WWW.JNEUROSCI.ORG
-
The Journal of Neuroscience Discover www.zeiss.de/functionality
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
-


HOME
  |  
SEARCH  |   ARCHIVE  |   SUBSCRIBE  |   CONTACT  |   HELP

The Journal of Neuroscience, April 5, 2006, 26(14):3791-3797; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0390-06.2006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit an eLetter
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holland, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holland, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Different Roles for Amygdala Central Nucleus and Substantia Innominata in the Surprise-Induced Enhancement of Learning

Peter C. Holland and Michela Gallagher

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Peter C. Holland, Johns Hopkins University, 222 Ames Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: pch{at}jhu.edu

Within most modern learning theories, the discrepancy between expected and obtained outcomes ("prediction error" or "surprise") is a critical determinant of the acquisition of learned associations. The results of studies from many laboratories show that the surprising omission of an expected event may enhance attention to stimuli that remain present, such that subsequent learning about those stimuli is enhanced. A series of reports from our laboratories demonstrated that these surprise-induced enhancements of stimulus associability depend on circuitry that includes the amygdala central nucleus (CeA), the cholinergic neurons in the sublenticular substantia innominata/nucleus basalis magnocellularis (SI/nBM), as well as certain cortical projections of these latter neurons. In this study, we found very different roles for CeA and SI/nBM in surprise-induced enhancements of stimulus associability. In four experiments that used transient inactivation techniques, we found that surprise-induced enhancement of subsequent learning about a stimulus depended on intact CeA function at the time of surprise but not when more rapid learning was subsequently expressed. In contrast, normal SI/nBM function was critical to the expression of enhanced learning but was not necessary when surprise was induced. These data suggest that these two components of the so-called "extended amygdala" serve distinct roles in the encoding and retrieval of information used in modulating attention to stimuli in associative learning. Additional circuitry linking these brain regions may also be important in the maintenance of that information.

Key words: amygdala central nucleus; attention; conditioning; prediction error; substantia innominata; transient inactivation; rat


Received Jan. 27, 2006; revised Feb. 21, 2006; accepted Feb. 23, 2006.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Peter C. Holland, Johns Hopkins University, 222 Ames Hall, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Email: pch{at}jhu.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. Knapska, K. Radwanska, T. Werka, and L. Kaczmarek
Functional Internal Complexity of Amygdala: Focus on Gene Activity Mapping After Behavioral Training and Drugs of Abuse
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2007; 87(4): 1113 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Schaefer, T. S. Braver, J. R. Reynolds, G. C. Burgess, T. Yarkoni, and J. R. Gray
Individual Differences in Amygdala Activity Predict Response Speed during Working Memory
J. Neurosci., October 4, 2006; 26(40): 10120 - 10128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. J. Lee, J. M. Youn, M. J. O, M. Gallagher, and P. C. Holland
Role of substantia nigra-amygdala connections in surprise-induced enhancement of attention.
J. Neurosci., May 31, 2006; 26(22): 6077 - 6081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



-

Home  |   Search  |   Archive  |   Subscribe  |   Contact  |   Help

-
Copyright 2008 by Society for Neuroscience ONLINE ISSN: 1529-2401
-