 |
The Journal of Neuroscience, October 12, 2005, 25(41):9524-9534; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1804-05.2005
Previous Article | Next Article 
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
The Contribution of Spike Threshold to Acoustic Feature Selectivity, Spike Information Content, and Information Throughput
Monty A. Escabí,1,2
Reza Nassiri,2
Lee M. Miller,4
Christoph E. Schreiner,5 and
Heather L. Read3
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2Biomedical Engineering, and 3Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-1157, 4Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95616, and 5W. M. Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
Hypotheses of sensory coding range from the notion of nonlinear "feature detectors" to linear rate coding strategies. Here, we report that auditory neurons exhibit a novel trade-off in the relationship between sound selectivity and the information that can be communicated to a postsynaptic cell. Recordings from the cat inferior colliculus show that neurons with the lowest spike rates reliably signal the occurrence of stereotyped stimulus features, whereas those with high response rates exhibit lower selectivity. The highest information conveyed by individual action potentials comes from neurons with low spike rate and high selectivity. Surprisingly, spike information is inversely related to spike rates, following a trend similar to that of feature selectivity. Information per time interval, however, was proportional to measured spike rates. A neuronal model based on the spike threshold of the synaptic drive accurately accounts for this trade-off: higher thresholds enhance the spiking fidelity at the expense of limiting the total communicated information. Such a constraint on the specificity and throughput creates a continuum in the neural code with two extreme forms of information transfer that likely serve complementary roles in the representation of the auditory environment.
Key words: inferior colliculus; spike threshold; feature selectivity; mutual information; linear rate code; spectrotemporal; neural code
Received May 5, 2005;
revised August 28, 2005;
accepted August 30, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. C. Sincich, J. C. Horton, and T. O. Sharpee
Preserving Information in Neural Transmission
J. Neurosci.,
May 13, 2009;
29(19):
6207 - 6216.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-R. Geis and J. G. G. Borst
Intracellular Responses of Neurons in the Mouse Inferior Colliculus to Sinusoidal Amplitude-Modulated Tones
J Neurophysiol,
April 1, 2009;
101(4):
2002 - 2016.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Atencio and C. E. Schreiner
Spectrotemporal Processing Differences between Auditory Cortical Fast-Spiking and Regular-Spiking Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
April 9, 2008;
28(15):
3897 - 3910.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Atencio, D. T. Blake, F. Strata, S. W. Cheung, M. M. Merzenich, and C. E. Schreiner
Frequency-Modulation Encoding in the Primary Auditory Cortex of the Awake Owl Monkey
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2007;
98(4):
2182 - 2195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Ringach and B. J. Malone
The Operating Point of the Cortex: Neurons as Large Deviation Detectors
J. Neurosci.,
July 18, 2007;
27(29):
7673 - 7683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|

|