1329 - 1330.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|