 |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
The Journal of Neuroscience, May 3, 2006, 26(18):4922-4929; doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4099-05.2006
Previous Article | Next Article
Behavioral/Systems/Cognitive
Premotor Correlates of Integrated Feedback Control for Eye–Head Gaze Shifts
Pierre A. Sylvestre andKathleen E. Cullen Aerospace Medical Research Unit, Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1Y6
Correspondence should be addressed to Kathleen E. Cullen, Aerospace Medical Research Unit, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1Y6. Email: kathleen.cullen{at}mcgill.ca
Simple activities like picking up the morning newspaper or catching a ball require finely coordinated movements of multiple body segments. How our brain readily achieves such kinematically complex yet remarkably precise multijoint movements remains a fundamental and unresolved question in neuroscience. Many prevailing theoretical frameworks ensure multijoint coordination by means of integrative feedback control. However, to date, it has proven both technically and conceptually difficult to determine whether the activity of motor circuits is consistent with integrated feedback coding. Here, we tested this proposal using coordinated eye–head gaze shifts as an example behavior. Individual neurons in the premotor network that command saccadic eye movements were recorded in monkeys trained to make voluntary eye–head gaze shifts. Head-movement feedback was experimentally controlled by unexpectedly and transiently altering the head trajectory midflight during a subset of movements. We found that the duration and dynamics of neuronal responses were appropriately updated following head perturbations to preserve global movement accuracy. Perturbation-induced increases in gaze shift durations were accompanied by equivalent changes in response durations so that neuronal activity remained tightly synchronized to gaze shift offset. In addition, the saccadic command signal was updated on-line in response to head perturbations applied during gaze shifts. Nearly instantaneous updating of responses, coupled with longer latency changes in overall discharge durations, indicated the convergence of at least two levels of feedback. We propose that this strategy is likely to have analogs in other motor systems and provides the flexibility required for fine-tuning goal-directed movements.
Key words: saccades; gaze; eye–head coordination; feedback control; vestibular; head-unrestrained; pontine reticular formation
Received Sept. 27, 2005; revised Feb. 13, 2006; accepted March 24, 2006.
Correspondence should be addressed to Kathleen E. Cullen, Aerospace Medical Research Unit, 3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1Y6. Email: kathleen.cullen{at}mcgill.ca
This article has been cited by other articles:
W. Y. Choi and D. Guitton
Firing Patterns in Superior Colliculus of Head-Unrestrained Monkey during Normal and Perturbed Gaze Saccades Reveal Short-Latency Feedback and a Sluggish Rostral Shift in Activity
J. Neurosci., June 3, 2009; 29(22): 7166 - 7180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. R. Van Horn and K. E. Cullen
Dynamic Coding of Vertical Facilitated Vergence by Premotor Saccadic Burst Neurons
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 1967 - 1982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
N. J. Gandhi and D. L. Sparks
Dissociation of Eye and Head Components of Gaze Shifts by Stimulation of the Omnipause Neuron Region
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2007; 98(1): 360 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
M. K. McCluskey and K. E. Cullen
Eye, Head, and Body Coordination During Large Gaze Shifts in Rhesus Monkeys: Movement Kinematics and the Influence of Posture
J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2976 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|