The Journal of Neuroscience, March 8, 2006, 26(10):2808-2813; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5406-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article 
Brief Communications
Impaired Bidirectional Synaptic Plasticity and Procedural Memory Formation in Striatum-Specific cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein-Deficient Mice
Christopher Pittenger,1 *
Stefania Fasano,3,4 *
David Mazzocchi-Jones,5
Stephen B. Dunnett,5
Eric R. Kandel,1,2 and
Riccardo Brambilla3
1Center for Neurobiology and Behavior and 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, 3San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milano, Italy, 4Istituto di Psicologia, Facoltà di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20134 Milano, Italy, and 5School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3US, United Kingdom
Correspondence should be addressed to Riccardo Brambilla, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy. Email: brambilla.riccardo{at}hsr.it
The striatum has a well documented role in procedural learning and memory. However, the synaptic and molecular mechanisms of acquisition and storage of this form of memory remain poorly understood. We examined procedural memory and plasticity in transgenic mice reversibly expressing a dominant-negative cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) mutant in the dorsal striatum. In these transgenic mice, corticostriatal long-term potentiation and depression are abolished, indicating that CREB function is essential for bidirectional long-term synaptic plasticity in this structure. Importantly, CREB-deficient animals show reversible alterations in several forms of striatum-dependent memory, including footshock avoidance learning and "response" learning in the cross maze. These findings implicate transcriptional regulation by CREB family transcription factors in striatum-dependent information processing and provide the first clear correlation between procedural learning and memory and synaptic plasticity at the corticostriatal synapse.
Key words: striatum; memory formation; learning and memory; transgenic; synaptic plasticity; genetics
Received Dec. 19, 2005;
revised Jan. 27, 2006;
accepted Jan. 27, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Riccardo Brambilla, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy. Email: brambilla.riccardo{at}hsr.it
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. S. Lee, R. S. Duman, and C. Pittenger
A double dissociation revealing bidirectional competition between striatum and hippocampus during learning
PNAS,
November 4, 2008;
105(44):
17163 - 17168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Nichols and W. M. DeBello
Bidirectional Regulation of the cAMP Response Element Binding Protein Encodes Spatial Map Alignment in Prism-Adapting Barn Owls
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2008;
28(40):
9898 - 9909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Green, I. N. Alibhai, S. Unterberg, R. L. Neve, S. Ghose, C. A. Tamminga, and E. J. Nestler
Induction of Activating Transcription Factors (ATFs) ATF2, ATF3, and ATF4 in the Nucleus Accumbens and Their Regulation of Emotional Behavior
J. Neurosci.,
February 27, 2008;
28(9):
2025 - 2032.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|